公民素養融入大學通識課程之實踐經驗研究：以「探究多元文化中的自我」課程為例

On the Research of Infusing Civic Literacy into a General Education Curriculum: An Example of ＂Self-Exploring within a Multicultural Context＂

10.3966/181665042013090903003

徐敏雄(Min-Hsiung Hsu)

公民素養 ； 通識教育 ； 課程與教學 ； 融入式課程 ； civic literacy ； general education ； curriculum and instruction

教育研究與發展期刊

9卷3期（2013 / 09 / 30）

59 - 85

繁體中文

為瞭解公民素養如何融入通識教育，本文以研究者開授之「探究多元文化中的自我」課程為例，將公民素養融入其中，並以質性研究方法記錄實踐過程。研究發現，教師若能善用電影廣告媒體、與學生切身相關議題，或足以引發生命反思與情緒感動的媒材，便可讓學生在經驗與價值碰撞過程中擴展知識與經驗，覺察自己、他人與外在社會文化框架的權力關係。若欲將課程成效發揮更佳，教師還必需在適當課程主題與團體氛圍下，適切地融合多元教學設計，才能讓學生因曖昧與衝突的價值與經驗碰撞，學習理性表達、尊重、包容等民主素養，反思各種社會與生命倫理、生活與身體美學，以及媒體意識型態之合理性。

In order to understand the possible strategies and their effects of nurturing civic literacy from the curriculum of general education, I took an example from the class of ＂Self-exploring within a multicultural context＂ taught by myself in the general education center, with qualitative research method, to record whole practice processes. The findings were that if making use of movies and commercial films, troubling issues that are pertinent to the students, or materials that are sufficient to trigger reflection on life, there were chances for students to make their own interpretations and constructions with one another, with possibility to expand knowledge and experiences, as well as the values presetting and power structures among oneself, other people and society. Besides this, if to extend better effects on the implementation of curriculum, there were requirements to make auxiliary of teaching designs, such as lecture, Socratic teaching, guided and groups discussions, role play and cooperative learning et al. During the process due to differences, as well as the collision of vague and conflicting values and experiences, students might learn the literacy of democracy such as rational expression, respect and tolerance, and reflect on the various kinds of social and human ethics, life and body aesthetics, and the rationality of ideology implied in the media.

