運用理解設計品質成果導向學習理論探討程式語言課程教學成效

Using the UDOBE Education Learning Model in Programming Language Course

10.3966/251964992017120102005

黃燕萍(Yan-Ping Huang)

成果導向教育 ； 理解設計 ； 資訊教育 ； 學聯網 ； outcome-based education ； understanding by design ； programming language education ； share course

大學教學實務與研究學刊

1卷2期（2017 / 12 / 31）

125 - 144

繁體中文

隨著人工智慧、物聯網、行動學習等與軟體共存的世界來臨，程式設計課程益發重要。普遍來說，程式設計對學生是一門不容易理解與學習的課程，如何讓學生可以針對自己的學習能力，進行程式設計學習，提高學生的學習動機與學習成效，本研究運用理解設計品質成果導向學習理論（Understanding by Design and Outcome-Based Education, UDOBE）進行課程教材設計，探討程式學習態度與程式學習成效。利用傳統教室教學並搭配學聯網磨課師數位課程進行補教教學，讓學生使用網路教學平台，依自己的能力自行調整進行程式設計學習。本篇論文的貢獻是運用理解設計課程品質成果導向學習理論進行建置程式語言數位教材並放置學聯網學習平台，引導學生了解程式設計技巧與語法、流程圖繪製與程式實作。將數位教材放置數位學習平台，讓學生可以隨時隨地依自己能力進行學習，研究結果顯示理解設計課程品質成果導向學習理論對於提升程式設計實作能力具有顯著成效。

The artificial intelligence, the Internet of things, and mobile learning mean that programming skills are increasingly essential. Programming language learning courses are regarded by many students as difficult and often have high dropout rates. Improving students' programming language skills and learning motivation is increasingly essential. Therefore, the emphasis in teaching practice has shifted from students' classroom scores to their learning processes and practical capabilities. This paper proposes a UDOBE learning model based on the understanding by design theory and outcome-based education theory. A programming language learning course was subsequently designed to evaluate the validity of the theory. The results of this study indicated that teaching programming languages using the UDOBE learning model improved students' programming language skills.

1. 劉兆漢、黃興燦（2003）。數位學習國家型科技計畫總體規劃書。取自http://web.it.nctu.edu.tw/~cpsun/e-learning-project.doc
2. McTighe, J. & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312. pdf
3. NTT DoCoMo (2009). FOMAハイスペード. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Mobile_Multimedia_Access
4. Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative(2010).Learning on demand: ADL and the future of e-learning.Washington, DC:Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative.
5. Bangert, H. S.,Drowns, R. L.(1993).The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction.Review of Educational Research,63(1),69-93.
6. Carmigniani, J.,Furht, B.,Anisetti, M.,Ceravolo, P.,Damiani, E.,Ivkovic, M.(2011).Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications.Multimed Tools,51,341-377.
7. Chandler, H. M.,Chandler, R.(2011).Fundamentals of game development.Sudbury, MA:Jones and Bartlett Learning.
8. Clark, R.(1985).Confounding in educational computing research.Journal of Educational Computing Research,1,137-148.
9. Clark, R.(1983).Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research,53,445-459.
10. Clark, R.(1994).Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology Research and Development,42,21-29.
11. Compeau, D. R.,Higgins, C. A.(1999).Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study.MIS Quarterly,23,145-159.
12. Department of Education and Science(2000).Learning for life: Paper on adult education.Dublin, Ireland:Stationery Office.
13. Donald, P. Y.,Lui, P. Y.,Grace, S. A.,Jones, Y. M.(2011).The pattern of electronic game use and related bodily discomfort in Hong Kong primary school children.Computers & Education,57,1665-1674.
14. Earle, M. T.,Wyatt, J. E.(2014).Preparing to teach STEM in middle school using understanding by design framework: Focus on using CAD in creative arts.2014 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference
15. Fletcherflinn, C. M.,Gravatt, B.(1995).The efficacy of computerassisted-instruction (CAI): A meta analysis.Journal of Educational Computing Research,12,219-242.
16. Franz, L.,Holger, N.(2002).The role of mobile devices in e-learning: First experiences with a wireless e-learning environment.Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, WMTE '02
17. Hargreaves, A.,Moore, S.(2000).Curriculum integration and classroom relevance: A study of teachers' practice.Journal of Curriculum Supervision,15(2),89-112.
18. Hill, B.(1999).A conceptual framework for understanding information seeking in open-ended information systems.Educational Technology Research & Development,47,5-27.
19. Hill, J. R.,Hannafin, M. J.(1997).Cognitive strategies and learning from the World Wide Web.Educational Technology Research & Development,45,37-64.
20. Huang, Y. P.(2012).Diffusion innovation, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.Proceedings of The 11th International Conference on e-Learning, e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, and e-Government
21. Huang, Y. P.,Huang, Y. M.(2013).Programming language learning supported by an accredited course strategy.Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Advanced Learning Technologies
22. Huang, Y. P.,Shih, W. K.,Lee, J. D.,Chen, T. Y.,Jhang, N. Y.,Chen, C.,Yang, C. W.(2014).A study of mobile embedded technology and on line nuclear energy education learning using the Tsing Hua open-pool reactor.International Journal of Modern Education Forum,3(1),31-33.
23. Huang, Y. P.,Wei, H. W.,Chen, T. Y.,Jhang, N. Y.,Chen, C.,Chen, Y. C.,Shih, W. K.(2015).The effectiveness of integrating somatosensory technology into nuclear energy education learning.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,173,476-482.
24. Joo, Y.,Bong, M.,Choi, H.(2000).Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development,48,5-17.
25. Keane, L.,Keane, M.(2016).STEAM by design.Design and Technology Education,21(1),61-82.
26. Li, M. C.,Tsai, C. C.(2013).Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research.Journal of Science Education and Technology,22(6),877-898.
27. Liang, Y. L.,Chen, G. D.,Yang, S. J.(2013).Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation.Computers & Education,60(1),32-39.
28. McTighe, J.、Grant, W.、賴麗珍譯(2008)。重理解的課程設計專業發展實用手冊。臺北:心理。
29. Michael, N. A.,Libarkin, J. C.(2016).Understanding by design: Mentored implementation of backward design methodology at the university level.Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching,42(2),44-52.
30. Terry, B.(2011).Understanding engineering by design [TM] perceptions.Technology and Engineering Teacher,70(4),21-24.
31. Wexler, J.(2001).Why computer users accept new systems.MIT Sloan management review,42(3)
32. Wilson, B.(Ed.)(1996).Constructivist learning environments.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.

1. (2021)。UbD 理論應用於高中生物 DNA 單元教學對高中生學習成效影響之研究。教育研究學報，55(2)，29-58。