以貿易協定保護個人勞動條件的方式演變與未來的發展

The Changes and Developments Through the Trade Agreements to Protect Individual Labor Conditions

周怡(Chou, Yi)

貿易相關措施 ； 勞工條款 ； 合作安排 ； 爭端解決機制 ； 漁業補貼協議 ； Trade-Related Measure ； Labor Standard Provisions ； Cooperation Arrangement ； Dispute Settlement ； Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies

軍法專刊

69卷1期（2023 / 02 / 01）

102 - 126

繁體中文;英文

貨品完成必有個人勞動的因素，有國家為達保護個人勞動權益的目的，常擴張解釋貿易協定，作為改變貿易夥伴國內勞工法制與政策之工具，但此舉常引發單邊貿易保護主義的批評。有文獻為解決前述問題，嘗試在組織功能的框架下，建議貿易組織預先明示解釋條款的方向，或跨組織合作提升勞工標準的法律主張，以免非議。但世界貿易組織基於傳統見解認為，即使貿易過程或產品與勞工有事實關聯性，也不能改變勞工權益保障屬於國際勞工組織的權限，並以部長級會議宣言終結爭議。此舉除影響有關國家在雙邊或多邊貿易協定的實踐方式，也影響多邊貿易規則形成過程。本研究試從擴張解釋貿易協定，貿易組織的改革與合作，國際實踐進行探討其法律主張，歸納國際實踐模式與提出結論。

Labor is an indispensable element of products. For the special purposes, a lot of States sometimes expand the literally meaning of legal term that special clause used in trade agreement as a tool to promote the domestic social values to trade-partners. It often leads to criticism of unilateral trade protectionism. To respond this scenarios, some scholars suggested WTO might officially declare the particular textual meanings or cooperate with ILO to deal with the cross-sectors disputes to refrain the argument lasting. Base on the traditional and conservative legal grounds, the WTO Singapore and Doha Ministerial Declarations affirmed among other things, that the ILO was the competent body to set and deal with international labor standards and terminated the academic arguments. As the research presented by ILO, it becomes a trend towards using particular labor provisions to promote social sustainability in labor standards, with legally enforceable commitments such as bilateral or multilateral trade agreements. This approach also demonstrated in the trade rules negotiation. This study tries analyzing the legal grounds, summarize international practice patterns and draw conclusions.

