少年修復式司法操作模式之研究

A Study for Practice Model of Restorative Justice in Juvenile

李瑞典(Li, Jui-Tien)

修復式司法 ； 少年事件 ； 人性尊嚴 ； 少年最佳利益 ； 衝突調解模式 ； Restorative Justice ； Juvenile Justice ； Human Dignity ； Juvenile's Best Interest ； Conflict Mediation

軍法專刊

68卷6期（2022 / 12 / 01）

149 - 184

繁體中文;英文

修復式司法雖存在各種不同的觀點及不同模式，然其包容及人性化的特點，已被概念化為社會正義理論及人性尊嚴的實踐。由於它為受害者及罪犯提供了一種處理犯罪的正向積極手段，所以國際性組織一再鼓勵使用，許多國家也透過立法推展，但是，由於人們缺乏認識及司法人員的態度等問題，造成刑事案件運用數量上的不成比例。我國雖已推展十年，且已將「修復」入法，亦面臨同樣的問題。本文以少年事件之修復經驗，參考外國文獻，提出系統性操作模式，透過實證研究證明該模式之有效性，期喚起國人對於修復式司法的認識及信任，並增強司法人員對其信心，更重要的是，幫助少年健全自我成長，矯治其性格。本文之實證部分係以臺北地方法院依「試辦方案」轉介修復之少年事件為樣本，進行相關問卷及訪談。研究發現，案採衝突調解模式，整個流程在後續追蹤的問卷及訪談的資料顯示正向評價，因此建議對於少年事件之修復式司法可以採此模式進行。

There are multiple viewpoints and different process models of restorative justice. Its tolerance and humanization have been conceptualized as an implementation of social justice theory and human dignity. It provides a positive and active approach for the victims and the inmates to confront the crimes. Therefore, international organizations proactively encourage countries to use it, and many countries even have enforced this concept through legislation. Although implemented restorative justice has been for a decade and has been legislated already in our country, because of people's lack of understanding and the negative attitude of relative judicial personnel, its utilization toward criminal cases appears disproportionately. This study attempts to propose a systematic practice model based on the restorative practice experience of juvenile criminal cases and prove the effectiveness of the practice model through empirical research. Hopefully, it can arouse people's understanding and trust in restorative justice, enhance the judicial personnel's confidence, more importantly, help the juvenile inmates comprehensively develop their self-growth and correct their character. This study's empirical evidence is based on juvenile incident referrals from Taipei District Court and conducts questionnaires and interviews. The study found that we adopted the conflict mediation model in the case and the follow-up data showed positive evaluation. It suggests that restorative justice can carry out this model for juvenile incidents.

