题名

休閒行為研究－系統決策實證分析（II）

并列篇名

Research on Leisure Behavior-Empirical Analysis of Systematic Decision(II)

DOI

10.6737/JDP.202003_(27).01

作者

陳寅全(Chen, Yin-Quan)；紀光陽(Chi, Kuang-Yang)；蕭漢森(Hsiao, Han-Shen)

关键词

休閒行為 ； 系統決策 ； 資訊反饋 ； eisure behavior ； systematic decision-making ； information feedback

期刊名称

發展與前瞻學報

卷期/出版年月

27期（2020 / 03 / 01）

页次

1 - 26

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文主要是以「系統決策」模型之概念，採立意取樣訪談具有決策背景之休閒活動者。再從訪談內容中歸納、分析，檢證Simon「系統決策」模型是否適合用在休閒行為上。經訪談內容得出，休閒行為就是一種動態決策，他必須藉由不斷的資訊反饋達尋找到滿意的休閒活動。因此，就休閒行為的決策過程基本上脫離不了「系統決策」的模型架構。其次，在研究中顯示，受訪者都一致認為設計與認知是一體兩面，無法各自獨立，因此，Simon的系統圖中「設計」應該修改成「認知（設計）」。另休閒行為是綜合個人認知（設計）、資訊而形成，也就是說方案的選定會受制於個人的認知（設計）、資訊的影響。當個人認知（設計）強烈，受資訊影響較低；如果個人認知（設計）不足，受資訊影響會較高。因此，休閒行為方案的產出，正是「資訊」與「認知（設計）」兩者拉扯之下的產物。資訊並非單向輸入，個人的認知也會指導、排斥資訊蒐集的方向。所以，Simon的「資訊」→「認知（設計）」，宜再增加←（指導、排斥）的符號，才能外拓理論的解釋與應用。
英文摘要

