题名

論南非全方位外交戰略及軍事法庭符合獨立公正性

并列篇名

A Study of South African Well-Rounded Diplomacy and Military Courts Conforming to Independence and Impartiality

作者

張瑋心(CHANG, Wei-Hsin)

关键词

軍事外交 ； 公平性 ； 獨立性 ； 戰略佈署 ； 和平穩定 ； Military Diplomacy ； Impartiality ； Independence ； Strategic Deployment ； Peace and Stability

期刊名称

軍法專刊

卷期/出版年月

64卷3期（2018 / 06 / 01）

页次

115 - 141

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

南非自1994 年黑人政權迄今，不論在軍事國防、外交政策、或社會經濟環境，都有相當程度的進步與崛起。作為非洲的大國，南非繼續發揮實現和平與穩定的作用，並且支持非洲大陸為創造更好條件所做出的集體努力。21世紀初期，南非也曾面臨軍事審判是否公正的疑慮，嗣通過外國法院判決的分析，南非軍事法庭大體上符合獨立性和公正性要件，只要軍事法庭成員稍作調整，關於公平審判的任何疑慮均可解決。誠如加拿大最高法院判決所揭，在一個軍事組織中，永遠不可能有真正完全獨立的軍事司法制度，蓋因軍事司法的一個主要利基點，就是利用訓練有素的軍官出席軍事法庭擔任司法參審角色。本文爰此探討當代南非在全球軍事、外交的戰略佈局，冀供參考。
英文摘要

