普高男校高一學生國語文電子書課外閱讀成效研究

A study on the effect of extracurricular reading of Chinese e-books for high school freshman in a boys high School

魏子閎(Wei, Tzu-Hung)

電子書 ； 閱讀素養 ； 閱讀成效 ； 低數位足跡 ； e-books ； reading literacy ； reading effectiveness ； low digital footprint

台北海洋科技大學學報

13卷2期（2022 / 09 / 01）

191 - 220

英文

依據〈十二年國民基本教育課程綱要〉課程目標第二點「結合國語文與科技資訊，進行跨領域探索，發展自學能力，奠定終身學習的基礎」。學習運用科技資訊使中學生具備國語文跨領域與自學素養。本研究問題有三。一、高中生閱讀課外書的種類與方式？二、若電子書經轉化為閱讀素養教材，閱讀成效為何？三、「低數位足跡」學生族群影響個人電子書閱讀成果？以中部某普通高中男校學生為樣本。研究第一階段採質性「半結構」訪談，每次5－10人，總抽樣訪談人數為120人，直覺描述個人語文課外閱讀與電子書閱讀的現況；第二階段，教學現場課程設計，選定雲端國語文（跨領域）電子書10本，便利抽樣5個班級學生，每班各進行一學期電子書課外閱讀計畫，每位學生從10本指定電子書中自選3本，各書搭配線上形成性評量，以新課綱混合題型命題，測驗電子書閱讀精熟程度。學期課程結束後，有3組共6人評定者（Rater），針對混合題型答案進行評分。最後，深度訪談任課班級5位國語文教師，了解現場觀察評量。研究結果如下：一、高中生停留在手機的時間很長，看劇、手遊RPG打怪遊戲、滑臉書、IG與LINE。加上網路費用便宜，不易選擇優良數位閱讀平台，電子書閱讀風氣養成不易。二、第一階段學生訪談口述與第二階段學生自選閱讀3本電子書，呈現相似結果。高中生閱讀種類較多的是文學小說、繪本漫畫、生活勵志類書籍。三、不管電子書、紙書都是書，現在最大的問題是學生看書種類欠缺多元。若能增加各類書籍的轉製量與互動介面，互動式電子書較受高中學生喜愛。四、電子書學習成效佳。依據學生閱讀完電子書填答情況，選擇題答題正確率平均89％；但是，歸納分析性簡答題，各書答題正確率平均為67％。經國語文教師研判，學生不熟悉新課綱混合題型答題方式、文字表達過於簡省、口語化且錯字偏多。五、網路電子書易學、好操作，「低數位足跡」學生的電子書閱讀效能不受影響。

According to the second point of the curriculum goal of the "12-year National Basic Education Curriculum Outline", "combining national language and technological information, conducting cross-field exploration, developing self-learning ability, and laying the foundation for lifelong learning". Learn to use technology and information to equip middle school students with cross-domain and self-learning literacy in Mandarin Chinese. There are three questions in this research. 1.What types and ways do high school students read extracurricular books? 2.What is the effect of reading? If e-books are transformed into reading literacy teaching materials. 3.Does the "low digital footprint" student group affect personal e-book reading results? Take the students of an ordinary high school boys' school in central China as a sample. In the first stage of the study, qualitative "semi-structured" interviews were conducted, with 5-10 people each time, and the total number of sample interviews was 120 people to intuitively describe the current situation of personal Chinese extracurricular reading and e-book reading; the second stage, teaching on-site curriculum design, Selected 10 e-books of Mandarin Chinese (cross-field) on the cloud, and conveniently sampled 5 class students. Each class carried out a one-semester e-book extracurricular reading plan. Each student selected 3 e-books from the 10 designated e-books. The online formative assessment uses the new syllabus and mixed question-type propositions to test the proficiency of e-book reading. At the end of the semester course, there are 3 groups of 6 raters (Rates) to grade the mixed-type answers. Finally, in-depth interviews were conducted with 5 Chinese teachers in the class to understand the on-site observation and evaluation. The results of the study are as follows: 1. High school students stay on their mobile phones for a long time, watching dramas, mobile games, RPG fighting games, swiping on Facebook, IG and LINE. In addition, the Internet is cheap, and it is difficult to choose a good digital reading platform. It is not easy to develop an e-book reading ethos. 2. The students in the first stage interviewed and dictated and the students in the second stage read 3 e-books by themselves, showing similar results. High school students read more literary novels, picture books and comics, and life inspirational books. 3. Regardless of whether e-books or paper books are books, the biggest problem now is the lack of diversity in the types of books that students read. Interactive e-books are more popular among high school students if the number of reprints and interactive interfaces of various books can be increased. 4. The e-book learning effect is good. According to the students' reading and filling in the e-book, the average correct rate of multiple-choice questions is 89%; however, for the short-answer questions, the average correct rate of each book is 67%. According to the judgment of the Chinese language teacher, the students are not familiar with the mixed-type answering method of the new syllabus, the text expression is too simple, and the colloquialism is too many and there are many typos. 5. Online e-books are easy to learn and easy to operate, and the e-book reading performance of students with "low digital footprint" will not be affected.

1. Barman, N.(2022).Digital technology adoption and its impact on the education system during the Covid-19 pandemic.International Management Review,Special issue,27-31.
2. Chen, F.,Sakyi, A.,Cui, Y.(2022).Identifying key contextual factors of digital reading literacy through a machine learning approach.Journal of Educational Computing Research
3. Crawford, M. B.(2015).The world beyond your head: on becoming an individual in an age of distraction.New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
4. 吳璧純(2017)。素養導向教學之學習評量。台灣教育評論月刊，6(3)，30-34。
5. 巫文娟(2017)。國立台灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
6. 沈佳慧(2018)。國立台灣師範大學英語學系。
7. 汪純煌(2016)。國立台南大學數位學習科技學系。
8. 林文藝(2016)。國立嘉義大學教育學系研究所。
9. 林巧敏,葉ㄧ蕾(2017)。青少年輕小說閱讀動機與閱讀行為之研究—以新北市為例。圖書資訊學研究，11(2)
10. 張貴琳(2011)。國立台南大學測驗統計研究所。
11. 許美觀(2020)。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系。
12. 黃文定(2019)。從 2018PISA 全球素養評量問卷論國際教育的實踐。台灣教育評論月刊，8(6)，06-11。
13. 黃思萍(2020)。國立中山大學教育研究所。
14. 黃婧華(2016)。國立雲林科技大學設計學研究所。
15. 黃惠敏(2018)。以學生學習為中心之學校教育與課程探究。台灣教育評論月刊，7(1)，178-181。
16. 楊純青(2004)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所。
17. 趙偉順,張玉山(2011)。經驗學習理論在生活科技課程的教學應用－以「扭轉乾坤」曲柄玩具單元為例。生活科技教育月刊，44(6)
18. 賴坤弘(2018)。國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
19. 魏彗娟(2017)。國立交通大學教育研究所。
20. 龔心怡(2016)。因應差異化教學的評量方式：多元評量停、看、聽。台灣教育評論月刊，5(1)，211-215。