题名

論國際法之新武器法律審查制度－以自主武器系統為中心

并列篇名

A Study on the Legal Review Process of New Weapons under International Law-With Special Focus on Autonomous Weapon Systems

作者

廖桂瑩(Liao, Kuei-Ying)

关键词

第一附加議定書第36條 ； 新武器法律審查 ； 自主武器系統 ； 人工智慧 ； 國際人道法 ； Article 36 of Additional Protocol I ； Legal Review of New Weapons ； Autonomous Weapons Systems ； Artificial Intelligence ； International Humanitarian Law

期刊名称

軍法專刊

卷期/出版年月

68卷2期（2022 / 04 / 01）

页次

60 - 85

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

隨著人工智慧技術的發展，新世代的科技軍備競賽已經展開。近期備受國際關注的自主武器系統，不僅改變了戰爭的格局與型態，更對既有的國際法框架帶來新的衝擊與挑戰。本文概述自主武器系統在全球的應用現況，以及國際社會對其發展的正反評價。面對人工智慧武器已是無法阻擋的趨勢，為了確保自主武器系統的使用符合國際法規範的要求，或許透過「第一附加議定書」第36條「新武器法律審查制度」的建立與執行，可以作為超越國際監管的手段，以求在科技發展、軍事利益及國際人道法的實踐之間找到折衷的平衡。
英文摘要

