都市大型國民小學重建領導經驗之個案研究

A Case Study of Turnaround Leadership Experiences in a Large Urban Elementary School

10.6925/SCJ.201209_8(3).0002

賴志峰(Chih-Feng Lai)

都市學校領導 ； 重建領導 ； 家長式領導 ； urban school l leadership ； turnaround leadership ； paternalistic leadership

教育研究與發展期刊

8卷3期（2012 / 09 / 30）

31 - 59

繁體中文

都市大型學校面臨複雜的環境，校長經常面臨許多挑戰與困難，都市學校領導的研究逐漸受到關注。本研究為質性個案研究，選取臺灣都會地區一所大型公立國民小學為研究對象，以訪談、參與觀察和文件分析進行資料蒐集。該校曾擁有輝煌的歷史，但過去幾年的聲望比較低迷的，校長上任之後，領導學校迅速建立辦學特色，重現學校風華與聲望，展現成功的重建領導。本研究有三個主要發現，首先，校長具有刻苦耐勞、嚴謹正直的個人特質，以及深厚的法學素養，鍛鍊出清晰思路的表達能力。其次，校長具有家長式領導風格，並運用漸近目標、資訊科技、課程與教學領導等作為，強化行政團隊及教學團隊，營造團結和優質環境。最後，校長領導的成效，廣泛獲得內外部的肯定，但都市學校教師的專業自主較高，對於校長的領導風格，難免有兩極的評價。

Due to the complicated settings of large urban schools, principals from urban schools are often confronted with challenges and difficulties. Consequently, research on urban school leaders has gradually aroused academic attention. This article reports the findings of a qualitative study with a large urban public elementary school as its subject. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. Despite its splendid history, the case school has been on the decline in recent years. After his assumption of duty, the principal of the case school devoted himself to developing the school features and demonstrating successful turnaround leadership; thus, the school regained its previous reputation. First, in addition to diligence and a candid spirit, the principal has a background in law and strong communication skills. Second, the principal adopts paternalistic leadership, in addition to strategies such as setting progressive goals, utilizing information technology, and demonstrating curricular and instructional leadership, to develop a professional administration, teaching staff, and a harmonious and high-quality campus. Finally, the leadership effectiveness of the principal earns intramural and extramural recognition; however, because of the high professional autonomy of teachers in urban schools, the leadership styles of the principal inevitably receive mixed reviews.

1. 林明地(2004)。我國學校領導研究與實際的現況與未來發展重點。學校行政雙月刊，33，1-9。
   連結：
2. 陳文彥(2011)。學校權力結構的形構與影響：以一所大型國中為例。新竹教育大學教育學報，18(1)，67-98。
   連結：
3. Ainscow, M.(Ed.)(2006).Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaborate.Berkshire, England:McGraw-Hill.
4. Ansell, D.(2004).Improving schools facing challenging circumstances.Nottingham, England:National College for School Leadership.
5. Brighouse, T.(2004).A model of school leadership in challenging urban environments.Nottingham, England:National College for School Leadership.
6. Bush, T.(2011).Theories of educational leadership and management.London, England:Paul Chapman Publishing.
7. Chance, P. L.(2009).Introduction to educational leadership & organizational behavior: Theory into practice.Larchmont, NY:Eye on Education.
8. Cooke, G. J.(2007).Key to success for urban school principals.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
9. Cotton, K.(1996).School size, school climate, and student performance.Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
10. Covey, S. R.(2004).The 8th habit: From effectiveness to greatness.New York, NY:Free Press.
11. Day, C.,Sammons, P.,Leithwood, K.,Hopkins, D.,Gu, Q.,Brown, E.,Ahtaridou, E.(2011).Successful school leadership: Linking with learning.Maidenhead, England:Open University Press.
12. Duke, D. L.(2010).Differentiating school leadership: Facing the challenges of practice.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
13. Firestone, W. A.(Ed.),Riehl, C.(Ed.)(2005).A new agenda for research in educational leadership.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
14. Fullan, M.(2006).Turnaround leadership.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
15. Fye, J.(2008).The urban school leadership model: Bringing school leadership into 21st century.Hoylake, England:Urban Leadership Centre Ltd.
16. Gardner, H.(2001).Good work: When excellence and ethics meet.New York, NY:Basic Books.
17. Garrett, Z.,Newman, M.,Elbourne, D.,Bradley, S.,Noden, P.,Taylor, J.,West, A.(2004).Secondary school size: A systematic review.London, England:EPPI-Centre.
18. Goldring, E. B.,Rallis, S. F.(2000).Principals of dynamic schools.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
19. Hargreaves, A.,Fink, D.(2004).The seven principles of sustainable leadership.Educational Leadership,61(7),8-13.
20. Harker, R.(2005).School size and student attainments: Some New Zealand data.CIES (West) Conference,Vancouver:
21. Heck, R. H.,Hallinger, P.(2005).The study of educational leadership and management.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,33(2),229-244.
22. Hughes, R. L.,Ginnett, R. C.,Curphy, G. J.(2006).Leadership: Enhancing the lessons of experience.Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill.
23. Irmsher, K.(1997).School size.Eugene, OR:University of Oregon.
24. Klonsky, M.(1995).Small schools: The numbers tell a story. A review of the research and current experiences.Small School Workshop,Chicago, IL:
25. Kutash, J.,Nico, E.,Gorin, E.,Tallant, K.,Rahmatullah, S.(2010).School turnaround: A brief overview of the landscape and key issues.Boston, MA:FSG Social Impact Advisors.
26. Leithwood, K. A.(Ed.),Chapman, J.(Ed.),Corson, D.(Ed.),Hallinger, H.(Ed.),Hart, A.(Ed.)(1996).International handbook of leadership and administration.Dordrecht, NED:Academic Publishers.
27. Leithwood, K.,Harris, A.,Strauss, T.(2010).Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
28. Leithwood, K.,Jantzi, D.(2009).A review of empirical evidence about school size effects: A policy perspective.Review of Educational Research,79(1),464-490.
29. Payzant, T. W.(2011).Urban school leadership.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
30. Stake, R. E.(2006).Multiple case study analysis.New York, NY:Guilford.
31. Steinberg, S.(Ed.)(2010).19 urban questions: Teaching in the city.New York, NY:Peter Lang.
32. the Wallace Foundation(Ed.)(2007).Education leadership: A bridge to school reform.Washington, DC:The Wallace Foundation.
33. Wren, J. T.(1995).The leaders’ companion: Insight on leadership through the ages.New York, NY:Free Press.
34. 鄭伯壎(2005).華人領導－理論與實務.臺北市:桂冠.
35. 鄭伯壎,樊景立,周麗芳(2006).家長式領導：模式與證據.臺北市:華泰.
36. 賴志峰(2012).不一樣的學校領導：追尋成功典範.臺北市:高等教育.

1. 賴志峰(2018)。國民小學校長重建領導層面及能力指標建構之研究：複合多評準決策的應用。教育實踐與研究，31(1)，71-112。
2. (2018)。國小校長重建領導之經驗分析。教育研究月刊，293，100-117。