英文摘要
|
"Philosophy for Teachers" (P4T) refers to a model of teachers' professional development which aims to engage teachers in a philosophical community of inquiry, so that teachers could reflect upon concrete problems and perplexities arising from daily teaching. The purpose is to deepen teachers' self-understanding and enhance their wellbeing through the process of story sharing, questioning, voting, communal dialogue and inquiry, and reflection. The first part of this paper looks at the background of P4T, its connection to Philosophy for Children (P4C), and relevant theories about teacher education and empirical research results. The second part of this paper introduces the practice of a localized model of P4T, including its five-step procedure, explanations of the functions of each step, examples drawn from practice, and teacher participants' perspectives towards P4T. Finally, this paper concludes by reassuring the significance and contribution of P4T to teacher professional development.
|
参考文献
|
-
王清思(2016b)。為什麼大學生上課不再靜悄悄?兒童哲學團體探究教學法融入大學課堂教學之研究。大學教學實務與研究學刊,1,31-75。
連結:
-
Biesta, G. (2012). Giving teaching back to education: Responding to the disappearance of the teacher. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 35-49.
連結:
-
Biesta, G. (2015) How does a competent teacher become a good teacher? On judgment, wisdom, virtuosity in teaching and teacher education. In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Teacher Education (pp. 3-22). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
連結:
-
Cam, P. (2018). The theory of education made flesh. In M. R. Gregory & M. J. Laverty (Eds.), In Community of inquiry with Ann Sharp: Childhood, Philosophy and Education (pp. 29-37). New York: Routledge.
連結:
-
Dewey, J. (1964). John Dewey on education; selected writings. New York: Modern Library.
Foreman-Peck, L. (2015). Towards a theory of wellbeing for teachers. In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Teacher Education (pp. 152-166). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
連結:
-
Higgins, C. (2015). Why we need a virtue ethics of teaching? (pp. 57-75). In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Teacher Education (pp. 57-75). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
連結:
-
Jackson, T. (2004). Philosophy for children Hawaii style “On not being in a rush.” Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 17(1-2), 4-8.
連結:
-
Johnson, L. E. & Reiman, A. J. (2007). Beginning teacher dispositions: Examining the moral/ethical domain. Teaching and teacher education, 23, 676-687.
連結:
-
Lipman, M. (2017). The Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children (IAPC) program. In S. Naji & R. Hashim (Eds.). History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children: International Perspectives (pp. 3-11). London: Routledge.
連結:
-
Naji, S. & Hashim, R. (Eds.). (2017). History, Theory and Practice of Philosophy for Children. London: Routledge.
連結:
-
Orchard, J., Heilbronn, R. & Winstanley, C. (2016) Philosophy for teachers (P4T)– Developing new teachers’ applied ethical decision-making, Ethics and Education, 11(1), 42-54.
連結:
-
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: what is it and why does it matter? In R. Kneyber & J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the System: Changing Education from the Bottom Up (pp. 134-148). London: Routledge.
連結:
-
Sharp, A. M (2018b). Is there an essence of education? In M. R. Gregory & M. J. Laverty (Eds.), In Community of inquiry with Ann Sharp: Childhood, Philosophy and Education (pp. 186-194). New York: Routledge.
連結:
-
Sharp, A. M (2018c). What is a community of inquiry? In M. R. Gregory & M. J. Laverty (Eds.), In Community of inquiry with Ann Sharp: Childhood, Philosophy and Education (pp. 38-48). New York: Routledge.
連結:
-
Wringe, C. (2015). Learning to teach and becoming a teacher. In R. Heilbronn & L. Foreman-Peck (Eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Teacher Education (pp. 23-37). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
連結:
-
Wang, J. C. (2020). Creating moral winds and nurturing moral Growth in a P4C Classroom Community in Taiwan. In Lam Chi-Ming (Ed.). Philosophy for Children in Confucian Societies: In Theory and Practice (pp. 54-69). London: Routledge. (ISBN9780367137274).
連結:
-
王清思(2008)。教育理論與實務的關係:剖析杜威對師資培育的看法及其對現今的啟示。初等教育學刊,31,13-33。
-
王清思(2016a)。杜威的教育哲學與人生:透視哲學與教育的共生關係。新教育哲 學(頁43-68)。臺北市:五南。
-
王清思(2018a)。論杜威與兒童哲學的關係。哲學與文化,45(6),81-100。
-
王清思(2018b)。兒童哲學團體探究中的德育意蘊。教育發展研究,38(15-16), 74-81。
-
陳伊琳(2019)。在師培中失陪?反思教育哲學教學在台灣師資培育課程中的定位。臺灣教育哲學,3(1),1-31。
-
簡成熙(譯)(2010)。G. R. Knight著。教育哲學導論。臺北市:五南。
-
楊忠斌(2013)。師資培育職前課程不需要教育哲學?。臺灣教育評論月刊,2(11), 62-64。
-
Gregory, M. & Laverty, M. (Eds.). (2018). In Community of inquiry with Ann Sharp: Childhood, Philosophy and Education. New York: Routledge.
-
Jackson, T. (2001). The art and craft of ‘gently Socratic’ inquiry. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing Minds: A Resource Book for Teaching Thinking (pp. 459-465). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
-
Jackson, T. (2012). Home grown. Educational Perspectives, 44(1-2), 3-7.
-
Lipman, M., Sharp, A., & Oscanyan, F. (1980). Philosophy in the Classroom. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
-
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Orchard, J. & Davids, N. (2019). Philosophy for teachers (P4T) in South Africa: Reimagining provision to support new teachers’ applied ethical decision making. Ethics and Education, 13(3), 333-350.
-
Sharp, A. M. (2007). The classroom community as ritual: How to cultivate wisdom. Critical and Creative Thinking, 15(1), 3-14.
-
Sharp, A. M. (2009). Let’s go visiting: Learning judgment making in a community of inquiry. In E. Marsal, T. Dobashi, & B. Weber (Eds.), Children Philosophize World Wide: Theoretical and Practical Concepts (pp. 323-336). Frankurt: Peter Lang.
-
Sharp, A. M (2018a). Self-transformation in the community of inquiry. In M. R. Gregory & M. J. Laverty (Eds.), In Community of inquiry with Ann Sharp: Childhood, Philosophy and Education (pp. 49-59). New York: Routledge.
-
Sharp, A. M & Laverty, M. J (2018). Looking at others’ faces. In M. R. Gregory & M. J. Laverty (Eds.), In Community of inquiry with Ann Sharp: Childhood, Philosophy and Education (pp. 120-130). New York: Routledge.
|