胡炳文《易》學學統的建立與以《本義》會通眾說析論

The Study of Hu Bing-wen Establish the Academic Legitimacy of Classic of Changes Studies and Convergence of Various Opinions by Zhouyibenyi

楊自平(Yang Tzu-Ping)

胡炳文 ； 元代 ； 易學 ； 朱熹 ； 周易本義 ； Hu Bing Wen ； Yuan Dynasty ； Classic of Changes studies ； Zhu Xi ； Zhouyibenyi

成大中文學報

58期（2017 / 09 / 01）

23 - 25+27-58

繁體中文

胡炳文（字仲虎，號雲峰，1250-1333）為元代著名《易》學家，常與胡一桂並稱，除治《易》外，亦專精《四書》，歸宗朱子。前賢的評價多基於羽翼朱子《本義》，未能真正指出重要性。深入考察後發現，胡氏提出《易》學學統的觀念，在此脈絡肯定朱子的重要性，並將自己視為朱子的繼承者，以朱子《易》為核心，會通眾說。雖然肯定朱子在《易》學學統的重要定位，對朱子的論點多所贊同，但在許多議題上，仍有他個人的抉擇。除致力闡釋朱子《本義》，展現朱子深意外，亦補朱子釋象及釋義不足處，多有見地，故為明、清《易》家所重視，常援引其說。胡氏《易》學亦具有時代性，身處於異族統治的元代，特別關注道德價值的維繫，釋《易》尤重視「貞」字、義利之辨及君子、小人之辨，這些觀念的強調都格外具有時代性。胡氏之志並非只是為推崇朱子一家之學，而是透過建立《易》學學統，透過朱子《易》會通眾說，融會己意，掘發《易》作為卜筮之書所蘊涵開物成務之理，此方是胡氏《易》學的特色及重要性所在。

Hu Bing Wen was a famous scholar of Classic of Changes studies in the Yuan Dynasty, and we often rank him with Hu Yi Gui. He studied Yijing and Four Books by following Zhu Xi's methods. Most of the evaluation are based on Zhu Xi's Benyi, unexpectedly it does not point out the importance. After observing and investigation, we found that Hu establishes the academic legitimacy of Classic of Changes studies and he affirmed the importance of Zhu Xi, and posed himself as Zhu Xi's heir. He focusses on Zhu Xi's Classic of Changes studies, and confirmed with the others. Although he affirmed Zhu Xi's Classic of Changes studies in the academic legitimacy of Classic of Changes studies, but in many subjects, he insisted on his argument. He industriously to interpret or giving Zhu Xi's Benyi an explanation in some depth. He was not only showing Zhu Xi's profound meaning but also recruiting Zhu Xi's defects. There was a lot of senses in Hu's Classic of Changes studies, and many scholars of Classic of Changes studies in the Ming and Qing Dynasties attached importance to him. Those scholars often quoted Hu's ideas. Hu's Classic of Changes studies reflected the characteristics of the times. He was in the Yuan Dynasty that was controlled by different tribe, and he fully paid attention on the value of morality. When he explained Yijing, he especially emphasizes to the words of ＂Zhen＂, the distinction between moral and interests, and the distinction between the gentleman and the nasty little man. Those ideas especially could reflect the characteristics of the times. Hu's ideals were not only hailed Zhu Xi's leaning, but also found the truth of Yijing that regards as the book of divination. It just is the importance of Hu's Classic of Changes studies.

1. (1983)。文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
2. (1983)。文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
3. (1983)。文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
4. (1983)。文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
5. (1983)。文淵閣四庫全書。臺北:臺灣商務印書館。
6. 明宋濂(1992)。新校本元史并附編二種。臺北:鼎文書局。
7. 明陳璉(1989)。琴軒集。臺北:新文豐出版有限公司。
8. 清永瑢(1995)。四庫全書總目。北京:中華書局。
9. 清徐乾學輯(1996)。通志堂經解。揚州:江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社。
10. 清徐乾學輯(1996)。通志堂經解。揚州:江蘇廣陵古籍刻印社。
11. 清徐乾學輯(1996)。通志堂經解。揚州=Yangzhou:蘇廣陵古籍刻印社=Jiangsu Guangling Guji Keyinshe。
12. 清黃虞稷(2001)。千頃堂書目。上海:上海古籍出版社。
13. 史甄陶(2013)。家學、經學和朱子學：以元代徽州學者胡一桂、胡炳文和陳櫟為中心。上海=Shanghai:華東師範大學出版社=East China Normal University Press。
14. 朱傑人編、王鐵校點(2002)。朱子全書。上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Books。
15. 袁麗(2015)。元代新安理學家胡炳文對易學的貢獻。蘭臺世界，24，116-117。
16. 高新滿(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。濟南，山東大學。
17. 常桂蘭、劉成群(2009)。元代新安理學的《易》學思想。內蒙古農業大學學報（社會科學版），11(6)，318-320。
18. 張平平(2008)。略論元代新安理學家胡炳文。樂山師範學院學報，23(8)，107-111。
19. 郭振香(2010)。論胡炳文對朱熹《周易本義》的推明與發揮。安徽大學學報（哲學社會科學版），34(2)，27-33。
20. 黃成(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。合肥，安徽大學。
21. 楊澤(2015)。論胡炳文易學的時中觀。周易研究，134，82-88。
22. 謝輝(2010)。簡論朱子易學在元代發展的基本面貌。周易研究，104，54-60。
23. 謝輝(2015)。胡炳文《周易本義通釋》版本考略。山東圖書館學刊，6，89-93。