創造力演進線形與領域相關技能之性質和層級研究——以陶藝拉坯造形為例

A Study of the Evolution Lines of Ceramic-Throwing-Form Creativity and the Properties and Levels of Domain-Relevant Skills

10.6922/THJAR.201907_1.0003

李堅萍(Zen-Pin Lee)

造形創造力 ； 陶藝拉坯 ； 領域相關技能 ； ceramic throwing ； domain-relevant skill ； form creativity

清華藝術學報

創刊號（2019 / 07 / 31）

61 - 81

繁體中文

創造力是諸多系所重要議題，本研究以陶藝拉坯為例，探索造形創造力之分項與總量的演進線形，以及所需領域相關技能的性質與層級。經實施八次視覺敘事，評估技能層級與界定造形創造力成效之後得到以下的結論：一、造形創造力各分項演進線形為：造形流暢力呈陡升浪狀、造形變通力呈近水平線、造形獨創力呈緩步斜升、造形精進力呈ㄏ型斜升等線形；二、總量呈緩步斜升線形；三、領域相關技能是門檻性質的「技能性動作形式」層級。並建議教學者應當視「獲得領域相關技能」為首要教學目標以具體化實現創造力。

The important educational goals of art, design and cultural creativity departments are to cultivate and stimulate students' creativity. Existing literature has no researches about evolution lines of creativity practice and the properties and levels of domain-relevant skills. The purposes of this study are to explore the evolution lines of (1) sub-items and (2) total of ceramic throwing form creativity, and the properties and levels of domain-relevant skills. This study used visual narrative research method in the practical skill evolution. The conclusions are: (1) The evolution forms of the form creativity sub-items are: form fluency is fast rise and wave type, form flexibility is horizontal line type, form originality is slowly rise type, form elaboration is ㄏ type, and (2) form creativity (total scores) is slowly rise type of evolution model. (3) The property and level of domain-relevant skills is threshold and Skilled Movement Forms. The suggestions are that instructors should consider ＂gain domain-relevant skills＂ as the primary teaching goal, and train learners at least have Skill Movement Forms to achieve form creativity.

1. Alkhenaini, N.(2013).Ann Arbor, Pennsylvania,The University of the Arts.
2. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Oxford, England:Westview Press.
3. Antonietti, A.,Colombo, B.(2012).Mental imagery as a strategy to enhance creativity in children.Imagination, Cognition and Personality,31(1-2),63.
4. Cseh, G. M.,Phillips, L. H.,Pearson, D. G.(2016).Mental and perceptual feedback in the development of creative flow.Consciousness and Cognition,42,150-161.
5. Denzin, N.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
6. Flaherty, A. W.(2011).Brain illness and creativity: Mechanisms and treatment risks.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry,56(3),132-143.
7. Fontichiaro, K.(2016).Junk box provocations.Teacher Librarian,43(5),53-63.
8. Harris, K.(2013).Teacher, I had a dream: A glimpse of the spiritual domain of children using project-based learning.International Journal of Children’s Spirituality,18(3),281.
9. Hong, S. W.,Lee, J. S.(2015).Nonexpert evaluations on architectural design creativity across cultures.Creativity Research Journal,27(4),314-321.
10. Huber, A. M.,Leigh, K. E.,Tremblay, K. R.(2012).Creativity processes of students in the design studio.College Student Journal,46(4),903-913.
11. Johnson, G., C.(2002).Using visual narrative and poststructuralism to (re)read a student teacher’s professional practice.Teaching and teacher education,18,387-404.
12. Shi, Y.(2011).iPhones in China: The contradictory stories of media-ICT globalization in the era of media convergence and corporate synergy.The Journal of Communication Inquiry,35(2),134.
13. Tai, J.(2014).Identities and dance competition: Re/discovering the force from within.Research in Dance Education,15(3),303-315.
14. Tomljenovic, Z.(2015).An interactive approach to learning and teaching in visual arts education.Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal,5(3),73-93.
15. Tsao, Y. C.,Lin, C. H.(2013).Apply mosaic pattern shaping images design into visual art courses.International Journal of Organizational Innovation,6(1),52-68.
16. Van Eerde, W.,Beeftink, F.,Rutte, C. G.(2016).Working on something else for a while: Pacing in creative design projects.Time & Society,25(3),676-699.
17. Weiss, Z.(2014).Buildings for mass entertainment: Tradition and innovation in Herodian construction.Near Eastern Archaeology,77(2),98.
18. Zhang, G. C.(2011).A thesis for the degree of Master.
19. 李堅萍(2001)。Simpson、Harrow 與Goldberger 技能領域教育目標分類之比較研究。屏東師院學報，14，675-710。
20. 李堅萍(2005)。陶藝釉藥呈色劑之顯色能力研究。國立臺中教育大學學報，19(2)，21-51。

1. 李堅萍(2021)。替代經驗策略對陶藝拉坯學習者造形創造力的成效影響與利弊觀點研究。藝術學報，108，41-63。