题名

從歐洲整合觀點論歐盟條約第50條之歐盟退出權

并列篇名

On Article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union: The Withdrawal Right from the European Union under the Perspective of European Integration

DOI

10.6868/HKLR.202012_(69).02

作者

林人一(Jen-Yi Lin)

关键词

單方退出權 ； 政府間主義 ； 超國家主義 ； 脫歐 ； 歐洲整合 ； 主權 ； 民主正當性 ； 退出協議 ； 原始法 ； 次級法 ； Unilateral Withdrawal Right ； Intergovernmentalism ； Supra-nationalism ； EU Exit ； European Integration ； Sovereignty ； Democratic Legitimacy ； Withdrawal Agreement ； Primary Law ； Secondary Law

期刊名称

華岡法粹

卷期/出版年月

69期（2020 / 12 / 01）

页次

55 - 95

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

歐盟成員國於歐盟憲法條約失敗後簽署里斯本條約以重構歐盟諸條約，修訂後的歐盟條約第50條承襲歐盟憲法條約第I-60條，明文承認歐盟成員國之單方退出權，解決長期以來對於退出歐盟許可性的爭議，也因此成為歐盟體制下歐洲整合的指標性立法，然此法規範有無與迄今之歐洲整合思想牴觸，殊有疑義，各該細部規定應如何解釋亦爭議迭生，在英國脫歐公投後更使此等爭議愈加受到矚目，而有釐清之必要。就此，本文認為從歐洲整合的歷史與理論淵源出發觀察歐盟條約第50條，有助於更加精確地建構對於本條之法釋義學思維，爰從歐洲整合的視角爬梳其路徑之爭如何影響吾輩對於本條構成要件與程序規定之解釋與評價，並進一步基於法釋義學的討論探究本條規定對歐洲整合究竟有何重要意義。
英文摘要

The member states of the European Union (EU) signed the Treaty of Lisbon after the failure of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe to reconstruct treaties of European Union. Article 50 of the revised Treaty on the European Union inherits article I-60 of the Constitutional Treaty and expressly recognizes the unilateral withdrawal right of EU member states from the EU and solves the long-standing problem of permission to withdraw from the EU. It therefore became an indicative legislation of the European integration under European Union regime. However, it is questionable, if it conflicts with the ideology of European integration. How to interpret the details of its provisions is also controversial. After the Brexit referendum, these disputes have become even more noticeable and are necessary to clarify. In this regard, this thesis considers that it is helpful to observe article 50 of the Treaty on the European Union and to construct a legal dogmatic reasoning more accurately from the historical and theoretical origins of European integration. Therefore, this thesis tries to analyze from the perspective of European integration, how disputes over the different paths of the European integration affect our interpretation and evaluation of the constituent elements and procedural requirements of this provision and tries to further explore the significance of this provision for European integration based on the discussion of its legal dogmas.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 洪德欽(2017)。國脫歐對其多元法律體系之影響。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，46(特刊)
    連結：
  2. 洪德欽(2017)。國脫歐對歐盟之影響。問題與研究，56(2)
    連結：
  3. 羅至美,吳東野(2016)。脫歐公投對英國的衝擊：政治與經濟的分析。問題與研究，55(3)
    連結：
  4. EUR-Lex, at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML /?uri=OJ:C:2016:202:FULL&from=EN (last visited December 25, 2020).
  5. Blanke, Hermann-Josef(ed.),Mangiameli(ed.),Stelio(ed.)(2012).Withdrawal from the Union, in THE EUROPEAN UNION AFTER LISBON.Blanke, Hermann-Josef Germany:Mangiameli & St Springer.
  6. Calliess, Christian(2018).Staatsrecht III.
  7. Calliess, Christian(2019).70 Jahre Grundgesetz und europäische Integration: “Take back control” oder “Mehr Demokratie wagen”?.NVwZ
  8. Corbett, Richard; Vigo, Íñigo Méndez de, European Parliament, available athttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A6-2008-0013+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN (last visited September 17, 2020).
  9. Häde, Ulrich(Hrsg.),Pechstein, Matthias(Hrsg.),Nowak, Carsten(Hrsg.)(2017).Frankfurter Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV/Band 1. EUV und GRC.
  10. Harbo, Florentina(2008).ecession Right - an Anti-Federal Principle? Comparative Study of Federal States and the EU.JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND LAW,1(3)
  11. Heber, Caroline(2017).Die Kompetenzverteilung im Rahmen der Austrittsverhandlungen nach Art. 50 EUV unter besonderer Berücksichtigung bestehenden Sekundärrechts.EuR
  12. Hestermeyer, Disastrous Stability: Brexit as a Constitutional Crisis, Verfassungsblog, at https://verfassungsblog.de/disastrous-stability -brexit-as-a-constitutional-crisis%ef%bb%bf/ (last visited January 13, 2020).
  13. Hobe, Stephan(2017).Fremuth, Michael Lysander, Europarecht.
  14. Hofmeister, Hannes(2012).Goodbye Euro: Legal Aspects of Withdrawal from the Eurozone.COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN LAW,18
  15. Koenig, Christian(2018).Pechstein, Matthias; Haratsch, Andreas: Europarecht.
  16. Nettesheim(Hrsg.)(2018).Das Recht der Europäischen Union.
  17. Schoo, Johann(Hrsg.),Jürgen, Schwarze(Hrsg.),Ulrich, Becker(Hrsg.),Augsberg, Steffen(Hrsg.),Hatje, Armin(Hrsg.)(2019).EU-Kommentar.
  18. Schwarze, Jürgen(Hrsg.),von der Groeben, Hans(Hrsg.),Hatje, Armin(Hrsg.)(2015).Europäisches Unionsrecht/1.Art. 1 bis 55 EUV; Art. 1 bis 54 GRC; Art. 1 bis 66 AEUV.
  19. Skouris, Vassilios(2016).Brexit: Rechtliche Vorgaben für den Austritt aus der EU.EuZW
  20. Streinz, Rudolf(Hrsg.)(2018).EUV/AEUV.
  21. Suhail, Abboushi(2018).Britain after Brexit - brief overview.JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW AND POLICY,17
  22. Thiele, Alexander(2016).Der Austritt aus der EU - Hintergründe und rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen eines “Brexit”.Zeitschrift Europarecht,51
  23. Told, Julia(2017).(BR) XIT from the EU.EUROPEAN COMPANY AND FINANCIAL LAW Review,14
  24. Witte, Bruno de; Piris, Jean-Claude; Grant, Charles, United Kingdom’s Renegotiation of its Constitutional Relationship with the EU: Agenda, Priorities and Risks, European Parliament, available athttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2015/536489/IPOL_STU(2015)536489_EN.pdf (last visited December 26, 2020).
  25. 林人一(2016)。國立中正大學。
  26. 張亞中(2007)。歐洲聯盟的演進。歐洲聯盟的組織與運作
  27. 陳怡凱(2017)。脫歐之法律問題。新世紀智庫論壇，79
  28. 鄭欽模(2013)。里斯本條約架構下歐盟會員國退會問題之研究。淡江國際與區域研究，2(1)
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。庇護權與難民法制－從歐盟與德國相關法制出發，檢視我國難民法草案。中正大學法學集刊，85，131-220。
print cancel