社會緊張對於高中職生毒品防治宣導與毒品使用態度之影響

The Effects of Social Strains on the Illicit Drugs Prevention and the Attitude toward Illicit Drugs Use for High School Students in Taiwan

10.3966/181665042019121504002

陳芝吟(Chih-Yin Chen)；李承傑(Cheng-Chieh Li)；董旭英(Yuk-Ying Tung)

社會緊張 ； 毒品防治宣導 ； 毒品使用態度 ； 認同非法手段 ； social strains ； illicit drugs prevention ； attitude toward illicit drugs use ； illegitimate means

教育研究與發展期刊

15卷4期（2019 / 12 / 31）

35 - 66

繁體中文

本研究基於緊張理論的觀點，探究社會緊張對於高中職學生對毒品防治宣導的態度與毒品使用態度的影響。針對臺灣南部三縣市共1,277位公私立高中職學生進行問卷調查，採用偏最小平方法之結構方程模型分析資料，並以多群組比較性別在此模型的差異。本研究發現不同緊張因素對於毒品使用態度的影響路徑有所不同。日常生活困擾和學校緊張關係會透過認同非法手段影響毒品防治宣導與毒品使用態度；學校負面事件不僅對於毒品防治宣導與毒品使用態度具有直接影響，而且會透過認同非法手段產生間接影響。在多群組比較方面，性別在學校緊張因素對於毒品防治宣導與毒品使用態度上具有調節效果，顯示男女生在此一模型有不同的影響路徑。社會緊張在青少年毒品使用態度上扮演重要的角色，建議學校不僅要多方關懷青少年的日常生活，也要加強青少年毒品的認知教育，減低毒品使用的可能性。

Based on strain theory, the aim of this study was to explore the effects of social strains on the illicit drugs prevention and the attitude toward illicit drugs use among high school students. This study was to survey 1277 participants from public and private high and vocational schools in southern Taiwan, including Tainan, Kaohsiung, and Pingtung, and to analyze the data with partial least squares - structural equation modeling as well as multiple group comparison. This study indicated that there were different paths that various strain factors influenced the attitude toward illicit drugs use. Daily life distresses and school strain relationships had indirect positive effects on the illicit drugs prevention and the attitude toward illicit drugs use through illegitimate means. In addition, school negative events not only had direct positive effects on the illicit drugs prevention and the attitude toward illicit drugs use, but also had indirect positive effects on those through illegitimate means. Moreover, gender had a moderate effect on this model, in which the influential path for males was different from that for females. In brief, the strains play a significant role on the attitude toward illicit drugs for teenagers. The academic authorities should pay more attention to their daily life and enhance the cognition of illicit drugs.

