性別暴力再犯風險評估及管理之演變與展望

Evolution and Prospect of Gender-based Violence Recidivism Risk Assessment and Management

黃翠紋(Huang, Tsui-Wen)

性別暴力 ； 風險評估 ； 靜態風險因素 ； 動態風險因素 ； Gender-based Violence ； Risk Assessment ； Static Risk Factors ； Dynamic Risk Factors

軍法專刊

68卷5期（2022 / 10 / 01）

22 - 49

繁體中文

性別暴力案件常因犯罪者與被害者多為認識關係，甚至具有親密或家屬關係，或是犯罪者的人格特質等因素影響，暴力行為具有持續發生的特性，嚴重者，甚至危害被害者生命安全。為防止犯罪者再犯行為，暴力風險評估逐漸受到關注。有關暴力風險評估的起源，可以追溯自1970年代末期，至今已有許多工具被驗證能對性別暴力行為具有可接受的預測效果。然而迄今尚無任何一個工具可以完全預測犯罪者的暴力行為，因此各國接續開發性別暴力風險管理方案。在我國於各個性別暴力防治法規實施後，為強化法律施行效益乃仿效西方先進國家，接續推動性侵害與家庭暴力風險評估及管理方案。然而目前除各項方案實施效果仍有待持續提升外，有關性別暴力再犯風險評估及管理之相關文獻更是欠缺系統化的探討，實有必要填補相關文獻之不足。因此，本文乃從暴力風險評估之沿革出發，介紹風險評估的四個世代演變及特色，接續介紹性別暴力案件風險管理步驟與相關方案，除介紹國外目前在性侵害與親密關係暴力之重要方案，亦將簡略說明我國目前的實施狀況。此外，目前性別暴力風險評估與管理有一些重要議題與侷限性，是吾人在探討性別暴力風險評估與管理議題時，需具備的基本概念，因此在本文第四個部分將針對這個部分進行說明。

Gender-based violence cases are often influenced by factors such as the perpetrator and the victim who have an acquaintance or even an intimate relationship, or the perpetrator's personality traits. This violence has the characteristics of continuous occurrence, and in severe cases, it even endangers the safety of the victim's life. In order to prevent offenders from recidivism, violence risk assessment is gaining increasing attention. The origins of violence risk assessment can be traced back to the late 1970s. To date, many tools have been validated to have acceptable predictive effects on gender-based violence. However, no single tool can fully predict the violence of perpetrators, so many countries continue to develop gender-based violence risk management programs. Since the implementation of various gender-based violence prevention laws, Taiwan has followed the example of advanced Western countries to promote sexual assault and domestic violence risk assessment and management programs. However, little literature provides a complete and systematic introduction to the evolution of gender-based violence recidivism risk assessment and management, as well as the special attention should be paid to risk assessment. In order to make up for the insufficiency of relevant literature, let relevant personnel recognize the importance of risk assessment and management in gender-based violence recidivism prevention, so as to improve the research and practice effectiveness in this field. This article will start from the evolution of violence risk assessment, introduce the evolution and characteristics of the four generations of risk assessment, and then introduce the risk management steps and related plans for gender-based violence cases. In addition to introducing important programs on sexual assault and intimate relationship violence in foreign countries, it will also briefly explain the current implementation situation in Taiwan. In addition, gender-based violence risk assessment and management are still under continuous development and improvement. There are some important issues and limitations in this field, which are the basic concepts that we need to have when discussing this issue. This article will also discuss this part.

