澳洲職業教育與訓練及其品質保證制度發展與啟示

Discussion and Reflection on the Vocational Education and Training and It's Quality Assurance in Australia

10.3966/181665042016061202002

于承平(Cheng-Ping Yu)

技專校院 ； 認可制 ； 品質保證 ； 教育評鑑 ； 職能基準 ； vocational and technological college and university ； accreditation ； quality assurance ； educational evaluation ； occupational competency standard

教育研究與發展期刊

12卷2期（2016 / 06 / 30）

31 - 63

繁體中文

臺灣為強化技專校院評鑑優點並改善不足之處，採認可制教育評鑑，但職業訓練機構則同時採品質保證制度，故如何使該項政策推動更為精進，並整合品質保證作法，值得進一步探討與改進。本文以文獻分析釐清澳洲職業教育與訓練及其品質保證關係，明確凸顯問題分析重點，並藉由文件分析法就澳洲縱向機關層級政策推動及橫向時間發展脈絡分析，呈現分析對象完整全貌，就研究結果提出四項具體可行建議：一、臺灣應建立職業教育與訓練統籌機關；二、臺灣應重新檢討現行技專校院人才培育制度；三、臺灣建立產業所需人才之職能基準及課程；四、臺灣建立職能評量及學習支持制度。除上述建議外，更應融入臺灣的社會文化發展脈絡，發展符合臺灣國情之職業教育與訓練及品質保證政策，期在既有優良之基礎下，發展創新的教育策略，晉升先進國家之林。

In order to strengthen vocational and technological college and university accreditation advantage and improve deficiencies, shift to educational evaluation of accreditation in Taiwan, vocational training institutions have adopted quality assurance system at the same time. It is how to make the policy to promote a more sophisticated and integrated quality assurance practice as well as further study and improvement. In this paper document analysis to clarify the Australian vocational education, training and quality assurance relationship, clearly highlights the problem analysis focused and driven by literature analysis and document analysis. It shows a lateral longitudinal level policy in Australia, presenting a complete picture analysis of objects of the research and the results. Four feasible recommendations are offered: (1) Taiwan should establish vocational education and training institutions; (2) Taiwan should re-examine the existing cultivation of talent system of vocational and technological colleges and universities; (3) Establish occupational competency standard and curriculum; (4) Establish occupational competency assessment and learning support system in Taiwan. In addition to these recommendations, social and cultural development should be integrated into the context of Taiwan's conditions and the development of vocational education and training and its quality assurance policy, to develop innovative educational strategies.

1. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) (2015b). Users' guide—standards for registered training organisations (RTOs) 2015. Retrieved from http://www.asqa.gov.au/verve/_resources/Users_Guide_to_the_Standards_for_Registered_Training_Organisations_RTOs_2015.pdf
2. Commonwealth of Australia (2008a). AQTF 2007: Learner survey guide. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/67518/AQTF_LearnerSurveyGuide.pdf
3. 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局（2013a）。職能導向課程品質認證作業規範（草案）。臺北市：作者。
4. Industry Skills Councils (ISCs) (2013). Quality in VET—A national imperative. Retrieved from http://www.isc.org.au/pdf/Tracked_Cover_sheet_v3_0.pdf
5. 職業訓練法（2011）。
6. 教育部（2013）。澳洲高等教育機構參考名冊。臺北市：作者。
7. Commonwealth of Australia (2008c). AQTF 2007: Competency completion online system guide. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/67523/AQTF-CompetencyCompletionOSGuide3.pdf
8. 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局（2012）。101 年度訓練品質評核系統實施計畫國際參訪活動觀摩實錄報告。臺北市：作者。
9. 勞動部勞動力發展署（2014b）。職能發展及應用推動要點。臺北市：作者
10. 職業訓練機構設立及管理辦法（2006）。
11. Industry Skills Councils (ISCs) (2011). Education, employment and workplace relations references committee : The senate industry skills councils final report. Retrieved from http://www.tda.edu.au/cb_pages/fi les/082O1054.pdf
12. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) (2014). The VET quality framework.Retrieved from http://www.asqa.gov.au/vet-registration/understand-therequirements-for-registration/the-vet-quality-framework.html#standards
13. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) (2013). Essential conditions and standards for initial registration. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/69330/AQTF_Essential_Conditions_and_Standards_for_Initial_Registration_-_publication_July_2013.pdf
14. National vocational education and training regulator act 2011 (2011).
15. Data provision requirements 2011 (2011).
16. 技術及職業教育法（2015）。
17. 勞動部（2014）。促進青年就業方案（103-105 年）（核定本）。臺北市：作者。
18. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) (2010). AQTF Essential conditions and standards for initial registration : Self assessment. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_fi le/0005/69386/AQTF_Essential_Conditions_and_Standards_for_Initial_Registration_-_Self_Assessment_Checklist_for_Applicants.pdf
19. 產業創新條例（2014）。
20. Commonwealth of Australia (2007). AQTF 2007 : standards for accredited courses.Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/69341/AQTF_2007_Standards_for_Accredited_Courses.pdf
21. 技專校院評鑑資訊網（2013）。103-107 學年度科技大學（104-108 學年度技術學院）評鑑指標公告版。取自 http://tve-eval.twaea.org.tw/NewsFile/103-107 學年度科技大學（104-108 學年度技術學院）評鑑指標公告版1020403.doc
22. Financial viability risk assessment requirements 2011 (2011).
23. 勞動部勞動力發展署（2014a）。103 年TTQS 訓練品質評核表—訓練機構版。臺北市：作者。
24. Commonwealth of Australia (2008b). AQTF 2007: Employer survey guide. Retrieved from http://www.nssc.natese.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/67518/AQTF_LearnerSurveyGuide.pdf
25. Foundation Education (2012). Summary of AQTF or VET quality framework audit information. Retrieved from http://www.foundationeducation.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Summary_of_AQTF_audit_information.pdf
26. 行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局（2013b）。訓練規劃與評估職能之國際合作研習活動—學員管理方案。臺北市：作者。
27. Fit and proper person requirements 2011 (2011).
28. 何醒邦（2013，3 月）。澳洲拚技職，藍領年薪尬贏白領。聯合報。取自http://vision.udn.com/storypage.php?ART_ID=727
29. Standards for NVR registered training organisations 2011 (2011).
30. 駐澳大利亞代表處教育組（2012）。澳洲職業教育與訓練制度。教育部電子報，538。取自http://epaper.edu.tw/print.aspx?print_type=windows&print_sn=11451&print_num=538
31. TAFE Directors Australia (2014). About us. Retrieved from http://www.tda.edu.au/cb_pages/about_us.php
32. 大學法（2011）。
33. Industry Skills Councils (ISCs) (2014). Shared responsibilities, shared solutions—analysis of the training package continuous improvement process for the industry skills councils forum. Retrieved from http://www.isc.org.au/resources/uploads/pdf/Training_Package_Continuous_Improvement.pdf
34. 技專校院評鑑資訊網（2011）。下一輪科技大學（技術學院）評鑑指標規劃說明。取自http://tve-eval.twaea.org.tw/NewsFile/ 下一輪技專校院評鑑指標規劃說明（精簡版-2）1000217.doc
35. Australian Government Department of Industry(2012).Annual national report of the australian vocational education and training system 2012.
36. Australian Qualifications Framework Council(2013).Australian Qualifications Framework - second edition.
37. Australian Skills Quality Authority=ASQA(2015).Australian skills quality authority annual report
38. 于承平、林俞均(2013)。歐洲職業教育與訓練教育品質保證制度探討與啟示。教育行政與評鑑學刊，16，65-98。
39. 于承平、高安邦、林俞均(2010)。英國、澳洲及歐盟資歷架構發展經驗對我國之啟示。教育資料集刊，47，213-244。
40. 余曉雯(2010)。德國高等教育中不同層級品質保證之探討。教育政策論壇，13(3)，57-95。
41. 吳思達、王湧泉、劉彥慧(2010)。訓練品質系統評核指標之研究—以國家訓練品質系統（TTQS）為例。「2010年金融海嘯下人力資源管理之挑戰」學術研討會，臺北市:
42. 孟克培(2011)。澳大利亞高等教育的學習成效。評鑑雙月刊，34，46-51。
43. 孫仲山、王明政(2011)。澳洲的職業教育與訓練。就業安全半年刊，100(1)
44. 徐昌慧(2008)。澳洲技職教育與訓練之品質保證機制。評鑑雙月刊，16，35-38。
45. 張一蕃(2014)。以「職能導向學位課程認證」協助科技校院發展特色。評鑑雙月刊，50，47-49。
46. 張心怡(2012)。政策論述2：回歸自我改進本質－技專校院評鑑改採認可制。高教技職簡訊，67
47. 陳振遠(2012)。發展自我特色，善用技專評鑑認可新制。高教技職簡訊，67
48. 陳舜田(2014)。談技專校院認可制評鑑指標。評鑑雙月刊，51，5-10。
49. 黃俐文(2012)。澳洲職能制度介紹。就業安全半年刊，101(2)，27-32。
50. 劉孟奇(2012)。借鏡AQTF 職能本位的課程品保機制。高教技職簡訊，67
51. 蔡錫濤(2013)。澳洲訓練品質管理制度之借鏡。訓練品質系統電子專刊，3
52. 蕭錫錡(2008)。,臺北市:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。

1. 于承平(2019)。結合基本學力與多元學制所發展之紐西蘭學歷資格架構。教育學誌，42，111-151。