题名

資優班生的系統性壓力：落後者觀點

并列篇名

Systematic Pressures of Students in the Gifted Class: From the Underachievers' Perspectives

DOI

10.53106/102887082023096903003

作者

吳玟秀(Wen-Hsiu Wu)；曾正宜(Jeng-Yi Tzeng)

关键词

系統性壓力 ； 落後生 ； 資優教育 ； 數理資優班 ； systematic pressure ； underachiever ； gifted education ； math and science gifted program

期刊名称

教育研究集刊

卷期/出版年月

69:3期（2023 / 09 / 30）

页次

81 - 121

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

許多學生希望能擠進資優班窄門，卻對資優班裡的世界一無所悉。資優教育旨在協助資賦優異學生適性發展潛能，卻未曾真正思考資優班教育是否真的適合每位資優班生。而資優班落後者同時背負資優生與落後者兩個衝突的二元標籤，其所面臨的雙重壓力更是鮮少被認真探討，因此，本研究從生物生態系統角度，以質性研究範式深度訪談四位曾就讀高中數理資優班且經歷學習落後的學生，以整體內容分析從社會文化（大系統）、學校制度、班級教學、家庭（中系統及小系統）等層面探討他們所背負的壓力，並從時間系統的角度檢視多年前資優班經驗對其往後生涯發展的意義。研究結果發現，學校、教師、家庭常將資優班生視為同質，忽視其個人需求，也加劇資優與落後雙重標籤所帶來的壓力。本研究希望藉此促發更多強調學生殊異性與個別需求的對話，從而面對並解決資優教育在理念與實務間的落差。
英文摘要