1. 徐敏雄(2009)。培養現代公民的社區大學課程連結原則之研究。當代教育研究，17(2)，71-101。
   連結：
2. 陳介英(2008)。通識教育與臺灣的大學教育。思與言，46(2)，1-34。
   連結：
3. 陳舜芬(2000)。臺灣地區大學通識教育的檢討與展望。新世紀教育的理論與實踐，高雄市:
   連結：
4. Ball, S. J.(Ed.)(1988).Sociology of education: major themes.New York, NY:Routledge.
5. Benhabib, S.(Ed.)(1996).Democracy and Difference.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University.
6. Brookfield, S. D.(2006).The skillful teacher: On technique, trust, and responsiveness in The classroom.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
7. Cordero, E. D.,White, S.,Park, Y. S.,Israel, T.(2010).Impact of instructor and course characteristics on the effectiveness of curriculum infusion.Journal of American College Health,59(2),75-81.
8. Corr, C. A.,Nabe, C. M.,Corr, D. M.(2003).Death and dying, life and living.Belmont, CA:Brooks/Cole.
9. European Commission (2004). Working Group B “Key Competence＂, Implementation of “Education and Training 2010＂ Work Programme, Key competences for lifelong learning: a European reference framework. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved, from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/basicframe.pdf
10. Galston, W. A.(1991).Liberal purposes: goods, virtues, and diversity in the liberal state.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
11. Giddens, A.(1990).The consequences of Modernity.Cambridge, England:Polity.
12. Giddens, A.(1984).The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
13. Giddens, A.(1992).The Transformation of Intimacy: sexuality, love & eroticism in modern societies.Cambridge, England:Polity.
14. Giroux, H. A.(1988).Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning.Westport, CT:Bergin & Garvey.
15. Gutmann, A.(1995).Civic Education and Social Diversity.Ethics,557-579.
16. Habermas, J.,Burger, T.(Trans.),Lawrence, F.(Trans.)(1989).The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of Bourgeois society.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
17. Hargreaves, A.(2003).Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
18. Kymlicka, W.,Norman, W.(1995).Return of the citizenship: a survey of recent work on citizenship theory.Theorizing citizenship,New York, NY:
19. Lash, S.,Urry, J.(1993).Economies of signs and space.London, England:Sage.
20. Palmer, P. J.(1998).The courage to teach: exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
21. Potter, W. J.(2008).Media literacy.Thousand Oasks, CA:Sage.
22. Ross-Gordon, J. M.(Ed.)(2002).Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
23. Schön, D. A.(1991).The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action.New York, NY:Basic Books.
24. Silverblatt, A.(2008).Media literacy: keys to interpreting media messages.Westprot, CT:Praeger.
25. Van der Kamp, M.,Veendrick, L.(2000).Different views on literacy.Adult education and social responsibility,Frankfurt am Main, Germany:
26. 朱建民(2002)。大學通識教育的回顧與前瞻。通識教育，9(2)，143-151。
27. 朱道凱（譯）,Bauman, Z.(2002).社會學動動腦.臺北:群學.
28. 江宜樺(2005)。公民理念與公民的教育。通識教育，12(1)，27-44。
29. 吳璧純（譯）,詹志禹（譯）,Ratcliff, J. L.,Johnson, D. K.,Gaff, J. G.(2010).通識教育課程改革.臺北市:政大出版社.
30. 李奉儒(2000)。西方大學理念的轉變：從傳統、現代到後現代。新世紀教育的理論與實踐，高雄市:
31. 李茂興（譯）,Corey, G.,Corey, M. S.(1998).追求未來與過去.臺北市:弘智.
32. 林火旺(2000)。公民議題的回顧與反省。二十一世紀公民與道德教育學術研討會論文集，臺北:
33. 林思伶(2011)。我國大專校院通識教育實施現況調查。教育資料與研究雙月刊，99，1-36。
34. 邱誌勇（譯）,許夢芸（譯）,Lewis, J.(2008).細說文化研究基礎.新北市:韋伯.
35. 孫善豪（譯）,Nussbaum, M. C.(2010).培育人文：人文教育改革的古典辯護.臺北市:政大出版社.
36. 張君玫（譯）,Bauman, Z.(2001).全球化：對人類的深遠影響.臺北市:群學.
37. 張秀雄(1999)。建構適合臺灣社會的公民資格觀。通識教育，6(2)，39-84。
38. 教育部(2011)。教育部（2011）。教育部辦理補助公民素養陶塑計畫徵件事宜。臺北市：教育部。
39. 教育部（2010）。第八次全國教育會議之10大中心議題全民論壇之結論與建議。搜尋日期2012/07/04，網址http://www.edu.tw/files/site_content/B0010/10大中心議題全民論壇之結論與建議(彙.pdf。
40. 畢恆達(2001).空間就是權力.臺北市:心靈工坊.
41. 黃武雄(2003).學校在窗外.臺北市:左岸.
42. 黃俊傑(1999)。論通識教育與公民養成之關係。通識教育，6(2)，1-16。
43. 黃俊傑(2004)。論大學通識教育中的主體覺醒與群體意識：教學理念與實踐。通識教育，11(4)，11-22。
44. 黃俊傑(2006).轉型期中的大學通識教育：理念、現況與展望.高雄市:中華民國通識教育學會.
45. 劉阿榮(1999)。臺灣地區通識教育之變遷：批判與反思。通識教育，6(2)，17-37。
46. 樊明德(2004).以電影開啟生命智慧：e化電影是生命教育之理論與實踐.臺北市:學富.
47. 謝明珊（譯）,Conant, J. B.(2010).自由社會的通識教育.臺北:韋伯.
48. 謝青龍,鄒川雄,葉裕民,林明炤(2006)。以經典為核心的通識教育—南華大學通識教育改進方案。南華通識教育研究，3(1)，1-16。