從東京審判看戰爭中被忽略的女性被害人

Tokyo Trial and the Rape in War

法思齊(Fa, Marietta Sze-Chie)

性犯罪 ； 戰爭犯罪 ； 南京大屠殺 ； 遠東國際軍事法庭 ； 東京審判 ； Rape ； War Crime ； The Rape of Nanking ； International Military Tribunal for the Far East ； Tokyo Trial

軍法專刊

67卷2期（2021 / 04 / 01）

1 - 17

繁體中文

自從人類的歷史有紀錄以來，女性即常成為人類各種爭奪戰爭（通常為男性主導）中的犧牲者。戰爭下的性犯罪，幾乎已成為人類戰爭史上，必然會發生且根本也已無從避免的戰爭暴行。然而，在國際法庭上，與其他戰爭犯罪相比，性犯罪卻一直未受到同等的重視。第二次世界大戰結束後，為審理戰犯而分別在德國進行的紐倫堡審判以及在日本進行的東京審判，亦大幅度地忽略了德日兩國於其侵略戰爭下曾經對婦女所進行之暴行。特別是其中在日本進行的東京審判，雖然有就部分日軍於中國戰場上對於中國婦女所為的性侵害行為加以追訴，並於最後的判決書中加以記錄，然各種的性犯罪或是性侵害行為，在東京審判之相關文獻中，係被列在副標題為「暴行」（atrocities）的分類下，僅被視為一種包含在「不人道對待」（inhumane treatment）、「未適當對待」（ill-treatment）或「不尊重家族榮譽與權利」（failure to respect family honor and rights.）分類下的次級犯罪，而未能單獨的被列舉作為一種獨立的戰爭犯罪類型加以追訴。因此，本文將從戰爭中的性犯罪為出發點，並以東京審判為中心，探討在國際法庭上過去一直被嚴重忽略的性犯罪問題。

Rape during war is as old as war itself. In World War II, rape was used first by the Germans and Japanese as a tactic for waging war. The invasion of Nanking during World War II became known as the Rape of Nanking, where the Japanese troops committed rape against the civilian Chinese population on a massive scale. After World War II, there were two international military tribunals set up, one in Nuremberg and the other in Tokyo. The international military tribunal that set up in Tokyo has been known as the ＂Tokyo Trial＂. However, in neither of the judgments of those tribunals was there specific mention of rape. There was evidence presented during those trials and, in fact, rape is included among the atrocities that occurred and that the defendants were found guilty of in Tokyo, but the judges in those cases shied away from dealing with the matter explicitly. Rather, they dealt more thoroughly with what they considered greater crimes-murder, mass deportation, and mass enslavement. In the Tokyo judgment, rape was included but only as part of the greater atrocities committed by the top military commanders. Therefore, the crimes of sexual violence during wartime did not really receive attention in proportion to their occurrence, and this article will further examine how the crime of rape has been greatly ignored in Tokyo trial after World War II.

1. 尤淑君(2008)。德國與日本對二戰戰爭責任認知的比較。政大史粹，14，119-120+127+132+140-142。
   連結：
2. 李恩涵(1991)。日本南京大屠殺所涉及的戰爭國際法問題。中央研究院近代史研究所集刊，20，1+7+335+342+362-364。
   連結：
3. Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nov. 14, 1945 to Oct. 1, 1946 (1947).
4. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War Art.27.
5. Askin, Kelly D.(2002).Crime against Women under International Law.BERKELEY J. INT'L.,21,288+296-297.
6. Askin, Kelly D.(2003).Prosecuting War Time Rape and other Gender-Related Crimes under INternational Law: Extraordinary Advances.Enduring Obstacles INT,21,202+288+295+297+299-302.
7. ASKIN, KELLY DAWN(1997).WAR CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN: PROSECUTION IN INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIMES TRIBU NALS.
8. BROWNMILLER, SUSAN(1975).AGAINST OUR WILL, MEN, WOMEN AND RAPE.
9. CHERIF BASSIOUNI, M.(1992).CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
10. CHERIF BASSIOUNI, M.(1986).INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW.
11. Chinkin, Christine(2001).Women's International Tribunal on Japanese Military Sexual Slavery.International Tribunal on Japanese Military Sexual Slavery,95,335-340.
12. Davis, Patricia H.(2000).The Politics of Prosecuting Rape as a War Crime.INT'L LAW.,34,1223-1234.
13. Davis, Patricia H.(2000).Comment, The Politics of Prosecuting Rape as a War Crime.INT'L LAW,3,1223-1227.
14. Gutman, Roy,席代岳（譯）(2002).戰爭的罪行.麥田出版社.
15. Harris, Whitney R.(1992).A Call for An International War Crimes Court: Learning From Nuremberg.TOL. L.REV.,23,229-237.
16. Howard, Michael(ed.)(1994).THE LAWS OF WAR: CONSTRAINTS ON WARFARE IN THE WESTERN WORLD.Michael Howard et al.
17. KHUSHAKANI, YOUGINDRA(1982).DIGNITY AND HONOUR OF WOMEN AS BASIC AND FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS.
18. Lehr-Lehnardt, Rana(2002).One Small Step for Woman: Female-Friendly Provisions in the Rome Starute of the International Criminmal Court.BYU J. PUB,16,317+320-322.
19. LEVIE, HOWARD S.(1992).TERRORISM IN WAR: THE LAW OF WAR CRIMES.
20. Meron, Theodor(1993).Rape as a Crime under International Humanitarian Law.AM. J. INT'L.,87,424-425.
21. Parks, Williams(1973).Command Responsibility for War Crimes.Command Responsibility for War Crimes, 62 MIL. L. REV,62,1.
22. Picart, Caroline Joan (Kay) S.(2011).Attempting to go Beyond Forgetting: The Legacy of the Tokyo IMT and Crimes of Violence Against Women.E. ASIA L.,7,1+5+6-7+26+38.
23. Tompkins, Tamara L.(1995).Prosecuting Rape as a War Crime: Speaking the Unspeakable.NOTRE DAME,70,845+880-881+883.
24. Wald, Alexandra(1997).Wald, What's Rightfully Ours: Toward a Property Theory of Tap.COLUM. J. L. & SOC. PROBS,30,459.
25. 丁介民(1989)。人類歷史上空前絕後的滔天罪行—南京大屠殺：實錄部分。政治評論，47(11)，39。
26. 日幕吉延,黃耀進（譯）,熊紹惟（譯）(2017).東京審判.八旗文化出版社.
27. 外人目睹中的日軍暴行=The Japanese Terror in China: A Documentary Records
28. 朱石炎(2015)。南京大屠殺事件日軍戰犯判決解讀。台灣法學，279，30+32-33+47-49。
29. 吳天威(1997)。紐倫堡審判之成功與東京審判之失敗。海峽評論，84，7。
30. 李恩涵(1997)。戰後戰勝國對南京大屠殺日本戰犯的審判。近代中國，122，6-7。
31. 林明德(1996)。遠東國際軍事法庭日本戰犯審判。歷史月刊，46-49。
32. 陳在俊(1994)。南京大屠殺實錄—日本軍人何以那麼殘暴。近代中國，101，130-133。
33. 楊鵑如，〈815 慰安婦全球抗議台灣阿嬤剩 3 人要求日本道歉〉（2016.8.16），公民行動影音紀錄資料庫，〈https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/52248〉。
34. 趙國材(2015)。論嚴重違反國際人道法事件、個人刑事責任、國家與國際司法機構之起訴、審判，以及國際刑法之最新發展。軍法專刊，61(3)，46-47。