Many students are fascinated with the idea of attending gifted classes but know little about their true nature and high demands. While the purpose of gifted education is to facilitate students with talents in actualizing their potential, people rarely consider whether gifted classes are suitable for every qualified student. In fact, the underachievers in gifted classes bear the conflicting dual labels of "gifted students" and "underachievers," and these dual pressures are rarely understood. Based on the qualitative research paradigm, we conducted in-depth interviews with four students who attended a high school math-science academic gifted class years ago and suffered from falling behind and maladjustment. We used the bioecological model and the holistic-content method to analyze the pressures they experienced from the environmental systems, including social culture (Macrosystem), school regulations, class teaching, and family (Mesosystem and Microsystem). We explored the meanings of these experiences in their life-development from the Chronosystem perspective. We found that schools, teachers, and families tended to treat students in the gifted class as homogeneous, which not only overlooked students' individual needs but also aggravated the pressures from dual labeling. We hope this study will draw attention to the heterogeneity and diverse needs among students in gifted classes and bridge the gap between the ideals and practices in gifted education.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 王震武（2002）。升學主義的成因及其社會心理基礎：一個歷史觀察。本土心理學研究，17，3-65。https://doi.org/10.6254/2002.17.3 [Wang, J.-W. (2002). The reason and myth of education fanaticism: A historical review. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 17(1), 3-65. https://doi.org/10.6254/2002.17.3]
    連結：
  2. 宋曜廷、黃瓅瑩、郭念平、曾芬蘭（2012）。以縱貫學業表現檢驗大魚小池效應與見賢思齊效應。中華心理學刊，54（3），315-330。https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2012.5403.03 [Sung, Y.-T., Huang, L.-Y., Kuo, N.-P., & Tseng, F.-L. (2012). Examining the big-fish-little-pond and upward comparison effects using longitudinal learning achievement. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 54(3), 315-330. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.2012.5403.03]
    連結：
  3. 林佩芳、張靖卿（2012）。從網路新聞看媒體對資優教育的認知。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，44，57-86。https://doi.org/10.6379/AJSE.201212.0057 [Lin, P.-F., & Zhang, J.-Q. (2012). Media perceptions of gifted education from online news. Annual Journal of Special Education, 44, 57-86. https://doi.org/10.6379/AJSE.201212.0057]
    連結：
  4. 郭靜姿（2013）。如何實施資優學生的區分性教學？資優教育季刊，127，1-11。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2013.127.01-11 [Kuo, C.-C. (2013). Implementing differentiated instruction for gifted and talented students. Gifted Education, 127, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.2013.127.01-11]
    連結：
  5. 郭靜姿、李欣潔、陳彥瑋、范成芳、王曼娜、劉貞宜、游健弘（2009）。資優學生鑑定標準及安置方式之調查研究。資優教育研究，9（2），1-33。https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200912.0001 [Kuo, C.-C., Li, H.-C., Chen, Y.-W., Fan, C.-F., Wang, M.-N., Liu, C.-Y., & Yu, C.-H. (2009). A survey research on identification criteria and placement of gifted and talented students. Journal of Gifted Education, 9(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200912.0001]
    連結：
  6. 陳勇祥（2006）。充實三合模式融入資優班戶外教學課程設計之研究。資優教育研究，6（1），1-18。https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200606.0001 [Chen, Y.-H. (2006). A study of infusing “enrichment triad model” into gifted outdoor education curriculum design. Journal of Gifted Education, 6(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200606.0001]
    連結：
  7. 游森棚（2010）。關於資優學生生涯規劃的一些思考。資優教育季刊，116，1-6。https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.201009_(116).0001 [Eu, S.-P. (2010). Considering the perspectives of career planning for gifted students. Gifted Education, 116, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.6218/GEQ.201009_(116).0001]
    連結：
  8. 薛育青、蔡典謨（2005）。國小資優生資優標記接受度與其自我概念、生活適應之相關研究。資優教育研究，5（2），1-24。https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200512.0001 [Hsueh, Y.-C., & Tsai, D.-M. (2005). A study on the relationship between the acceptance of the gifted label, the self-concept of the gifted students in elementary school and the life adjustment of the gifted students in the elementary school. Journal of Gifted Education, 5(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200512.0001]
    連結：
  9. 丁國鈞（2017，8月22日）。[資優班洩題風暴]全台41所明星高中資優班錄取率排行榜曝光。鏡新聞。https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20170822inv003/ [Ding, K.-G. (2017, August 22). A storm of leaked questions from gifted classes— The admission rate rankings of gifted classes among 41 star high schools in Taiwan are exposed. Mirror media news. https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20170822inv003]
  10. 吳麗寬（2007）。探討資優生於集中式資優班之成就動機及教學。資優教育季刊，105，15-21。[Wu, L.-K. (2007). Exploring the motivation and teaching of students in intensive gifted classes. Gifted Education, 105, 15-21.]
  11. 侯雅齡（2010）。科學自我概念之大魚小池效應探究：資優生教育安置方式的思考。教育科學研究期刊，55（3），61-87。 [Hou, Y.-L. (2010). The big-fish-little-pond effect on science self-concept: Some implications in educational placement for gifted students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(3), 61-87.]
  12. 教育部（2008）。資優教育白皮書。http://www.cage.org.tw/USER/Userfile/FILE/ff170831140657426352.pdf [Ministry of Education. (2008). The white book for the gifted and talented. http://www.cage.org.tw/USER/Userfile/FILE/ff170831140657426352.pdf]
  13. 教育部國民及學前教育署（2021）。概況填報系統。https://srm.aide.gov.tw/Pro/Anonymous/ProfileX.aspx?sid=23 [K-12 Education Administration. (2021). Overview of gifted education. https://srm.aide.gov.tw/Pro/Anonymous/ProfileX.aspx?sid=23]
  14. 臺中市政府（2013）。臺中市資賦優異教育白皮書。http://163.22.139.100/web/upload/201503261432173.pdf [Taichung City Government. (2013). The white book for the gifted and talented in Taichung city. http://163.22.139.100/web/upload/201503261432173.pdf]
  15. 臺北市政府（2016）。臺北市資賦優異教育白皮書。https://trcgt.tp.edu.tw/pro/Center/ArticleBrowseX.aspx?sid=041 [Taipei City Government. (2016). The white book for the gifted and talented in Taipei city. https://trcgt.tp.edu.tw/pro/Center/ArticleBrowseX.aspx?sid=041]
  16. 臺北市政府（2021）。臺北市資賦優異教育白皮書（2021-2026）。https://trcgt.tp.edu.tw/pro/Center/ArticleBrowseX.aspx?sid=041 [Taipei City Government. (2021). The white book for the gifted and talented in Taipei city (2021-2026). https://trcgt.tp.edu.tw/pro/Center/ArticleBrowseX.aspx?sid=041]
