歧視的交織性－以CEDAW、CRC及CRPD三項人權公約之交織為思考

A Preliminary Examination of Intersectional Discrimination in Taiwan - CEDAW, CRC and CRPD

林沛君(Peggy Pei-Chun Lin)

不歧視 ； 歧視 ； 交織性 ； 人權公約 ； intersectional discrimination ； intersectionality ； girls with disabilities

台灣國際法學刊

16卷2期（2020 / 07 / 01）

7 - 23

繁體中文

平等及不歧視誠然係聯合國各核心人權公約所共同保障之基本權利，而在性別的領域，歧視的交織性（intersectional discrimination）則是日益受到聯合國各人權監督機制及國際學者所重視的議題之一。儘管各人權公約委員會對交織性的概念如何運用在其所關注之族群上，近年來透過公約解釋性文件陸續已有更多著墨，惟在現有之國際人權規範及機制下，仍需透過公約監督機制間之相互合作，例如共同出具一般性建議／意見等方式，促使交互歧視的概念能夠真正發揮其加乘效應。但除規範的解釋面外，各公約在監督及實踐的層面（如各人權公約國家報告審查），亦應思考如何將交織性納入其監督模式，以使交織性的理論在個案實踐上亦可達到對遭受多樣且複雜處境之受歧視者進行更深入理解的目的。本文以CEDAW、CRC及CRPD三項人權公約之交織初步檢視國內身心障礙女童所遭受之歧視現況。在這群身心障礙女童所面對之諸多歧視議題中，不論是遭受暴力、懷孕、人工流產及施行結紮手術等問題上，皆涉及法律、醫療、社工等跨領域之專業，未來有必要以科際整合的角度為更周延及深入的探討。

The concept of intersectional discrimination has increasingly been recognized by international human rights treaty-bodies in recent years, including through jointly issued general comments and recommendations. Nonetheless, further consideration, guidance and work is needed from these treaty-bodies, in order to incorporate intersectional discrimination into their monitoring activities for their respective treaties. This article looks at the intersection of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as an example of how intersectional discrimination can arise in Taiwan. Girls with disabilities are among the most vulnerable people, as they may face intertwined issues of violence, pregnancy, abortion and artificial ligation. This article urges the Taiwan government to gather statistics and data on the situation of such young girls, and examine the issues they face from a multidisciplinary perspective.