1. 吳育仁(2004)。以國際勞動基準作為國際貿易的「遊戲基礎」？ : 爭辯與行動。中山管理評論，12(4)，729-738。
   連結：
2. ILO 憲章第 31 條至第 34 條
3. 馬拉喀什協定第 9 條
4. 聯合國憲章第 33 條第 1 項
5. (2022).Implementing the WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies.World Trade Organization.
6. 「跨太平洋夥伴全面進步協定 」（Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, CPTPP）第 19.3.2 條、第 19.8. 條、第 19.8.2 條 - 第 19.8.6 條、第 19.2.2 條與第 19.4 條、第 19.15.3 條、第 19.4 條、第 19.5 條、第 19.7 條、第 19.9 條、第 19.13 條、第 19.10 條 3 項、 19.12 條、第 19.15.13 條、第 19.15.12 條、第 19.11 條、第 19.15.14 條、第 19.11.8 條 B 款、第 19.15.8 條、第 19.15.10 條、第 28.4 條
7. 21 世紀議程第 2.3 項 (A)。
8. 原文參見〈https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/havana_e.pdf〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 6 月 3 日。
9. Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, ICJ Rep. 1949, 174 at 182.
10. AGREEMENT ON FISHERIES SUBSIDIES, WT/MIN(22)/33˙WT/L/1144, 22 June 2022.
11. 行政院經濟部國際貿易局WTO 入口網，〈https://www.trade.gov.tw/cwto/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=419&pid=311340&dl_DateRange=all&txt_SD=&txt_ED=&txt_Keyword=&Pageid=0〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 12 月 22 日。
12. 1977 年托雷莫利諾斯國際漁船安全公約 （Torremolinos International Convention for the Safety of Fishing Vessels, SFV）
13. ENHANCING TRADE AND INVESTMENT, SUPPORTING JOBS, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: OUTLINES OF THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/tpp/pdfs/tpp01_07e.pdf (last visited on 4 June 2022).
14. 「國際法院規約」第 26 條、第 34 條、第 65條
15. IMO 爾後陸續制定 1995年漁船人員培訓、認證和值班標準國際公約 （International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Fishing Vessel Personnel, STCW-F）
16. 「維也納條約法公約」第 2 條、第 30 條第 4 項。
17. SUMMARY OF THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, available at: https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2015/october/summary-trans-pacific-partnership (last visited on 4 June 2022).
18. 1969 年「維也納條約法公約」第 31 條與第 32 條。
19. 2012 年關於執行 1993 年與托雷莫利諾斯國際漁船安全公約有關的開普敦議定書 （Cape Town Protocol ）
20. Alben, Elissa(2001).GATT and the Fair Wage: A Historical Perspective on the Labor-Trade Link.Columbia Law Review,101,1430.
21. Alston, Philip(2002).Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann.European Journal of International Law,13(4),836+843.
22. Alvaro Santos, The Lessons of TPP and the Future of Labor Chapters in Trade Agreements, p.7, available at： https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/2093 (last visited on 4 June 2022).
23. Bal, Salman(2001).International Free Trade Agreements and Human Rights: Reinterpreting Article XX of GATT.Minnesota Journal of Global Trade,10,63+66.
24. Brown, Drusilla K.,Deardorff, Alan V.(2004).Pros and Cons of Linking Trade and Labor Standards.The Political Economy of Policy Reform: Essays in Honor of J. Michael Finger
25. Cottier, Thomas(2002).Trade and Human Rights: a relationship to Discover.Journal of International Economic Law,5,112.
26. Ehrenberg, Daniel S.(1996).From Intention to Action: An ILO/WTO Enforcement Regime for International Labor Rights.Human Rights, Labor Rights, and International Trade,Philadelphia:
27. Eres, Tatjana(2004).The Limits of GATT Article XX: A Back Door for Human Rights?.Georgetown Journal of International Law,35(3),605+607.
28. FAO，1995 年責任漁業行為守則（Code of conduct for responsible fisheries）第 8.1.5 條、第 8.2.5 條
29. Francioni, Francesco(ed.)(2001).Environmental, Human Rights and International Trade.Hart Publishing.
30. Gardiner, Richard K.(2008).Treaty Interpretation.Oxford Press.
31. Harrison, James(2019).The Labour Rights Agenda in Free Trade Agreements.Journal of World Investment & Trade,20,707+713+716.
32. Harrison, James(2007).The Human Rights Impact of the World Trade Organization.Oxford Press.
33. ILO(2016).Labour provisions in G7 trade agreements: A Comparative perspective.Geneva:International Labour Office.
34. Kolben, Kevin(2010).A Development Approach to Trade and Labor Regimes.Wake Forest,45,356-357.
35. Kolben, Kevin(2017).A New Model for Trade and Labor? The Trans-Pacific Partnership's Labor Chapter and Beyond.International Law and Politics,49,1096.
36. Karen McVeigh, First WTO deal on fishing subsidies hailed as historic despite 'big holes', Tue 21 Jun 2022, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/21/first-wto-deal-on-fishing-subsidies-hailed-as-historic-despite-big-holes
37. Nadakavukaren Schefer, Krista(2010).Social Regulation in the WTO.Edward Elgar Publishing.
38. OECD, "International trade and core labour standards", OECD Policy Brief, October 2000. Available online at: https://bit.ly/2WR3ZoJ (last visited on 4 June 2022).
39. Pauwelyn, Joost(2001).The Roles Public Law in the WTO：How Far Can We Go ？.American Journal International Law,95,566.
40. Peel, Jacquline(2011).Science and Risk Regulation in International Law.Cambridge Press.
41. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich(2004).The 'Human Rights Approach' Advocated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and by the International Labour Organization: Is It Relevant for WTO Law and Policy?.Journal of International Economic Law,7,608.
42. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich(2002).Time for a United Nations 'Global Compact' for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration.European Journal of International Law,13,622.
43. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich(2000).The WTO Constitution and Human Rights.Journal of International Economic Law,3(1),19.
44. Powell, Stephen J.(2004).The Place of Human Rights Law in World Trade Organization Rules.Florida Journal of International Law,16,221-223.
45. Ruffert, Matthias,Walter, Christian(2015).Institutionalised International Law.Germany:C. H. Beck.
46. Schermers, Henry G.,Blokker, Niels M.(1995).International Institutional Law：Unity within Diversity.Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
47. Stirling, Patricia(1996).The Use of Trade Sanctions as an Enforcement Mechanism for Basic Human Rights: A Proposal for Addition to the World Trade Organization.American University International Law Review,11,40-42.
48. Sumaila, U. R.,Zeller, D.,Hood, L.,Palomares, M. L. D.,Li, Y.,Pauly, D.(9202).Illicit trade in marine fish catch and its effects on ecosystems and people worldwide.Science Advances,6(9),eaaz3801.
49. Vazquez, Carlos Manual(2003).Trade sanctions and Human Rights- Past, Present, and Future.Journal of International Economic,6,801.
50. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1996. Singapore Ministerial Declaration, No. WT/MIN(96)/DEC, 18 December. Available online at: https://bit.ly/2KXco37. (last visited on 4 June 2022).
51. World Trade Organization (WTO).2001. Ministerial Declaration, No. WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1, 20 November. Available online at: https://bit.ly/2Kr7VpZ. (last visited on 4 June 2022).
52. Young, Margaret A.(2009).Fragmentation or Interaction: The WTO, Fisheries Subsidies and International Law.World Trade Review,8(4),477-515.
53. Young,, Margaret A.(2009).Fragmentation or Interaction: The WTO, Fisheries Subsidies and International Law.World Trade Review,8(4),477-515.
54. Zagel, Gudrun(2004).The WTO and Trade-Related Human Rights Measures: Trade Sanctions Vs. Trade Incentives.Austrian Review of International and European Law,9,135.
55. 中華經濟研究院 WTO 與 RTA 研究中心，〈爭端解決議題之簡介〉，〈https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Node.aspx?id=340〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 12月 22 日。
56. 行政院勞工委員會，《國際勞工公約》，2000 年 6 月，〈https://www.mol.gov.tw/1607/28162/28600/28614/28616/28620/lpsimplelist〉，頁 853。I
57. 呂理祺(2002)。國立政治大學勞工研究所。
58. 周怡(2016)。國立臺灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學學系。
59. 段奇琬(2011)。交通大學科技法律研究所。
60. 國際勞工局(2005)。漁業部門的工作條件。國際勞工大會第 92 屆會議
61. 經濟部國際貿易局，〈世界貿易組織（WTO）會員〉，2011 年 7 月 31 日，〈https://www.trade.gov.tw/cwto/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=338&pid=312541〉。