確定給付制退休金計畫評估指標以及其在台灣之應用

Evaluation Indicators for Defined Benefit Pension Plans and an Application to Plans in Taiwan

10.6504/JMBR.202209_39(3).0006

黃泓智(Hong-Chih Huang)；李永琮(Yung-Tsung Lee)；郭又瑄(Yu-Hsuan Kuo)

退休金 ； 年金改革 ； 世代公平 ； 退休金指標 ； pension ； pension reform ； intergenerational fairness ； pension index

管理學報

39卷3期（2022 / 09 / 01）

357 - 381

繁體中文;英文

本研究建立涵蓋財務面、老年經濟安全、公平性與經濟面之退休金計畫評估指標，以提供重要資訊，協助進行跨計畫比較，並可作為年金改革時決策之參考及溝通之工具。我們對勞保、國保、公保、公務人員退撫新制以及勞退新制進行實證，結果發現：（1）勞保在清償能力指標顯著不如其它計畫，揭露出勞保財務問題的急迫性；（2）國保給付僅約9,500元，如能將國保與勞保整併，未就業之國民以最低基本工資納保，可改善參與者老年經濟安全；（3）世代公平性指標F-G指出財務健全對於世代公平的重要性；公保接近足額提撥，世代差異最小；（4）在職業公平性指標F-O方面，公保指標數值最低。（5）勞保個人公平性指標F-I最大，若提高個人保費負擔比例可強化勞保財務狀況，同時平衡計畫間之個人公平。（6）經濟面指標指出勞保若有無法清償或年金改革等事件對於社會的影響最深遠。

This study presents a pension evaluation indicator model that provides a pension plan's critical information in terms of solvency, economic security, fairness, and economics. The proposed indicator model is helpful for making cross-plan comparisons, for policymaking, and for government communication. An empirical study using the model finds the following: (1) The solvency indicator of the Labor Insurance is the lowest, indicating the scheme's financial emergency. (2) Merging the National Pension Insurance into the Labor Insurance and covering unoccupied nationals with a minimum monthly wage could improve the economic security of pensioners insured under the National Pension Insurance. (3) The intergenerational fairness indicator F-G indicates the importance of financial soundness; the Civil Servant and Teacher Insurance is nearly fully funded and has the smallest generational differences. (4) The Civil Servant and Teacher Insurance has the lowest interoccupational fairness indicator F-O. (5) The Labor Insurance has the highest interindividual fairness indicator F-I. Raising the proportion of the premium paid by the insured person can improve the financial status of the Labor Insurance and balance interindividual fairness across plans. (6) The economic indicator reveals the significant and far-reaching social impact of an insolvency event or reform of the Labor Insurance.