  17. Abelman, R. (2006). Fighting the war on indecency: Mediating TV, internet, and videogame usage among achieving and underachieving gifted children. Roeper Review, 29(2), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554393
  18. Abu-Hamour, B., & Al-Hmouz, H. (2013). A study of gifted high, moderate, and low achievers in their personal characteristics and attitudes toward school and teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 5-15.
  19. Adamsons, K., O’Brien, M., & Pasley, K. (2007). An ecological approach to father involvement in biological and stepfather families. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 5(2), 129-147. https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0502.129
  20. Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2016). Teachers’ conceptions of gifted and average-ability students on achievement-relevant dimensions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216647115
  21. Blanton, H., Buunk, B. P., Gibbons, F. X., & Kuyper, H. (1999). When better-than-others compare upward: Choice of comparison and comparative evaluation as independent predictors of academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.420
  22. Bright, J. E., Pryor, R. G., & Harpham, L. (2005). The role of chance events in career decision making. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 561-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.001
  23. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
  24. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
  25. Burney, V. (2008). Indiana mandate for high-ability identification and services signed by governor Daniels: Record funding for high-ability students. Gifted Child Today, 31, 50-51.
  26. Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). The development of perceived scholastic competence and global self-worth in African American adolescents from low-income families: The roles of family factors, early educational intervention, and academic experience. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(3), 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558402173004
  27. Campbell, S. M., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Duffy, A. (2019). Friends and education: Identity patterns across domains and associations with emotion dysregulation and identity disturbance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 703-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0924-4
  28. Coleman, L. J. (2011). Lived experience, mixed messages, and stigma. In T. L. Cross & J. R. Cross (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents: Development, relationships, school issues, and counseling needs/interventions (pp. 371-392). Prufrock Press.
  29. Cross, J. R., & Cross, T. L. (2015). Clinical and mental health issues in counseling the gifted individual. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2015.00192.x
  30. Curran, T., & Hill, A. P. (2019). Perfectionism is increasing over time: A meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000138
  31. Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. Gryf.
  32. Daniels, S., & Meckstroth, E. (2009). Nurturing the sensitivity, intensity, and developmental potential of young gifted children. In S. Daniels & M. M. Piechowski (Eds.), Living with intensity (pp. 33-56). Great Potential Press Daniels.
  33. Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78, 828-879. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321210
  34. Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir. Gallimard.
  35. Freeman, J. (2006). The emotional development of gifted and talented children. Gifted and Talented International, 21(2), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2006.11673472
  36. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder.
  37. Garn, A. C., & Jolly, J. L. (2014). High ability students’ voice on learning motivation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13513262
  38. Garn, A. C., Matthews, M. S., & Jolly, J. L. (2010). Parental influences on the academic motivation of gifted students: A self-determination theory perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210377657
  39. Goegan, L. D., & Daniels, L. M. (2022). Just a little healthy competition: Teacher perceptions of competition and social comparison in the classroom. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(4), 394-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735221101223
  40. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 11(2), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072702250415
  41. Guinier, L. (2015). The tyranny of the meritocracy: Democratizing higher education in America. Beacon Press.
  42. Harrison, G. E., & Van Haneghan, J. P. (2011). The gifted and the shadow of the night: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities and their correlation to insomnia, death anxiety, and fear of the unknown. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 669-697. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400407
  43. Hattie, J. A. (2002). Classroom composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 449-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00015-6
  44. Jaggers, J. W., Church, W. T., Tomek, S., Hooper, L. M., Bolland, K. A., & Bolland, J. M. (2015). Adolescent development as a determinant of family cohesion: A longitudinal analysis of adolescents in the mobile youth survey. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 1625-1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-9966-8
  45. Joel, O. P. (2019). Learning environment, achievement motivation and career decision making among gifted secondary school students. American Journal of Education and Learning, 4(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.20448/804.41.50.61
  46. Kao, C. Y. (2012). The educational predicament confronting Taiwan’s gifted programs: An evaluation of current practices and future challenges. Roeper Review, 34(4), 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2012.715335
  47. Kennedy, K., & Farley, J. (2018). Counseling gifted students: School-based considerations and strategies. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(3), 361-367. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018336194
  48. King, L. S., Osofsky, J. D., Osofsky, H. J., Weems, C. F., Hansel, T. C., & Fassnacht, G. M. (2015). Perceptions of trauma and loss among children and adolescents exposed to disasters a mixed-methods study. Current Psychology, 34, 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9348-4
  49. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Sage.
