仁井田好古《毛詩補傳》對《毛詩正義》的批判

The Criticism of Maoshi Zhengyi in Kōko Niida's Mōshi Hoden

張文朝(Chang, Wen-Chao)

仁井田好古 ； 孔穎達 ； 《毛詩補傳》 ； 《毛詩正義》 ； 孔《疏》 ； Kōko Niida ； Kong Ying Da ； Mōshi Hoden ； Maoshi Zhengyi ； Kong's Shu

成大中文學報

79期（2022 / 12 / 01）

153 - 194

繁體中文;英文

本文主要目的在探討日本江戶後期古義學者仁井田好古如何對孔《疏》進行批判。好古所批判的大多是「訓詁音釋、文字異同、名物委曲」之屬，經調查得100例，將之分成：好古對孔《疏》「解《傳》」、「解《箋》」、「合《傳》、《箋》作解」、「不依《傳》、《箋》作解」、「不依〈序〉作解」、「依《爾雅》、《說文》作解」之批判等六項，舉其中33例分析。筆者認為好古對孔《疏》的批判屬於合理者達18例，但難以成立的也有15例。好古在批判孔《疏》之際，間有引他人之說以為己意，值得注意的是引徐鼎、陳啟源、段玉裁等清儒的意見，可見好古對當時中國學術界的動向頗為留意。好古對同屬漢學《詩經》系統的孔《疏》提出批判，以期「通暢毛義」，足見其用心與苦心。

The main purpose of this article is to explore how Kōko criticized Kong's Shu. It is believed that most of what Kōko criticized was the exegesis and transliteration, similarities and differences in words, and meaning and origin of naming items. After the investigation of 100 cases were obtained and divided into six categories: Kōko's criticism of Kong's Shu interpretation of Zhuan, the interpretation of Jian, the interpretation according to Zhuan and Jian, the interpretation not according to Zhuan and Jian, the interpretation not according to "Preface", and the criticism of the interpretation according to Erya and Shuowen. In this article, thirty-three cases were analyzed. The author believed that Kōko's criticism of Kong's Shu was wise up to eighteen cases, but there were also fifteen cases that were untenable. Moreover, when Kōko criticized Kong's Shu, he occasionally quoted other scholars' opinions as his own ideas, particularly the opinions of Qing Confucian scholars, including Xu Ding, Chen Qiyuan, Duan Yucai, etc., which Kōko had quoted in the Mōshi Hoden, which showed that Kōko paid considerable attention to the trends in Chinese academic world at that time. Kōko criticize Kong's Shu belonging to the sinology Shijing system in order to "explicate Mao Yi", which shows his efforts and painstaking efforts.

1. 張文朝(2015)。域外漢學另一章：日本江戶經學家仁井田好古。漢學研究通訊，34(1)，28-37。
   連結：
2. (2013).域外漢籍珍本文庫.北京:人民出版社.
3. (1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press, Ltd..
4. (1983).景印文淵閣四庫全書.臺北=Taipei:臺灣商務印書館=The Commercial Press, Ltd..
5. （宋）朱熹（集傳）, Xi,朱傑人（校點）, Jie Ren(2010).詩集傳.上海=Shanghai:上海古籍出版社=Shanghai Ancient Works Publishing House.
6. （周）左丘明（傳）,（晉）杜預（注）,（唐）孔穎達（疏）,浦衛忠（整理）(2000).春秋左傳正義.北京:北京大學出版社.
7. （清）永瑢,（清）紀昀(1983).欽定四庫全書總目.臺北:臺灣商務印書館.
8. （清）段玉裁(1977).段玉裁遺書.臺北:大化書局.
9. （清）段玉裁, Yu Cai(1977).段玉裁遺書.臺北=Taipei:大化書局=Dahua Books.
10. （清）徐鼎（纂輯）, Ding,王承略（校注）, Cheng Lue(2020).毛詩名物圖說.北京=Beijing:中華書局=Zhonghua Book Company.
11. （漢）毛公（傳）, Gong,（漢）鄭玄（箋）, Xuan,（唐）孔穎達（疏）, Ying Da,龔抗雲（整理）, Kang Yun(2000).毛詩正義.北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Peking University Press.
12. （漢）鄭玄（注）,（唐）陸德眀（音義）,賈公彦（疏）,彭林（整理）(2000).儀禮注疏.北京:北京大學出版社.
13. （漢）鄭玄（注）,（唐）陸德眀（音義）,賈公彦（疏）,趙伯雄（整理）(2000).周禮注疏.北京:北京大學出版社.
14. 中國詩經學會（編）=Chinese Poetry Society(ed.)(2002).詩經要籍集成.北京=Beijing:學苑出版社=Xue Yuan Publishing House.
15. ﹝日﹞仁井田好古：《毛詩補傳》，京都：紀州樂古堂，1834。Kōko Niida, Mao Shi Bu Chuan (Mōshi Hoden) [A Supplementary Commentary on Mao Poetry] (Kyoto: Kishū Rakkodō, 1834).
16. 王曉平, Xiao Ping(2009).日本詩經學史.北京=Beijing:學苑出版社=Xue Yuan Publishing House.
17. 市川本太郎(1987).日本儒教史.東京:東亞學術研究會.
18. 市川本太郎(1987).日本儒教史.東京:東亞學術研究會.
19. 市川本太郎(1987).日本儒教史.東京:東亞學術研究會.
20. 市川本太郎(1987).日本儒教史.東京:東亞學術研究會.
21. 市川本太郎(1987).日本儒教史.東京:東亞學術研究會.
22. 江口尙純(2016)。仁井田好古の《詩經》葛覃篇解釋。詩經研究，38，35-41。
23. 張文朝(2012).日本における《詩經》學史.臺北:萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司.
24. 張文朝, Wen Chao(2019).日本江戶時代古學派對朱熹《詩》觀之批評.臺北=Taipei:中央研究院中國文哲研究所=Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica.
25. 斯文會(1977).日本漢學年表.東京:大修館書店.
26. 楊立英(2021)。太原，山西大學中國古代文學研究所。
27. 楊樹達(1971).積微居小學述林.臺北:大通書局.
28. 内野熊一郎(1991).日本漢文研究.東京:名著普及會.