1. Alexander, E. F.,Backes, B. L.,Johnson, M. D.(2021).Evaluating measures of intimate partner violence using consensus-based standards of validity.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,1-19.
2. Andrews, D. A.,Bonta, J.,Wormith, J. S.(2006).The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment.Crime and Delinquency,52,7-8.
3. Baldwin, K.(2017).Sex offender risk assessment.Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative
4. Clarke, M.,Brown, S.,Vollm, B.(2017).Circles of support and accountability for sex offenders: A systematic review of outcomes.Sexual Abuse,29(5),446-478.
5. Coid, J. W.,Ullrich, S.,Kallis, C.,Freestone, M.,Gonzalez, R.(2016).Improving Risk Management for Violence in Mental Health Services: A Multimethods Approach.Programme Grants for Applied Research,2+235+255+279.
6. Cooke, D.J.,Michie, C.(2013).Violence risk assessment: form predicting to understanding-or from what? To why?.Managing Clinical Risk a Guide to Effective Practice,New York:
7. Council of State Governments=CSG(2015).,未出版
8. Coupland, S. H.(2018).British Columbia, Canada,Simon Fraser University.
9. Davies, J.(2011).Davies, J.(2011). Advocacy and Safety Planning for VictimsIn Contact.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, pp.5-6.
10. Davies, J.,Menard, A.,Davis, L.(2011).Davies, J., Menard, A. & Davis, L. (2011).Helping Battered Women in Contact With Current or Former Partners: A Guide for Domestic Violence Advocates. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, p8..
11. Douglas, K. S.(2019).Evaluating and managing risk for violence using structured professional judgment.The Wiley International Handbook of Correctional Psychology,Hoboken, NJ:
12. Douglas, K. S.,Skeem, J. L.(2015).Violence risk assessment Getting specific about being dynamic.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,11(3),348-351.
13. Farrington, D. P.,Ttofi, M. M.,Piquero, A. R.(2016).Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development.Journal of Criminal Justice,45,63-64+69.
14. Friendship, C.,Mann, R. E.,Beech, A. R.(2003).Evaluation of a National Prison-based Treatment Program for Sexual Offenders in England and Wales.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,18(7),754-754.
15. Grove, W.M.(2005).Clinical versus statistical prediction: The contribution of Paul E. Meehl.Journal of Clinical Psychology,61,1233-1237.
16. Hanson, R. K.,Howard, P.(2010).Individual confidence intervals do not inform decision-makers about the accuracy of risk assessment evaluations.Law and Human Behavior,34,275-277.
17. Hanvey, S.(2011).But does it work? Evaluation and evidence.A Community-Based Approach to the Reduction of Sexual Reoffending: Circles of Support and Accountability,London, England:
18. Helmus, L. M.,Quinsey, V. L.(2020).Predicting violent reoffending with the VRAG-R: Overview, controversies, and future directions for actuarial risk scales.The Wiley Handbook of What Works in Violence Risk Management: Theory, Research and Practic,Hoboken, NJ:
19. Hogan, N. R.(2021).Critical considerations in the development and interpretation of common risk language.Psychiatry, Psychology and Law,28(2),218-219.
20. Janus, E.S.,Meehl, P.E.(1997).Assessing the legal standard for predictions of dangerousness in sex offender commitment proceedings.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,3(1),33-64.
21. Jones, L.(2020).Violence risk formation the move towards collaboratively: Produced, strengths-based safety planning.The Wiley Handbook of What Works in Violenc Risk Management: Theory, Research and Practice,Hoboken, NJ:
22. Kazemian, L.(2015).,New York, NY:Research & Evaluation Center, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York.
23. Kingston, D. A.,Yates, P. M.,Firestone, P.,Babchishin, K. M.,Bradford, J. M.(2008).Long-term predictive ability of the Risk Matrix 2000: A comparison with the Static-99 and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide.Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment,20,466-467.
24. Kroner, D. G.,Mills, J. F.,Reddon, J. R.(2005).A coffee can, factor analysis, and prediction of antisocial behavior: The structure of criminal risk.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry,28,372.
25. Lobanov-Rostovsky, C.(2017).Sex offender management strategies.Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative
26. Logan, C.(2016).Risk formulation: The new frontier in risk assessment and management.Treatment of Sex Offenders,Switzerland:
27. Losel, F.,Farrington, D.P.(2012).Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence.American Journal of Preventive Medicine,43,s8.
28. Maden, T.,Tyrer, P.(2003).Dangerous and severe personality disorders: A new personality concept from the United Kingdom.Journal of Personality Disorders,17,489-492.
29. Monahan, J.(1984).The prediction of violent behavior: toward a second generation of theory and policy.American Journal of Psychiatry,141,10-12.
30. Nicholls, T. L.,Pritchard, M. M.,Reeves, K. A.,Hilterman, E.(2013).Risk assessment in intimate partner violence: A systematic review of contemporary approaches.Partner Abuse,4(1),77-81.
31. Ogloff, J. R.P.,Davis, M.R.(2020).From predicting dangerousness to assessing and managing risk for violence: A journey across four generations.The Wiley Handbook of What Works in Violence Risk Management: Theory, Research and Practice,Hoboken, NJ:
32. Olver, M.,Wong, S. C. P.(2009).Therapeutic responses of psychopathic sexual offenders: Treatment attrition, therapeutic change, and long-term recidivism.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,77,333-334.
33. Pence, E.,Shepard, M.(1999).An introduction: Developing a coordinated community response.Coordinating community responses to domestic violence,CA:
34. Satinsky, S.,Harris, L.,Farhang, L.,Alexander, G.(2016).Excessive Revocations in Wisconsin: The Health Impacts of Locking People Up without a New Conviction.Oakland, CA:Human Impact Partners.
35. Skeem, J. L.,Monahan, J.(2011).Current directions in violence risk assessment.Current Directions in Psychological Science,20(1),38-41.
36. Trevethan, R.(2017).Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice.Frontiers in Public Health,5,2-4.
37. Ttofi, M. M.,Farrington, D. P.,Piquero, A. R.,Lösel, F.,DeLisi, M.,Murray, J.(2016).Intelligence as a protective factor against offending: A meta-analytic review of prospective longitudinal studies.Journal of Criminal Justice,45,4-5.
38. U.S. Department of Justice(2020).An Overview of Offender Reentry.Washington, DC:National Institute of Justice.
39. Victorian State Government(2020).Victorian State Government (2020). Family Violence Multi Agency Risk Assessment and Management Framework: Practice Guides. Australia, Family Safety Victoria, pp.14-15..
40. Wilson, R.J.,Cortoni, F.,McWhinnie, A.(2009).Circles of Support & Accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings.Sexual Abuse,21(4),125+412.
41. Wong, S. C. P.,Gordon, A.(2006).The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale: A treatment-friendly violence risk assessment tool.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,12,288.
42. Yang, M.,Wong, S. C. P.,Coid, J.(2010).The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools.Psychological Bulletin,136(5),740-742+759+761-762.
43. 黃翠紋(2013).婦幼安全政策分析.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
44. 黃翠紋（編）(2019).性別平權與警察實務.中央警察大學出版社.
45. 黃翠紋,斯儀仙(2018)。性侵犯類型學及其處遇措施之研究。警政論叢，18，21+23。