  50. Liew, J., Kwok, O., Chang, Y. P., Chang, B. W., & Yeh, Y. C. (2014). Parental autonomy support predicts academic achievement through emotion-related self-regulation and adaptive skills in Chinese American adolescents. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 5(3), 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034787
  51. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x
  52. Marcia, J. E. (1966). Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023281
  53. Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20, 319-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6
  54. Meeus, W., van De Schoot, R., Keijsers, L., Schwartz, S. J., & Branje, S. (2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Child Development, 81(5), 1565-1581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x
  55. Moore, B. J. (1978). Injustice: The social bases of obedience and revolt. The MacMillan Press.
  56. Mullet-Hume, E., Anshel, D., Guevara, V., & Cloitre, M. (2008). Cumulative trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder among children exposed to the 9/11 World Trade Center attack. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78(1), 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10.1037/0002-9432.78.1.103
  57. Neihart, M., & Yeo, L. S. (2018). Psychological issues unique to the gifted student. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 497-510). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-032
  58. Ng, F. F., Pomerantz, E. M., & Deng, C. (2014). Why are Chinese mothers more controlling than American mothers? “My child is my report card”. Child Development, 85(1), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12102
  59. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2017). Longitudinal change in adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(3), https://doi.org/698-710. /10.1111/jora.12362
  60. Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., Goetz, T., & Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Female “big fish” swimming against the tide: The “big-fish-little-pond effect” and gender-ratio in special gifted classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.08.001
  61. Regoli, R. M., Hewitt, J. D., & DeLisi, M. (1991). Delinquency in society. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  62. Reis, S. M., Colbert, R. D., & Hébert, T. P. (2004). Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school. Roeper Review, 27(2), 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554299
  63. Richards, J., Encel, J., & Shute, R. (2003). The emotional and behavioural adjustment of intellectually gifted adolescents: A multi-dimensional, multi-informant approach. High Ability Studies, 14(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813032000163889
  64. Rotigel, J. V. (2003). Understanding the young gifted child: Guidelines for parents, families, and educators. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 209-214. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331422963
  65. Scharf, M., & Goldner, L. (2018). “If you really love me, you will do/be...”: Parental psychological control and its implications for children’s adjustment. Developmental Review, 49, 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.07.002
  66. Sevilla, A., & Borra, C. (2015). Parental time investments in children: The role of competition for university places in the UK. IZA Discussion Papers, 9168. https://docs.iza.org/dp9168. pdf
  67. Silverman, L. K. (2017). The construct of asynchronous development. In A. L. Corn & L. M. Henderson (Eds.), Charting a new course in gifted education (pp. 36-58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203765098
  68. Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., Yan, G., & Sherry, S. B. (2016). Cultural similarities in 4 perfectionism: Perfectionistic strivings and concerns generalize across Chinese and Canadian 5 groups. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 49, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175615596785
  69. Sultan, S. (2016). Teacher’s domination in classroom interactions: A critical analysis for developing a qualified teacher-students relationship. Prosiding Ictte Fkip Uns 2015, 1(1), 987-998. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/13026/1/ICTTE.pdf
  70. Tokmak, F., Sak, U., & Akbulut, Y. (2021). Big-fish-little-pond effect on gifted students’ academic self-concepts: What if the big fish has adaptable academic self-concepts? Education & Science, 46(206), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.15390/eb.2021.9303
  71. Tudge, J. R., Odero, D. A., Hogan, D. M., & Etz, K. E. (2003). Relations between the everyday activities of preschoolers and their teachers’ perceptions of their competence in the first years of school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 18(1), 42-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(03)00005-X
  72. Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Havard University Press.
  73. Vaillant, G. E. (2002). Aging well. Havard University Press.
  74. Vaillant, G. E. (2012). Triumphs of experience: The men of the Harvard Grant Study. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067424
  75. van der Zanden, P. J., Denessen, E. J., & Scholte, R. H. (2015). The effects of general interpersonal and bullying-specific teacher behaviors on pupils’ bullying behaviors at school. School Psychology International, 36(5), 467-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034315592754
  76. Verhaeghe, P. (2014). What about me? The struggle for identity in a market-based society. Scribe. https://doi.org/10.1002/psaq.12137
  77. Webb, J. T. (1995). Nurturing social emotional development of gifted children: ERIC Digest # E527. Teaching Exceptional Children, 27(2), 76-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005005999502700222
  78. White, S. L., Graham, L. J., & Blaas, S. (2018). Why do we know so little about the factors associated with gifted underachievement? A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 24, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.001
  79. Yamamoto, Y., & Holloway, S. D. (2010). Parental expectations and children’s academic performance in sociocultural context. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 189-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9121-z
  80. Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 305-329. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0985
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。從阿德勒觀點看「鼓勵」－與讚美之間的距離：應用於金融保險業輔導教學團體之省思。中華團體心理治療，30(1)，20-33。
print cancel