题名

線上紛爭處理制度（ODR）之研究－以司法型線上紛爭處理為核心

并列篇名

Online Dispute Resolution: Focusing on Judicial Online Dispute Resolution

作者

林靖庭(Lin,Jing-Ting)

关键词

訴訟外紛爭處理 ； 線上紛爭處理 ； 線上調解 ； Alternative Dispute Resolution ； Online Dispute Resolution(ODR) ； Online Mediation

期刊名称

軍法專刊

卷期/出版年月

69卷1期（2023 / 02 / 01）

页次

127 - 159

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

在數位科技蓬勃發展之下，人民對於科技之使用和紛爭處理型態也隨之改變。此外，面對嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎（COVID）之衝擊，為配合公共衛生之需要，亦必須發展出得以簡速、遠距處理紛爭之方式。本文將針對民事之訴訟外線上紛爭處理制度，作為討論之核心。首先介紹線上紛爭處理制度之定義、分類，並比較線上紛爭處理制度（ODR）發展有成的澳洲維多利亞省法院及加拿大哥倫比亞省民事審判處理庭。本文認為我國具有設置司法型ODR之必要性，使紛爭可以更簡易、迅速地解決。ODR之程序設計應以人為本，並得採取多階段之紛爭處理模式，使當事人具有以合意解決紛爭之機會。最後，應賦予當事人程序保障，其對於程序開啟、程序進行及事後救濟，不得因線上化而減損，始能增進當事人利用司法制度之可近性及效率。
英文摘要

