题名

知識如何有感?「人類行為與社會環境」課程發展與教學歷程反思

并列篇名

"Human Behavior and Social Environment" Curriculum Content Design and Self-Reflection on Teaching

DOI

10.6870/JTPRHE.201906_3(1).0002

作者

莊文芳(Wen-Fang Chuang)

关键词

人類行為與社會環境 ; 自學 ; 翻轉教室 ; HBSE ; self-learning ; flipped classroom

期刊名称

大學教學實務與研究學刊

卷期/出版年月

3卷1期(2019 / 06 / 30)

页次

39 - 70

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文整理了「人類行為與社會環境」三年的課程發展與教學歷程,說明教師如何受創新作法影響建構課程內容,包括翻轉教室、自學計畫,並運用多元媒材,逐漸形塑出適合學生需求的課程安排,協助記憶與理解知識,並能進一步實踐。在教學目標與對應策略上,有四點考量:多元組合學習設計、持續強化學生學習動機、生活經驗與時事結合課程,以及課堂討論與作業分析,逐步培養學生更高層次的應用能力。此外,作者持續收集學生回饋,並自我檢視,逐步調整三年的課程設計。最後就教學目的、學生需求、課程實施的發現和反思,提出課程設計與導入創新的建議。

英文摘要

This study is organized from a three-year curriculum development and teaching process of the "Human Behavior and Social Environment" course. It illustrates how the auther constructed the curriculum as a teacher and how certain innovative teaching methods had shaped its implementation. The instructional design features complementary methods composed of teacher-student co-participation, as well as various new teaching practices, e.g. the flipped classroom model, self-learning and multimedia learning so as to promote student's engagement in learning. The author gradually adjusted the curriculum design by consistently collecting student feedback and self-reflection as a teacher. Finally, reflect on the purpose of teaching, the needs of students, and the findings which will benefit for the future improvements of class design, several suggestion was provided.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Hu, C. F.,Hsu, F. F.(2018).The value of a flipped learning component to a humanities course in higher education: Student perception and performance.Taiwan Journal of TESOL,15(2),1-32.
    連結:
  2. 許佩玲,易正義(2016)。臉書社群有助於翻轉教學。亞東學報,36,63-82。
    連結:
  3. 陳豐祥(2009)。新修訂布魯姆認知領域目標的理論內涵及其在歷史教學上的應用。歷史教育,15,1-53。
    連結:
  4. Anderson, L. W.(Ed.),Krathwohl, D. R.(Ed.),Airasian, P. W.(Ed.),Cruikshank, K. A.(Ed.),Maver, R. E.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.),Wittrock, M. C.(Ed.)(2001).A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  5. Ash, K.(2012).Educators evaluate "flipped classrooms".Education Week,32,6-8.
  6. Ashford, J. B.,LeCroy, C. W.(2013).Human behavior in the social environment: A multidimensional perspective.Belmont, CA:Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  7. Besthorn, F. H.,Canda, E. R.(2002).Revisioning environment: Deep ecology for education and teaching in social work.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,22(1/2),79-102.
  8. Bloom, B. S.,Engelhart, M. D.,Furst, E. J.,Hill, W. H.,Krathwohl, D. R.(1956).Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.New York, NY:David McKay.
  9. Bodriguez-Keyes, C.,Schneider, D. A.(2013).Cultivating curiosity: Integrating hybrid teaching in courses in human behavior in the social environment.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,33(3),227-238.
  10. Cornbleth, C.(1990).Curriculum in context.London, England:Falmer Press.
  11. Garthwait, C. L.(2015).Social work education: A vehicle for innovative practice.International Journal of Social Science and Humanity,5(9),798-803.
  12. Guskey, T.(2002).Does it make a difference?.Educational Leadership,59(6),45-51.
  13. Holmes, M. R.,Tracy, E.,Painter, L. L.,Oestreich, T.,Park, H.(2015).Moving from flipcharts to the flipped classroom: Using technology driven teaching methods to promote active learning in foundation and advanced masters social work courses.Clinical Social Work Journal,43(2),215-224.
  14. Karolich, R.,Ford, J.(2013).Applying learner-centered principles to teaching human behavior in the social environment in a baccalaureate program.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,33(1),26-40.
  15. Mendoza, N. S.,Bonta, K.,Horn, P.,Moore, E.,Gibson, A.,Simmons, D.(2012).PUSH(ing) limits: Using fiction in the classroom for human behavior and the social environment.Journal of Teaching in Social Work,32(4),376-391.
  16. Rawson, K. A.,Dunlosky, J.,Sciartelli, S. M.(2013).The power of successive relearning: Improving performance on course exams and long-term retention.Educational Psychology Review,25(4),523-548.
  17. Taylor, C.,White, S.(2006).Knowledge and reasoning in social work: Educating for humane judgement.British Journal of Social Work,36(6),937-954.
  18. 史美瑤(2012)。以學生學習為中心的教學:老師教了嗎?學生學了沒?。評鑑雙月刊,36,42-44。
  19. 史英(2015)。翻轉翻轉。人本教育札記,311,2-4。
  20. 吳仲堯(2015)。「虛無式」翻轉,誰要?。人本教育札記,312,20-23。
  21. 曾釋嫻,蔡秉燁(2015)。翻轉課堂教學與傳統教學對大學生學習策略之差異研究。雙溪教育論壇,3,1-19。
  22. 黃政傑(2014)。翻轉教室的理念、問題與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(12),161-186。
  23. 劉怡甫(2013)。翻轉課堂──落實學生為中心與提升就業力的教改良方。評鑑雙月刊,41,31-34。
被引用次数
  1. 龔馬利莎(2023)。運用歷程模式發展創新成功老化高齡運動方案。嘉大體育健康休閒期刊,22(1),79-88。
  2. 許世孟(2022)。讓學習產生意義-「防災工程實務課程」之教學創新實踐。大學教學實務與研究學刊,6(1),109-142。