美術館網站繪畫作品資訊與瀏覽功能之研究

A Study of Painting Information and Browsing Functions of Art Museum Websites

10.6922/THJAR.201907_1.0006

楊美雪(Mei-Hsueh Yang)；林怡騰(Yi-Teng Lin)

美術館 ； 美術館網站 ； 瀏覽功能 ； 繪畫作品資訊 ； art museum ； art museum website ； browsing function ； painting information

清華藝術學報

創刊號（2019 / 07 / 31）

161 - 190

繁體中文

本研究透過內容分析法，探討美術館網站繪畫作品資訊、瀏覽功能。共選取20間歐洲與美洲美術館網站之400幅繪畫作品進行分析。主要發現如下：一、美術館網站繪畫作品所提供的資訊以作品名稱與繪畫方法提供比率最高，作品評分提供比率最低；二、美術館網站繪畫作品所提供的瀏覽功能以畫家姓名、作品名稱、作品年份、繪畫方法等關鍵字搜尋比率最高，影音功能最低；三、美洲與歐洲的美術館網站所提供的繪畫作品資訊在畫家資訊提供數量上有顯著差異；四、美洲與歐洲的美術館網站所提供的繪畫作品瀏覽功能在搜尋功能、縮放與效果功能提供數量上有顯著差異。

Content analysis is used in this study to investigate the ability of the websites of art museums to manage information and browsing functions in regard to their collections of paintings. This study utilized 20 museum websites and 400 artworks. The results are that ＂painting title＂ and ＂painting method＂ have the highest providing rate, while ＂evaluation＂ has the lowest providing rate on art museum websites for paintings; ＂artist name,＂ ＂painting title,＂ ＂year of work,＂ and ＂drawing method＂ are the most searched keywords; ＂video function＂ has the lowest searched keyword rate for paintings; there is a significant difference between American and European art museum websites in providing ＂artist information＂; and there is a significant difference between American and European art museum websites in providing ＂search＂ and ＂zoom and effect.＂

