题名

國小雙語自然教師的專業認同：「衝突」－「協調」－「再生」

并列篇名

Elementary Science-CLIL Teachers' Professional Identity: Conflict, Negotiation, Production

DOI

10.53106/102887082023066902001

作者

陳惠雪(Hui-Hsueh Chen)

关键词

CLIL教學法 ； 教師專業認同 ； 雙語自然教師 ； CLIL ； teacher's professional identity ； science-CLIL teachers

期刊名称

教育研究集刊

卷期/出版年月

69:2期（2023 / 06 / 30）

页次

1 - 48

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

雙語教師的產生是順應全球化趨勢「雙語國家」的新政策，他們需要同時具備學科專長與英語能力－「雙重標準」，可謂重新定義教師的知能專長，而CLIL教學法又屬於新的課程教學範疇，對學生來說，也算是新型態的學習。本研究探討面對諸多「新」挑戰的雙語教師對自我專業的認同，以個案研究的方式，訪談五位現任國小雙語自然教師，發現他們教師專業認同的複雜、波動、動態的歷程，在社會結構、人際互動與情緒感受的交互影響下，儘管「衝突」發生，教師認同的發展與行動仍持續進行「協調」，他們仍是以學生學習為教師專業的核心目標，課程教學與教育知能都是為了讓學生愛上學習，也因此顯露有責任感的教師特質，透過反思雙語教學經驗中學科知識與英語的使用，從原本的自然教師或英語教師「再生」為雙語自然教師。
英文摘要