1. 李景美,張鳳琴,賴香如,江振東,李碧霞,陳雯昭,張瑜真(2008)。臺北縣市高職學生開始使用成癮物質之危險與保護因子追蹤研究。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，27(5)，399-410。
   連結：
2. 李蓉蓉,邱惟真,江湧益(2017)。中學藥物濫用輔導策略與方法：以春暉輔導成功個案為例。學生事務與輔導，56(1)，49-66。
   連結：
3. 林育陞(2016)。藥物濫用生理、心理狀態之探究─以青少年藥物濫用為例。諮商與輔導，368，37-42。
   連結：
4. 邱名謙(2016)。青少年藥物濫用認知在反毒教育需求之調查研究：以雲林縣國中學生為例。彰化師大教育學報，30，87-109。
   連結：
5. 楊士隆,顧以謙,鄭凱寶(2017)。藥物濫用監測與系統整合研究。刑事政策與犯罪防治研究專刊，14，13-34。
   連結：
6. 董旭英(2003)。一般化緊張理論的實證性檢證。犯罪學期刊，6(1)，103-128。
   連結：
7. 廖容瑜,黃久美,葉敏芳,姜智惠,郭鐘隆(2015)。Flash 動畫融入國民中學藥物教育之成效。數位學習科技期刊，7(3)，1-13。
   連結：
8. 譚子文,范書菁(2010)。依附關係、參與傳統活動、社會緊張因素與臺灣地區青少年外向性偏差行為及內向性偏差行為關聯性之研究。輔導與諮商學報，32(1)，17-42。
   連結：
9. 譚子文,董旭英,葉雅馨(2010)。社會緊張因素與臺灣大學生內化適應問題關聯性之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，28，143-185。
   連結：
10. Agnew, B.(1992).Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency.Criminology,30(1),47-87.
11. Agnew, B.(2001).Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,38(4),319-361.
12. Agnew, B.(1985).A revised strain theory of delinquency.Social Forces,64(1),151-167.
13. Agnew, B.,White, H. R.(1992).An empirical test of general strain theory.Criminology,30(4),475-499.
14. Baldwin, J. N.,Scott, D. M.,DeSimon, E M.,Forrester, J. H.,Fankhauser, M. P.(2011).Substance use attitudes and behaviors at three pharmacy colleges.Substance Abuse,32(1),27-35.
15. Barbieri, N.,Connell, N. M.(2017).Examining general strain: Using subjective and objective measures of academic strain to predict delinquency.Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice,15(4),330-348.
16. Bridges, L. J.,Sigelman, C. K.,Brewster, A. B.,Leach, D. B.,Mack, K. L.,Rinehart, C. S.,Sorongon, A. G.(2003).Cognitive predictors of children’s attitudes toward alcohol and cocaine.Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse,12(3),19-44.
17. Broidy, L.,Agnew, R.(1997).Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,34(3),275-306.
18. Clark, H. K.,Ringwalt, C. L.,Shamblen, S. R.,Hanley, S. M.(2011).Project success’ effects on substance use-related attitudes and behaviors: A randomized controlled trial in alternative high schools.Journal of Drug Education,41(1),17-44.
19. Cloward, R. A.(1959).Illegitimate means, anomie, and deviant behavior.American Sociological Review,24(2),164-176.
20. Cloward, R.A.,Ohlin, L.(1960).Delinquency and opportunity: A theory of delinquent gangs.Glencoe, IL:Free Press.
21. DuPont, R. L.,Campbell, M. D.,Campbell, T. G.,Shea, C. L.,DuPont, H. S.(2013).Self-reported drug and alcohol use and attitudes toward drug testing in high schools with random student drug testing.Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse,22(2),104-119.
22. Espada, J. P.,Gonzálvez, M. T.,Orgilés, M.,Lloret, D.,Guillén-Riquelme, A.(2015).Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of school substance abuse prevention programs in Spain.Psicothema,27(1),5-12.
23. Fornell, C. R.,Larcker, D. F.(1981).Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error.Journal of Marketing Research,18(1),39-50.
24. Francis, K. A.(2014).General strain theory, gender, and the conditioning influence of negative internalizing emotions on youth risk behaviors.Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,12(1),58-76.
25. Gallupe, O.,Baron, S. W.(2009).Street youth, relational strain, and drug use.Journal of Drug Issues,39(3),523-546.
26. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Hult, T. M.,Ringle, C.,Sarstedt, M.(2017).A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
27. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2011).PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet.Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,19(2),139-151.
28. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Sarstedt, M.,Ringle, C. M.,Gudergan, S. P.(2018).Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
29. Henseler, J.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstedt, M.(2015).A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,43(1),115-135.
30. Jang, S. J.(2007).Gender differences in strain, negative emotions, and coping behaviors: A general strain theory approach.Justice Quarterly,24(3),523-553.
31. Jang, S.J.,Johnson, B. R.(2005).Gender, religiosity, and reactions to strain among African American.The Sociological Quarterly,46(2),323-357.
32. Jennings, W. G.,Piquero, N. L.,Gover, A. R.,Pérez, D. M.(2009).Gender and general strain theory: A replication and exploration of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/strain hypothesis among a sample of southwestern Mexican American adolescents.Journal of Criminal Justice,37(4),404-417.
33. Kaufman, J. M.(2009).Gendered responses to serious strain: The argument for a general strain theory of deviance.Justice Quarterly,26(3),410-444.
34. Kline, R. B.(2005).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:The Guiford Press.
35. Liu, X.,Kaplan, H. B.(2001).Role strain and illicit drug use: The moderating influence of commitment to conventional values.Journal of Drug Issues,31(4),833-856.
36. Mazerolle, P.(1998).Gender, general strain, and delinquency: An empirical examination.Justice Quarterly,15(1),65-91.
