場域環境互動：開放公共空間互動作品案例研究

Ambient Interaction: Case Studies of Interactive Artworks in Public Space

10.29465/IJDMD.201312_5(1).0003

賀俊智(Jiun Jhy Her)

場域環境互動 ； 互動藝術 ； 公共空間 ； 公共藝術 ； Ambient Interaction ； Interactive Art ； Public Art ； Public Space

國際數位媒體設計學刊

5卷1期（2013 / 12 / 01）

23 - 32

繁體中文

參與者自發性的肢體介入常被視為構成互動藝術之基本要件；然而事實上，設置於開放公共空間的藝術作品常被賦予多重目的，其中甚至有許多並未將與「人」自發性參與的肢體互動，作為體現作品之主要條件。因此也衍生出一個值得探究的問題；參與者對互動作品的「直接」 肢體互動，是否仍應被視為一個不可或缺的條件，特別是在開放公共空間展示的作品。透過針對上述問題的研究，本文提出一個非常重要但鮮少被討論，屬於互動藝術的重要特質—「場域環境互動」；即作品的呈現受環境元素或情境影響，而非僅仰賴「人」主動的介入，或透過肢體與作品直接的接觸。在此一條件基礎上，若創作者以較開放性的態度，將 「互動」視為創作媒材；不僅僅是對「誰」，同時必須考慮作品於展出的空間將遭受到「什麼」或者將與「什麼」外在環境條件相互作用。如此，創作的空間則能被延展，同時能更適切的體現作品之創作目的與意涵。

The spontaneous and physical engagement of participants is often regarded as fundamental in the realm of interactive art. However art works exhibited in public spaces are often imbued with multiple purposes; many do not regard peoples' direct intervention as a key element herein. This brings up the issue of whether a participant's direct interaction with art works, in particular with those displayed in spaces accessible to the public, is deemed to be fundamental or not. This article proposes a concept 'Ambient Interaction', a largely unexplored but important characteristic of interactive art; rather than exclusively through people's spontaneous and physical interaction, art works become realized via situational and environmental influences. It is thus argued that art practitioners would benefit from a wider recognition of not only whom, but what their art works will encounter and interact with; so doing, their creativity can be expanded, whilst the purpose and meaning of an art work can be presented effectively.

