網路到後網路－社會參與網路藝術的批判意識

Internet to Post-Internet: The Critical Awareness of Socially Engaged Internet Art

10.6922/THJAR.202112_(3).0003

曾鈺涓(Yu-Chuan Tseng)

社會參與藝術 ； 後網路藝術 ； 網路文化 ； 網路藝術 ； 數位文化 ； 藝術與社會 ； Socially Engaged Art ； Post-Internet Art ； net culture ； Internet Art ； digital culture ； art and sociality

清華藝術學報

3期（2021 / 12 / 31）

39 - 64

繁體中文

思考依賴數位生活情境中的個體，討論人與科技之間的交互關係與虛實切換，理解生活於網路集權與控制的監控資本主義時代，是身處於後網路時代裡的藝術家們，需要思考與關切的問題。以藝術創作進行網路文化的討論與批判，是一種重新建構、探求、參與、揭露與連結的思考過程。本研究將以「社會參與網路藝術」，梳理網路藝術到後網路藝術中的反思性批判，以三個主題「網路烏托邦的夢與真實」、「數位監控中的展演、隱私與偷窺」、「網路資本主義的操控與霸權」透過作品文本分析，討論網路藝術作品中的批判意識與社會參與網路藝術的實踐意義。

As artists who live in the post-Internet era, it is inevitable that we need to face the virtual and real culture created by technology. We have to show solicitude for the human being who relies on digital life, and consider the reflexive relationships between people and machine. We should be wary of and ascertain the ambiguous intersection of the real and virtual world when we switch between our real and virtual lives. We need to understand that we are already living in a centralized and controlled age of Surveillance Capitalism. Discussing and critiquing net culture in the manner of art practice is a thinking process of reconstruction, exploration, participation, exposure, and connection. The research analyzes the context of reflexivity criticism from the development of Internet Art to Post-Internet Art. Based on Socially Engaged Internet Art, this research performs textual analysis on three topics: ＂the dream and reality of cyber utopia,＂ ＂performance, privacy, and peeping in digital surveillance,＂ and ＂the supremacy and manipulation of cyber capitalism.＂ The article will acknowledge the critical consciousness and practical significance of socially engaged Internet art.