Since the Black-government's ruling in 1994, South Africa has made a great progress in military defense, diplomatic policies, and social economic environments. As a big country in the African Continent, South Africa has continued to play the role of bringing about peace and stability in support of the continent's collective efforts to create the necessary conditions. At the beginning of 21th century, South Africa faced the questions of impartiality and independence in the military system; through foreign case decisions made, it was concluded that South African military courts can in general be regarded as independent and impartial although, with small changes, any doubt with regard to independence could be eradicated. In a military organization, there cannot ever be a truly independent military judiciary, because a major strength of the present military judicial system rests on the use of trained military officers, who are also legal officers to sit on courts martial in judicial roles. This paper aims to discuss the South African's global deployment in military operations and diplomatic strategies for our reference.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
社會科學 > 軍事學
参考文献
  1. Rex v Valente, [1985] 19 C.R.R. 354 (SCC).
  2. European Convention of Human Rights, Art. 6 s §1.
  3. Van Rooyen v The State, 2002 5 SA 246 (CC).
  4. https://www.gov.za/about-government/government-system/justice-system/judicial-system, visited on April 18, 2018.
  5. 軍事紀律守則(MDC) s 4.
  6. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/salisbury-attack-joint-statement-from-the-leaders-of- france-germany-theunited-states-and-the-united-kingdom, visited on April 8, 2018.
  7. http://www.saiia.org.za/opinion-analysis/south-africa-s-foreign-policy-under-zuma-towards-greater-strategic-partnerships, visited on April 8, 2018.
  8. Dumbu v Commissioner of Prisons, 1992 1 SA 58 (E).
  9. Van Rooyen v De Kock NO 2003 2 SA 317 (T)
  10. http://www.dod.mil.za/, visited on April 2, 2018.
  11. European Court of Human Rights, 9 June 1998, Incal v Turkey, Strasbourg Case No. 41/1997/825/1031.
  12. http://www.32battalion.net/32%20Battalion%20a%20Short%20Overview.htm, visited on April 8, 2018.
  13. S v Généreux, (1992) 88 DLR (4th) 110 (SCC).
  14. https://www.gov.za/, visited on April 12, 2018.
  15. Freedom of Expression Institute v President, Ordinary Court Martial 1999 2 SA 471 (C).
  16. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//NSAEBB/NSAEBB190/01.pdf, visited on April 2, 2018.
  17. https://israelipalestinian.procon.org/view.background-resource.php? resourceID=000921, visited on April 20, 2018.
  18. Grieves v The United Kingdom, Application 57067/00, dated 16 December 2003
  19. Section 34(1) and (3) of the Supreme Court
  20. President, Ordinary Court Martial v Freedom of Expression Institute 1999 4 SA 682 (CC)
  21. Expression Institute v President Ordinary Court Martial, 1999 2 SA 471 (C)
  22. Minister of Defence v Potsane, 2002 1 SA 1 (CC).
  23. R v Généreux, [1992] 1 SCR 259.
  24. Section 34(7) of the Supreme Court
  25. Mönnig v Council of Review, 1992 3 SA 482 (A).
  26. http://www.china.com.cn/news/2015-11/30/content_37195002_2.htm, visited on April. 9, 2018.
  27. Engel v The Netherlands, Judgment of 8J une 1976, Series A no 22.
  28. Section 34(5) of the Supreme Court
  29. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43469316, visited on April 9, 2018.
  30. Morris v The United Kingdom, dated 26 May 2002 (Application no 38784/97).
  31. SANDF Union v Minister of Defence, 2004 4 SA 10 (T)
  32. https://www.un.org/press/en/2013/sc10964.doc.htm, visited on April 2, 2018.
  33. 南非軍事紀律補充措施辦法（MDSMA）
  34. Section 200(1) of Act 108of 1996 (here after referred to as Constitution).
  35. https://www.fpri.org/article/2006/04/private-military-companies-and-the-future-of-war/, visited on April 26, 2018.
  36. http://sh.qihoo.com/9b3f7206f30b6eda4? uid=096e45b8508e0327f67cc4740f7a68a9&sign=360_0de6261f, visited on April 8, 2018.
  37. Cooper v The United Kingdom, Application 48843/99, dated 16 December 2003
  38. Section 24(1) of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959.
  39. Defence Act 44 of 1957 and MDC
  40. Section 34(2) of the Supreme Court
  41. http://www.southafrica-travel.net/economy/economy.htm, visited on April 20, 2018.
  42. R v Boyd, [2002] UKHL 31.
  43. Section 34(4) and Rule 71(2) of the Supreme Court
  44. http://www.vivianwu.org.tw/02c.php? ser=36&ser1=7, visited on April 9, 2018
  45. Campbell & Fell v United Kingdom, 28 June 1984, Series A no 80.
  46. Section 25 of the Supreme Court
  47. Ciki v Commissioner of Prisons, 1992 2 SA 269 (E). .
  48. S v Jaipal (Constitutional Court) unreported case number CCT 21/04, dated 18F ebruary 2005
  49. https://www.iol.co.za/news/south-africa/gauteng/un-slams-sas-private-army-1373943#.UFNFz8jdGnQ, visited on April 26, 2018.
  50. http://www.dod.mil.za/advert/ndic/index.html, visited on April. 9, 2018.
  51. https://www.parliament.gov.za, visited on April 6, 2018.
  52. De Lange v Smuts NO 19983 SA 785 (CC)
  53. https://www.un.org/africarenewal/magazine/september-2002/new-partnership-africas-development-nepad, visited on April 10, 2018.
  54. http://wemedia.ifeng.com/58098948/wemedia.shtml, , visited on April 9, 2018.
  55. Findlay v The United Kingdom, dated 25 February 1997 (110/1995/616/706).
  56. https://www.brandsouthafrica.com/south-africa-fast-facts/history-facts, visited on April 6, 2018.
  57. Mbambo v Minister of Defence, 2005 (2) SA 226 (TPD).
  58. http://www.southafrica-travel.net/economy/e_gold.htm, visited on April 20, 2018.
  59. Jaipal v S [2004] 3 All SA 409 (SCA).
  60. http://www.ibsa-trilateral.org/, visited on April 20, 2018.
  61. http://forum.3us.com/thread-15501-1-1.html
  62. https://newsone.com/3774297/south-africa-anc-party-jacob-zuma-resignation-crisis/, visited on April 6, 2018.
  63. S v Tsotsi, 2004 2 SACR 273 (E).
  64. Batchelor, Peter,Kingma, Kees,Lamb, Guy(2003).Demilitarisation and Peace-building in Southern Africa.Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report,2,39.
  65. Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science Inc.(1993).South Africa comes clean.Washington, DC:Atomic Scientists.
  66. Hooper, Jim(1988).Koevoet.Johannesburg:Southern Book Publishers.
  67. Vanneman, Peter(1990).Soviet Strategy in Southern Africa: Gorbachev's Pragmatic Approach.Stanford:Hoover Institution Press.
  68. 鄭健吾(2014)。國防大學政治作戰學院。
print cancel