To implement the Bilingual Nation 2030 policy in Taiwan, bilingual education has become an indispensable aspect of every curriculum. Content and language integrated learning (CLIL)-which involves teaching other subjects through the target language (English)-is considered as an innovative approach in this context. However, CLIL teachers are expected to fulfill dual roles: they are simultaneously language teachers and teachers of specific subjects and content areas. This article explores the roles of science-CLIL teachers and their professional identities in an elementary school. The study employed a case study methodology to investigate how teachers' explicit meaningful experiences and perceptions influence their understanding of their roles and the formation of their identities as science-CLIL teachers. The factors shaping these processes are revealed. The research findings include the teachers' conflicts in prioritizing their roles and their metacognitive negotiations of their professional identities. Both contextual and personal factors within social interactions contribute to the ways in which the participant teachers perceived themselves as science-CLIL teachers. The result leads to a framework involving teachers' professional identities in social contexts, the core issues of science-CLIL teaching, and the construction of identity for these science-CLIL teachers.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳英成（2010）。新加坡雙語教育政策的沿革與新機遇。臺灣語文研究，5（2），63-80。https://doi.org/10.6710/JTLL.201009_5(2).0004 [Goh, Y.-S. (2010). Bilingual education policy in Singapore: Evolution and new opportunities. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and Literature, 5(2), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.6710/JTLL.201009_5(2).0004]
    連結：
  2. 周梅雀（2006）。教師課程意識覺醒的社會解放潛力。課程與教學季刊，9（4），67-78。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200610.0067 [Chou, M.-C. (2006). The liberating potential for teachers to aware their curricular consciousness. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 9(4), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.200610.0067]
    連結：
  3. 林政逸、賴慧君（2021）。我國中小學教師專業標準之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，14（3），1-28。https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492021121403001 [Lin, J.-Y., & Lai, H.-J. (2021). The professional standards of elementary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 14(3), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3966/207136492021121403001]
    連結：
  4. 姜添輝（2008）。從學校教師會功能與小學教師專業認同的關聯性省思教師組織的屬性。教育研究集刊，54（3），65-97。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200809_(54-3).0003 [Chiang, T.-H. (2008). Examining the nature of teacher associations: The interaction between function and professional identity. Bulletin of Educational Research, 54(3), 65-97. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200809_(54-3).0003]
    連結：
  5. 范信賢（2013）。敘事探究的社會學想像：個體經驗與社會脈絡的交織。課程與教學，16（1），139-157。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201301_16(1).0006 [Fan, H.-H. (2013). The sociological imagination of narrative inquiry: The intertwining between individual experiences and social context. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(1), 139-157. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201301_16(1).0006]
    連結：
  6. 陳玉玫（2009）。親師互動之微觀政治分析：教師專業主義vs.家長彰權益能。中正教育研究，8（2），35-74。https://doi.org/10.6357/CCES.200912.0035 [Chen, Y.-M. (2009). Micropolitical analysis of parent-teacher interaction: Teacher professionalism vs. parent empowerment. Chung Cheng Educational Studies, 8(2), 35-74. https://doi.org/10.6357/CCES.200912.0035]
    連結：
  7. 陳幸仁（2012）。國小教師與家長之情緒距離研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，5（2），133-154。https://doi.org/10.6764/JTEPD.201212.0133 [Chen, H.-J. (2012). A study on elementary school teacher-parent emotional distance. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 5(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.6764/JTEPD.201212.0133]
    連結：
  8. 黃嘉莉（2021）。評介《教師能動性：生態取向》。當代教育研究季刊，29（2），95-103。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0004 [Huang, J.-L. (2021). Review of “Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach.” Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 29(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0004]
    連結：
  9. 黃嘉莉、桑國元、葉碧欣（2020）。十二年國民基本教育課程變革中教師能動性之個案研究：社會結構二元論觀點。課程與教學，23（1），61-92。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202001_23(1).0003 [Huang, J.-L., Sang, G.-Y., & Ye, B.-X. (2020). The enablement and constraint factors on teacher agency of 12-year basic education curriculum reform: A perspective of social structure duality. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 23(1), 61-92. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202001_23(1).0003]
    連結：
  10. 楊巧玲（2008）。教育改革對教師專業認同之影響：五位國中資深教師的探索性研究。師大學報，53（1），25-54。https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200804.0002 [Yang, C.-L. (2008). The influence of educational reform on teachers’ professional identities: An exploratory study of five junior high school teachers. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(1), 25-54. https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200804.0002]
    連結：
  11. 甄曉蘭（2003）。教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊，49（1），63-94。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200303_(49-1).0003 [Chen, H.-L. (2003). Teacher’s curricular consciousness and pedagogical praxis. Bulletin of Educational Research, 49(1), 63-94. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200303_(49-1).0003]
    連結：