With the rapid development of digital technology, the practice of dispute resolution faces the changing circumstances of digital society.Under the impact of COVID pandemic, spurs the need to develop a simple,expeditious and remote dispute resolution. This article focuses on civil online dispute resolution (hereinafter"ODR").This article shows the meaning and types of ODR and introduces the experiences of Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Australia) and British Columbia’s Civil Resolution Tribunal (Canada),whose ODR systems have been well established. This article demonstrates the necessity for Taiwan to establish online dispute resolution, so that disputes can be resolved conveniently and expeditiously. The design of ODR platform should be human-centered and multi-tier dispute resolution and allowing the parties to have opportunities to resolve disputes by consensus before litigation. Finally, under the premise to safeguard the due process, the right to procedural disposition for the proceeding of initiation, conduct and relief, how should online dispute resolution be built, ultimately improving the accessibility and efficiency of the judicial system.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
社會科學 > 軍事學
参考文献
  1. 李淑如(2019)。消費者線上紛爭解決（ODR）機制－以歐盟與德國之ODR法制為啟示。高大法學論叢，15(1)，146-147。
    連結：
  2. 沈冠伶(2015)。2014 年民事訴訟法裁判回顧：程序選擇權、非機構仲裁與國際審判管轄合意。台大法學論叢，44(特刊)，1474-1475。
    連結：
  3. 沈冠伶(2017)。2016 年民事訴訟法裁判回顧：訴訟權保障之具體實踐。台大法學論叢，46(特刊)，1427-1428。
    連結：
  4. Google Meet: https://support.google.com/meet/answer/9308681? hl=zh-Hant （ 最後瀏覽日：2022.05.11）
  5. 商業事件審理法第 14 條
  6. 『嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎援助、救濟及經濟安全法』（Coronavirus Aid,Relief, and Economic Security Act）
  7. 我國公務機關經常使用之 U Meeting: https://u.cyberlink.com/products/umeeting
  8. 官方網站 :https://civilresolutionbc.ca/，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 5 月 1 日。
  9. CRT Act, ss 68, ss 2. 原CRT 法 56.5 條可以參見：https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/consol30/consol30/12025_01#section56.5(last visited: 2022.05.01)
  10. Cisco Webex:https://www.webex.com/zh-tw/index.html
  11. REGULATION (EU) No 524/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL(2013), available at http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/524/oj(last visited: 2022.05.01).
  12. 『嚴重特殊傳染性肺炎傳染病法』（Coronavirus Act 2020）
  13. Cisco Webex: https://help.webex.com/zh-tw/article/jfgavq/Webex-%7C-%E5%9C%A8%E9%9B%BB%E8%85%A6%E4%B8%8A%E9%8C%84%E8%A3%BD%E6%9C%83%E8%AD%B0 等（最後瀏覽日：2022 年 5 月 11 日）。
  14. (2018).Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Annual Report 2018-2019, at 23-24..
  15. Google Meet: https://support.google.com/meet#topic=7306097
  16. 傳染病流行疫情嚴重期間司法程序特別條例第 1 條立法理由。
  17. Civil Resolution Tribunal, 2020/2021 Annual Report, at 14, available at https://civilresolutionbc.ca/2020-2021-annual-report/.
  18. Consumer Affairs Victoria, What is an owners corporation, available at https://www.consumer.vic.gov.au/housing/owners-corporations/buying-into-an-owners-corporation/what-is-an-owners-corporation (last visited:2022.05.01).
  19. European Committee on Legal Co-operation (CDCJ),Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on online dispute resolution mechanisms in civil and administrative court proceedings-Explanatory Memorandum(2021), available at https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=0900001680a2cf97(last visited: 2022.05.01).
  20. Kamphorst, Anne(2019).The Right to a Fair Trial in Online Consumer Dispute Resolution.J. EUR. C ONSUMER & MKT. L.,8,179-180.
  21. Koh, Harold Hongju(2021).The "Gants Principles" for Online Dispute Resolution: Realizing the Chief Justice's Vision for Courts in the Cloud.B.C. L. REV.,62,2787-2794.
  22. Rainey, Daniel(ed.),Katsh, Ethan(ed.)(2021).ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: THEORY AND PRACTICE.
  23. Salter, Shannon(2017).Online Dispute Resolution and Justice System Integration: British Columbia's Civil Resolution Tribunal.WINDSOR Y.B. ACCESS JUST.,34,120.
  24. Salter, Shannon,Thompson, Darin(2016).Public-Centered Civil Justice Redesign: A Case Study of the British Columbia Civil Resolution Tribunal.MCGILL J. DISP. RESOL.,3,115-117+120.
  25. Supreme Court of Victoria, Electronic Court Books for Virtual Courtrooms, available at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/law-and-practice/virtual-hearings/electronic-court-books-for-virtual-courtrooms (last visited:2022.05.01).
  26. Supreme Court of Victoria, Guidance for Civil Proceedings Affected by Coronavirus, available athttps://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/news/guidance-for-civil-proceedings-affected-by-coronavirus (last visited:2022.05.01).