1. (2018)。消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約（CEDAW）中華民國（臺灣）第 3 次國家報告審查委員會結論性意見與建議，第 60 及 61 點（2018 年 7 月 20 日）。
2. (2014)。CEDAW 委員會個人申訴意見書，CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011，第 2.5 點（2014 年 3 月 12 日）。第 3.8 點。
3. CRPD 委員會之網站，https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/GC.aspx。
4. (2011)。交叉路口與樓上樓下反歧視法中的交錯問題。月旦法學雜誌，189，51-68。
5. Civil Rights Act of 1964 42 USC§ 2000e, et seq as amended (1982).
6. 聯合國普遍定期審查（Universal Periodic Review）。聯合國網站說明 https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/upr/pages/BasicFacts.aspx（最後瀏覽日 2020 年 6 月 10 日）。
7. 413 F Supp 142 (E. D. Mo. 1976)
8. CEDAW 第三次國家報告之問題清單，2018 年，第三點。下載自 http://www.cedaw.org.tw/tw/en-global/download/index/2（最後瀏覽日 2020 年 6 月 10 日）。
9. CEDAW 第 3 次國家報告第 60 至 61 點結論性意見與建議各權責機關之回應表，第 5 場會議討論資料，頁 1（2019 年 1 月 9 日），下載自 https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/DEBC79210F1AC20D/61918600-3262-4b9e9220-a8295dc724c4（最後瀏覽日 2020 年 6 月 10 日）。
10. (2010)。CEDAW委員會第 28 號一般性建議，締約國在《公約》第 2 條之下的核心義務，2010 年 12 月 16 日，CEDAW/C/GC/28，第 18 點。
11. Brah, Avtar,Phoenix, Ann(2004).Ain＇t I a Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality.J Int Womens Stud,5(3),75-86.
12. CEDAW Committee,CRC Committee(2014).CEDAW Committee and the CRC Committee, Joint General Recommendation No. 31 / General Comment No. 18 on harmful practices, CEDAW/C/GC/31-CRC/C/GC/18 (14 November 2014)..
13. Chow, Pok Yin S.(2016).Has Intersectionality Reached its Limits? Intersectionality in the UN Human Rights Treatybody Practice and the Issue of Ambivalence.HRLR,16(3),453.
14. Crenshaw, Kimberlé(1989).Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.University of Chicago Legal Forum,8,139-167.
15. Crenshaw, Kimberlé(1991).Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.Stanford Law Review,43,1241.
16. Davis, Aisha N.(2015).Intersectionality and International Law: Recognizing Complex Identities on the Global Stage.Harv. Hum. Rights J.,28,205-242.
17. de Silva de Alwis, Rangita(2009).Rangita de Silva de Alwis, Mining the Intersections: advancing the rights of women and children with disabilities within an interrelated web of human rights, Faculty Scholarship (Paper 1697) 292, 321-322 (2009)..
18. DPI Women＇s Network Japan and DPE Japan Women＇s Committee, Comment on the draft General Comment 3 on women with disabilities, article 6 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (23 July 2015), available at https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/GC.aspx (last viewed on 25 February 2020) .
19. Ehrenreich, Nancy(2002).Subordination and Symbiosis: Mechanisms of Mutual Support Between Subordinating Systems.UMKC Law Review,71,251-424.
20. Fredman, Sandra(2016).Sandra Fredman for the European Commission, European network of legal experts in gender equality and non-discrimination, Intersectional discrimination in EU gender equality and nondiscrimination law, May 2016..
21. Harris, Angela(1990).Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.Stan. L. Rev,42(3),581-599.
22. OHCHR(2012).OHCHR, Strengthening the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Body System: a Report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, June 2012, at 8..
23. Pyaneandee, Coomara(2019).International Disability Law: A Practical Approach to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
24. Mary Robinson, Address of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (28 August 2001), available at http://www.un.org/WCAR/pressreleases/ngo_forum.htm (last viewed on 25 February 2020).
25. Secretary-General(1998).Report by the Secretary-General, Integrating the Gender Perspective into the Work of United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies, 14-18 September 1998, HRI/MC/1998/6, para. 30..
26. Truscan, Ivona,Bourke-Martignoni, Joanna(2016).International Human Rights Law and Intersectional Discrimination.The Equal Rights Review,16,103-131.
27. UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women(1992).UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General recommendation No. 19 on violence against women, para.12 (1992).
28. UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women(2017).UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General recommendation No. 35 on gender-based violence against women, updating general recommendation No. 19, para.12 (14 July 2017)..
29. UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities(2015).UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, draft general comment on Article 6 on women with disabilities, para. 5 (22 May 2015)..
30. UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities(2016).UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General comment No.3 (2016) on women and girls with disabilities, Para 2, para. 4(c)., para. 63(d) (25 November 2016)..
31. UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities(2014).UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Discussion on Women and Girls with Disabilities (September 2014).
32. UN Committee on the Rights of the Child(2007).UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No.9 on the rights of children with disabilities, CRC/C/GC 9, para. 8 (27 February 2007)..
33. 人權公約施行監督聯盟(2017)。人權公約施行監督聯盟，身心障礙者權利公約初次國家報告之 2017 年平行報告，137-139 點，第 141 點，2017 年6 月。
34. 郭惠瑜(2017)。微光「殘」影：消失的身心障礙女性群像。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，38-43。
35. 陳麒文(2018)。身心障礙與性別。醫療品質，22(4)，422-427。
36. 衛生福利部，性侵害案件被害人身心障礙者人數及比率、性侵害事件通報被害人年齡統計，https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dops/lp-1303-105-xCat-cat02.html（最後瀏覽日 2020 年 6 月 10 日）。

1. 許家嘉(2023)。遭受網路性剝削少女的處境與防制工作：以性別與年齡交織觀點分析。臺灣社會工作學刊，26，127+129-152。
2. (2023)。交織性理念對身心障礙女童之保障——國際人權規範及對臺灣之啟示。政大法學評論，173，85-156。
3. (2024)。交織性於輔導諮商專業之啟發：多元文化與社會正義諮商知能。輔導季刊，60(1)，55-70。