1. 李瑞典,陳祥美(2021)。修復式司法對於親子關係影響之研究－以少年事件為中心。軍法專刊，67(6)，94。
   連結：
2. 李瑞典,陳祥美(2021)。我國少年事件運用修復式正義之研究。國立中正大學法學集刊，71，68-71。
   連結：
3. 柴漢熙,陳祥美,蔣大偉,李瑞典(2018)。修復式正義工作模式之研究－以衝突調解模式為中心。軍法專刊，64(4)，83。
   連結：
4. 鄭學鴻,李瑞典(2022)。性暴力案件運用修復式正義之研究－紐澳經驗。臺北大學法學論叢，123，204-206。
   連結：
5. 總統府司法改革國是會議，〈file:///E:/Download/8ca89cf6-00e2-4c35-9fe3d6e54bb90e89%20（1）.pdf〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 8 月 10 日。
6. 司法院秘書長 107 年 2 月 23 日秘台廳少家一字第 1070005340 號函
7. 鄉鎮市調解條例第 21 條第 1 項規定、第 22 條第 1 項規定
8. THE CHILDREN, YOUNG PERSONS, AND THEIR FAMILIES ACT 1989. art.245: Duties of youth justice co-ordinator. http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1989/0024/65.0/DLM147088.html (last visited Jan. 31, 2021).
9. 「少年事件處理法」第 29 條第 3 項規定
10. 聯合國兒童權利公約及兒童委員會一般性意見參考衛生福利部網站，〈https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/crc_front/index.php? action=content&uuid=5344af55-d148-4dd6-946a-412af8f41afc〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 9 月 3 日。
11. 司法院秘書長107 年 3 月 19 日秘台廳少家一字第 1070007525 號函參照。
12. Accreditation and Specialist Endorsements: A guide to the accreditation system and assessment, Restorative Justice Resolution Institute Accreditatio, 11-16. https://www.resolution.institute/documents/item/1958.
13. The Restorative Service Quality Mark, restorativejustice.org.uk/restorative-service-quality-mark.(last visited Jan. 31, 2022)
14. The International Institute for Restorative Practices (IIRP) Graduate School. https://www.iirp.edu/defining-restorative/supporting-framework(last visited Dec. 15, 2021).
15. 法務部，〈https://www.moj.gov.tw/2204/2205/2323/2354/2388/2402/2403/9081/post〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 5 月 10 日。
16. 立法院第 9 屆第 7 會期第 16 次會議議案關係文書，頁 193、194。
17. Bailie, J. W.(2012).Lesley University.
18. Bailie, John W.(2018).A Science of Human Dignity: Belonging, Voice and Agency as Universal Human Needs.International Institute for Restorative Practices (IIRP) Conference:“Strengthening the Spirit of Community”
19. Blagg, Harry(2010).Reparation and Justice for Juveniles-The Corby experience.Restorative Justice: Critical Concepts in Criminology, Volume II
20. Bolívar, Daniela,Aertsen, Ivo,Vanfraechem, Inge(2015).Victims and Restorative Justice: An Empirical Study of the Needs, Experience and Position of the Victim Within Restorative Justice Practices.
21. Braithwaite, John(2014).RegNet Working PaperRegNet Working Paper,School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet).
22. Council of Europe, Draft Recommendation CM/Rec（2018）XX of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning Restorative Justice in Criminal Matters and its Explanatory Report, 2, https://rm.coe.int/draftrecommendation-cm-rec-2018-xx-concerning-restorative-justice-oct/168075f921(last visited Jan. 11, 2022).
23. Daly, Kathleen(2002).Restorative Justice: The Real Story.Punishment & Society,4(1),55+66-67.
24. Daly, Kathleen,謝如媛（譯）(2018)。少年修復式司法的批判性考察－從少年的最佳利益到利益平衡。政大法學評論，152，129。
25. IIRP, Defining Restorative,6, from https://www.iirp.edu/defining-restorative/supporting-framework.(last visited Jan. 31, 2022).
26. Johnstone, Gerry(ed.),Van Ness, Daniel W.(ed.)(2007).HANDBOOK OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE.
27. Laxminarayan, Malini(2014).Accessibility and Initiation of Restorative Justice.European Forum for Restorative Justice
28. Maxwell, Gabrielle(2014).,Ministry of Social Development.
29. Maxwell, Gabrielle,Morris, Allison(2010).Youth Justice in New Zealand Restrative Justice in Practice ?.RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: CRITICAL CONCEPTS IN CRIMINOLOGY, Volume Ⅱ
30. McCold, P.,Wachtel, T.(2003).In pursuit of paradigm: A theory of restorative justice.XIII World Congress of Criminology,Rio de Janeiro, Brazil:
31. McCold, P.,Wachtel, T.(2001).Restorative justice in everyday life.RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AND CIVIL SOCIETY
32. Nathanson, D.(1998).From empathy to community.First North American Conference on Conferencing,Minneapolis, MN, USA:
33. Resolution Institute (2019), Accreditation and Specialist Endorsements: A guide to the accreditation system and accreditation assessment, 3. New Zealand: Resolution Institute and PACT: www.resolution.institute/documents/item/1958. (last visited Jan. 31, 2022)
34. Restorative Justice Council, RJC Trainer Handbook, 8(2016). https://restorativejustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/files/Trainers%20Handbook_0.pdf. (last visited Jan. 31, 2022).
35. Shapland, J.,Atkinson, A.,Colledge, E.,Dignan, J.,Howes, M.,Johnstone, J.,Pennant, R.,Robinson, G.,Sorsby, A.(2004).Implementing Restorative Justice Schemes (Crime Reduction Programme): A Report on the First Year, Home Office Online Report.London:Home Office.
36. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime=UNODC(2020).Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes.
37. Van Ness, D. W., Restorative Justice as World View, 2, https://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/research/programmes/restorativeapproaches/seminartwo/DanielWVanNess.pdf(last visited Jan. 21, 2021).
38. 王炳煌(2017)。中央警察大學犯罪防治研究所。
39. 法務部，《法務部統計年報》（106），頁 18，〈https://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/RJSDWeb/book/Book_Detail.aspx? book_id=299〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 1 月 31 日。
40. 柴漢熙,蔣大偉,陳祥美(2020).衝突後的關係重建－修復式正義.羅德教育文化事業有限公司.
41. 許福生(2018).犯罪學與犯罪預防.元照出版有限公司.
42. 楊士隆(2013).犯罪心理學.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
43. 蔡德輝,楊士隆(2010).少年犯罪－理論與實務.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
44. 鄭學鴻,洪俊瑋,李瑞典(2022)。修復式正義運用於少年輔導委員會案件之研究。少輔會的政策何去何從?迴盪在犯罪預防與審前轉向的迷失中，2022 年秋季論壇會議手冊
45. 盧鐵榮,黃成榮(2009).香港的復和司法在少年司法制度中的應用、發展與限制.香港城市大學出版社.

1. (2023)。臺灣校園修復式正義教育政策之研究。教育理論與實踐學刊，48，1-26。