题名

聯合國公民與政治權利國際公約在別的國際程序下審查之研究

并列篇名

Consideration Under Another International Procedure Within the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

作者

胡慶山(Ching-Shan, HU)

关键词

聯合國 ； 公民與政治權利 ； 國際公約 ； 國際程序 ； 第一任擇議定書 ； 相同事件 ； 保留 ； United Nations ； Civil and Political Rights ； International Covenant ； International Procedure ； Optional Protocol ； Same Matter ； Reservation

期刊名称

台灣國際法學刊

卷期/出版年月

15卷2期（2019 / 06 / 01）

页次

33 - 46

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究將基於多層級政治環境下之「人權保障的層級關係」，分析與探討公政公約與「其他國際程序」之適用上「排他」關係，以貫徹對國際人權法機制的理解，特別是聯合國公民與政治權利國際公約（以下簡稱為「公政公約」）第一任擇議定書（以下簡稱為「議定書」）第五條第二項（a）款規定，「委員會不得審查個人來文，除非已確定，相同事件未在別的國際調查或解決的程序下受到審查」。特別是針對任擇議定書第五條第二項（a）款在排除相關案件的可受理性時，應如何對處在與任擇議定書類似可比擬的人權機構程序的審查？同時，一旦上述審查停止時，應如何理解第五條第二項（a）款的可受理性？如何理解許多歐洲締約當事國針對任擇議定書提出保留，排除相同事件已受到可比擬的人權機構審查，即使上述審查已完成？結果是上述許多保留與人權事務委員會的關係如何？帶來何種的法效果？人權事務委員會如何因應上述的保留？有何事例可循？同時，在何種條件下，上述保留亦將不予適用？上述論點皆會在本文中加以考察。
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. Chanderballi Mahabir v. Austria, Communication No. 994/2000, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/82/D/994/2000 (2004)
  2. Ebenezer Derek Mbongo Akwanga v. Cameroon, Communication No. 1813/2008, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/101/D/1813/2008 (2011).
  3. Miguel A. Millán Sequeira v. Uruguay, Communication No. 6/1977, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/10/D/6/1977 (1980).
  4. Antonio Sánchez López v. Spain, Communication No. 777/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/67/D/777/1997 (1999).
  5. Nabil Sayadi and Patricia Vinck v. Belgium, Communication No. 1472/2006, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006 (2008).
  6. Walter Kollar v. Austria, Communication No. 989/2001, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/78/DR/989/2001 (2003)
  7. Carl Henrik Blom v. Swden, Communication No. 19/1985, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 216 (1990).
  8. Zohra Madoui and Menouar Madoui v. Algeria, Communication No. 1495/2006 U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/94/D/1495/2006 (2008), para. 6.2.
  9. L.E.S.K v. e Netherlands, Communication No. 381/1989, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/45/D/381/1989(1992).
  10. Mrs. Dagmar Urbanetz Linderholm v. Croatia, Communication No. 744/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/66/C/744/1997 (1990).
  11. Wright v. Jamaica, Communication No. 349/1989, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 (1992).
  12. Alzbeta Pezoldova v. Czech Republic, Communication No. 757/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/76/D/757/1997 (2002) , para 6.6.
  13. Antonius Valentijn v. France, Communication No. 584/1994, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/57/D/584/1994 (1996)
  14. Duilio Fanali v. Italy, Communication No. 75/1980, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 99 (1990).
  15. Ms. Edith Loth v. Germany, Communication No. 1754/2008, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/98/D/1754/2008 (2004).
  16. Chanderballi Mahabir v. Austria, Communication No. 944/2000, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/82/D/944/2000 (2004), para. 8.2.
  17. Millán Sequeira v. Uruguay, Communication No. 6/1977, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/10/D/6/1977 (1980), para 6
  18. Trébutien v. France, Communication No. 421/1990, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/421/1990 (1994)
  19. VØ v. Norway, Communication No. 168/1984, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 at 48 (1990)
  20. Randolph v. Togo, Communication No. 901/2000, U.N. Doc. CCPR/A/59/40/901/2000 (2003) , para. 8.4.
  21. RLA W v. e Netherlands (372/1989)
  22. Evangeline Hernández v. Philippines, Communication No. 1559/2007, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/99/D/1559/2007 (2010), part 6.4.
  23. Kanta Baboeram-Adhin et al. v. Suriname, No. 146/1983, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/24/D/146/1983(1985).
  24. Polay Campos v. Peru, Communication No. 577/1994, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/61/D/577/1994 (1996).
  25. Bandajevski v. Belarus, Communication No.1100/2002, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/86/D/1100/2002 (2006).
  26. Basilio Laureano Atachahua v. Peru, Communication No.540/1993, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/56/D/540/1993(1996).
  27. Werner Peterson v. Germany, Communication No. 1115/2002, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/80/D/1115/2002 (2004).
  28. Mrs. Dagmar Urbanetz Linderholm v. Croatia, Communication No. 744/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/66/C/744/1997 (1999).
  29. Mr. Mümtaz Karakurt v. Austria, Communication No. 965/2000, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/74/D/965/2000 (2003)
  30. Dietmar Pauger v. Austria, Communication No. 716/1996, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/65/D/716/1996 (1999)
  31. Mr. Rupert Althammer et al. v. Austria, Communication No. 998/2001, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/78/D/998/2001 (2003)
  32. Mr. Orly Marcellana, Mr. Daniel Gumanoy, Eden Marcellana and Mr. Eddie Gumanoy v. Philippines, Communication No. 1560/2007, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/94/D/1560/2007 (2008), para 6.3
  33. Thomas v. Jamaica, Communication No. 321/1988, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/49/D/321/1988 (1993), para 5.1.
  34. HvdP v. e Netherlands, Communication No. 217/1986, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/29/D/217/1986(1987)
  35. Wallman v. Austria, Communication No. 1002/2001, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/80/D/1002/2001 (2004), para. 8.6.
  36. Jesús Rivera Fernández v. Spain, Communication No. 1396/2005, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/85/D/1396/2005
  37. José Ramón Pindado Martínez v. Spain, Communication No. 1490/2006, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/94/D/1490/2006 (2008)
  38. Jean Glaziou v. France, Communication No. 452/1991, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/452/1991 (1994)
  39. Abdelhakim Wanis El Abani v. Libya, Communication No. 1640/2007 U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/99/D/1640/2007 (2010), para. 6.2.
  40. Ángela Poma Poma v. Peru, Communication No. 1475/2006, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/95/D/1475/2006 (2009), para. 6.2.
  41. Nikolov v. Bulgaria , Communication No. 824/1998, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/68/D/824/1998 (2000).
  42. Torres Ramirez v. Uruguay, Communication No. 4/1977, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/10/D/4/1977 (1980), para 9
  43. Sholam Weiss v. Austria, Communication No. 1086/2002, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002 (2003)
  44. Robert Casanovas v. France, Communication No. 441/1990, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/51/D/441/1990 (2003).
  45. Davidson, J. Scott(1991).The procedure and practice of the Human Rights committee under the First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.Canterbury Law Review,4(3),337.
  46. Ghandhi, P. R.(1998).The Human Rights Committee and the Right of Individual Communication: Law and Practice.Dartmouth:Ashgate.
print cancel