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, the race for new generation of armed technology has begun. Autonomous weapon systems that have attracted attention worldwide have not only changed the scope and nature of warfare, but also created new impact and challenges to the existing international legal framework. This article summarizes the current status of the autonomous weapon systems being applied across the world, and examines the positive and negative viewpoints from the international community. In light of the unstoppable trend of artificial intelligence weapons, henceforth in an effort to ensure the use of autonomous weapon systems meet the requirements of international laws and regulations, the fundamental thinking here is - By establishing and implementing the ＂New Weapons Legal Review Process＂ in Article 36 of Additional Protocol I, this could supersede international supervision and control. As such, the intention is to strike a balance between technological development, military interests, and the practice of International Humanitarian Law.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
社會科學 > 軍事學
参考文献
  1. Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons System, Annex III: commentaries on the 11 guiding principles, U.N. Doc. CCW/GGE.1/2020/WP.7 45, 84, 61 (Apr. 19. 2021), https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CCW_GGE1_2020_WP_7-ADVANCE.pdf
  2. (2013).MANUAL ON INTERNATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO AIR AND MISSILE WARFARE.
  3. Australia, The Australian Article 36 Review Process, U.N. Doc. CCW/GGE.2/2018/WP.6 1 (Aug. 30, 2018), https://reachingcriticalwill.org/disarmament-fora/ccw/2018/laws/documents.
  4. IEEE, https://www.ieee.org/(last visited Jan. 4, 2022)
  5. 「維也納條約法公約」第 26 條
  6. Fisheries (U.K. v. Nor.), 1951 I.C.J. 116, 139 (Dec. 18, 1951).
  7. 國際人道法所「第一附加議定書」第 48 條，第 51 條第 5 項第 2 款，第 57 條第 2 項第 2 款，第 52 條第 2 項
  8. 國際刑事法院羅馬規約」第 28 條，第 30 條
  9. Last ditch defence- the Phalanx close-in weapon system in focus, NAVY LOOKOUT (Aug. 10, 2020), https://www.navylookout.com/last-ditch-defence-the-phalanx-close-in-weapon-system-in-focus/
  10. Adams, Thomas K.(2001).Future Warfare and the Decline of Human Decision making.PARAMETERS: U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE QUARTERLY,31,58.
  11. Anderson, Kenneth(2014).Adapting the Law of Armed Conflict to Autonomous Weapons Systems.INT'L L. STUD.,90,386+389-390.
  12. ARKIN, RONALD C.(2009).GOVERNING LETHAL BEHAVIOR IN AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS.
  13. ISAAC ASIMOV, RUNAROUND, in I, ROBOT 20, 27 (Street & Smith, 1942), available at http://ekladata.com/-Byix64G_NtE0xI4A6PA1--o1Hc/Asimov-Isaac-I-Robot.pdf
  14. Backstrom, Alan,Henderson, Ian(2012).New Capabilities in Warfare: An Overview of Contemporary Technological Developments and the Associated Legal and Engineering Issues in Article 36 Weapons Reviews.INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF THE RED CROSS,94,483+513.
  15. Beard, Jack M.(2014).Autonomous Weapons and Human Responsibilities.GEO. J. INT'L L.,45,617+658-659.
  16. Biller, Jeffrey T.,Schmitt, Michael N.(2019).Classification of Cyber Capabilities & Operations as Weapons, Means, or Methods of Warfare.INT'L L. STUD.,95,179+195-196.
  17. Ingvild Bode & Tom Watts, Worried about the autonomous weapons of the future? Look at what's already gone wrong, BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS (Apr. 21, 2021), https://thebulletin.org/2021/04/worriedabout-the-autonomous-weapons-of-the-future-look-at-whats-already-gone-wrong/.
  18. Boulanin, Vincent(2015).Implementing Article 36 Weapon Reviews in the Light of Increasing Autonomy in Weapon Systems.SIPRI INSIGHTS ON PEACE AND SECURITY,2015/1,2.
  19. Vincent Boulanin & Maaike Verbruggen, SIPRI Compendium on Article 36 Reviews, STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 (Dec. 2017), https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/sipri_bp_1712_article_36_compendium_2017.pdf.
  20. Congressional Research Service(2020).,未出版
  21. Crootof, Rebecca(2015).War Torts: Accountability for Autonomous Weapons.U. PA. L. REV.,164,1347+1375.
  22. Crootof, Rebecca(2018).Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Limits of Analogy.HARV. NAT'L SEC. J.,9,51+60.
  23. Crootof, Rebecca(2015).The Killer Robots Are Here: Legal & Policy Implications.CARDOZO L. REV.,36,1837+1844.
