基於水能糧鏈結的地方創生治理模式初探

A Preliminary Study of The Local Revitalization Governance Model Based on WEF Nexus

10.29694/ILG.202111.0021

李長晏；楊子申

地方創生 ； 永續發展 ； 治理 ； 水能糧鏈結 ； Local Revitalization ； Sustainable Development ； Governance ； WEF Nexus

2021後疫情時代創新地方治理國際學術研討會會議手冊(含論文集)

2021年（2021 / 11 / 19）

b3-43 - 65

繁體中文

隨著經濟發展以及科技進步，人口向都市集中的現象日趨極端，導致嚴重的城鄉差距問題，與此同時，多數亞洲國家面臨人口結構快速老化的困境，致使鄉鎮遭受人口外流及老化的雙重衝擊，遂出現了生活機能瀕臨崩潰的現象。為了緩解此一問題，日本政府首先提出地方創生政策，企圖振興地方經濟、促進人口回流。然而現行之地方創生政策，往往在政府轉為支援性質之後，其政策效果就因牽動複雜區域關係、社會與自然資源等問題，遭遇難以延續的困境。為應對此一困境，本研究嘗試導入在永續治理議題上，發展已久的水、能源和糧食鏈結（Water-Energy-Food Nexus, WEF Nexus）理論，探索基於WEF鏈結的地方創生治理模式。研究主要應用文獻分析法，析探WEF鏈結研究的發展背景、理論與研究進展，並針對國際上主要推動WEF鏈結研究之機構所提出的概念模型，進行比較分析，歸納各模型的架構以及所納入的影響因素，作為建構地方創生治理模式的基礎。基此，研究進一步基於WEF鏈結框架的歸納成果，結合地方創生概念內涵，初步提出基於水糧能鏈結的於地方創生治理模式。模型以水、能源和糧食三項基本元素的鏈結關係為核心，並納入七項外部影響因素維度，分別為經濟、自然環境、人口、創新、文化社會、利害關係人以及治理。研究建議後續研究可基於此一治理模式框架，導入更具體的治理理論，如多中心治理（polycentric governance）、後設治理（metagoverance）理論，以更貼近實務應用場域，同時也為後續構建可量化運算的系統模型，執行情境模擬、政策評估和預測等研究鋪墊根基。

With economic development and technological advancement, the phenomenon of population concentration in cities has become increasingly extreme, leading to a serious urban-rural gap problem. At the same time, most Asian countries are facing the predicament of rapid aging of the population structure, causing towns and villages to suffer from the dual impact of population exodus and aging. Then there appeared the phenomenon of life function on the verge of collapse. In order to alleviate this problem, the Japanese government first proposed a local revitalization policy in an attempt to revitalize the local economy and promote the population. However, the current policies often encounter difficulties that are difficult to sustain due to problems affecting complex regional relations, society, and natural resources. To cope with this dilemma, this research attempts to combine Water-Energy-Food Nexus (WEF Nexus) theory, and explore the local revitalization governance model based on WEF nexus. The research mainly uses the literature analysis method to analyze the background, theories and research development of WEF Nexus research, compares and analyzes the conceptual models proposed by the institutions that mainly promote WEF Nexus research. The study summarizes the structure of each model and the influencing factors included as the basis for constructing the governance model of local revitalization. The research is further based on the summary results of the WEF link framework, combined with the connotation of the concept of local creation, and initially proposes a local revitalization governance model based on WEF nexus. The model centers on the linkage of the three basic elements of water, energy, and food, and includes seven external influencing factors, namely economy, natural environment, population, innovation, cultural society, stakeholders, and governance. The research suggests that follow-up research can be based on this framework and add more specific governance theories, such as polycentric governance and metagoverance, to get closer to practice. At the same time, it also pave the way for the construction of quantitative models, the implementation of scenario simulation, policy evaluation and forecasting research.

