题名

重複美學研究:神話文本中的編織史

并列篇名

Repetitive Aesthetic Research: The History of Weaving in Mythological Texts

DOI

10.6922/THJAR.202012_(2).0005

作者

劉鳳鴒(Fengling Liu)

关键词

文本 ; 重複美學 ; 神話 ; 編織 ; text ; repetitive aesthetics ; mythology ; weaving

期刊名称

清華藝術學報

卷期/出版年月

2期(2020 / 12 / 31)

页次

95 - 128

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

當阿拉克妮(Arachne)日復一日地編織,有如蜘蛛結網般的重複勞役,沒有明顯結構,卻在重複當中織出時間軌跡。重複做為美學實踐自神話故事中即可見端倪,擁有無限創意與想像。本篇論文將以重複美學為主軸,以「重複美學」之「編織概念」書寫「編織的起源與傳說」:神話故事中編織女神各司其職,雅典娜(Athena)身為工藝女神,發明紡織,是諸神視覺藝術的核心焦點;阿拉克妮以凡人角度重寫神的故事,遞嬗變化無止境的精湛技藝;潘妮洛普(Penelope)以拆解包裝編織,所有啟動皆源於舊有材料的再觸探,讓殘餘反具意義;奈特(Neit)兼具男性與女性特徵,被認為是創造原始水的化身,名字本身亦帶有織工意涵。神話故事猶如一匹縱橫交錯的布料,雜揉著生活與想像的染料,而人類文明第一次縫紉經驗,來自獸骨與肌腱穿引,編織創作原型是如此與肉身骨幹貼合,又與史料文本相熨。筆者以創作者角度觀察與整理,由個人創作脈絡延伸出的論述體,透過歷史文本作為線梭,將不同文本對於編織的傳說與記錄作為線軸,拉出編織發展脈絡之依循,並以此對應當代藝術中與編織相關的藝術創作。歷史文本與當代藝術中重複美學實踐作品互文,以此織錦世代與歷時痕跡的編年地圖。本文將分成四個部分討論:緒論、重複美學、文本中的編織、結論。嘗試以「編織」概念整理文獻,透過曼陀羅思考法(Mandala)拓展相關文本聯想與參照,將中心思想與關鍵字彙串連,往外延伸擴展並加深,猶如織網架構此論述。

英文摘要

When Arachne weaves day after day, it is akin to spiderweb-like repetitive labor without the obvious structure but with the weaving time trajectory in the repetition. Repetition as an aesthetic practice can be noticed in myths and stories, with unlimited creativity and imagination. This thesis will consider repetitive aesthetics as the main axis and compose the "origin and legend of weaving" based on the "weaving concept" of "repetitive aesthetics." As per mythology, the goddess of weaving performs her duties. As the goddess of craftsmanship, Athena invented textiles, which is the core focus of the visual arts of the gods. Arachne rewrites the story of the gods from the perspective of mortals, passing endless changes and exquisite skills. Penelope weaves by disassembling the packaging; everything comes from the reprobing of the old materials, rendering the remnants meaningful. Neit has both male and female characteristics and is considered to be the incarnation of original water creation. The name itself means weaver. The mythical story is like a crisscrossing cloth, mixed with the dyes of life and imagination, and the first sewing experience of human civilization comes from animal bones and tendon threads. The prototype of weaving very close to the backbone of the flesh and historical materials, including the related texts. The author observes from the perspective of the creator; the discourse extends from the personal creation context, using historical texts as thread shuttles; and the legends and records of weaving in different texts are considered as spools, drawing out the evolving context of weaving and the corresponding artistic creation related to weaving in contemporary art. Historical texts and contemporary art with repetitive aesthetic practice are intertextualized in such a way that a chronological map of the brocade of generations and diachronic traces can be drawn. This thesis will be divided into four parts for discussion: introduction, repetitive aesthetics, weaving in the text, and conclusion. This is an attempt to organize the literature applying the concept of "weaving," expand the association and reference of related texts through Mandala, concatenate the central idea and keywords, and extend and deepen it, similar to a web structure.

