大學生社團參與經驗與批判思考能力關係之研究

A Study of the Relationships among Club Experiences and Critical Thinking Skills for College Students' Participation in Clubs

10.6909/JSO.201601_(4).0002

李育齊(Yu-Chi, Li)；洪錦珠(Ching-Chu Hung)；葉昌智(Chang-Chih, Yeh)

批判思考能力 ； 社團經驗 ； 大學生 ； critical thinking skills ； club experiences ； College students

學生社團學刊

4期（2016 / 01 / 01）

27 - 46

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究大學生社團參與經驗與批判思考能力的關係，採用混合研究設計，量化部分採用問卷調查法，選定北部某國立大學學生為施測樣本，以社團負責人會議、通識中心所開設之思考相關課程、哲學相關課程、軍訓課程為研究場域，有效施測樣本為367人。並編製「大學生社團參與經驗與批判思考能力量表」為研究工具，運用描述性統計、單因子變異數分析等統計分析方法，此外並針對量化研究結果，進行質化訪談，探究學生大學生社團參與經驗與批判思考能力之關係。研究結果分述如下：（一）個人背景方面，不同性別、年級、父母教育程度之大學生，其批判思考能力有顯著差異，其中女生批判思考能力得分顯著高於男生；四年級、三年級顯著高於二年級；父母教育程度為大專的學生顯著高於高中職以下。（二）社團參與經驗部分，參與不同社團類型、時數、年資、投入程度之大學生，其批判思考能力有顯著差異，且參與學術、自治性社團者較佳。

The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between college students' club experiences and critical thinking skills. A mixed-method research design and questionnaire survey was adopted for the quantitative study. It takes samples from students of the national university in the north of Taiwan. These students are either leaders of clubs or learners in those curriculums related to thinking, philosophy and military training. A total of 367 valid samples were retrieved. A ＂Scale of College Student's Club Experience and Critical Thinking skills＂ is compiled as the instrument of this research. The data were analyzed by statistical methods including descriptive statistics, and one-way ANOVA. For the qualitative study, interviews were conducted based on the quantitative results, in order to analyze the relationships among club experiences and critical thinking skills for college students. The findings are as follows: 1. The difference in critical thinking skills among the students with different personal background such as gender, grade and parents' education status, is significant statistically. In terms of the score in this ability, female is higher than male, senior and junior are higher than sophomore, and parents with undergraduate degree is higher than those with lower education level. 2. The difference in critical thinking skills among the students with different society experience in terms of type of club, hours of participation, years of participation, and the extent of involvement, is significant statistically. The critical thinking skills of the members of academy and autonomy types of clubs are better than those in other types of clubs.

1. 陳昭雄,林合懋,張同廟,潘怡君(2006)。影響大專校院校園社團發展因素之探討—社團幹部與課指組師長認知態度之比較。弘光學報，49，13-36。
   連結：
2. 葉玉珠,陳月梅,謝佳蓁,葉碧玲(2001)。「成人批判思考技巧測驗」之發展。測驗年刊，48(2)，35-50。
   連結：
3. 葉玉珠,葉碧玲,謝佳蓁(2000)。中小學批判思考技巧測驗之發展。測驗年刊，47(1)，27-46。
   連結：
4. Astin, A. W.(1993).What matters in college? : Four critical years revisited.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
5. Astin, A.W.(1991).Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education.New York:American Council on Educayion.
6. Braun, N. M.(2004).Critical thinking in the business curriculum.Journal of Education for Business,79(4),232-236.
7. Ennis, R. H.(1996).Critical thinking.NJ:Prentice Hall.
8. Facione, P. A.(1990).Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction.Millbrae, CA:The California Academic Press.
9. Foubert, J. D.,Grainger, L.U.(2006).Effects of involvement in clubs and organizations on the psychological development of first-year and senior college students.NASPA Journal,43(1),166-182.
10. Gellin, A.(2003).The effects of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature 1991-2000.Journal of College Student Development,44,746-762.
11. Inkelas, K. K.,Zeller, W. J.,Murphy, R. K.,Hummel, M. L.(2006).Learning moves home.About Campus,10-16.
12. Kuh, G. D.(1993).In their own words: What students learn outside the classroom.American Educational Research Journal,30(2),277-307.
13. Pascarella, E. T.,Terenzini, P. T.(1991).How college affects students.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
14. Pascarella, E. T.,Terenzini, P. T.(2005).How college affect students: A third decade of research.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
15. Terenzini, P. T.,Springer, L.,Pascrella, E. T.,Nora, A.(1995).Academic and out-of-class influences on students’ intellectual orientations.Review of Higher Education,19(1),23-44.
16. 吳靜吉,鄭英耀,王文中(1992)。華格批判思考量表之修訂。教育與心理研究，15，91-128。
17. 周甘逢,蔡武志,羅志明(1988).社團理念.高雄:復文.
18. 邱皓政(2007).量化研究與統計分析：SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析.臺北:五南.
19. 張玉成(1993).思考技巧與教學.臺北:心理.
20. 張同廟(2007)。大專女性社團負責人暨幹部能力獲得之研究-以台南女子技術學院社為例。社團活動理論與實務，台南:
21. 張雪梅(2010)。大學生學校社團參與經驗及參與效益研究。「大專校院校務研究與高等教育發展國際學術研討會」論文集，臺北市:
22. 陳密桃(1993)。師範生批判思考的相關因素及其教學效果之分析研究。教育學刊，10，105-158。
23. 傅木龍(2000)。校園學生社團活動之發展與輔導。訓育研究，39(1)，16-24。
24. 葉玉珠(1991)。臺北市，國立政治大學教育研究所。
25. 葉玉珠(1998)。有效批判思考教學的基礎之探討。教育研究雙月刊，59，57-67。
26. 葉玉珠（2005）。批判思考測驗第二級。2013 年 5 月 28 日，取自 http://www3.nccu.edu.tw/~ycyeh/4tool.htm
27. 葉玉珠(2003).批判思考測驗第一級與指導手冊.臺北:心理出版社.
28. 劉惠琴(1994)。國科會 83 年度「科學教育專題研討計畫」成果討論會國科會 83 年度「科學教育專題研討計畫」成果討論會,國科會。
29. 蔡偉鼎（譯）,Missimer, C. A.(2002).批判思考導論：如何精進論證.臺北:學富.
30. 戴佳蓉(2012)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導系碩士在職專班。
31. 顏妙桂(2000)。學生社團之輔導與發展。訓育研究，39(1)，31-33。