創造力教育研究之文獻計量分析

A Bibliometric Analysis of Creativity in Education Research

10.7034/DSE.202212_(74).0003

林業盈(Yeh-Ling Lin)

回顧性研究 ； 文獻計量分析 ； 引文分析 ； 共被引分析 ； 創造力教育 ； bibliometric review ； review of research ； citation analysis ； co-citation analysis ； creativity education

特殊教育發展期刊

74期（2022 / 12 / 01）

31 - 52

繁體中文;英文

創造力不僅是二十一世紀的關鍵核心能力，教育及研究領域更是世界各國持續推動的領域與發展的方向。本研究從國內外具代表性的兩個電子資料庫蒐集創造力教育研究文獻，並使用文獻計量學的引文分析方法進行文獻回顧性分析，旨在了解國內外創造力教育研究文獻的分布特性與引用情形，例如：文獻發表的年代分布、作者分布、出版國家分布、隸屬的研究領域分布、期刊出版品分布、文獻被引用及共被引情形等。

Creativity is not only a key core competency in the 21st century, but also the field of education and research is a field and development direction that countries around the world continue to promote. This study collects periodicals of creativity education researches from domestic and foreign databases, and uses the citation analysis method of bibliometrics to conduct a retrospective analysis. The purpose of this study is to understand the distribution characteristics and relationship between domestic and foreign literature on creativity education researchsuch asthe distribution of the year of publication, the distribution of authors, the distribution of publishing countries, the distribution of research fields, the distribution of journal publications, the citations and co-citations of the literatures.

1. Å ström, F.(2007).Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,58(7),947-957.
2. Andres, A.(2009).Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study.Chandos Publishing.
3. Baas, M.,De Dreu, C. K. W.,Nijstad, B. A.(2008).A meta-analysis of 25 years of research on mood and creativity: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?.Psychological Bulletin,134,739-756.
4. Bassecoulard, E.,Lelu, A.,Zitt, M.(2007).Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: a preliminary analysis.Scientometrics,70(3),859-880.
5. Batdi, V.,Batdi, H.(2015).Effect of creative drama on academic achievement: A meta analytic and thematic analysis.Educational Sciences:Theory & Practice,15(6),1459-1470.
6. Beghetto, R. A.,Plucker, J. A.,MaKinster, J. G.(2001).Who Studies Creativity and How Do We Know?.Creativity Research Journal,13,351-357.
7. Biçer, N.(2017).The Influence of Student-centered Methods in Turkish Language Instruction on Academic Success: A Meta-analysis Study.Universal Journal of Educational Research,5,687-697.
8. Byron, K.,Khazanchi, S.(2012).Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses.Psychological Bulletin,138(4),809-830.
9. Byron, K.,Khazanchi, S.(2011).A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship of state and trait anxiety to performance on figural and verbal creative tasks.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,37(2),269-283.
10. Castillo-Vergara, M.,Alvarez-Marin, A.,Placencio-Hidalgo, D.(2018).A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics.Journal of Business Research,85,1-9.
11. Conrad, F.,Asher, J. W.(2000).Self-concept and self-esteem through drama: A meta-analysis.Youth Theatre Journal,14,78-84.
12. Creswell, J.W. ,張宇樑（譯）,吳樎椒（譯）(2007).研究設計：質化、量化、與混合方法取向.學富.
13. Davis, M. A.(2009).Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,108(1),25-38.
14. Gajda, A.,Karwowski, M.,Beghetto, R. A.(2017).Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis.Journal of Educational Psychology,109(2),269-299.
15. Haase, J.,Hoff, E. V.,Hancel. P. H.,Innes-Ker, Å(2018).A Meta-Analysis of the Relation between Creative Self-Efficacy and Different Creativity Measurements.Creativity Research Journal,30,1-16.
16. Hursen, C.,Kaplan, A.,Ozdal, H.(2014).Assessment of Creative Thinking Studies In Terms of Content Analysis.Social and Behavioral Sciences,143,1177-1185.
17. Kardash, C. M.,Wright, L.(1987).Does Creative Drama Benefit Elementary School Students: A Meta-Analysis.Youth Theatre Journal,1(3),11-18.
18. Kim, K. H.(2008).Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores.The Journal of Creative Behavior,42(2),106-130.
19. Kim, K. H.(2005).Can Only Intelligent People Be Creative? A Meta-Analysis.Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,16(2-3),57-66.
20. Kodama, H.,Watatani, K.,Sengoku, S.(2013).Competency-basedassessment of academic interdisciplinary research and implication touniversity management.Research Evaluation,22(2),93-104.
21. Krippendorff, K.(2004).Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology.Sage.
22. Long, H.,Plucker, J.,Yu, Q.,Ding, Y.,Kaufman, J.(2014).Research Productivity and Performance of Journals in the Creativity Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis.Creativity Research Journal,26(3),353-360.
23. Marshall. C.,Rossman, G.B.,李政賢（譯）(2006).質性研究：設計與計畫.五南.
24. Milojevic, S.,Leydesdorff, L.(2013).Information metrics (iMetrics): A research specialty with a socio cognitive identity?.Scientometrics,95(1),141-157.
25. Nemeth, C. J.,Goncalo, J. A.(2005).Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent authors.Creativity Research Journal,17,1-8.
26. Ö zdas, F,Batdi, V.(2017).AThematic-based meta analytic study regarding the effect of creativity on academic success and learning retention.Journal of Education and Training Studies,5(3),53.
27. Osenberg, C.W.,Sarnelle, O.,Cooper, S.D.(1997).Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis.American Naturalist,150,798-812.
28. Price, D. J.(1965).Networks of scientific papers.Science,149(3683),510-515.
29. Ricciardelli, L. A.(1992).Bilingualism and cognitive development in relation to threshold theory.J Psycholinguist Res,21(4),301-316.
30. Sandelowski, M.,Barroso, J.(2007).Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research.Springer Verlag.
31. Sawyer, K.(2015).A Call to Action: The Challenges of Creative Teaching and Learning.Teachers College Record,117(10),1-34.
32. Small, H.(1973).Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,24(4),265-269.
33. Small, H.,Griffith, B. C.(1974).The structure of scientific literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties.Science Studies,4(1),17-40.
34. Ulubery, Ö .(2018).The Effedct of Creative Drama as a Method on Skills: A meta-analysis Study.Journal of Education and Training Studies.,6(4),63-78.
35. 王崇德(1996)。21 世紀的資訊科學。21 世紀資訊科學與技術的展望國際學術研討會，臺北市，臺灣:
36. 何光國(1994).文獻計量學導論.三民書局.
37. 吳雅萍(2008)。國立新竹教育大學。
38. 孟連生(1996)。試問引文索引法的性質與功能。資訊傳播與圖書館學，3(1)，15-19。
39. 林巧敏(2010)。歷史論文引用檔案文獻之特性分析。2010 年海峽兩岸檔案暨微縮學術交流會論文集
40. 教育部(2003).創造力教育白皮書.教育部.
41. 黃雨柔(2016)。國立臺灣科技大學。
42. 詹啟德(2011)。國立中山大學。
43. 劉林青(2005)。範式視覺化與共被引分析：以戰略管理研究領域為例。情報學報，24(1)，20-25。
44. 蔡明月(2003).資訊計量學與文獻特性.國立編譯館.