题名

為何大學生上課不再靜悄悄?兒童哲學團體探究教學法融入大學課堂教學之研究

并列篇名

Why Are University Students No Longer Silent in Class? A Study on the Implementation of Philosophy for Children's Pedagogy of a Community of Inquiry in a University Classroom

DOI

10.6870/JTPRHE.201612_1(1).0002

作者

王清思(Jessica Ching-Sze Wang)

关键词

兒童哲學 ; 團體探究教學法 ; 社會空間 ; 教育可能 ; 教師引導 ; 大學教學 ; the pedagogy of a community of inquiry ; philosophy for children ; social space ; educational possibilities ; the role of a teacher facilitator ; university teaching

期刊名称

大學教學實務與研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

創刊號(2016 / 12 / 01)

页次

31 - 75

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文首先指出大學生上課不提問、不發言的普遍問題,並從自身的教育哲學研究領域和教學實例切入,分享筆者在「思考教育與民主素養」通識課中,融入兒童哲學的團體探究教學法之教學歷程與研究發現。首先說明該教學法之理論依據、設計理念以及實施方式,最後則綜合評述大學生的轉變,以及這堂課獨有的教與學風貌之教育意涵。本文指出,團體探究所創造出的「社會空間」,能造就出不同的「教育可能」,包含體驗平等、自由和當下的真善美。本文亦探討教師引導之角色,並藉由自我角色之剖析,提供大學教學工作者一些教學理念上的參考方向。最後,本文試圖提出團體探究教學法的核心精神對一般大學教學的啟示。

英文摘要

The paper addresses the problem of university students' reluctance to participate in class discussion. The author described how she adopted the pedagogy of a community of inquiry, well-known in philosophy for children, in her general education course Education for Thinking and Democracy. The author shared her findings about students' experiences and transformation, and explored some implications for education. In the paper, she contends that the community of inquiry approach to education provides a "social space" conducive to alternative "educational possibilities." Students experienced equality and freedom, and learned to appreciate the true, the good and the beautiful in the rich present. In conclusion, the author discussed the role of a teacher facilitator and offered some suggestions to university teaching.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 李宗祐(2013)。怕問笨問題,88%大學生靜悄悄。中國時報。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%80%95%E5%95%8F%E7%AC%A8%E5%95%8F%E9%A1%8C-88-%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E9%9D%9C%E6%82%84%E6%82%84-213000391.html
  2. Biesta, G.(2013).The beautiful risk of education.Boulder, CO:Paradigm.
  3. Biesta, G.(2011).Philosophy, exposure, and children: How to resist the instrmentalization of philosophy in education.Journal of Philosophy of Education,45(2),305-319.
  4. Biesta, G.(1994).Pragmatism as a pedagogy of communicative action.Studies in Philosophy and Education,13,273-290.
  5. Biesta, G.(1999).Radical intersubjectivity: Reflections on the 'different' foundation of education.Studies in Philosophy and Education,18(4),203-220.
  6. Biesta, G.(2010).'This is my truth. Tell me yours': Deconstructive pragmatism as a philosophy for education.Educational Philosophy and Theory,42(7),710-727.
  7. Boydston, J. A.(Ed.)(1987).John Dewey: The later works (vol. 11).Carbondale, IL:University of Southern Illinois.
  8. Boydston, J. A.(Ed.)(1988).John Dewey: The later works (vol. 14).Carbondale, IL:University of Southern Illinois.
  9. Boydston, J. A.(Ed.)(1980).John Dewey: The middle works (vol. 9).Carbondale, IL:University of Southern Illinois.
  10. Costa, A. L.(Ed.)(2001).Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  11. Freire, P.(1999).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY:Continuum.
  12. Glaser, B. G.,Strauss, A. L.(1967).The discovery of grounded theory.Dallas, TX:Houghton Mifflin.
  13. Goering, S.(Ed.),Shundak, N.(Ed.),Wartenberg, T.(Ed.)(2013).Philosophy in schools: An introduction for philosophers and teachers.New York, NY:Routledge.
  14. Golding, C.(2011).Educating philosophically: the educational theory for Philosophy for Children.Educational Theory and Philosophy,43(5),413-14.
  15. Jackson, T. E.(2012).Home grown.Perspectives,44(1 & 2),3-7.
  16. Jackson, T. E.(2004).Philosophy for children Hawaiian Style-"On not being in a rush".Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children,17(1 & 2),4-8.
  17. Kronman, A.(2008).Education's end: Why our colleges and universities have given up on the meaning of life.New Haven, CT:Yale University.
  18. Leng, L.(2015).The role of philosophical inquiry in helping high school students engage in learning and seeking meaning in lives.Honolulu, HI:University of Hawaii at Manoa.
  19. Lewis, H.(2007).Excellence without a soul.New York, NY:Public Affairs.
  20. Lien, J.(2004).Making sense of evaluation of p4c.Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children,17(1 & 2),73-76.
  21. Lipman, M.(2003).Thinking in education.New York, NY:Cambridge University.
  22. Lipman, M.(2004).Philosophy for children's debt to Dewey.Critical and Creative Thinking,12,1-8.
  23. Makaiau, A.,Lukey, B.(2013).A philosopher's pedagogy: A three-Part model for school betterment.Journal of Academic Perspectives,2013(3)
  24. Makaiau, A.,Miller, C.(2012).The philosopher's pedagogy.Educational Perspectives,44(1 & 2),8-19.
  25. Marsal, E.(Ed.),Dobashi, T.(Ed.),Weber, B.(Ed.)(2009).Children philosophize worldwide: Theoretical and practical concepts.New York, NY:Peter Lang International Academic.
  26. Paradales, M. J.,Girod, M. C.(2006).Community of inquiry: Its past and present future.Educational Philosophy and Theory,38(3),299-309.
  27. Peters, M. A.(2007).Kinds of thinking, styles of reasoning.Educational Philosophy and Theory,39(4),350-363.
  28. Standish, P.(2011).Preface.Journal of Philosophy of Education,45(2),i-ii.
  29. Steel, S.(2014).The pursuit of wisdom and happiness in education: Historical sources and contemplative practices.Albany, NY:Sunny.
  30. Taylor, M. S.(Ed.),Schreier, H.(Ed.),Ghiraldelli, J. P.(Ed.)(2008).Pragmatism, education, and children: International philosophical perspectives.New York, NY:Rodopi.
  31. Vanderstraeten, R.,Biesta, G.(2006).How is education possible? Pragmatism, communication and the social organization of education.British Journal of Educational Studies,54(2),160-174.
  32. Wang, J. C.(2015).From learning outcomes to educational possibilities: What happens when philosophical community inquiry 'works wonder'with university students in Taiwan.Analytical Teaching and Philosophical Praxis,36,26-43.
  33. 佐藤學、黃郁倫譯、鍾啟泉譯(2012)。學習的革命─從教室出發的改變。臺北:天下雜誌。
  34. 潘小慧(2008)。兒童哲學的理論與實務。新北:輔仁大學。
被引用次数
  1. 王清思(Ching-Sze Wang);葉譯聯(Yi-Lien Yeh)(2021)。教師哲學(P4T)的意涵與實踐之研究。臺灣教育哲學。5(1)。32-72。