题名

商管領域掠奪型出版：學術期刊黑名單與白名單及因應建議

并列篇名

Predatory Publishing in Business and Management: Journal Whitelists/Blacklists and Cautionary Notes

DOI

10.6504/JMBR.201806_35(2).0005

作者

彭台光(T. K. Peng)

关键词

開放取用 ； 掠奪型出版 ； 學術期刊品質 ； open access ； predatory publishing ； journal quality

期刊名称

管理學報

卷期/出版年月

35卷2期（2018 / 06 / 01）

页次

241 - 266

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

學術出版業的傳統模式是使用者付費，經由訂閱學術期刊來閱讀、使用學術論文。由於此出版業長期被全球少數大出版商壟斷，期刊訂閱費居高不下，於是學術界催生了開放取用(open access)模式，主張由發表者付費，刊登的論文可免費下載，開放使用。但新模式卻衍生出以謀利為目的的出版商和期刊，收費即可刊登，棄審稿把關的前提於不顧，形成所謂掠奪型出版(predatory publishing)和偽科學(pseudo-science)。本文從開放取用的演進談起，介紹掠奪型出版的真相、特徵、品質、投稿者和收費情形，再討論商管領域掠奪型出版的特性和造成的影響，並探討台灣商管學者涉入掠奪型期刊的狀況，進而評述學術期刊黑名單和白名單的現況及其困境，最後提出四項因應建議，分別供學者、博士班負責人、大學和學術單位、教育部和科技部參考，期減少商管領域學術研究及其評量制度受到汙染。
英文摘要

