题名

商業利用權與言論自由之調和－以美國法為借鏡

并列篇名

Harmonization of Right of Publicity and Freedom of Speech: Lessons from the United States

DOI

10.53106/207873752022070025002

作者

許炳華(HSU Pin-Hua)

关键词

商業利用權 ； 隱私權 ； 財產權 ； 言論自由 ； 社群媒體 ； Right of Publicity ； Privacy Right ； Property Right ； Freedom of Speech ； Social Media

期刊名称

中正財經法學

卷期/出版年月

25期（2022 / 07 / 01）

页次

61 - 126

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

商業利用權源自於普通法之隱私權，而在財產權之分析下發展壯大，當個人達到相當的人氣，其姓名及其他得以確認之特徵本身的利用足以創造出經濟上價值，個人對於該等利用排他控制之權利，即熟知美國法上之「商業利用權」，該等權利主要在允許個人就其得以確認之特徵的利用，行使排他權而作為獲得經濟收益的工具，雖然商業利用權有其重要之功能，卻可能限制創作者，也因此，商業利用權直接與美國憲法第一修正案保障個人之言論自由產生扞格，一方面，美國憲法第一修正案要求國家捍衛言論自由，另一方面，個人使用權之法理則承認這種緣起於人格權而形成之財產權，如何在當中畫出一道妥適的界線，對於司法實務誠屬艱困之任務。美國司法實務及立法在過往發展出商業利用權，然隨著科技之演進，卻也關注如何加以詮釋，更需注意商業利用權與美國憲法第一修正案之平衡，個人經濟價值遭受利用及作品之商業性表達其間之融整，使得司法判決分歧，在各種融整之檢驗模式各自表述下，恐怕應由美國最高法院出面來定紛止爭。在這之前，本文分析現有融整之檢驗模式，而建議以「轉化性檢驗」做為我國之借鏡。
英文摘要

