他山之石之更生保護－澳洲新南威爾斯州經驗

Learning from Others' Strong Points: The Experience of Rehabilitation Protection in New South Wales, Australia

李瑞典(Li, Jui-Tien)

更生保護 ； 更生人 ； 復歸社會 ； 全程照護 ； Rehabilitation Protection ； Rehabilitated People ； Reintegration into Society ； Comprehensive Care

軍法專刊

69卷3期（2023 / 06 / 01）

35 - 68

繁體中文;英文

更生人因經過刑事司法程序而被貼上負面標籤，尤其監獄烙印羞恥，對於重新融入社會更是面臨無數挑戰與障礙，從而增加再犯機會以及監獄收容人與日俱增現象。根據澳洲調查統計，新南威爾斯州是全澳擁有最龐大的矯正系統，近年來收容人成長比率卻明顯負成長，使政府相信更生保護制度發揮功能。因此該州更生保護成就具有代表性，殊值借鏡。根據我國法務部統計資料顯示，更生人之再犯比率居高不下，如何落實更生保護，預防再犯，始終為我國刑事政策的重要課題。本研究透過文獻探討，從法制面及組織面介紹新南威爾斯州更生保護制度；再闡述我國更生保護在法制面及組織面困境之梗概；接續進行兩國制度之比較；最後，提出新南威爾斯州殊值我國參考之六項作為或觀念。「他山之石，可以攻錯」最後針對以上各項，本文臚列（一）適度檢討分流之任意性及強制性更生保護；（二）重構檢察和矯正機關之更生保護定位及全民意識；（三）更生保護應聚焦出監更生人並明定聲請之期限；（四）建構全程照護及深化個案輔導之更生保護制度；（五）檢視更保工作指引關注更保人員之身心；（六）明定轉介修復為更生保護措施，以彰顯更生價值六點建議，作為我國更生保護制度未來改革方向。

Rehabilitated people who have gone through the criminal justice system are often labeled negatively, particularly with the stigmatization of prison branding. They face numerous challenges and obstacles when trying to reintegrate into society, thus increasing their chances of reoffending and imprisonment. According to Australian statistics, New South Wales's correctional system is the biggest in Australia, and in recent years, the growth rate of the prison population has significantly declined. The success of the correction system in this state is representative and worth learning. In Taiwan, however, the recidivism rate among rehabilitated people remains high. Therefore, implementing rehabilitation protection and preventive reoffending are critical issues in criminal justice policy. This study explores and compares the rehabilitation protection system in New South Wales and Taiwan from a legal and organizational perspective, followed by an explanation of the challenges in the rehabilitation protection system in Taiwan. Finally, this article proposes six recommendations for the future reform of Taiwan's rehabilitation protection system: (1) moderately review the diversion of voluntary and compulsory rehabilitation protection; (2) reconstruct the positioning of prosecution and correctional agencies in rehabilitation protection, as well as raise public awareness of rehabilitation and protection; (3) specify the deadline for submitting rehabilitation protection applications and focus on inmates released from prison; (4) establish a comprehensive care system that deepens case counseling for rehabilitation protection; (5) review the guidelines for rehabilitation protection work; and (6) explicitly designate restorative justice referrals as rehabilitation protection measures.

