瑠公農田水利會在公益社會的應為與能為

The Active Role of the Liugong Irrigation Association in the Public Welfare Society

10.6737/JDP.201912_(26).02

陳邦賓(Chen, Bang-Ping)；陳寅全(Chen, Yen-Chuan)

農田水利會 ； 瑠公圳 ； 公益社會 ； 公法人 ； 組織改制 ； farm irrigation associations ； Liugong Waterway ； public welfare society ； public corporation ； organizational restructuring

發展與前瞻學報

26期（2019 / 12 / 01）

15 - 39

繁體中文

農田水利會改制過程中的紛擾，社會大眾或許未能全盤理解。對都市型水利會而言，即使隨著都市化的腳步，灌溉排水功能逐漸弱化，但其於公益社會的耕耘仍一如從事農田水利事業之初，堅持並擴大。以台北市瑠公農田水利會為例，瑠公建圳之始，即本於服務鄉里從事公益的精神，隨著農田水利會的組織沿革至今，善用會有資產，秉持瑠公無私奉獻和服務理念，從農民擴大到一般民眾，再遍及社會，是瑠公農田水利會在公益社會的應為。面對未來，都市型農田水利會如何不減損公益價值，尋求兼顧政府全盤考量與全民福祉的方案，是在公益社會的能為。本文提出兩個方向思考，一為擴大服務灌區與服務全臺農田水利會，並持續推動農業轉型；二為跳脫既有框架，以公私協力財團法人之組織型態，維繫在公益社會中的積極角色。然而經評估、分析後，兩個情境均無法兼有目前水利會運作之功能與價值。建議政府在未能提出更妥適之精進方案前，維持現行公法人制度運行；農田水利會改制應該以發揮其業務特色為考量，並能積極的提出改善組織管理的運作模式。

The disturbances during the farm irrigation association reformed won't be fully understood by the public. For the urban irrigation association, even with the footsteps of urbanization, the irrigation and drainage functions are gradually weakened, its development in the public welfare society has still been growing, just the same as the beginning of the farm irrigation association project. Taking the Taipei Liugong Irrigation Association as an example. At the start of the construction for the Liugong Waterway, it was following the spirit of public welfare for the service township. With the organizations of the Irrigation Association, it's been so fully use of assets, and such a selfless dedication to be upheld. While the service concept, it's effectively widen from the peasants to the general public, and then a scale-up to the society, that's the decent role of the Liugong Irrigation Association in the public welfare society. In the face of the future, how won't the urban irrigation association weaken the primitive value of public welfare, further to seek a better solution that taking into account both the government's overall consideration and the welfare of the whole people. That's our dedication and consistancy. This paper is trying to propose two indications: the one is to expand the service irrigation district and serve the overall Taiwan's farm irrigation associations, somehow continue to promote the transformation of agriculture; and the other is to break away from the existing framework, and to maintain the organization model as a public-private partnerships and a positive role in the public welfare society. However, after evaluation and analysis, neither situations are hard to perform those functions and values of the current farm irrigation associations. Therefore, we are proposing that the government ought to be obligated to maintain the operation of the existing public corporation system before normally advocating a more appropriate and refined plan. The reform of the farm irrigation associations is supposed both based on the consideration of its business characteristics, and actively to propose an operational mode for improving organizational management.

1. (2005)。水利會永續經營之展望座談會參考資料。
2. 郭錫瑠先生文教基金會，綠化基金會目的事業，未出版。
3. 郭錫瑠先生文教基金會，AERC 中文簡介，未出版。
4. 民眾投稿(1964)，迎接光輝十月瑠公圳泰順街支流臭水溝應疏濬，徵信新聞，9 月 18 日，第三版。
5. (2014)。李宗信、李進億訪談(2014)，郭錫瑠先生文教基金會董事長陳炯松訪談稿，2 月 10 日。
6. 大愛新聞(2011)，水圳桑田--滋養大台北開鑿不易非"水到渠成"，大愛電視台，1 月 24 日。
7. 王月鏡（修）(1988).台北市志卷六經濟志農林漁礦篇.台北市文獻會委員會.
8. 台北市瑠公農田水利會(2018)。台北市瑠公農田水利會會訊，27
9. 台北市瑠公農田水利會(1993).台北市瑠公農田水利會會史.台北市:
10. 台北市瑠公農田水利會會藏(1932)，台北帝國大學行文瑠公水利組合請求取水入圳公文，2 月23 日。
11. 李宗信(2014).瑠公大圳.台北市:玉山社.
12. 李宗信,顧雅文,莊永忠(2009)。,未出版
13. 徐世大(1960).台北縣志水利志.台北縣:臺北縣文獻委員會.
14. 陳竑達(2011)。中國文化大學政治學系。
15. 劉育嘉(1995)。圳與清代台灣北部的開發-以瑠公圳為中心。中興史學，2，107-135。
16. 蔡志展(1999).明清台灣水力開發研究.南投縣:台灣省文獻委員會.
17. 聯合報(1975)，紀念蔣公豐功偉業北市各界決成立中正獎學基金會瑠公水利會等昨捐款千餘萬元。
18. 聯合報(1981)，設立病理中心再開籌備會議將為財團法人性質。
19. 聯合報(1984)，瑠公水利會決捐贈兩億台北病理中心募款困擾不再。
20. 瑠公水利組合(1941)，瑠公水利組合概況，台北市：台灣日日新報社，2-3 ，4-5頁。