The Right of publicity was born of common law privacy rights and flourished under property law analysis. When a person reaches a level of popularity that inherently creates economic value in the use of their name and likeness, that person is entitled to the exclusive control of such use. Known as the right of publicity, this entitlement essentially allows every person to exclude others from using their identity as a means for acquiring economic gain. Though it has many important uses, one unfortunate consequence of the right of publicity is that it restricts artists' abilities to portray real persons in their works. In so doing, the right of publicity directly conflicts with the First Amendment protections of an individual's freedom of expression. The constitutional command embodied in the First Amendment safeguards freedom of expression in our society. On the other hand, right of publicity jurisprudence recognizes the property right that stems from the value of an individual's persona. Where to draw the line is often a difficult determination for the court. As courts and legislatures developed the right of publicity over the past decades, changes in technology have provided for considerations concerning how the right should be interpreted. Courts have constantly maintained that the right of publicity must be balanced with First Amendment concerns. The balance between a man or woman's economic value being exploited against the commercial expression of a work has left litigants confused. With various tests being used in the judiciary and different levels of common law and statutory protection throughout the country, it is time that the Supreme Court gets ＂in the game.＂. This thesis also analyize these various tests, and recommend transformative test to learn.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 胡心蘭, Hsin-Lan(2018)。轉化才是王道？論合理使用原則轉化性要素之適用與影響。東海大學法學研究，53，183-246。
    連結：
  2. 劉靜怡, Ching-Yi(2012)。社群網路時代的隱私困境：以 Facebook 為討論對象。臺大法學論叢，47(1)，1-70。
    連結：
  3. Arsuaga, Rafael Toro(2012).Freedom of Speech vs. the Right of Publicity in Today's Gaming World.RE. J. U. P. R.,81,245-261.
  4. Baird, Douglas G.(1978).Human Cannonballs and the First Amendment: Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co..STAN. L. REV.,30,1185-1209.
  5. Barnett, Stephen R.(1996).The Right of Publicity Versus Free Speech in Advertising: Some Counter-Points to Professor McCarthy.HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L. J.,18,593-613.
  6. Bruni, Barbara(2020).The Right of Publicity as Market Regulator in the Age of Social Media.CARDOZO L. REV.,41,2203-2241.
  7. Bucher, Timothy J.(2012).Game On: Sports-Related Games and the Contentious Interplay between the Right of Publicity and the First Amendment.TEX. REV. ENT. & SPORTS L.,14,1-23.
  8. Carr, Nanci K.(2020).Social Media and the Internet Drive the Need for a Federal Statute to Protect the Commercial Value of Identity.TUL. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP.,22,31-89.
  9. Conrad, Mark(2020).A New Standard for Right of Publicity Protection for Statistics in the Era of Daily Fantasy Sports and Legalized Sports Betting - A Critique of Daniels v. FanDuel and a Revival of an Economic-Based Rationale to Protect Athletes’ Property Rights.CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L. J.,38,1-53.
  10. Conrad, Mark(2014).A New First Amendment Goal Line Defense - It’s Time to Stop the Right of Publicity Offensive.OHIO N. U. L. REV.,40,743-809.
  11. Cotter, Thomas F.(2010).Integrating the Right of Publicity with First Amendment and Copyright Preemption Analysis.COLUM. J. L. ARTS,33,165-225.
  12. DiGregorio, Christine(2017).Finding a Fair Balance for the Right of Publicity and First Amendment Protections.TOURO L. REV.,33,995-1042.
  13. Dougherty, F. Jay(2004).All the World’s Not a Stooge: The‘Transformativeness’ Test for Analyzing a First Amendment Defense to a Right of Publicity Claim Against Distribution of a Work of Art.COLUM. J. L. & ARTS,27,1-78.
  14. Duquette, Hayley(2020).Digital Fame: Amending the Right of Publicity to Combat Advances in Face-Swapping Technology.J. HIGH TECH. L.,20,82-117.