1. 李瑞典,陳祥美(2021)。我國少年事件運用修復式正義之研究。國立中正大學法學集刊，71，108。
   連結：
2. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/support/family-support.html (2023/2/26).
3. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/work-with-us/careers-at-csnsw/job-profiles/community-corrections-officer.html (2023/2/24).
4. https://dcj.nsw.gov.au/community-inclusion/disability-and-inclusion/disability-inclusion-action-plan.html (2023/2/26).
5. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/community-corrections/community-service-work.html (2023/2/25).
6. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/about-us/csnsw-history.html (2023/3/07).
7. https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1999-092 (2023/2/18).
8. https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-1999-093 (2023/2/18).
9. https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/whole/html/inforce/current/act-2014-041 (2023/2/26).
10. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/reducing-re-offending/initiatives-to-support-offenders/offender-assessment.html (2023/2/20).
11. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/correctional-centres/specialist-correctional-centres.html (2023/2/23).
12. 我國監獄行刑法第 139 條
13. CSNSW Compendium of Offender Behaviour Change Programs. (https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/reducing-re-offending/initiatives-to-support-offenders/how-do-we-choose-the-group-programs-we-use.html)(2023/2/20).
14. 總統府司法改革國是會議第五分組「維護社會安全的司法」「5-4. 犯罪預防與管理」決議，司法改革進度追蹤資訊平台。
15. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/ (2023/2/18).
16. https://correctiveservices.dcj.nsw.gov.au/csnsw-home/contact-and-visit-inmates/contact-an-inmate/video-calls.html (2023/2/27).
17. Alexander Maconochie Centre(2011).Alexander Maconochie Centre(2011). Seeing it Through Options for improving offender outcomes in the community. Australian, ACT Government: Social Policy and Implementation Branch, p4..
18. Australia Government Productivity Commission(2021).Australia's prison dilemma Research paper.
19. Australian Bureau of Statistic〈Twenty-seven years of Prisoners in Australia〉(https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/twenty-seven-years-prisoners-australia)(2023/2/20)
20. Corrective Services NSW, Community Corrections Officer Handbook (CCOH)(2016). (https://csa.intersearch.com.au/csajspui/bitstream/10627/897/1/community-corrections-officer-handbook.pdf) (2023/3/7)
21. Davis, C.,Bahr, S. J.,Ward, C.(2013).The process of offender reintegration: Perceptions of what helps prisoners reenter society.Criminology & Criminal Justice,13(4),447.
22. Kirkwood, S.(2021)."A wee kick up the arse": Mentoring, motivation and desistance from crime.Criminology & Criminal Justice,2.
23. Reed, C.,Oliva, C. M.(2017).A Report of the NYU Center on the Administration of Criminal LawA Report of the NYU Center on the Administration of Criminal Law,未出版
24. Sapouna, M.,Bisset, C.,Conlong, A.M.,Matthews, B.(2015).What Works to Reduce Reoffending: A Summary of the Evidence.Justice Analytical Services, Scottish Government.
25. Satinsky, S.,Harris, L.,Farhang, L.,Alexander, G.(2016).,Wisconsin. Oakland, CA:Human Impact Partners.
26. 王祥安,林正昇,蔡協利(2013)。澳洲與台灣矯正機關技能訓練之比較研究－以 Victorian 監獄、法務部矯正署泰源技能訓練所、高雄戒治所為例。矯政期刊，2(1)，109+114-116+121。
27. 江振亨,黃天鈺(2015)。江振亨、黃天鈺，〈104 年度法務部矯正署「澳大利亞矯正機關參訪紀實」出國報告〉，法務部矯正署，2015 年 11 月，頁 29。
28. 行政院。行政院核定之「強化社會安全網計畫」第二期計畫（110-113 年）。
29. 周愫嫻,侯崇文,曹光文(2014)。行政院勞動部勞動力發展署委託研究計畫行政院勞動部勞動力發展署委託研究計畫,行政院勞動部勞動力發展署。
30. 林順昌(2009).觀護法論 - 社會復歸與社會防衛之間的拔河.元照出版有限公司.
31. 法務部犯罪研究中心，〈出獄人就業狀況報告〉，法務部犯罪研究中心編印，1999 年，頁 73。
32. 施茂林(2007)。我國現行司法保護作為與未來展望。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集
33. 徐錦鋒（編）(2008).少年觀護制度理論與實務.洪葉文化事業有限公司.
34. 財團法人臺灣更生保護會(2022).更生保護工作指引.
35. 黃宗旻(2004)。國立臺灣大學法律學系研究所。
36. 黃宗旻(2019)。我國觀護制度及更生保護組織重新定位之探討。刑事政策與犯罪研究論文集
37. 黃翠紋,斯儀仙(2018)。性侵犯類型學及其處遇措施之研究。警政論叢，18，22。
38. 計畫主持人蔡宜家，〈中華民國一一 O 年犯罪狀況及其分析－ 2021 犯罪趨勢關鍵報告〉（第八篇），法務部司法官學院，2022 年 12 月，頁 8。
39. 蔡宜家、吳永達，〈中華民國一 O 七年犯罪狀況及其分析—2018 犯罪趨勢關鍵報告〉，法務部司法官學院編印，2019 年，頁 82。