37. Menard, S.(1995).A developmental test of Mertonian anomie theory.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,32(2),136-174.
38. Morash, M.,Moon, B.(2007).Gender differences in the effects of strain on the delinquency of South Korean youth.Youth & Society,38(3),300-321.
39. Peck, J. H.,Childs, K. K.,Jennings, W. G.,Brady, C. M.(2017).General strain theory, depression, and substance use: Results from a nationally representative, longitudinal sample of white, African-American, and hispanic adolescents and young adults.Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse,27(1),11-28.
40. Pereira, A. P. D.,Paes, Â. T.,Sanchez, Z. M.(2016).Factors associated with the implementation of programs for drug abuse prevention in schools.Rev Saude Publica,50,1-10.
41. Piquero, N. L.,Sealock, M. D.(2004).Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/GST hypotheses.Justice Quarterly,21(1),125-158.
42. Posick, C.,Farrell, A.,Swatt, M. L.(2013).Do boys fight and girls cut? A general strain theory approach to gender and deviance.Deviant Behavior,34(9),685-705.
43. Rigg, K. K.,Ford, J. A.(2014).The misuse of benzodiazepines among adolescents: Psychosocial risk factors in a national sample.Drug and Alcohol Dependence,137,137-142.
44. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
45. Russell, B. S.,Trudeau, J. J.,Leland, A. J.(2015).Social influence on adolescent polysubstance use: The escalation to opioid use.Substance Use & Misuse,50(10),1325-1331.
46. Sarstedt, M.,Henseler, J.,Ringle, C. M.(2011).Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results.Advances in International Marketing,22,195-218.
47. Schwinn, T. M.,Hopkins, J. E.,Schinke, S. P.(2015).Developing a web-based intervention to prevent drug use among adolescent girls.Research on Social Work Practice,26(1),8-13.
48. Schwinn, T. M.,Schinke, S. P.,Di Noia, J.(2010).Preventing drug abuse among adolescent girls: Outcome data from an internet-based intervention.Prevention Science,11(1),24-32.
49. Schwinn, T. M.,Schinke, S. P.,Hopkins, J.,Keller, B.,Liu, X.(2017).An online drug abuse prevention program for adolescent girls: Posttest and 1-year outcomes.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,47(3),490-500.
50. Schwinn, T. M.,Schinke, S. P.,Keller, B.,Hopkins, J.(2019).Two- and three-year follow-up from a gender-specific, web-based drug abuse prevention program for adolescent girls.Addictive Behaviors,93,86-92.
51. Stogner, J.,Gibson, C. L.(2011).The influence of health strain on the initiation and frequency of substance use in a national sample of adolescents.Journal of Drug Issues,41(1),69-94.
52. UNODC(2004).Schools: School-based education for drug abuse prevention.New York, NY:UN.
53. Velasco, V.,Griffin, K. W.,Antichi, M.,Celata, C.(2015).A large-scale initiative to disseminate an evidence-based drug abuse prevention program in Italy: Lessons learned for practitioners and researchers.Evaluation and Program Planning,52,27-38.
54. Watkins, W. C.(2016).Prescription drug misuse among college students: A comparison of motivational typologies.Journal of Drug Issues,46(3),216-233.
55. Wong, T. W,Manning, M.(2017).Adolescent illicit drug use and policy options in Australia: A multicriteria decision analysis.Journal of Drug Issues,47(4),638-664.
56. Yun, M.,Kim, E.,Morris, R.(2014).Gendered pathways to delinquency: An examination of general strain theory among South Korean youth.Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice,12(3),268-292.
57. 吳啟安,譚子文(2013)。負面人際關係、低自我控制對青少年偏差行為的影響。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，5(1)，35-62。
58. 李承傑,郭玲玲,董旭英(2018)。一般化緊張理論對高中生抗拒毒品自我效能之影響。藥物濫用防治，3(4)，23-39。
59. 李承傑,郭玲玲,董旭英(2017)。美國高中生宗教觀對大麻使用的態度與行為之關聯性研究。藥物濫用防治，2(2)，47-74。
60. 李承傑,陳芝吟,董旭英(2018)。以「前加後式理論整合」探討高中生藥物濫用態度之影響機制。藥物濫用防治，3(2)，23-45。
61. 李思賢,林國甯,楊浩然,傅麗安,劉筱雯,李商琪(2009)。青少年毒戒治者對藥物濫用之認知、態度、行為與因應方式研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，1(1)，1-28。
62. 李福恩,傅有生(2014)。以結構方程模式探討高中職校推行紫錐花運動反毒宣導教育之研究。體育運動與 Amos 統計應用期刊，4(1)，16-28。
63. 馬友群(2014)。學校教育要如何防止藥物濫用。諮商與輔導，344，2-4。
64. 張楓明,譚子文(2011)。個人信念、負向生活事件、偏差同儕與青少年初次偏差行為關聯性之實證研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，3(1)，133-159。
65. 張鳳琴(2011)。,臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系。
66. 教育部（2019）。防制學生藥物濫用實施計畫。取自 http://enc.moe.edu.tw/Law/Index2#
67. 許春金,鄭凱寶,蔡田木(2010)。少年生活壓力對犯罪經驗的影響分析：以一般化緊張理論的縱貫性檢驗。中央警察大學犯罪防治學報，12，31-64。
68. 楊士隆,吳志揚,李宗憲(2010)。臺灣青少年藥物濫用防制政策之評析。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，2(2)，1-20。
69. 董旭英(2009)。生活壓迫事件、社會支持、社會心理特質與臺灣都會區國中生偏差行為之關係。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，1(1)，129-164。
70. 蔡東敏,譚子文,董旭英(2015)。臺南都會區國中生緊張因素、接觸偏差同儕、認同非法手段對偏差行為之影響：建構整合理論解釋模型。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，7(2)，37-80。
71. 衛生福利部（2019）。108 年 7 月非法藥物使用案件計檢驗統計資料。取自 https://drug-prevention.fda.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeID=1060&pid=10313
72. 譚子文,張楓明(2012)。緊張因素、接觸偏差同儕及低自我控制與青少年偏差行為關聯性之研究。臺中教育大學學報：數理科技類，26(1)，27-50。

1. 徐乙文(Yi-Wen Hsu);李承傑(Cheng-Chieh Li);董旭英(Yuk-Ying Tung)(2021)。家庭關係對於國中生外向性偏差行為與學業適應問題之影響：以憂鬱情緒與認同非法手段為中介。教育研究與發展期刊。17(3)。107-137。