  15. Edelman, Marc(2013).Closing the "Free Speech" Loophole: The Case for Protecting College Athletes' Publicity Rights in Commercial Video Games.FLA. L. REV.,65,553-586.
  16. Ellis, Douglas J.(1996).The Right of Publicity and the First Amendment: A Comment on Why Celebrity Parodies Are Fair Game for Fair Use.U. CIN. L. REV.,64,575-616.
  17. Emerson, Thomas I.(1963).Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment.YALE L. J.,72,877-956.
  18. Feinberg, Michael(2014).A Collision Course Between the Right of Publicity and the First Amendment: The Third and Ninth Circuit Find EA Sports’s NCAA Football Video Games Infringe Former Student-Athletes Right of Publicity.SETON HALL CIRCUIT REV.,11,175-227.
  19. Fletcher, Peter L.,Rubin, Edward L.(1979).Privacy, Publicity, and the Portrayal of Real People by the Media.YALE L. J.,88,1577-1622.
  20. Ford, William K.(2020).So Are Games Coffee Mugs or What? Games and the Right of Publicity Revisited.UIC REV. INTELL. PROP. L.,19,178-200.
  21. Frankel, Simon J.,Brookover, Laura,Satterfield, Stephen(2020).Famous for Fifteen People: Celebrity, Newsworthiness, and Fraley v. Facebook.STAN. L. REV. ONLINE,64,82-87.
  22. Frontera, Nicholas E.(2015).The Best of Two Tests: A Hybrid Test for Balancing Right of Publicity and First Amendment Interests Tailored to the Complexities of Video Games.UCLA ENT. L. REV.,22,193-232.
  23. Gallagher, William T.(2005).Strategic Intellectual Property Litigation, the Right of Publicity, and the Attenuation of Free Speech: Lessons from the Schwarzenegger Bobblehead Doll War (and Peace).SANTA CLARA L. REV.,45,581-615.
  24. Georgescu, Dora(2014).Two Tests Unite to Resolve the Tension Between the First Amendment and the Right of Publicity.FORDHAM L. REV.,83,907-947.
  25. Grady, Mark F.(1994).A Positive Economic Theory of the Right of Publicity.UCLA ENT. L. REV.,1,97-126.
  26. Greene, Grace(2020).Instagram Lookalikes and Celebrity Influencers: Rethinking the Right to Publicity In the Social Media Age.U. PA. L. REV. ONLINE,168,153-202.
  27. Haemmerli, Alice(1999).Whose Who? The Case for a Kantian Right of Publicity.DUKE L. J.,49,383-492.
  28. Havlir Timothy W.(2008).Is Fantasy Baseball Free Speech? Refining the Balance Between the Right of Publicity and the First Amendment.DEPAUL J. SPORTS L. & CONTEMP. PROBS.,4,229-254.
  29. Hessick, Carissa Byrne(2002).Right of Publicity in Digitally Produced Images: How the First Amendment is Being Used to Pick Celebrities' Pockets.UCLA ENT. L. REV.,10,1-17.
  30. Hoenig, Emily(2020).Why Can’t We All Just Cher?: Drag Celebrity Impersonators Versus an Ever-Expanding Right of Publicity.CARDOZO ARTS & ENT. L. J.,38,537-567.
  31. Hunt, Alicia M.(2001).Everyone Wants to Be a Star: Extensive Publicity Rights for Noncelebrities Unduly Restrict Commercial Speech.NW. U. L. REV.,95,1605-1658.
  32. Hylton, J. Gordon(2001).Baseball Cards and the Birth of the Right of Publicity: The Curious Case of Haelan Laboratories v. Topps Chewing Gum.MARQ. SPORTS L. REV.,12,273-294.
  33. Jones, Russell S., Jr.(2006).Flip Side of Privacy: The Right of Publicity, the First Amendment, and Constitutional Line Drawing - A Presumptive Approach.CREIGHTON L. REV.,39,939-960.
  34. Joseph, Bodine, J., Jr.(1988).Comment. A Picture is Worth $775.00: The Right of Publicity, An Analysis and Proposed Test.CAP. U. REV.,17,411-430.
  35. Kadri, Thomas E.(2014).Fumbling the First Amendment: The Right of Publicity Goes 2-0 Against Freedom of Expression.MICH. L. REV.,112,1519-1531.
  36. Kadri, Thomas E.(2019).Drawing Trump Naked: Curbing the Right of Publicity to Protect Public Discourse.MD. L. REV.,78,899-959.
  37. Kalven, Harry, Jr.(1996).Privacy in Tort Law-Were Warren and Brandeis Wrong?.LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS.,31,326-341.
  38. Kwall, Roberta Rosenthal(1994).The Right of Publicity vs. The First Amendment: A Property and Liability Rule Analysis.IND. L. J.,70,47-116.
  39. Lee, Mark S.(2003).Agents of Chaos: Judicial Confusion in Defining the Right of Publicity-Free Speech Interface.LOY. L.A. ENT. L. REV.,23,471-501.
  40. Levine, Jason K.(2004).Can the Right of Publicity Afford Free Speech - A New Right of Publicity Test for First Amendment Cases.HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L. J.,27,171-232.
