電子檔案對檔案理論模式之影響

The Impact of Electronic Records on Archival Theories and Models

林秋燕(Lin, Chiu-Yen)

檔案理論 ； 檔案管理模式 ； 電子檔案 ； archival theory ； archival management model ； electronic records

檔案半年刊

14卷1期（2015 / 03 / 01）

30 - 44

繁體中文

本文依檔案理論發展特性，探討電子檔案管理問題促動之檔案理論與模式變革，形成新典範理論特性，並分析其對檔案管理模式、鑑定、編排、描述、典藏、應用等不同面向理論產生之影響，歸納新舊理論內涵差異及關鍵要素，期作為國內檔案理論與實務發展參考，建立符合資訊時代之檔案管理模式與創新思維。

Based on the characteristics of the revolution of new archival paradigm, this article discusses the impact of electronic records on the archival theories in the respect of management model, appraisal, arrangement, description, custody and access. In addition, the differences between the traditional and new theories are also identified. Finally, some references are provided for further development of theories and practices in Taiwan, and hope to establish an integrated and effective model for records and archives management through innovative thinking in the information age.

1. 林奇秀(2007)。紀錄連續體理論淺析。圖書資訊學刊，5(1/2)，107-137。
   連結：
2. Philip C. Brooks, "Current Aspects of Records Administration: the Archivist's Concern in Records Administration," The American Archivist 6, no.3 (1943): 158-164.
3. Philip C. Brooks, "The Selection of Records for Preservation," The American Archivist 3 (Oct. 1940): 230-234.
4. Society of American Archivists (SAA), A Glossary of Archival and Records Terminology (2005),〈http://www2.archivists.org/glossary/terms/l/life-cycle〉（20 July, 2012）
5. Abraham, Terry(1991).Oliver W. H. Revisited: Levels of Arrangement and Description in Practice.The American Archivist,54(3),370-377.
6. Artherton, Jay(1985).From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management-Archives Relationship.Archivaria,21,43-51.
7. Bantin, Philip C.(1998).Strategies for Managing Electronic Records: a New Archival Paradigm? an Affirmation of Our Archival Traditions?.Archival Issues,23(1),1-22.
8. Bearman, David(1992).Diplomatics, Weberian Bureaucracy, and the Management of Electronic Records in Europe and America.The American Archivist,55(1),168-181.
9. Bearman, David,Lytle, Richard H.(1985).The Power of the Principle of Provenance.Archivaria,21,14-27.
10. Buckland, Michael(1994).On the Nature of Records Management Theory.The American Archivist,57(2),346-351.
11. Cook, Terry(2005).Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950-2000.Archival Science,5(2-4),101-161.
12. Cook, Terry(1997).What is Past is Prologue: a History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift.Archivaria,43,17-63.
13. Cook, Terry(1994).Electronic Records, Paper Minds: the Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era.Archives and Manuscripts,22,300-328.
14. Cook, Terry(2001).Archival Science and Postmodernism: New Formulations for Old Concepts.Archival Science,1(1),3-24.
15. Cook, Terry(2004).Macro-Appraisal and Functional Analysis: Documenting Governance Rather Than Government.Journal of the Society of Archivists,25(1),5-18.
16. Cook, Terry,Schwartz, Joan M.(2002).Archival, Records, and Power: From（Postmodern）Theory to (Archival) Performance.Archival Science,2(3-4),171-185.
17. Cox, Richard J.(1992).University of Pittsburgh.
18. Derrida, Jacques,Prenowitz, Eric(1995).Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression.Diacritics,25(2),9-63.
19. Duranti, Luciana(2001).Concepts, Principles, and Methods for the Management of Electronic Records.The Information Society: an International Journal,17(4),271-279.
20. Duranti, Luciana,MacNeil, Heather(1996).The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.Archivaria,42,46-67.
21. Eastwood, Terry(Ed.)(1992).The Archival Fonds: From Theory to Practice.Bureau of Canadian archivists.
22. Ham, F. Gerald(1981).Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era.The American Archivist,44(3),207-216.
23. Hedstrom, Margaret(1991).Understanding Electronic Incunabula: a Framework for Research on Electronic Records.The American Archivist,54(3),334-354.
24. Hedstrom, Margaret(Ed.)(1993).Electronic Records Management Program Strategies.Pittsburgh:Archives & Museum Informatics.
25. Henry, Linda J.(1998).Schellenberg in Cyberspace.American Archivist,61,309-27.
26. International Council on Archives=ICA(1997).Guide for Managing Electronic Records from an Archival Perspective.Paris:ICA.
27. International Council on Archives=ICA(2005).Electronic Records: a Workbook for Archivists.Paris:ICA.
28. International Council on Archives=ICA(1996).Electronic Records Management: a Literature Review.Paris:ICA.
29. Jimerson, Randall C.(Ed.)(2000).American Archival Studies: Readings in Theory and Practice.Chicago:The Society of American Archivists.
30. Lappin, James(2010).What Will Be the Next Records Management Orthodoxy?.Records Management Journal,20(3),252-264.
31. McKemmish, Sue(1997).Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility.Proceedings of the Records Management Association of Australia 14th national convention,Perth=澳洲伯斯:
32. Peterson, Trudy Huskamp(1986).The National Archives and the Archival Theorist Revisited, 1954-1984.The American Archivist,49(2),125-133.
33. Pinkett, Harold T.(1981).Archival Theory: the State of Art.The American Archivist,44(3),217-222.
34. Ridener, John(2009).From Polders to Postmodernism: a Concise History of Archival Theory.Duluth, MN:Litwin Books, LLC.
35. Schellenberg, Theodore R.(1956).Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
36. Scott, Peter J.(1966).The Record Group Concept: a Case for Abandonment.The American Archivist,29(4),493-504.
37. Stielow, Frederick J.(1992).Archival Theory and the Preservation of Electronic Media: Opportunities and Standards below the Cutting Edge.The American Archivist,55(2),332-343.
38. Stielow, Frederick J.(1991).Archival Theory Redux and Redeemed: Definition and Context Toward a General Theory.The American Archivist,54(1),14-26.
39. Upward, Frank(1996).Structuring the Records Continuum, Part One: Post-Custodial Principles and Properties.Archives and Manuscripts,24(2),268-285.