  24. Jonathan Cuénoud, 40th Anniversary of the Additional Protocols of 1977 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, EJIL：TALK! BLOG (Jun. 8, 2017), https://www.ejiltalk.org/40th-anniversary-of-the-additional-protocols-of-1977-of-the-geneva-conventions-of-1949/
  25. Department of Defense, DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms 230 (2021), https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/dictionary.pdf.
  26. Bonnie Docherty, Mind the Gap: The Lack of Accountability for Killer Robots, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH 25(Apr. 9, 2015), https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/04/09/mind-gap/lack-accountability-killer-robots
  27. Fry, James D.(2006).Contextualized Legal Reviews for the Methods & Means of Warfare: Cave Combat & Int'l Humanitarian Law.COLUM. J. TRANSNAT'L L.,44,453+473.
  28. Dan Gettinger ＆ Arthur Holland Michel, Loitering Munitions, CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE DRONE 1-4 (2017), https://dronecenter.bard.edu/files/2017/02/CSD-Loitering-Munitions.pdf
  29. Gill, Terry(ed.),Fleck, Dieter(ed.)(2010).THE HANDBOOK OF THE LAW OF MILITARY OPERATIONS.
  30. Human Rights Watch(2020).Stopping Killer Robots: Country Positions on Banning Fully Autonomous Weapons and Retaining Human Control.
  31. Human Rights Watch & International Human Rights Clinic, Losing Humanity: The Case against Killer Robots (Dec.5, 2012), https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/arms1112_ForUpload.pdf.
  32. IAI, Harpy Autonomous Weapon for All Weather, https://www.iai.co.il/p/harpy (last visited Jun.8 2020).
  33. INT'L COMM. OF THE RED CROSS, ICRC POSITION ON AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS 5 (2021), https://shop.icrc.org/icrc-position-on-autonomous-weapon-systems-pdf-en
  34. INT'L COMM. OF THE RED CROSS, EXPERT MEETING: AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS, IMPLICATIONS OF INCREASING AUTONOMY IN THE CRITICAL FUNCTIONS OF WEAPONS 8(2016), https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/4283-autonomous-weapons-systems.
  35. Int'l Comm. of the Red Cross, A Guide to The Legal Review of New Weapons, Means, and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977 3-4 (2006), https://shop.icrc.org/a-guide-to-the-legal-review-of-new-weapons-means-and-methods-of-warfare-pdf-en
  36. Int'l Comm. of the Red Cross, Expert Meeting on Autonomous Weapon Systems: Technical, Military, Legal and Humanitarian Aspects 17 (Geneva, Mar. 26-28, 2014), https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/2014/expertmeeting-autonomous-weapons-icrc-report-2014-05-09.pdf
  37. Int'l Comm. of the Red Cross(2019).,未出版
  38. Int'l Comm. Red Cross, Treaties, States Parties and Commentaries, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/States.xsp? xp_viewStates=XPages_NORMStatesSign&xp_treatySelected=470 (last visited Jun. 17, 2020).
  39. Int'l Comm. Red Cross, Autonomy, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics: Technical Aspects of Human Control 15-16 (2019), https://www.icrc.org/en/document/autonomy-artificial-intelligence-and-robotics-technical-aspects-human-control.
  40. Int'l Comm. Red Cross, Ethics and Autonomous Weapons Systems: An Ethical Basis for Human Control? 22 (2018), https://www.icrc.org/en/document/ethics-and-autonomous-weapon-systems-ethical-basis-human-control.
  41. Int'l Comm. Red Cross(2006).A Guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977.INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF THE RED CROSS,88,931+934.
  42. INT'L COMM. RED CROSS(2016).INT'L COMM. RED CROSS, EXPERT MEETING: AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS, IMPLICATIONS OF INCREASING AUTONOMY IN THE CRITICAL FUNCTIONS OF WEAPONS 15 (2016)..
  43. Jensen, Eric Talbot(2020).Autonomy & Precautions in the Law of Armed Conflict.INT'L L. STUD.,96,577+595.
  44. Jevglevskaja, Natalia(2015).Legal Review of New Weapons: Origins of Article 36 AP I.FIN. Y.B. INT'L L.,2015-2016,109+126.
  45. Jevglevskaja, Natalia(2018).Weapons Review Obligation Under Customary Int'l Law.INT'L L. STUD.,94,186+192.
  46. Kraska, James(2021).Command Accountability for AI Weapon Systems in The Law of Armed Conflict.INT'L L. STUD.,97,407+424.
  47. Takeshi Kumon, The First Ai Conflict? Israel's Gaza Operation Gives Glimpse of Future, NIKKEI ASIA (Jun. 28, 2021 05:05), https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/The-first-AI-conflict-Israel-s-Gaza-operation-gives-glimpse-of-future.