1. Chan, L. F. S.,Lee, Y. T.,Chiu, S. Y.(2017).Using the generational accounting method to evaluate the reforms of the labor insurance old-age pension benefit.Journal of Financial Studies,25(3),125-156.
   連結：
2. Chan, L. F. S.,Lee, Y. T.,Chiu, S. Y.(2017).Using the generational accounting method to evaluate the reforms of the labor insurance old-age pension benefit.Journal of Financial Studies,25(3),125-156.
   連結：
3. Chiu, S. B.,Lai, H. K.(2017).Major Taiwanese pension funds’ international investments and currency hedging strategies.Taiwan Economic Forecast and Policy,48(1),105-139.
   連結：
4. 王靜怡, C. Y.,鄭清霞, C. H.(2016)。我國勞保老年年金世代年金權益探討：從世代會計觀點。社會政策與社會工作學刊，20(2)，83-124。
   連結：
5. 王儷玲, J. L.,黃泓智, H. C.,陳彥志, Y. C.,鄭惠恒, M. H. H.(2019)。臺灣年金制度改革的財務影響與世代不均問題。臺大管理論叢，29(2)，139-171。
   連結：
6. 王儷玲, J. L.,黃泓智, H. C.,楊曉文, S. S. W.,陳彥志, Y. C.,鄭惠恒, M. H. H.(2017)。年金改革與建立臺灣永續年金制度。臺灣經濟預測與政策，48(1)，1-39。
   連結：
7. 何金巡, C. S.,蕭麗卿, L. C.,周麗芳, L. F.,林建甫, C. F.(2004)。開放經濟體系勞工退休制度之總體經濟計量分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策，34(2)，73-128。
   連結：
8. 呂曉萍, H. P.,徐淑芳, S.,陳煒朋, W. P.(2018)。管理期貨基金應用於退休基金投資組合之探討。保險專刊，34(1)，1-33。
   連結：
9. 邵靄如, A. J.,傅從喜, T. H.(2017)。年金制度與世代公平－我國不同世代公務員退休保障的比較。臺灣經濟預測與政策，48(1)，75-103。
   連結：
10. 陳芬苓, F. L.,張森林, S. L.(2019)。勞保年金給付方式的新思維。臺大管理論叢，29(2)，103-138。
    連結：
11. 陳芬苓, F. L.,張森林, S. L.(2008)。台灣地區勞工退休金制度的性別分析。人文及社會科學集刊，20(1)，67-104。
    連結：
12. 傅從喜, T. H.,施世駿, S. J.,林宏陽, H. Y.(2019)。我國社會安全年金制度可攜性分析。臺大管理論叢，29(2)，173-200。
    連結：
13. 童嬋娟, C. C.,林盈課, A.,李瑞珠, G.(2019)。退休基金自選投資制度之研究。臺大管理論叢，29(2)，1-27。
    連結：
14. 楊子霆, T. T.,駱明慶, M. C.(2009)。誰付退休金？－勞退新制對私部門勞工薪資的影響。經濟論文，37(3)，339-368。
    連結：
15. 楊曉文, S. S.,唐俊華, C. H.(2009)。不同投資策略下勞退新制收益率保證成本與所得替代率之探討。財務金融學刊，17(1)，143-172。
    連結：
16. 董安琪, A. C.,謝餘慶, K. Y. C.(2017)。既患不均，可不患寡、不患貧乎？—從財政永續性與世代間不均的角度看臺灣的年金改革。臺灣經濟預測與政策，48(1)，41-73。
    連結：
17. 鄭清霞, C. H.,洪明皇, M. H.,王靜怡, C. Y.,李佩芳, P. F.(2017)。臺灣年金改革的老年基本年金規劃。臺灣社會福利學刊，13(2)，117-160。
    連結：
18. 龎寶宏, P. H.,陳心怡, H. Y.(2020)。從社會保險純度觀點探討公教年金改革成效。聯大學報，17(2)，57-77。
    連結：
19. Arimori, M.(2004).Evaluation criteria for pension system and their applications to pension reform in Japan.PBSS Program Part of the IACA, PBSS & IAAust Colloquium
20. Brown, J. R.,Pennacchi, G. G.(2016).Discounting pension liabilities: Funding versus value.Journal of Pension Economics and Finance,15(3),254-284.
21. Chybalski, F.(2016).The multidimensional efficiency of pension system: Definition and measurement in cross-country studies.Social Indicators Research,128(1),15-34.
22. Clair, T. S.,Guzman, J. P. M.(2017).Contribution volatility and public pension reform.Journal of Pension Economics and Finance,17(4),513-533.
23. Cotter, J., Blake, D., & Dowd, K. 2012. What should be done about the underfunding of defined benefit pension schemes? A case study of Ireland. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2403242 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2403242. Accessed January 20, 2022.
24. Disney, R.(2000).Crises in public pension programmes in OECD: What are the reform options?.The Economic Journal,110(461),1-23.
25. Finke, R., & Sabatini, M. 2016. 2016 Pension sustainability index. International pension papers 1/2016. Munich, Germany: Allianz SE Publishing.
26. Holzmann, R.,Hinz, R.(2005).Old age income support in the 21st century: The world bank’s perspective on pension systems and reform.Washington, D. C.:World Bank.
27. Kalisch, D. W.,Aman, T.(1998).OECD Ageing Working PapersOECD Ageing Working Papers,未出版
28. Munnell, A. H., Aubry, J. P., & Hurwitz, J. 2013. Locally-administered pension plans: 2007–2011. State and local pension plans, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.
29. Novy-Marx, R.(2015).Economic and financial approaches to valuing pension liabilities.Journal of Pension Economics and Finance,14(2),144-150.
30. Novy-Marx, R.,Rauh, J.(2011).Public pension promises: How big are they and what are they worth?.The Journal of Finance,66(4),1211-1249.
31. OECD(2019).Pensions at a glance 2019: OECD and G20 indicators.
32. Peng, J.,Wang, Q.(2017).Affordability of public pension benefit: A historical and empirical analysis of US state and local government pension contributions.Journal of Pension Economics and Finance,16(1),21-42.
33. Platanakis, E.,Sutcliffe, C.(2016).Pension scheme redesign and wealth redistribution between the members and sponsor: The USS rule change in October 2011.Insurance: Mathematics and Economics,69,14-28.
34. SOA(2018).Spotlight on retirement: Taiwan.:LL Global, Inc..
35. Tausch, F.,Potters, J.,Riedl, A.(2013).Preferences for redistribution and pensions. What can we learn from experiments?.Journal of Pension Economics and Finance,12(3),298-325.
36. The PEW Charitable Trusts. 2013. A widening gap in cities: Shortfalls in funding for pension and retiree health care. https://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/legacy/uploadedfiles/pcs_assets/2013/pewcitypensionsreportpdf.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2022.
37. Wang, Q.,Peng, J.(2016).An empirical analysis of state and local public pension plan funded ratio change, 2001–2009.American Review of Public Administration,46(1),75-91.
38. World Bank(1994).Averting the old-age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth.New York, NY:Oxford University Publishing.
39. 毛治文, C. W.,沈中華, C. H.(2010)。金融發展與經濟成長－退休金的角色。證券市場發展季刊，23(1)，43-80。
40. 國家發展委員會=National Development Council(2018).中華民國人口推估（2018 至2065 年）.台北=Taipei:國家發展委員會=National Development Council.
41. 鄭清霞, C. H.(2014)。國家發展委員會委託研究國家發展委員會委託研究,國家發展委員會=National Development Council。