主题分类 人文學 > 藝術
参考文献
  1. (1989).世界神話辭典.瀋陽市:遼寧人民.
  2. Broude, N.,Garrard, M. D.(1982).Feminism and art history: Questioning the Litany.New York, NY:Harper and Row.
  3. Deleuze, G.(1994).Difference and repetition.New York, NY:Columbia University Press.
  4. Fleming, F.,Lothian, A.(1998).The way to eternity: Egyptian myth.Time-Life Education.
  5. Haw Hsu(2011)。重複之必然性:圖像樣式美學初探。取自 http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_73b6576b0100opuv.html
  6. Kavita, M.(2019).Arachne’s voice: Race, gender and the goddess.Feminist Theology,28(1),52-65.
  7. Kerenyi, K.(1976).Dionysos: Archetypal image of indestructible life.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  8. Kolesnikov-Jessop, S. (2007). Ghada Amer: Defusing the power of erotic images. New York Times Arts Review. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/12/arts/12iht-jessop.4882064.html
  9. Lubin, D. M.(1989).Lubin, D. M. (1989). Ariadne and the Indians: Vanderlyn’s neoclassical princess, racial seduction, and the melodrama of abandonmen. The University of Chicago Press Journals, Chapter 3, 3..
  10. 今藝術編輯部(2017)。臺灣當代纖維藝術於紐約展出。ARTouch,2017。取自 https://artouch.com/news/content-3086.html
  11. 司徒嘉慧(2016)。藝術引線編織 24 幅故事。天下雜誌,596
  12. 朱侃如(譯),May, Rollo(2003).哭喊神話.臺北市:立緒.
  13. 羊毛誌(2011)。用纖維寫作─纖維藝術家楊偉林。取自 http://feltmaking.blogspot.com/2011/05/blog-post_24.html
  14. 何春蕤(1987)。抗拒、重覆與轉移:佛洛伊德的治療經驗(未發表)。取自 http://sex.ncu.edu.tw/jo_article/1987/12/%E6%8A%97%E6%8B%92%E3%80%81%E9%87%8D%E8%A6%86%E8%88%87%E8%BD%89%E7%A7%BB%EF%BC%9A%E4%BD%9B%E6%B4%9B%E4%BC%8A%E5%BE%B7%E7%9A%84%E6%B2%BB%E7%99%82%E7%B6%93%E9%A9%97/
  15. 宋濤(2017)。存在反思與主體返回─西方重複美學思想芻議。中北大學學報(社會科學版),33(1)
  16. 希利斯.米勒(2002)。重複的兩種形式。二十世紀西方文論選,北京市:
  17. 李海紅(2013)。解讀外國文學作品中“重複”結構的敘事意義。語文學刊,2013(4)
  18. 李爽(譯),Wilson, Michael(2017).如何讀懂當代藝術:體驗 21 世紀的藝術.北京市:中信.
  19. 林鈺雄(2020)。洗澡熊說「法」/睡美人:被頌揚千古的性犯罪?。取自 https://www.twreporter.org/a/legal-knowledge-showerbear-sleeping-beauty
  20. 孫曉彤(2014)。徐永旭泥土裡的時光賦格。藝外雜誌,60
  21. 高千惠(2019).當代藝術生產線.臺北市:典藏藝術家庭.
  22. 許素芬(2018)。排灣族織布的復振。原教界,80,38-41。
  23. 許琦玲(譯),Barthes, Roland(1995).明室.臺北市:臺灣攝影.
  24. 陳勝榮(2007).織藝精湛的紋面民族:泰雅族.臺北市:臺灣原住民文化產業發展協會.
  25. 黃珮玲(譯),黃恩霖(譯),Behar, Ruth(2010).傷心人類學:易受傷的觀察者.臺北市:群學.
  26. 楊凱麟(2014)。起源與重複:德勒茲哲學的差異問題性。國立政治大學哲學學報,31,107-140。
  27. 楊韶剛(譯),高申春(譯),Freud, Sigmund(2000).超越快樂原則.臺北市:米娜貝爾.
  28. 楊韶剛(譯),彭舜(譯),Freud, Sigmund(2000).詼諧與潛意識的關係.臺北市:米娜貝爾.
  29. 葉淑吟(譯),Esquivel, Laura(2011).巧克力情人.臺北市:漫遊者.
  30. 劉佳婧(2019)。杭州市,中國美術學院。
  31. 劉紀蕙(1994).文學與藝術八論:互文.對位.文化詮釋.臺北市:三民.
  32. 蔡宜容(譯),Clair, Kassia St.(2019).絲線上的文明─十三個故事,纖維紡線如何改變人類的歷史.臺北市:本事.
  33. 羅秀(譯),Duenas, Maria(2012).時間裁縫師.臺北市:新經典圖文傳播.
  34. 譚善明(2014)。修辭與解構的遊戲─耶魯學派文本理論研究。中國文學研究,2014(1)
  35. 嚴曉馳(2020)。歐洲“編織”主題童話的象徵。瀋陽大學學報(社會科學版),22(1)
  36. 龔卓軍(譯),Bachelard, Gaston(2003).空間詩學.臺北市:張老師文化.