Mechanical Precision and the Cosmic Sublime in Thomas De Quincey's Writing

10.6153/EXP.202206_(47).0002

Li-hsin Hsu

Thomas De Quincey ； mechanical precision ； the nebular hypothesis ； epistemological dualism ； telescope

Ex-position

47期（2022 / 06 / 01）

7 - 33

英文

Proclaimed by Thomas Carlyle as the ＂Mechanical Age,＂ the nineteenth century saw a prevailing preoccupation with mechanical ingenuity and instrumental advancement in both the scientific and the literary worlds in Europe. This article examines a number of writings by Thomas De Quincey about human perception in the 1840s, exploring how they magnify the awkward and yet intimately entangled, symbiotic relationship between technology and poetry. In essays like ＂The Palimpsest of the Human Brain＂ (1845) and ＂System of the Heavens Revealed by Lord Rosse's Telescopes＂ (1846), De Quincey embraces mechanical progress and its necessity in providing one with an unadulterated access to cosmic reality. However, in a later essay, ＂The Poetry of Pope＂ (1848), De Quincey would theorize the distinction between scientific and aesthetic writing, prioritizing poetic imagination over scientific facts. The article examines De Quincey's epistemological dualism in relation to mechanical precision and explores how these essays disclose a more nuanced reading of scientific invention and its close alliance with the mediating and duplicating power of literary representation. It shows how De Quincey's writing speaks to the Romantic longing for a convergence between empirical objectivity and spiritual transcendence by disquieting, or even dissolving, the mind-matter and human-machine dichotomies established in his cosmology. Furthermore, these essays utilize the notion of mechanical precision to make human perception accessible, manageable, and potentially reproducible, in order to claim a higher level of aesthetic potency.