1. Abbey, H. N.(2012).Does a decade make a difference? Comparing the web presence of north american art museum libraries and archives in 1999 and 2011.Art Libraries Journal,37(3),34-40.
2. Andrelchik, H.(2015).Reconsidering literacy in the art classroom.Art Education,68(1),6-11.
3. Anthes, G.(2012).Zoom in, zoom out.Communications of the ACM,55(12),18-19.
4. Chamorro-Premuzic, T.,Burke, C.,Hsu, A.,Swami, V.(2010).Personality predictors of artistic preferences as a function of the emotional valence and perceived complexity of paintings.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,4(4),196-204.
5. Çildir, Z.(2015).Discussion on the concept of visual culture at museum within postmodern art education.Journal of Education and Future,8,67-83.
6. Ciurea, C.,Filip, F. G.(2016).New researches on the role of virtual exhibitions in digitization, preservation and valorization of cultural heritage.Informatica Economica,20(4),26-33.
7. Duncum, P.(2014).Revisioning premodern fine art as popular visual culture.Studies in Art Education,55(3),203-213.
8. Gül, S. N.,Akmehmet, K. T.(2015).Interactive spaces in art museums: A landscape of exhibition strategies/interaktivni prostori v muzejih umetnosti: pokrajina razstavnih strategij.Solsko Polje,26(5/6),141-155.
9. Haffner, D.(2016).Artists’ estates: Keep or get rid of them?.Art Libraries Journal,41(1),56-61.
10. Hamzah, M.,Aziz, A. A.(2012).Virtual art education: Is it possible?.Distance Learning,9(1),29-35.
11. Harpring, P., & Baca, M (2017, October 23). Categories for the description of works of art. The J. Paul Getty Trust . Retrieved from http://www.getty.edu/research/publications/electronic_publications/cdwa/index.html
12. Hoeber, O.(2013).A longitudinal study of hotmap web search.Online Information Review,37(2),252-267.
13. Hume, M.,Mills, M.(2011).Building the sustainable imuseum: Is the virtual museum leaving our museums virtually empty?.International Journal of Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Marketing,16(3),275-289.
14. Lamb, A.,Johnson, L.(2010).Divergent convergence part 1: Cross-genre, multi-platform, transmedia experiences in school libraries.Teacher Librarian,37(5),76-88.
15. Lauring, J. O.,Pelowski, M.,Forster, M.,Gondan, M.,Ptito, M.,Kupers, R.(2016).Well, if they like it…Effects of social groups’ ratings and price information on the appreciation of art.Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity & the Arts,10(3),344-359.
16. Lawton, P. H.(2016).Teaching for respect and understanding of difference: Social media and contemporary art as vehicles for addressing racism.Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education (Online),33,124-136.
17. Lepkowska-White, E.,Imboden, K.(2013).Effective design for usability and interaction: The case of art museum websites.Journal of Internet Commerce,12(3),284-305.
18. Locher, P.,Krupinski, E.,Schaefer, A.(2015).Art and authenticity: Behavioral and eye-movement analyses.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,9(4),356-367.
19. Mital, M.,Israel, D.,Agarwal, S.(2010).Information exchange and information disclosure in social networking web sites: Mediating role of trust.The Learning Organization,17(6),479-490.
20. Moreno, L.,Martinez, P.(2013).Overlapping factors in search engine optimization and web accessibility.Online Information Review,37(4),564-580.
21. Puerta Melguizo, M. C.,Vidya, U.,van Oostendorp, H.(2012).Seeking information online: The influence of menu type, navigation path complexity and spatial ability on information gathering tasks.Behaviour & Information Technology,31(1),59-70.
22. Pulh, M.,Mencarelli, R.(2015).Web 2.0: Is the museum-visitor relationship being redefined?.International Journal of Arts Management,18(1),43-51.
23. Ransom, N.,Rafferty, P.(2011).Facets of user-assigned tags and their effectiveness in image retrieval.Journal of Documentation,67(6),1038-1066.
24. Roth-Katz, E.(2012).Access and availability: A study of use policies on art museum library websites.Art Documentation : Bulletin of the Art Libraries Society of North America,31(1),123-140.
25. Rusu, M.,Chandrinou, T.(2015).Characteristics and principles of art education.Review of Artistic Education,9/10,191-200.
26. Samanian, K.,Nedaeifar, H.,Karimi, M. S.(2016).A survey on the influence of titles on the visitor's interpretation and learning in art galleries: An Iranian context.Australian Journal of Adult Learning,56(1),29-51.
27. Sankey, M. D.,Birch, D.,Gardiner, M. W.(2011).The impact of multiple representations of content using multimedia on learning outcomes across learning styles and modal preferences.International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology,7(3),18-35.
28. Sederberg, K.(2013).Bringing the museum into the classroom, and the class into the museum: An approach for content-based instruction.Die Unterrichtspraxis,46(2),251-262.
29. Seward, R.,O'Brien, B.,Breit-Smith, A. D.,Meyer, B.(2014).Linking design principles with educational research theories to teach sound to symbol reading correspondence with multisensory type.Visible Language,48(3),86-108.
30. Solina, F.(2014).New media art projects, panoramic images and live video as interface between real and virtual worlds.DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology,34(2),110-124.
31. Sova, R. B.(2015).Art appreciation as a learned competence: A museum-based qualitative study of adult art specialist and art non-apecialist visitors.CEPS Journal : Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal,5(4),141-157.
32. Swami, V.(2013).Context matters: Investigating the impact of contextual information on aesthetic appreciation of paintings by Max Ernst and Pablo Picasso.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,7(3),285-295.
33. Tavcar, A.,Antonya, C.,Butila, E. V.(2016).Recommender system for virtual assistant supported museum tours.Informatica,40(3),279-284.
34. The Art Newspaper (2014, March 25). Top 100 art museum attendance. The Art Newspaper , p. A3. Retrieved from https://zh.scribd.com/doc/215029981/256-Attendance-Embargo-New-25-March
35. Vajjala, S.,Meurers, D.(2013).On the applicability of readability models to web texts.Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Predicting and Improving Text Readability for Target Reader Populations
36. Wilks, J.,Cutcher, A.,Wilks, S.(2012).Digital technology in the visual arts classroom: An [un]easy partnership.Studies in Art Education,54(1),54-65.
37. Yang, G. M.,Suchan, T.,Kundu, R.(2011).TeachArt wiki: A collaborative, interactive, and dialogic platform for teaching and learning art.Art Education,64(4),48-53.
38. 何政廣(2007).環球美術館見聞錄.臺北市:藝術家.
39. 宛家禾（譯）,蔡裴驊（譯）,蔡心語（譯）,Neubert, H.-J.(2008).一生必遊的 100 世界博物館.臺北縣:京中玉國際.