服務－學習對班級凝聚力的影響～以華夏技術學院之服務學習融入課程為例

The Impact of Service-learning on Class Cohesion~ A case of service-learning inclusion curriculum in the Hwa Hsia Institute of technology

10.6909/JSO.201301_(1).0003

洪錦珠(Hung, Ching-Chu)

社會網絡 ； 服務－學習 ； 班級凝聚力 ； social network ； service-learning ； class cohesion

學生社團學刊

1期（2013 / 01 / 01）

49 - 62

繁體中文

協同合作是服務－學習的特質之一，本研究從團體行為改變技術的角度，探討服務－學習對於班級凝聚力的提升有無明顯作用；為此，本研究於100學年度第一學期，針對實施服務－學習課程的7個班級共359位學生，應用問卷調查法於課程前後各施測一次，有效問卷共計325人，量表的信度前後測皆為 .837。本研究發現，參與此項課程的班級在團體凝聚力的三個指標，亦即「吸引力」、「團結一致」以及「協同合作」的得分上皆有明顯的進步；若以另一個凝聚力的指標──「社會關係密度」觀之，也呈現相同的現象；顯示協同合作式的服務－學習課程的參與，對班級的凝聚力的提升是有顯著的效果。其次，從社會關係結構圖加以觀察，七個班級內部的人際關係結構，也有明顯的改變，置身於團體以外「孤獨型」的學生人數減少，本不相連結的小團體也與其他團體建立關係的連結，這些都顯示參與服務－學習的確有其效益存在。

Collaboration is one of the characteristics of service-learning. The purpose of this research is to investigate if class cohesion has been significantly improved through one-semester of service-leaning activities. Three hundred and fifty nine students are surveyed with questionnaires before and after the activities. Three hundred and twenty five questionnaires are effective and the reliabilities reach .837. This research finds that either group attraction or solidarity and collaboration of these classes have significantly improved. The increase in social relationship density of these classes also proves the similar phenomenon. All of these findings show that exercising collaboration type of service-leaning curriculums has positive effects on improving class cohesion. In addition, this research also finds that the personal relationship structure of these seven classes has changed dramatically too. Isolators of each class decrease dramatically and independent subgroups have been connected after the service-leaning curriculum. This paper proves that findings show that service-leaning curriculum has positive function in education.

1. Burt, R.(1982).Toward a structural theory of action.New York:Academic Press.
2. Carron, A. V.,Brawley, L. R.(1985).The Development to assess cohesion in sport teams.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,244-266.
3. Carron, A.V.(1982).Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and Considerations.Journal of sport psychology,4,123-138.
4. Festinger, L.(1968).Informal social communication.Group dynamics: Research and theory,New York:
5. Hanneman, R.A. & Mark R. (2005).Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/)
6. Kozeracki, C. A.(2000).ERIC Review: Service Learning in the community college.Community College Review,27(4),54-64.
7. Shelley, H. B. (2005). Impacts of Service-Learning on Participating Students, Retrieved December 23, 2009, from http://www.service-learningpartnership.org/site/DocServer/S-L_Impacts_Fact_Sheet_-_Mar_05.doc?docID=801
8. Winmeyer, W.N.,Williams, J.M.(1991).Predicting cohesion in coacting sport.Small group research,22,548-570.
9. 呂勝瑛(1984).團體診療的過程與實際.台北市:五南.
10. 李青芬（譯）,李雅婷（譯）,趙慕芬（譯）,Robbins, Stephen P.(2001).組織行為學.台北:華泰文化.
11. 洪錦珠,張美足,蕭佳賓(2012)。服務-學習與班級凝聚力。「第四屆服務學習學術研討會」論文集
12. 陳盈方(2007)。台中市，靜宜大學青少年兒童服務學系。
13. 陳瑞,周桂如(2002)。團體凝聚力。慈濟護理雜誌，1(1)，23-28。
14. 黃玉(2005)。大學生發展理論與應用再探。學生事務與社團輔導
15. 蕭佳賓,洪錦珠(2012)。組織內部關鍵影響者的辨識。2012 資訊科技與管理研討會論文發表會
16. 謝文全(1994).教育行政：理論與實務.台北市:文景.

1. 蔡昕璋(2020)。2010年代臺灣學生事務的社會脈動與相關研究分析。學生事務與輔導，58(4)，13-32。
2. 蔡雅涵(2021)。大學生參與服務學習課程經驗與領導力發展之研究：以國立臺灣師範大學服務學習活動設計與實施課程為例。學生事務與輔導，59(4)，38-57。