  48. Robert H. Latiff & Patrick J. McCloskey, Opinion, With Drone Warfare, America Approaches the Robo-Ru-bicon, WALL ST. J. (Mar. 14, 2013, 7:37 PM), https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324128504578346333246145590
  49. Dustin A. Lewis et al., War Algorithm Accountability, HARV. LAW SCH. PROGRAM ON INT'L LAW AND ARMED CONFLICT 33 (2016), https://pilac.law.harvard.edu/waa.
  50. Leys, Nathan(2020).Autonomous Weapon Sys., Int'l Crises, & Anticipatory Self-Def..YALE J. INT'L L.,45,377+386.
  51. Liivoja, Rain(2016).Technological Change and the Evolution of the Law of War.INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF THE RED CROSS,97,1157+1168-1169.
  52. Tim Lister, Israel's Iron Dome Doesn't Chase Every Rocket It Sees, CNN (May 18, 2021), https://edition.cnn.com/2021/05/18/middleeast/israel-iron-dome-defense-gaza-rockets-intl-cmd/index.html.
  53. Marchant, Gary E.(2011).International Governance of Autonomous Military Robots.COLUM. SCI. & TECH. L. REV.,12,272+287.
  54. Martellini, Maurizio(ed.)(2020).21ST CENTURY PROMETHEUS: MANAGING CBRN SAFETY AND SECURITY AFFECTED BY CUTTING-EDGE TECHNOLOGIES.
  55. McDougall, Carrie(2019).Autonomous Weapon Sys. & Accountability: Putting the Cart Before the Horse.MELB. J. INT'L L.,20,58+87.
  56. PILLOUD, CLAUDE(1987).COMMENTARY ON THE ADDITIONAL PROTOCOLS OF 8 JUNE 1977 TO THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OF 12 AUGUST 1949.
  57. Jon Rabiroff, Machine Gun-Toting Robots Deployed on DMZ, STARS AND STRIPES (Jul. 12, 2010), https://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/korea/machine-gun-toting-robots-deployed-on-dmz-1.110809
  58. Richemond-Barak, Daphné,Feinberg, Ayal(2016).The Irony of the Iron Dome: Intelligent Def. Sys., Law, & Sec..HARV. NAT'L SEC. J.,7,469+494.
  59. Sassòli, Marco(2014).Autonomous Weapons and International Humanitarian Law: Advantages, Open Technical Questions and Legal Issues to Be Clarified.INT'L L. STUD.,90,308+324.
  60. Paul Scharre, Autonomy,“Killer Robots,”and Human Control in the Use of Force--Part I, JUST SECURITY (Jul. 9, 2014, 11:17 AM), https://www.justsecurity.org/12708/autonomy-killer-robots-human-control-force-part/
  61. Paul Scharre & Michael C. Horowitz, An Introduction to Autonomy in Weapon Systems 6 (Feb. 2015) (CNAS working paper), https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/Ethical-Autonomy-Working-Paper_021015_v02.pdf.
  62. Paul Scharre & Michael C. Horowitz, An Introduction to Autonomy in Weapon Systems, 12 CTR. FOR A NEW AM. SEC., WORKING PAPER NO. 021015 (2015), https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/files.cnas.org/documents/Ethical-Autonomy-Working-Paper_021015_v02.pdf? mtime=20160906082257&focal=none
  63. Schmitt, Michael N.(ed.)(2017).TALLINN MANUAL 2.0 ON THE INTERNATIONAL LAW APPLICABLE TO CYBER OPERATIONS.
  64. Schmitt, Michael N.,Thurnher, Jeffrey S.(2013).“Out of the Loop”: Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Law of Armed Conflict.HARV. NATL. SEC. J.,4,231+281.
  65. Shany, Yuval,Michaeli, Keren R.(2002).The Case Against Ariel Sharon: Revisiting the Doctrine of Command Responsibility.N.Y.U. J. INT'L L. & POL.,34,797+884-886.
  66. JAN VAN TOL et al, AIRSEA BATTLE: A POINT-OF-DEPARTURE OPERATIONAL CONCEPT, CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS 33-34 (2010), https://csbaonline.org/research/publications/airsea-battle-concept
  67. U.K. Ministry of Defence(2019).UK Terminology Supplement to NATOTerm 2.
  68. U.K. Ministry of Defence, Joint Concept Note 1/18: Human-Machine Teaming 57-58 (2018), https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/709359/20180517-concepts_uk_human_machine_teaming_jcn_1_18.pdf
  69. U.S. Department of Defense, Directive No. 3000.09: Autonomy in Weapon Systems 13-14 (2012), https://fas.org/irp/doddir/dod/d3000_09.pdf
  70. Alexander Velez-Green, The Foreign Policy Essay: The South Korean Sentry－A“Killer Robot”to Prevent War, LAWFARE (Mar.1, 2015, 10:00 AM), https://www.lawfareblog.com/foreign-policy-essay-south-korean-sentry%E2%80%94-killer-robot-prevent-war.
  71. Vestner, Tobias,Rossi, Altea(2021).Legal Reviews of War Algorithms.INT'L L. STUD.,97,509+521.
  72. Walsh, James Lgoe(2015).Political Accountability and Autonomous Weapons.RES. & POL., OCT.-DEC.,2,2-3.
  73. 黃居正(2013).判例國際公法I.自版.
print cancel