This research is mainly based on the concept of the systematic decision model. The purposive samplings are the interviewees who are the decision maker of the leisure activities that they participate in. Then summarize and analyze from the interview content to verify whether the ＂systematic decision-making＂ model is suitable for leisure behavior. According to the interview, it shows that leisure behavior is a dynamic decision. And this leisure behavior must be satisfied by continuous information feedback. Therefore, the decision-making process for leisure behavior is related to systematic decision-making model. Furthermore, the research shows that respondents all agree that design and cognition are two sides of one body and cannot be independent of each other. Another study shows that respondents all agree that leisure behaviors are formed by integrating personal cognition and information, which means that the choice of plan will be affected by personal cognition and information. If personal cognition is strong, the influence of information is low; if personal cognition is insufficient, the influence of information is high. Therefore, the output of the leisure behavior is the product of two interrelated factors which are information and cognition. Therefore, Simon's ＂information＂ → ＂cognition (design)＂, it is advisable to add ← (instruction, exclusion) symbols to expand the interpretation and application of the theory.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 林又瑾,李英弘,葉源鎰(2004)。認真性休閒與休閒阻礙關條之研究:以高爾夫運動者為例。戶外遊憩研究，17(3)，51-79。
    連結：
  2. 紀光陽,吳宏熙(2017)。從系統動態決策探討休閒「心流」。發展與前瞻學報，13，35-52。
    連結：
  3. 許志仲,藍孝勤(2010)。從健康體適能談環狀運動課程設計。大專體育，109，16-22。
    連結：
  4. 楊仁壽,卓秀足,李怡穎(2007)。團體種的個人學習：決策程序與資訊分享型態的影響。管理與系統，14(4)，647-670。
    連結：
  5. 劉世南,鄭中平(2006)。決定不確定之因應策略類型與選擇。中華心理學刊，48(3)，219-234。
    連結：
  6. Anderson, P. M.(1986).Marketing communication.NJ:Prentice-Hall.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(Ed.),Csikszentmihalyi, I.(Ed.)(1988).Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness.New York:Cambridge.
  8. Engel, J. F.,Blackwell, R. D.,Miniard, P. W.(1993).Consumer behavior.New York:Free Press of Glencoe.
  9. Godbey, G.(1994).Leisure in your life: An exploration.State College, PA:Venture.
  10. Haberkost, M.,Dellmann- Jenkins, M.(1996).Importance of quality recreation activities for older adults residing in nursing homes: Considerations for gerontologists.Educational Gerontology,22(8),735-746.
  11. Han, H.(2015).Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior.Tourism Management,47,164-177.
  12. Harmon, Paul(1985).E×pert System: Artificial Intelligence in Business.New York:John Willey.
  13. Hill, C. W. L.,Jones, G. R.(1998).Strategic management theory：An integrated approach.MA:Houghton Mifflin.
  14. Jepson,D. A,Dilley, J.S.(1974).Vocational decision-making models: A review and comparative analysis.Review of Educational Research,44(3),331-349.
  15. Kumar, Ranjit,胡龍騰（譯）,黃瑋瑩（譯）,潘中道（譯）(2014).研究方法：步驟化學習指南.台北:學富文化出版社.
  16. Lee, Y.,O'Dell, I.(1999).How do individuals experience leisure.Parks & Recreation,34(2),40-45.
  17. Payne, J. W.(1982).Contingent decision behavior.Psychological Bulletin,1(2),382-402.
  18. Pereira, R. E.(1999).Factors influencing consumer perceptions of web-based decision support systems.Logistics Information Management,12,157-181.
  19. Punj, G. N.,Steward, D. W.(1983).An interaction framework of consumer decision making.Journal of Consumer Research,10(1),181-196.
  20. Resnick, B.(2001).Prescribing an exercise program and motivating older adults to comply.Educational Gerontology,27,209-226.
  21. Schmidt, R. A.(1988).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis.Champaign. IL.:Human Kinetics Publishers.
  22. Shannon, Claude E. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  23. Simon, Herbert A.(1960).The New Science of Management Decision.New York:Harper Row.
  24. Sproles, G. B.(1985).From perfectionism to faddism: Measuring consumer decision-making styles.Proceeding of American council on consumer interests 30th Annual Meeting
  25. Stebbins, R. A.(1993).Social world, Life-style, and serious leisure: Toward a mesostructural analysis.McGill-Gueen's University Press.
  26. Sternberg, Robert J.(1985).Beyond IQ: A diarchic theory of human intelligence.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  27. Thompson, James D.(1967).Organization in action.New York:McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  28. Wiener, N.(1962).Cybernetics.New York:MIT Press.
  29. 文崇一,楊國樞(2000).訪問調查法社會及行為科學研究法.台北:東華出版社.
  30. 王文科(2001).教育研究法.台北:五南出版社.
  31. 司徒達賢(1995).策略管理.台北:遠流出版社.
  32. 吳思華(2000).策略九說─策略思考的本質.台北:臉譜出版社.
  33. 沈潔姮(2008)。高雄市，國立高雄餐旅學院旅遊管理研究所。
  34. 林正昌(1995)。不同生涯決策型態大學生的決策行為研究-屬性數量變化與訊息呈現方式之效果分析。教育心理學報，28，219-250。
  35. 林連聰,歐聖榮,陳思倫(2011).休閒遊憩概論.台北:五南出版社.
  36. 洪蘭(2010).理直氣平：勇於改變才會進步.台北:遠流出版社.
  37. 席汝楫(1997).社會與行爲科學研究方法.台北:五南出版社.
  38. 黃朗文(1999).標準化的調查訪問.台北:國立編譯館.
  39. 盧俊宏(1998).運動心理學.台北:師大書苑.
  40. 戴有德,許惠玲,紀欽舞(2008)。參與登山健行之高齡者其休閒涉入、休閒效益及幸福感關係之研究─以高雄縣市郊山為例。中華觀光管理學會暨臺灣休閒與遊憩學會聯合學術研討會，台南:
print cancel