  12. 王文科、王智弘（2014）。教育研究法。五南。[Wang, W.-K., & Wang, C.-H. (2014). Education research method. Wu-Nan Book.]
  13. 卯靜儒、張建成（2005）。在地化與全球化之間—解嚴後臺灣課程改革論述的擺盪。臺灣教育社會學研究，5（1），39-76。[Mao, C.-J., & Chang, C.-C. (2005). Between the local and the global: The shifting discourses of curriculum reform after the post-martial era of Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(1), 39-76.]
  14. 田耐青（2020）。論國小雙語師資應有之教學知能。臺灣教育評論月刊，9（5），51-56。[Tyan, N.-N. (2020). The teaching knowledge and ability of bilingual teachers in elementary schools. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 9(5), 51-56.]
  15. 李奉儒（2003）。從教育改革的批判談教師作為實踐教育正義的能動者。臺灣教育社會學研究，3（2），113-150。[Lee, F.-J. (2003). Teachers as agents to perform justice-based educational reform. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(2), 113-150.]
  16. 李昀修、江思妤（2022）。哪一種才算雙語教育？人本教育札記，393，12-16。[Lee, Y.-X., & Jiang, S.-Y. (2022). What kind of bilingual education? Humanistic Education Journal, 393, 12-16.]
  17. 李高英（2021）。高中以下學校實施雙語教育問題研析。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=212693 [Lee, K.-Y. (2021). Research and analysis on the implementation of bilingual education in high schools, junior high schools, and elementary schools. https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=212693]
  18. 吳芝儀（2003）。敘事研究的方法論探討。載於齊力、林本炫（編），質性研究方法與資料分析（頁143-170）。復文。[Wu, C.-Y. (2003). Discussion on the methodology of narrative research. In L. Chi & P.-H. Lin (Eds.), Qualitative research methods and data analysis (pp. 143-170). Fu Wen.]
  19. 吳清山（2011）。建立教師專業標準的重要性。國家教育研究院電子報，26。https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=1&edm_no=26&content_no=683 [Wu, C.-S. (2011). The importance of establishing professional standards for teachers. National Academy for Educational Research, 26. https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/edm.php?grp_no=1&edm_no=26&content_no=683]
  20. 林子斌（2021a）。雙語教育：破除考科思維的20堂雙語課。親子天下。[Lin, T.-B. (2021a). Bilingual education: 20 bilingual lessons to break the focus of exam. Education Parenting Family Lifestyle Press.]
  21. 林子斌（2021b）。雙語教育實踐的要素：雙語教師專業學習社群之運作與功能初探。教育研究月刊，327，4-13。https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602021070327001 [Lin, T.-B. (2021b). A key element of realizing bilingual education: A preliminary study of exploring the characters and functions of professional learning community for bilingual teachers. Journal of Education Research, 327, 4-13. https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602021070327001]
  22. 姜添輝（2010）。影響結構與施為之間互動關係的媒介物：小學教師的專業認同與文化知覺分析。臺灣教育社會學研究，10（1），1-43。[Chiang, T.-H. (2010). The medium for influencing the interactive relations between structure and agency: An analysis of primary teachers’ professional identity and cultural awareness. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 10(1), 1-43.]
  23. 范信賢（2006）。教師身分認同與課程改革：後殖民論述的探討。國教學報，12，275-287。[Fan, H.-H. (2006). The teachers, Identity and curriculum reform: Postcolonial perspective. Journal of Elementary Education, 12, 275-287.]
  24. 孫志麟（2001）。師資培育制度變革下職前教師的專業認同。臺灣教育社會學研究，1（2），59-89。[Sun, C.-L. (2001). Professional identity of pre-service teachers in a changing teacher education. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 1(2), 59-89.]
  25. 國家發展委員會（2021）。2030雙語國家政策整體推動方案。https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNDUzMi83NDB1MTY5Ny11ZmIwLTRjZGItYjYxMio3M2UzMTVhMTM52jIucGRm&n=MjAzMOmbmeiqnuaVv%2Betli5wZGY%3D&icon=.pdf [National Development Council. (2021). Overall promotion plan for bilingual country policy. https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNDUzMi83NDB1MTY5Ny11ZmIwLTRjZGItYjYxMio3M2UzMTVhMTM52jIucGRm&n=MjAzMOmbmeiqnuaVv%2Betli5wZGY%3D&icon=.pdf]
  26. 張新仁（2016）。我國教師專業標準的全方位運用、省思與展望。載於黃嘉莉（主編），教師專業標準、發展與實踐（頁23-66）。中華民國師範教育學會。[Chang, S.-J. (2016). The all-round application, reflection and prospect of teachers’ professional standards in my country. In C.-L. Huang (Ed.), Teacher professional standards, development and practice (pp. 23-66). Republic of China Normal Education Society.]
  27. 張繼寧（2011）。教師認同。臺灣師資培育電子報，16。https://tted.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=361 [Chang, C.-N. (2011). Teacher identity. Taiwan Teacher Education Epaper, 16. https://tted.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=361]
  28. 教育部（2011）。國民小學教師加註各領域專長專門課程架構表實施要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000491 [Ministry of Education. (2011). Key points for the implementation of national primary school teachers’ annotation of specialized curriculum framework tables in various fields. https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000491]
  29. 教育部（2012）。國民教育階段家長參與學校教育事務辦法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070029 [Ministry of Education. (2012). Measures for parents’ participation in school education affairs at the national education stage. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070029]
  30. 教育部（2016）。中華民國教師專業標準指引。http://web.nutn.edu.tw/gac201/%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A/%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB%E5%B0%88%E6%A5%AD%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96%E6%8C%87%E5%BC%95105-2-15(1050018281%E5%87%BD).pdf [Ministry of Education. (2016). Guidelines for professional standards for teachers. http://web.nutn.edu.tw/gac201/%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A/%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB%E5%B0%88%E6%A5%AD%E6%A8%99%E6%BA%96%E6%8C%87%E5%BC%95105]
  31. 教育部（2020）。前瞻基礎建設—人才培育促進就業建設—2030雙語國家政策（110至113年計畫）。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=FB233D7EC45FFB37 [Ministry of Education. (2020). Forward-looking infrastructure - Talent cultivation to promote employment construction – 2030 bilingual national policy. https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=FB233D7EC45FFB37]