1. 蔡蕙如(2021)。批判大數據現象：全球媒體與科技巨頭壟斷市場的危機。臺灣東亞文明研究學刊，18(1)，89-129。
   連結：
2. Andersen, Kirsti Reitan et al. “The Social and Civic Impact of the Arts,” SSRN (2020), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3714692, download on 29 July 2021.
3. Baumgärtel, Tilman et al. “The Opening of Documenta X, A First Flash Report,” (1997), https://www.heise.de/tp/features/The-Opening-of-Documenta-X-A-First-Flash-Report-3442107.html, download on 13 May 2018.
4. Beard, Thomas. “Interview with Guthrie Lonergan,” (2008), https://rhizome.org/editorial/2008/mar/26/interview-with-guthrie-lonergan/, download on 21 July 2021.
5. Bernhard, Hans and Alessandro Ludovico. Google will Eat Itself (2005), http://www.gwei.org/index.php, download on 15 December 2019.
6. Bishop, Claire(2005).The Social Turn: Collaboration and its Discontents.Artforum,44(6),178.
7. Bishop, Claire(2012).Digital Divide: Contemporary Art and New Media.Artforum
8. Bookchin, Natalie, and Alexei Shulgin. Introduction to Net.art (1994-1999) (1999), http://variants.artbase.rhizome.org/Q4308/index.html, download on 21 December 2020.
9. Broegger, Andreas. “The Aesthetics of Programming: An Interview of Mark Napier,” (2000), http://rhizome.org/discuss/view/29933/#2456, download on 29 January 2010.
10. Chen, Xiang,Yang, Cheng-Zen(2006).Position Paper: A Study of Web Search Engine Bias and its Assessment.IW3C2 WWW
11. Connor, Michael J.(ed.),Dean, Aria(ed.),Espenschied, Dragan(ed.)(2019).The Art Happens Here: Net Art Anthology.New York:Rhizome.
12. Ćosić, Vuk. “No Land’s Man,” (1996), http://www.ljudmila.org/~vuk/, download on 29 July 2021.
13. Cramer, Florian. “Discordia Concors: www.jodi.Org,” (2002), http://www.cramer.pleintekst.nl/all/jodi_-_discordia_concors/jodi_-_discordia_concors.pdf, download on 29 July 2021.
14. Datasphere. “Telematic Connections,” (2001), http://telematic.walkerart.org/datasphere/laporta_index.html, download on 29 May 2016.
15. Debatty, Regine. “Interview with Marisa Olson,” We Make Money Not Art (2008), https://we-make-money-not-art.com/how_does_one_become_marisa/, download on 29 May 2016.
16. deJong, Constance, Tony Oursler, and Stephen Vitiello. Fantastic Prayers (1995), https://awp.diaart.org/fp/fprayer2.html, download on 23 July 2021.
17. Dia. “James Buckhouse in Collaboration with Holly Brubach, Tap,” (2002), https://www.diaart.org/program/artistswebprojects/james-buckhouse-in-collaboration-with-holly-brubachtap-web-project, download on 29 April 2004.
18. Govan, Michael. “Fantastic Prayers Introduction,” (1995), https://awp.diaart.org/fp/mgintro.html, download on 23 May 2021.
19. Greene, Rachel(2004).Internet Art.London:Thames & Hudson.
20. Huffman, Kathy Rae. “The WebSite of Documenta x,” (1997), https://www.heise.de/tp/features/The-WebSite-of-documenta-x-3442115.html, download on 25 January 2021.
21. Ippolito, Jon(2002).Ten Myths of Internet Art.Leonardo,35(5),485-498.
22. Jana, Reena. “Whitney Speaks: It Is Art,” (2000), https://www.wired.com/2000/03/whitney-speaks-it-is-art/, download on 23 December 2020.
23. Klein, Kristin(2021).Post-digital, Post-internet: Propositions for Art Education in the Context of Digital Cultures.Post-Digital, Post-Internet Art and Education: The Future is All-Over,Switzerland:
24. LaPorta, Tina. VOYEUR_WEB (2001), https://whitney.org/exhibitions/voyeur-web, download on 5 July 2021.
25. McDonald, Kyle. “When Art, Apple and the Secret Service Collide: ‘People Staring at Computers,’” (2012), https://www.wired.com/2012/07/people-staring-at-computers/, download on 23 July 2021.
26. McHugh, Gene(2011).Post Internet.New York:Lulu.Com.
27. Moss, Ceci(2019).Expanded Internet Art: Twenty-First-Century Artistic Practice and the Informational Milieu.New York:Bloomsbury Publishing.
28. Olson, Marisa(2008).Lost not Found: The Circulation of Images in Digital Visual Culture.Words Without Picture,Los Angeles:
29. Olson, Marisa(2012).Postinternet.Foam Magazine,29,59-63.
30. Paul, Christiane(2015).From Immateriality to Neomateriality: Art and the Conditions of Digital Materiality.Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art,Vancouver, Canada:
31. Paul, Christiane(2003).Digital Art.London:Thames & Hudson.
32. Respini, Eva(ed.)(2018).Art in the Age of the Internet: 1989 to Today.London:Yale University Press.
33. RHIZOME. “Announcing the Winner of the $10,000 Prix Net Art: Constant Dullaart,” (2015), https://rhizome.org/editorial/2015/nov/16/announcing-the-winner-of-the-10000-prix-net-art-constant-dullaart/, download on 5 July 2021.
34. Smith, Giulia. “Smoke and Mirrors: Amalia Ulman’s Instagram,” OAR: The Oxford Artistic and Practice Based Research Platform (2017), http://www.oarplatform.com/smoke-mirrors-amalia-ulmans-instagram/, download on 5 July 2021.
35. Tavin, Kevin(ed.),Kolb, Gila(ed.),Tervo, Juuso(ed.)(2021).Post-Digital, Post-Internet Art and Education: The Future is All-Over.
36. van der Meulen, Sjoukje(2017).A Strong Couple: New Media and Socially Engaged Art.Leonardo,50(2),170-176.
37. Vierkant, Atie, “The Image Object Post-Internet,” (2010), https://www.artlurker.com, download on 5 July 2015.
38. Wallace, Ian. “What Is Post-Internet Art? Understanding the Revolutionary New Art Movement,” (2014), https://www.artspace.com/magazine/interviews_features/trend_report/post_internet_art-52138, download on 5 July 2015.
39. Wands, Bruce(2006).Art of the Digital Age.New York:Thames & Hudson.
40. Weibel, Peter(ed.),Druckrey, Timothy(ed.)(2001).Net_Condition.Cambridge:MIT press.
41. Wilson, Stephen(2001).Information Arts: Intersections of Art, Science, and Technology.Cambridge:MIT press.
42. 王俊傑(2004)。接受、交往與漫遊：論數位時代的藝術傾向。漫遊者 2004 國際數位藝術大展專刊，臺中:
43. 尼茲維奇, Hal,黃玉華（譯）(2012).我愛偷窺：集體愛上偷窺與被偷窺的時代.臺北:立緒.
44. 波斯曼, Neil,章艷（譯）(2015).娛樂至死.北京:中信出版社.
45. 埃爾格拉, Pablo,吳岱融（譯）,蘇瑤華（譯）(2018).社會參與藝術的十個關鍵概念.臺北:臺北藝術大學.
46. 祖博夫, Shoshana,溫澤元（譯）,林怡婷（譯）,陳思穎（譯）(2020).監控資本主義時代.臺北:時報出版.
47. 畢莎普, Claire,林宏濤（譯）(2015).人造地獄：參與式藝術與觀看者政治學.臺北:典藏藝術家庭.
48. 凱斯特, Grant,吳瑪俐（譯）,謝明學（譯）,梁錦鋆（譯）(2006).對話性創作：現代藝術中的社群與溝通.臺北:遠流.
49. 曾鈺涓(2016)。網路藝術已死？。數位藝述第伍號：數位文化網絡世代的哲思，臺北:
50. 曾鈺涓(2019)。網路藝術介入社會的情境。藝術家，528，222-227。
51. 曾鈺涓(2010)。新竹，國立交通大學應用藝術研究所。
52. 萊西, Suzanne,吳瑪悧（譯）(2004).量繪形貌──新類型公共藝術.臺北市:遠流.
53. 濱野智史,蘇文淑（譯）(2011).架構的生態系：資訊環境被如何設計至今？.臺北:大藝出版.