  41. Lilly, Alexis Nicole(2020).Raising the Stakes: The Battle Between the First Amendment and Athlete’s Publicity Rights in the Wake of Murphy v. NCAA.AM. U. BUS. L. REV.,9,103-122.
  42. McKelvey, Stephen,Goins, Jonathan,Krauss, Frederick(2016).The Air Jordan Rules: Image Advertising Adds New Dimension to Right of Publicity-First Amendment Tension.FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L. J.,26,945-994.
  43. McKenna, Mark P.(2005).The Right of Publicity and Autonomous Self-Definition.U. PITT. L. REV.,67,225-294.
  44. Messenger, Ashley(2018).Rethinking the Right of Publicity in the Context of Social Media.WIDENER L. REV.,24,259-287.
  45. Mtima, Lateef(2018).So Many Waters Under This Troubled Bridge: Navigating Right of Publicity Jurisprudence.IDEA,59,213-231.
  46. Nguyen, Sebastien(2020).The First Amendment: The Best Defense in the Game.U. S. F. L. REV.,55,1-6.
  47. Nimmer, Melville B.(1954).The Right of Publicity.LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS.,19,203-223.
  48. Olander, Erika T.(2002).Stop the Presses! First Amendment Limitations of Professional Athletes' Publicity Rights.MARQ. SPORTS L. REV.,12,885-905.
  49. Palachuk, Geoffrey F.(2014).Transformative Use Test Cannot Keep Pace with Evolving Arts.U. DENV. SPORTS & ENT. L. J.,16,233-278.
  50. Post, Robert C.,Rothman, Jennifer E.(2020).The First Amendment and the Right(s) of Publicity.YALE L. J.,130,86-96.
  51. PROSSER, WILLIAM L., HANDBOOK OF THE LAW OF TORTS (West Publishing Company, 1st ed. 1947).
  52. Prosser, William L.(1960).Privacy.CALIF. REV.,48,383-423.
  53. Redish, Martin H.,Shust, Kelsey B.(2015).The Right of Publicity and the First Amendment in the Modern Age of Commercial Speech.WM. & MARY L. REV.,56,1443-1499.
  54. Reynolds, Glenn Harlan(2016).Looking Ahead: October Term 2016.CATO SUP. CT. REV.,2016,313-331.
  55. Samuelson, Pamela(1983).Reviving Zacchini: Analyzing First Amendment Defenses in Right of Publicity and Copyright Cases.TUL. L. REV.,57,836-928.
  56. Schwabe, James(2016).Delay of Game: When Will the Supreme Court Tackle First Amendment Issue in Madden NFL? The Uncertain Future of The Right of Publicity.VA. SPORTS & ENT. L. J.,16,120-145.
  57. Sheff, Jeremy(2019).Scope and Justification of the Right of Publicity.COLUM. J. L. & ARTS,42,333-336.
  58. Simcox, Kyle D.(2013).Selling Your Soul at the Crossroads: The Need for a Harmonized Standard Limiting the Publicity Rights of Professional Athletes.DEPAUL L. REV.,63,87-121.
  59. Stern, Nat,Stern, Mark Joseph(2015).A New Test to Reconcile the Right of Publicity with Core First. Amendment Values.J. INTELL. PROP. L.,23,93-112.
  60. Treece, James M.(1973).Commercial Exploitation of Names, Likenesses, and Personal Histories.TEX. L. REV.,51,637-672.
  61. Tseng, Yen-Shyang(2021).Protecting the First Amendment Rights of Video Games from Lanham Act and Right of Publicity Claims.PEPP. L. REV.,48,425-495.
  62. Villardi, Jessica(2001).ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publishing, Inc.: Why the First. Amendment Should Trump the Right of Publicity When Art Imitates Life.CONN. L. REV.,34,293-314.
  63. Volokh, Eugene(2000).Freedom of Speech and Information Privacy: The Troubling Implications of a Right to Stop People From Speaking About You.STAN. L. REV.,52,1049-1124.
  64. Warren, Samuel D.,Brandeis, Louis D.(1980).The Right to Privacy.HARV. L. REV.,4,193-220.
  65. Wassom, Brian D.(2013).Uncertainty Squared: The Right of Publicity and Social Media.SYRACUSE L. REV.,63,227-251.
  66. Zimmerman, Diane L.(1983).Requiem for a Heavyweight: A Farewell to Warren and Brandeis’s Privacy Tort.CORNELL L. REV.,68,291-367.
  67. 何愛文, An-Wen(1999)。美國法之個人公開權（Right of Publicity）於我國受保護之可能性。全國律師，3(12)，52-60。
  68. 李智仁, Chih-Jen(2004)。人格權經濟利益之保護－個人公開權（Right of Publicity）之探討。法令月刊，55(11)，28-41。
  69. 法治斌, JYH-PIN,董保城, BAU-TSCHENG(2020).憲法新論.元照出版=Angle Publishing Co., Ltd.
  70. 陳仲麟, Chung-Lin(2011)。商業性言論憲法解釋十年回顧與評析。中原財經法學，27，101-150。
  71. 楊智傑, Chih-Chieh(2008)。智慧財產權的憲法基礎－兼論智財權與言論自由的衝突。財產法暨經濟法，16，1-40。
  72. 劉得寬, Teh-Koan(2008)。人格權上的「Publicity 權」（公表權）－以日本判例、學說為中心。月旦法學雜誌，155，155-120。
  73. 謝銘洋, Ming-Yan(2010)。從美國法上之商業利用權（Right of Publicity）探討肖像權之財產權化－最高法院九十七年臺上字第一三九六號民事判決解析。月旦裁判時報，4，102-108。
print cancel