1. Weng, Jerry Chia-Je(2020).Thomas De Quincey and the Palimpsest of Empire.The Wenshan Review of Literature and Culture,14(1),1-32.
   連結：
2. Armstrong, Isobel(2008).Victorian Glassworlds: Glass Culture and the Imagination, 1830-1880.Oxford:Oxford UP.
3. Bacon, Francis. Novum Organum. 1620. Ed. and trans. Basil Montague. The Works. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: Parry & MacMillan, 1854. 343-71. 3 vols.
4. Barrell, John(1991).The Infection of Thomas de Quincey: A Psychopathology of Imperialism.New Haven:Yale UP.
5. Brothers, Dometa Wiegand(2015).The Romantic Imagination and Astronomy: On All Sides Infinity.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
6. Burwick, Frederick(Ed.)(2016).The Works of Thomas De Quincey.London:Routledge.
7. Carlyle, Thomas,Tennyson, G. B.(Ed.)(1984).Carlyle Reader.Cambridge:CUP Archive.
8. Chico, Tita(2018).The Experimental Imagination: Literary Knowledge and Science in the British Enlightenment.Stanford:Stanford UP.
9. Cian, Duffy(2014).‘My purpose was humbler, but also higher’: Thomas De Quincey’s ‘System of the Heavens,’ Popular Science, and the Sublime.Romanticism,20(1),1-14.
10. Clej, Alina(1995).A Genealogy of the Modern Self: Thomas De Quincey and the Intoxication of Writing.Stanford:Stanford UP.
11. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor,Keach, William(Ed.)(2014).Samuel Taylor Coleridge: The Complete Poems.London:Penguin Books.
12. Cronin, Richard(2002).Romantic Victorians: English Literature, 1824-1840.Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Dawson, Clara(2021).Mechanical Reproduction, Commodity, and the Gift-Annual Aesthetic.Studies in Romanticism,60(3),247-275.
14. De Quincey, Thomas,Burwick, Frederick(Ed.)(2010).Selected Essays on Rhetoric.Carbondale:Southern Illinois UP.
15. De Quincey, Thomas,Morrison, Robert(Ed.)(2013).Confessions of an English Opium-Eater and Other Writings.Oxford:Oxford UP.
16. Dillon, Sarah(2007).The Palimpsest: Literature, Criticism, Theory.London:Bloomsbury.
17. Duncan, Ian(2019).Human Forms: The Novel in the Age of Evolution.Princeton:Princeton UP.
18. Fulford, Tim,Lee, Debbie,Kitson, Peter J.(2014).Literature, Science and Exploration in the Romantic Era: Bodies of Knowledge.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
19. Garofalo, Devin M.(2021).Worlds More or Less: Nineteenth-Century Ethno-Astronomy and Cosmologies of Reference.European Romantic Review,32(5-6),583-600.
20. Gaull, Marilyn(1990).Under Romantic Skies: Astronomy and the Poet.Wordsworth Circle,21(1),34-41.
21. Gigante, Denise(2009).Life: Organic Form and Romanticism.New Haven:Yale UP.
22. Goldstein, Amanda Jo(2017).Sweet Science: Romantic Materialism and the New Logics of Life.U of Chicago P.
23. Goulding, Christopher(2006).Shelley’s Cosmological Sublime: William Herschel, James Lind and the ‘Multitudinous Orb’.Review of English Studies,57(232),783-792.
24. Greene, John C.(1978).Rev. of Creation by Natural Law: Laplace's Nebular Hypothesis in American Thought by Ronald L. Numbers.Isis,69(2),312.
25. Gurevich, Tatiana(2018).Thomas de Quincey as the Disseminator of Kantian Traditions.Philosophical Traditions in Europe,34,43-49.
26. Hall, Jason David(2017).Nineteenth-Century Verse and Technology: Machines of Meter.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
27. Hasted, Meegan(2014).U of Sydney.
28. Henchman, Anna(2014).The Starry Sky Within: Astronomy and the Reach of the Mind in Victorian Literature.Oxford:Oxford UP.
29. Hewitt, Rachel(2007).‘Eyes to the Blind’: Telescopes, Theodolites and Failing Vision in William Wordsworth’s Landscape Poetry.Journal of Literature and Science,1(1),5-23.
30. Holmes, Richard(2008).The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science.New York:Pantheon.
31. Hoskin, Michael(2012).The Construction of the Heavens: William Herschel’s Cosmology.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
32. Janowitz, Anne(2005).‘What a rich fund of Images is treasured up here’: Poetic Commonplaces of the Sublime Universe.Studies in Romanticism,44(4),469-492.
33. Jordan, John O.(ed.),Patten, Robert L.(ed.)(1995).Literature and the Marketplace: NineteenthCentury British Publishing and Reading Practices.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
34. Kelley, Philip(ed.),Lewis, Scott(ed.)(1984).The Brownings' Correspondence.Winfield, Kansas:Wedgestone.
35. Lightman, Bernard(2007).Victorian Popularizers of Science: Designing Nature for New Audiences.Chicago:U of Chicago P.
36. Lindop, Grevel(1985).The Opium-Eater: A Life of Thomas De Quincey.Oxford:Oxford UP.
37. Luca, V. A. De(1980).Thomas De Quincey: The Prose of Vision.Toronto:U of Toronto P.
38. McLane, Maureen N.(2000).Romanticism and the Human Sciences: Poetry, Population, and the Discourse of the Species.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
39. Miller, Joseph Hillis(1963).The Disappearance of God: Five Nineteenth-Century Writers.Champaign:U of Illinois P.
40. Milligan, Barry(1995).Pleasures and Pains: Opium and the Orient in Nineteenth-Century British Culture.Charlottesville:UP of Virginia.
41. Milligan, Barry(2008).Brunoniamsm, Radicalism, and ‘The Pleasures of Opium’.Thomas De Quincey: New Theoretical and Critical Directions,London:
42. Moore, James Richard(Ed.)(2002).History, Humanity and Evolution: Essays for John C. Greene.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
43. Morrison, Robert(2009).The English Opium Eater: A Biography of Thomas De Quincey.London:Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
44. Morrison, Robert(Ed.)(2016).The Works of Thomas De Quincey.London:Routledge.
45. Murray, Alex(2011).Vestiges of the Phoenix: De Quincey, Kant and the Heavens.Victoriographies,1(2),243-260.
46. Nemoniau, Virgil(1984).The Taming of Romanticism: European Literature and the Age of Beidermeier.Cambridge, MA:Harvard UP.
47. Nichol, John Pringle. Views of the Architecture of the Heavens: In a Series of Letters to a Lady. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1839.
48. Nichol, John Pringle. Thoughts on Some Important Points Relating to the System of the World. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1846.
49. Numbers, Roland L.(1977).Creation by Natural Law: Laplace's Nebular Hypothesis in American Thought.Seattle:U of Washington P.
50. O’Connor, Ralph(2007).The Earth on Show: Fossils and the Poetics of Popular Science, 1802-1856.Chicago:U of Chicago P.
51. Parker, Mark(2000).Literary Magazines and British Romanticism.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
52. Peel, Robin(2010).Emily Dickinson and the Hill of Science.Madison:Fairleigh Dickinson UP.
53. Richardson, Alan(2001).British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
54. Rudwick, Martin J. S.(2005).Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution.Chicago:U of Chicago P.
55. Sachs, Jonathan(2021).De Quincey’s Slowness.Romanticism,27(3),250-261.
56. Sha, Richard G.(2018).Imagination and Science in Romanticism.Baltimore:John Hopkins UP.
57. Siskin, Clifford(ed.),Warner, William(ed.)(2010).This Is Enlightenment.Chicago:U of Chicago.
58. Smith, Jonathan(1993).De Quincey’s Revisions to ‘The System of the Heavens.’.Victorian Periodicals Review,26(4),203-212.
59. Smith, Jonathan. "‘Abysses of the Heavenly Wildernes’: Thomas De Quincey, John Herschel, and J. P. Nichol Confront the Great Nebula in Orion." Web. Accessed 26 May 2022.
60. Snyder, Robert Lance(1981).‘The Loom of Palingenesis’: De Quincey’s Cosmology in ‘System of the Heavens.’.Thomas De Quincey: Bicentenary Studies,Norman:
61. Stanyon, Miranda(2014).Serpentine Sighs: De Quincey‘s Suspiria de Profundis and the Serpentine Line.Studies in Romanticism,53(1),31-58.
62. Tresch, John(2012).The Romantic Machine: Utopian Science and Technology after Napoleon.Chicago:U of Chicago.
63. Volney, Constantin-François. Volney’s Ruins; Or, Meditation on the Revolutions of Empires: Tr., Under the Immediate Inspection of the Author, from the Latest Paris Ed., with His Notes of Illustration. To which is Added, The Law of Nature, and a Short Biographical Notice. G. Vale, 1855.
64. Wise, M. Norton(Ed.)(1995).The Values of Precision.Princeton:Princeton UP.
65. Wordsworth, William,Owen, W. J. B.(Ed.),Smyser, J. W.(Ed.)(1974).The Prose Works of William Wordsworth.Oxford:Oxford UP.
66. Wylie, Charles Clayton. "The Nebular Hypothesis in the Nineteenth Century." The Scientific Monthly 27.3 (1928): 260-63.