  27. Supreme Court of Victoria, Easing of Restrictions: Message from the Chief Justice, available at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/news/easing-of-restrictions-message-from-the-chief-justice (last visited: 2022.05.01).
  28. Supreme Court of Victoria, About Virtual Hearing, available at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/law-andpractice/virtual-hearings(last visited: 2022.05.01).
  29. Supreme Court of Victoria, Accessing Virtual Hearing, available at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/news/accessing-virtual-hearings (last visited: 2022.05.01). 此處並未說明如何給予協助，但合理推測應該是給予會議連結。
  30. Supreme Court of Victoria, Daily Hearing List, available at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/daily-hearing-list (last visited: 2022.05.01).
  31. Supreme Court of Vitoria, Covid-19 and the Court, available at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/news/covid-19 (last visited: 2022.05.01).
  32. Supreme Court of Vitoria, Supreme Court Changes in Response to COVID-19, available at https://www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au/for-the-media/media-releases/supreme-court-changes-in-response-to-covid-19(last visited:2022.05.01)
  33. Sykes, Katie,Dickson, Rebecca,Ewart, Sarah,Foulkes, Candice,Landry, Marina(2020).Civil Revolution: User Experiences with British Columbia's Online Court.WINDSOR Y.B. ACCESS JUST.,37,173+174+180-185.
  34. Tan, Vivi(2019).Online Dispute Resolution for Small Civil Claims in Victoria: A New Paradigm in Civil Justice.DEAKIN L. REV.,24,126-127.
  35. Thomas, Luke,Kaur, Sarah,Goodrich, Simon(2018).Making ODR Human: Using Human-Centred Design for ODR Product Development.IJODR,5,147-150.
  36. UNCITRAL Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution(2017), available at https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/v1700382english_technical_notes_on_odr.pdf(last visited: 2022.05.01)
  37. University of Cambridge(2019).University of Cambridge(2019), A Comparative Analysis of Online Dispute Resolution For The International Legal Aid Group, at 50-51, 60-61, 68-69..
  38. Van Arsdale, Suzanne(2015).User Protection in Online Dispute Resolution.NEGOT. L. REV.,21,107+110+124+125.
  39. VCAT, How to join a phone or videoconference, available at https://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/help-and-support/join-phone-or-videoconference (last visited: 2022.05.01).
  40. VCAT, Hearings｀on the papers＇, available at https://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/the-vcat-process/when-vcat-startsa-case/hearings-on-the-papers (last visited: 2022.05.01).
  41. VCAT, Recordings and transcripts of VCAT hearings, available at https://www.vcat.vic.gov.au/the-vcat-process/privacy-and-access-to-information/recordings-and-transcripts-of-vcat-hearings(last visited: 2022.05.01).
  42. Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, Annual Report 2020-2021, at 18, 20-21, 26..
  43. Victorian Government(2017).Victorian Government(2017), Access to Justice Review: Government Response, at 10..
  44. Victorian Government, Pandemic Order Register, available at https://www.health.vic.gov.au/covid-19/pandemic-order-register (last visited: 2022.05.01).
  45. Victorian Government(2016).Access to Justice Review: Summary Report.
  46. Wallace, Anne,Laster, Kathy(2021).Courts in Victoria, Australia, during COVID: Will Digital Innovation Stick?.I JCA,12,6-7.
  47. 中華民國總統府，《司法改革國是會議成果報告書》，頁 107，〈https://www.president.gov.tw/News/21581〉，最後瀏覽日： 2022 年 5 月 1 日。
  48. 文家倩(2021)。從英美法觀點看臺灣法院的視訊開庭。月旦裁判時報，109，77-95。
  49. 司法院「訴訟外紛爭解決機構查詢平台」，〈https://www.judicial.gov.tw/tw/lp-2176-1-1-20.html〉，最後瀏覽日：2022 年 5 月 1 日。
  50. 沈冠伶(2012).程序保障與當事人.元照出版有限公司.
  51. 沈冠伶(2021)。民事訴訟之線上起訴與遠距審理 ( 上 ) －民事法院數位轉型及現代化之展望。月旦法學雜誌，316，107+266。
  52. 沈冠伶(2021)。數位化時代的裁判外紛爭處理制度－從 ADR 到 ODR 的程序保障。政大法學評論，166，58+261-263+265-269+285+286+289+293+294+296+301+302。
  53. 沈冠伶(2022)。民事訴訟之數位證據與證據調查。月旦法學雜誌，330，77-103。
  54. 沈冠伶(2021)。民事訴訟之線上起訴與遠距審理（下）－民事法院數位轉型及現代化之展望。月旦法學雜誌，317，86-89。
  55. 林俊廷(2017)。訴訟外紛爭解決機制（ADR）與司法改革 ( 上 )。司法周刊，1879，2 版-3 版。
  56. 林俊廷(2017)。訴訟外紛爭解決機制（ADR）與司法改革 ( 中 )。司法周刊，1880，2 版-3 版。
  57. 邱聯恭(2000).程序選擇權論.自版.
  58. 邱聯恭（講述）,許士宦（整理）(2021).口述民事訴訟法講義 ( 一 ).自版.
  59. 高啟中(2021)。仲裁案件進行遠距聽審的相關議題。仲裁季刊，113，37-48。
  60. 許士宦(2021).口述講義民事訴訟法 ( 下 ).新學林出版股份有限公司.
  61. 許戎沂(2021)。視訊訊問法庭概念的詮釋－評最高法院 97 年度台上字第 2537 號判決。銘傳大學法律判解評論，3，69-88。
  62. 陳品蓁(2018)。臺灣大學科際整合法律學研究所。
  63. 陳瑋佑(2021)。論商業事件審理法上之律師強制代理制度－以其適用範圍為中心。月旦法學教室，219，35-38。
print cancel