1. Taiwan Public Art. (2012). Collection. Taiwan Ministry of Culture. Accessed 17 April 2013. http://publicart.moc.gov.tw/eng/search/content.php?id=2434
2. Ascott, R.(ed.)(1999).Reframing Consciousness: Art, Mind and Technology.Exeter, UK:Intellect.
3. Bialoskorski, L. S.,Westerink, J. H.,Van den Broek, E. L.(2010).Experiencing affectiveinteractive art.International Journal of Arts and Technology,3(4),341-356.
4. Bilda, Z.,Bowman, C.,Edmonds, E.(2008).Experience evaluation of interactive art: study of GEO landscapes.Proceedings of the 5th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment,Brisbane, Queensland, Australia:
5. Bochner, A. P.,Ellis, C.(2003).An Introduction to the Arts and Narrative Research: Art as Inquiry.Qualitative Inquiry,9(4),506-514.
6. Boros, D.(2012).Creative Rebellion for The Twenty-First Century: The Importance of Public and Interactive Art to Political Life in America.New York, USA:Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Bradley, N.,Dunlop, M.(2002).Understanding contextual interactions to design navigational context-aware applications.Proceedings of the Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices
8. Brignull, H.,Rogers, Y.(2003).Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces.Human-Computer Interaction - Interact’03,Zurich, Switzerland:
9. Ciolfi, L.,Cooke, M.,Bertelsen, O.,Bannon, L.(2005).Understanding and Co-Designing for Aesthetic Experience.HCI 2005,Edinburgh, UK:
10. Dewey, J.(2005).Art As Experience.New York:Penguin Group.
11. Dezeuze, A.(ed.)(2010).The‘Do-it-Yourself’ Artwork: Participation from Fluxus to New Media.Manchester:Manchester University Press.
12. Downes, E. J.,McMillan, S. J.(2000).Defining interactivity a qualitative identification of key dimensions.New Media & Society,2(2),157-179.
13. Edmonds, E.(2011).Art, interaction and engagement.proceeding of Information Visualisation (IV),Sydney, Australia:
14. Edmonds, E.(2010).The art of interaction.Digital Creativity,21(4),257-264.
15. Edmonds, E.,Bilda, Z.,Muller, L.(2009).Artist, evaluator and curator: three viewpoints on interactive art, evaluation and audience experience.Digital Creativity,20(3),141-151.
16. Edmonds, E.,Everitt, D.,Macaulay, M.,Turner, G.(2004).On physiological computing with an application in interactive art.Interacting with computers,16(5),897-915.
17. Flick, U.(2007).An introduction to qualitative research.London:Sage.
18. Goto, R. (2013). COLLINS.GOTO-art and environmental change. from 6 September 2013. http://collinsandgoto.com/reiko-goto/
19. Graham, B.(1997).University of Sunderland.
20. Gray, C.,Malins, J.(2004).Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design.Surrey, UK:Ashgate.
21. Hansen, M.,Rubin, B.(2002).Listening post: Giving voice to online communication.Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Auditory Display,Kyoto, Japan:
22. Hein, H.(1996).What is public art?: Time, place, and meaning.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,54(1),1-7.
23. Heinrich, F.(2011).Investigating Interactive Beauty - A research-art installation.ISEA2011,Istanbul:
24. Höök, K.,Sengers, P.,Andersson, G.(2003).Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems,Florida, USA:
25. Horowitz, G. M.(1996).Public art/public space: The spectacle of the Tilted Arc Controversy.The Journal of Aesthetics And Art Criticism,54(1),8-14.
26. Huang, E. M.,Koster, A.,Borchers, J.(2008).Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays?.Pervasive Computing,Berlin Heidelberg:
27. JiunsView. (2013). The Flower Clusters. from 17 April 2013.http://www.jiunsoutlook.idv.tw/computer-animation/theflowerclusters.jpg
28. Keyson, D.,Doff-Ottens, H(2009).Contextual Interaction Design: The Case of Pause Buddy.Ambient Intelligence,5859,174-185.
29. Kim, K. N.,Kim, T.(2012).Utilization of material-focused paintings in interactive art through the analysis of immersive elements.Digital Creativity,23(3-4),278-290.
30. Knickmeyer, R. L.,Mateas, M.(2005).Preliminary evaluation of the interactive drama facade.CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
31. Knight, C.(2008).Public Art: Theory, Practice and Populism.USA, UK:Blackwell.
32. Krueger, M. W.(1977).Responsive environments.Proceedings of the national computer conference,New York, USA:
33. Kwon, M.(2004).One place after another: Site-specific art and locational identity.Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT press.
34. Larsson, A. O.(2011).Interactive to me–interactive to you? A study of use and appreciation of interactivity on Swedish newspaper websites.new media & society,13(7),1180-1197.
35. Malloy, J.(ed.)(2003).Women, art, and technology.USA:The MIT Press.
36. Manovich, L. (2001). Post-media Aesthetics Medium in Crisis. Accessed 17 April 2013. http://www.alice.id.tue.nl/references/manovich-2005.pdf
37. Miura, K. (2011). “Fast and Slow”. Accessed 17 April 2013. http://www.miuraarchitecture.com/0807fast_slow/0807fast_slow.htm
38. Morrison, A.(2010).The University of Queensland.
39. Morrison, A.,Viller, S.,Mitchell, P.(2011).Open-ended art environments motivate participation.Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology,Lisbon, Portugal:
40. Müller, J.,Alt, F.,Michelis, D.,Schmidt, A.(2010).Requirements and design space for interactive public displays.Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia,Firenze, Italy:
41. Müller, L.,Edmonds, E.,Connell, M.(2006).Living laboratories for interactive art.CoDesign,2(4),195-207.
42. Papacharissi, Z.(2002).The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere.New Media & Society,4(1),9-27.
43. Paulos, E. (2007). HCI Cannot Be Used to Evaluate Art. Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, from 17 April 2013. http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1208&context=hcii
44. Petersen, M. G.,Iversen, O. S.,Krogh, P. G.,Ludvigsen, M.(2004).Aesthetic Interaction: a pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems.Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques,New York, USA:
45. Popper, F.(2007).From technological to virtual art.Cambridge, Massachusetts:MIT Press.
46. Rogala, M.(2005).Toward a theory of interactive art experience.Proceedings of the 3rd International symposium of interactive media design,Istanbul, Turkey:
47. Selwood, S.(1995).The Benefits of Public Art: The polemics of permanent art in public places.London, UK:Policy Studies Institute.
48. Simon, P.(ed.)(1995).Critical Issues in Electronic Media.New York:State University of New York Press.
49. Sims, R.(1997).Interactivity: A forgotten art?.Computers in Human Behavior,13(2),157-180.
50. Sundar, S. S.,Xu, Q.,Bellur, S.(2010).Designing interactivity in media interfaces: A communications perspective.Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems,Atlanta, USA:
51. Tikka, H.,Viña, S.,Jacucci, G.,Korpilahti, T.(2011).Provoking the city-touch installations for urban space.Digital Creativity,22(3),200-214.
52. Urbantimes. (2013). Enhancing Our Public Space Through Interactive Art, Urban Times. from 3 August 2013. http://urbanismnews.com/none/none/enhancing-our-public-space-through-interactive-art
53. 台灣電力公司(2013)。封面故事─自立變電所的建築和公共藝術。台電月刊，580
54. 張寶芳(2007)。人機互動2.0─無所不在的電腦運算挑戰人機互動設計。科學人雜誌，69，33。