The traditional model of science knowledge dissemination and academic journal publishing is ＂pay-to-read＂. Users read and use journal papers via subscription of journals and databases. This model overtime enables major publishers to dominate the industry. Constantly facing subscription fee hikes, the academics has thus developed an open access model, one that is ＂pay-to-publish＂ and allows free use of published papers by anyone who is interested. Despite the positive intention, the new model opens an opportunity for publishers and journals that are interested solely in making profit. Naturally, it results in predatory open access (POA) and pseudo-science. This study first outlines the evolution of open access and introduces POA in terms of its operations, quality, users, and fees. Second, it presents the common characteristics of POA in business and management and the impact of such publishing as well as how business scholars in Taiwan have involved in POA. Third, it addresses the current status of journal whitelists and blacklists and their limitations. In the final section, this study makes suggestions specifically for individual researchers, doctoral program directors, university administrators, and the Ministry of Education in a hope to minimize the contamination of POA on academic research and appraisal system.
主题分类 社會科學 > 管理學
参考文献
  1. 林奇秀, C. S.,賴璟毅, C. Y.(2014)。開放近用的陰暗面：掠奪型出版商及其問題。圖書與資訊學刊，85，1-21。
    連結：
  2. Adler, N. J.,Harzing, A. W.(2009).When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings.Academy of Management Learning & Education,8(1),72-95.
  3. Alison, M. 2016. U.S. government agency sues publisher, charging it with deceiving researchers. Retraction Watch. http://retractionwatch.com/2016/08/26/u-sgovernment-group-sues-publisher-charging-it-withdeceiving-researchers/. Accessed August 27, 2017.
  4. Beall, J. 2016a. List of publishers. https://web.archive.org/web/20161222020349/https:/scholarlyoa.com/publishers/. Accessed July 31, 2017.
  5. Beall, J.(2015).Predatory journals and the breakdown of research cultures.Information Development,31(5),473-476.
  6. Beall, J.(2017).What I learned from predatory publishers.Biochemia Medica,27(2),273-278.
  7. Beall, J. 2016b. List of standalone journals. https://web.archive.org/web/20161202192038/https://scholarlyoa.com/individual-journals/. Accessed July 31, 2017.
  8. Berger, M.,Cirasella, J.(2015).Beyond Beall's list: Better understanding predatory publishers.College & Research Libraries News,76(3),132-135.
  9. Bohannon, J.(2013).Who's afraid of peer review?.Science,342(6154),60-65.
  10. DOAJ. 2017. What are the basic standards that a journal must meet for the application to be considered? Directory of Open Access Journals. http://doaj.org/faq#standards. Accessed August 20, 2017.
  11. Grant, B. 2009. Editor quit after fake paper flap. The Scientist. http://www.thescientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/27461/title/Editors-quit-after-fake-paper-flap/. Accessed August 24, 2017.
  12. Harzing, A. W.,Adler, N. J.(2016).Disseminating knowledge: From potential to reality-new openaccess journals to collide with convention.Academy of Management Learning and Education,15(1),140-156.
  13. Jalalian, M.,Mahboobi, H.(2014).Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research?.Walailak Journal of Science and Technology,11(5),389-394.
  14. Kolata, G. 2013. Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/forscientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudoacademia.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed August 14, 2017.
  15. Lariviere, V.,Haustein, S.,Mongeon, P.(2015).The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era.PLOS ONE,10(6),e0127502.
  16. McLeod, A.,Savage, A.,Simkin, M. G.(2016).The ethics of predatory journals.Journal of Business Ethics
  17. Nelson, N.,Huffman, J.(2015).Predatory journals in library databases: How much should we worry?.The Serials Librarians,69(2),169-192.
  18. Petrini, C,Alleva, E.(2015).On the oligopoly of academic publishers.Ann Ist Super Sanita,51(4),259-260.
  19. Pyne, D.(2017).The rewards of predatory publications at a small business school.Journal of Scholarly Publishing,48(3),137-160.
  20. Shen, C.,Bjork, B. -C.(2015).Predatory' open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.BMC Medicine,13(1),230.
  21. Solomon, D. J.,Bjork, B. -C.(2012).Publication fees in open access publishing: Sources of funding and factors influencing choice of journal.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,63(1),98-107.
  22. Tenopir, C.,King, D. W.(1997).Trends in scientific scholarly journal publishing in the United States.Journal of Scholarly Publishing,28(3),135-170.
  23. Thornton, P. H.(2004).Market from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing.New York:Stanford University Press.
  24. Tin, L.,Ivana, B.,Biljana, B.,Ljubica, I.B.,Dragan, M.,Dušan, S.(2014).Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers - A global outbreak with rising trend: A review.Geographica Pannonica,18(3),69-81.
  25. Truth, F.(2012).Pay big to publish fast: Academic journal rackets.Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies,10(2),54-105.
  26. Virmani, V.(2016).,India:Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad.
  27. Vogel, G.,Kupferschmidt, K.(2017).A bold open-access push in Germany could change the future of academic publishing.Science,August 23
  28. Xia, J.(2015).Predatory journals and their article publishing charges.Learned Publishing,28(1),69-74.
  29. Xia, J.,Harmon, J. L.,Connolly, K. G.,Donnelly, R. M.,Anderson, M. R.,Howard, H. A.(2015).Who published in "predatory" journals?.Journal of the Association for the Information Science and Technology,66(7),1406-1417.
  30. 洪世章, S.C.(2017)。發行人的話：莫愁前路無知己。人文與社會科學簡訊，18(3)，1-3。
  31. 胡潔芳, C. F.(2017)。從追求顯著差異談起。人文與社會科學簡訊，18(3)，53-55。
  32. 教育部=Ministry of Education Republic of China(2017)。教育部，2017。臺教高五字第 1050150406 號函。台北：教育部。(Ministry of Education Republic of China, 2017. Ministry of Education's official letter No. Tai-Jiao-Kao-5-Tzu 1050150406. Taipei: Ministry of Education Republic of China.)。
被引用次数
  1. 彭美姿(2021)。小心披著羊皮的狼－淺談開放取用與掠奪性期刊。護理雜誌，68(6)，91-98。
  2. (2024)。認識研究倫理：要避免的雷區和當前的挑戰。產業與管理論壇，26(2)，12-27。
print cancel