  32. 教育部（2023）。在職教師雙語教育增能。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2600/Content_List.aspx?n=2DFA1EA62E9A0262 [Ministry of Education. (2023). Bilingual education empowerment for in-service teachers. https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2600/Content_List.aspx?n=2DFA1EA62E9A0262]
  33. 許倪瑋（2007）。國小教師與外籍配偶親師合作之行動研究。教育與社會研究，14，33-74。https://doi.org/10.6429/FES.201712.0033 [Hsu, N.-W. (2007). An action research on parent-teacher cooperation between elementary school tearchers and a foreign mother. Formosan Education and Society, 14, 33-74. https://doi.org/10.6429/FES.201712.0033]
  34. 陳惠雪（2020a）。師說心語：教師專業的脆弱性。教育學誌，44，139-175。[Chen, H.-H. (2020a). Teachers’ talk: Teachers’ professional vulnerability. Journal of Education, 44, 139-175.]
  35. 陳惠雪（2020b）。新住民單親母親與國小教師的情緒距離。教育與多元文化研究，22，71-107。https://doi.org/10.3966/207802222020110022003 [Chen, H.-H. (2020b). A study on teacher-parent emotional distance between single mothers who are newly arrived immigrants and elementary school teachers. Journal of Educational and Multicultural Research, 22, 71-107. https://doi.org/10.3966/207802222020110022003]
  36. 陳葦芸（2022，8月1日）。【投書】現場教師眼中的雙語教育：課程規劃與教師量能，是推行的兩大困難！。天下雜誌。https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/12573。[Chen, W.-Y. (2022, August 1).【Subject】Bilingual education in the eyes of on-site teachers: curriculum planning and teachers’ ability are two major difficulties in implementation! CommonWealth. https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/52/article/12573]
  37. 陶麗、李子建（2018）。課程改革背景下教師專業身份的理解與建構：基於師生互動的視角。教師教育研究，30（3），79-85。[To, L., & Li, C.-J. (2018). Understanding and construction of teachers’ professional identity in the background of curriculum reform: Based on the perspective of teacher-student interaction. Teacher Education Research, 30(3), 79-85.]
  38. 游伯龍（1993）。智慧乾坤袋。財團法人洪健全教育文化基金會。[Yu, P.-L. (1993). Wisdom cosmos bag. Hong Foundation.]
  39. 黃彥超、翁福元（2009）。臺灣中部地區國民小學教師社會地位知覺與專業認同之研究。臺灣教育社會學研究，9（2），37-78。[Huang, Y.-C., & Weng, F.-Y. (2009). A study on the primary school teachers perception on their social status and professional identity: A case study of central Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(2), 37-78.]
  40. 黃琇屏（2021）。公立中小學雙語教育實施現況與挑戰。臺灣教育評論月刊，10（12），6-11。[Huang, H.-P. (2021). The current situation and challenges of bilingual education implementation in public primary and secondary schools. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 10(12), 6-11.]
  41. 黃嘉莉（2011）。各國師資培育制度與教師素質之理論分析。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素養現況（頁353-401）。教育部。[Huang, J.-L. (2011). Theoretical analysis of teacher training system and teacher quality in various countries. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Teacher education institutions and the status of teacher quality in different nations (pp. 353-401). Ministry of Education.]
  42. 黃鴻順、游伯龍（2011）。認同圈的量化與應用之初探。習慣領域期刊，2（2），1-19。[Huang, H.-S., & Yu, P.-L. (2011). Exploring quantification and applications of identification spheres. Journal of Habitual Domains, 2(2), 1-19.]
  43. 鄒文莉（2021）。臺灣雙語教育之全球在地化思維：學術面與實踐面的反思與啟示。教育研究月刊，321，17-29。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602021010321002 [Tsou, W.-L. (2021). Glocalization and Taiwan’s bilingual education. Journal of Education Research, 321, 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602021010321002]
  44. 鄒文莉、高實玫、陳慧琴（2018）。學科內容與語言整合教學的核心精神。載於鄒文莉、高實玫（主編），CLIL教學資源書：探索學科內容與語言整合教學（頁9-16）。書林。[Tsou, W.-L., Kao, S.-M., & Chen, H.-C. (2018). The core spirit of integrating subject content and language teaching. In W.-L. Tsou & S.-M. Kao (Eds.), CLIL teaching resource book: Exploring subject content and language integration instruction (pp. 9-16). Shulin Books.]
  45. 楊承彧（2021，11月20日）。2030雙語國家！反映教育現場困境教師疾呼減時數、增資源。自由時報。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3743256 [Yang, C.-Y. (2021, November 20). 2030 bilingual country! Reflecting the plight of the education scene Teachers clamored to reduce hours and increase resources. Liberty Times. https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3743256]
  46. 楊智穎（2011）。弱勢者教育改革中教師專業認同之研究：偏鄉學校教師敘事的省思。屏東教育大學學報：教育類，36，499-522。[Yang, J.-Y. (2011). The educational reform for the disadvantaged and teachers’ professional identities: The narratives of remote area teachers. Journal of Pingtung University of Education: Education, 36, 499-522.]
  47. 劉益嘉、閔柏惠（2022）。讓現職教師成為雙語教師—談現職教師的雙語師培。臺灣教育評論月刊，11（8），54-60。[Liu, I.-J., & Min, B.-H. (2022). Let current teachers become bilingual teachers – Talk about the training of bilingual teachers for current teachers. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 11(8), 54-60.]
  48. 劉懿萱（2021）。不能永遠靠外師！雙語教育本國師資缺口仍待補足。聯合新聞網。 https://udn.com/news/story/7323/5989242 [Liu, Y.-H. (2021). You can’t always rely on foreign teachers! Bilingual education teacher gap in the country still needs to be filled. udn.com. https://udn.com/news/story/7323/5989242]
  49. 戴文青（2005）。從深層結構論台灣幼兒園教師專業認同轉化的可能性。南大學報，39，19-42。[Day, V.-C. (2005). On the possibility of Taiwan kindergarten teachers’ professional identity transformation from the deep structure. South University Journal, 39, 19-42.]
  50. 羅文杏（2021）。在臺灣國小實施雙語教學所面臨的挑戰及教師專業發展之可行建議。教育研究月刊，321，79-97。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602021010321006 [Luo, W.-H. (2021). Challenges facing teachers in implementing bilingual instruction in Taiwan and implications for teacher professional development. Journal of Education Research, 321, 79-97. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602021010321006]
  51. Adler, P., & Adler, P. A. (1987). Role conflict and identity salience: College athletics and the academic role. Social Science Journal, 24(4), 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(87)90059-0
  52. Alsup, J. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Erlbaum.
  53. Akkerman, S., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013
  54. Akkerman, S. F., Admiraal, W., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Unity and diversity in a collaborative research project. Culture & Psychology, 18(2), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X11434835
  55. Ball, P. (2018). Innovations and challenges in CLIL materials design. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484036
  56. Banegas, D. L. (2012). CLIL teacher development: Challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4
  57. Banegas, D. L. (2020). Teacher professional development in language-driven CLIL: A case study. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 12(2), 242-264. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.3
  58. Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
  59. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
  60. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
  61. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
  62. Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
  63. Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2005). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90(1), 68-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20096
  64. Erel, U. (2009). Migrant women transforming citizenship: Life stories from Britain and Germany. Ashgate.
  65. Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167322
  66. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity.
  67. Graddol, D. (2006). English next. https://www.academia.edu/12530018/English_Next_by_David_Graddol
  68. Hargreave, A., & Goodson, I. F. (1996). Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities. In I. F. Goodson & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teachers professional lives (pp. 1-27). Farmer Press.
  69. Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243-281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0173001
  70. Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Jansen, E. (1995). Self-narratives: The construction of meaning in psychotherapy. Guilford Press.
  71. Jurasaite-Harbison, E. (2005). Reconstructing teachers’ professional identity in a research discourse: A professional development opportunity in an informal setting. TRAMES, 9(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2005.2.04
  72. Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.009
  73. Liu, H., & Sammons, P. (2021). Teaching in the shadow: Explorations of teachers’ professional identities in private tutoring institutions in China. Science Direct, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100071
  74. MacLure, M. (1993). Arguing for yourself: Identity as an organising principle in teachers’ jobs and lives. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192930190401
  75. Maljers, A. Marsh, D., & Wolff, D. (2007). Windows on CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in the European spotlight. Ter Burg Offset.
  76. Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 93-119.
  77. Meijers, F. (2002). Career learning in a changing world: The role of emotions. International Journal for Advancement. British of Counselling, 24(3), 149-167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022970404517
  78. Newman, C. S. (2000). Seeds of professional development in pre-service teachers: A study of their dreams and goals. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(2), 125-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00003-3
  79. Pappa, S. (2021). 2 identity and emotions in teaching CLIL: The case of primary school teachers in Finland. In K. Talbot, M. Gruber, & R. Nishida (Eds.), The psychological experience of integrating content and language (pp. 16-32). Multilingual Matters.
  80. Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Teachers’ pedagogical and relational identity negotiation in the Finnish CLIL context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.008
  81. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
  82. Pena Díaz, C., & Porto Requejo, M. D. (2008). Teacher beliefs in a CLIL education project. Porta Linguarum, 10, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.31786
  83. Siry, C., & Lara, J. (2011). I didn’t know water could be so messy: Coteaching in elementary teacher education and the production of identity for a new teacher of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-011-9339-1
  84. Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159278
  85. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
  86. Tierney, W. G. (1998). Life history’s history: Subjects foretold. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(1), 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049800400104
  87. Valdés-Sánchez, L., & Espinet, M. (2020). Coteaching in a science-CLIL classroom: Changes in discursive interaction as evidence of an English teacher’s science-CLIL professional identity development. Language Issues in Science Education in Multilingual Societies, 42(3), 2426-2452. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1710873
  88. Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. Teachers College Press.
  89. Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
  90. Yu, P. L. (2002). Habitual domains and forming winning strategies. NCTU Press
print cancel