1. 李長晏(2020)。地方創生政策理論與策略之建構：政策整合觀點。中國地方自治，73(2)，18-35。
   連結：
2. 楊研,金晨曦,夏朋(2019)。“水─能源─糧食 Nexus 關係”典型國家實踐及啟示。水利發展研究，19(1)，78-81。
   連結：
3. Aksnes, D. L.,Holm, P.,Bavinck, M.,Biermann, F.,Donovaro, R.,Harvey, P.,St John, M.(2017).Food from the Oceans-How can more food and biomass be obtained from the oceans in a way that does not deprive future generations of their benefits?.Berlin:SAPEA.
4. Albrecht, T. R.,Crootof, A.,Scott, C. A.(2018).The Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A systematic review of methods for nexus assessment.Environmental Research Letters,13(4),043002.
5. Allan, J. A.(1993).Fortunately there are substitutes for water otherwise our hydro-political futures would be impossible.Priorities for water resources allocation and management,13(4),13-26.
6. Al-Saidi, M.,Elagib, N. A.(2017).Towards understanding the integrative approach of the water, energy and food nexus.Science of the Total Environment,574,1131-1139.
7. Aquastat, F.(2016).FAO’s information system on water and agriculture.Italy:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
8. Bazilian, M.,Rogner, H.,Howells, M.,Hermann, S.,Arent, D.,Gielen, D.,Yumkella, K. K.(2011).Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach.Energy Policy,39(12),7896-7906.
9. Biggs, E.,Bruce, E.,Boruff, B.,Duncan, J.,Horsley, J.,Pauli, N.(2015).Sustainable development and the water-energy-food nexus: A perspective on livelihoods.Environmental Science & Policy,54,389-397.
10. Bizikova, L.,Roy, D.,Swanson, D.,Venema, H. D.,McCandless, M.(2013).,未出版
11. Boas, I.,Biermann, F.,Kanie, N.(2016).Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach.International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics,16(3),449-464.
12. Conti, J.,Holtberg, P.,Diefenderfer, J.,LaRose, A.,Turnure, J. T.,Westfall, L.(2016).International energy outlook 2016 with projections to 2040.Washington, DC:Energy Information Administration.
13. De Strasser, L.,Lipponen, A.,Howells, M.,Stec, S.,Bréthaut, C.(2016).A methodology to assess the water energy food ecosystems nexus in transboundary river basins.Water,8(2),59.
14. DESA. (2018). 2018 revision of world urbanization prospects, and 2017 revision of world population prospects: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
15. DESA. (2015). World population prospects: the 2015 revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
16. Endo, A.,Burnett, K.,Orencio, P. M.,Kumazawa, T.,Wada, C. A.,Ishii, A.,Taniguchi, M.(2015).Methods of the water-energy-food nexus.Water,7(10),5806-5830.
17. Endo, A.,T., I.,Burnett, K.,Orencio, P. M.(2017).A review of the current state of research on the water, energy, and food nexus.Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies,11(6),20-30.
18. ESCAP, U.(2013).,未出版
19. FAO(2014).The Water‐Energy‐Food Nexus: a New Approach in Support of Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture.Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
20. Finley, M.(2018).Finley, M. (2018). BP energy outlook. London: BP plc..
21. Foran, T.(2015).Node and regime: Interdisciplinary analysis of water-energy-food nexus in the Mekong region.Water alternatives,8(1),665-674.
22. Granit, J.,Jägerskog, A.,Lindström, A.,Björklund, G.,Bullock, A.,Löfgren, R.,Pettigrew, S.(2012).Regional options for addressing the water, energy and food nexus in Central Asia and the Aral Sea Basin.International Journal of Water Resources Development,28(3),419-432.
23. Guillaume, J. H.,Kummu, M.,Eisner, S.,Varis, O.(2015).Transferable principles for managing the nexus: Lessons from historical global water modelling of central Asia.Water,7(8),4200-4231.
24. Hoff, H.,Alrahaife, S. A.,El Hajj, R.,Lohr, K.,Mengoub, F. E.,Farajalla, N.,Schultz, R.(2019).A nexus approach for the MENA region-from concept to knowledge to action.Frontiers in Environmental Science,7,48.
25. Hoff, J.(2011).Understanding the nexus.Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus,Stockholm, Sweden:
26. Keskinen, M.,Guillaume, J. H.,Kattelus, M.,Porkka, M.,Räsänen, T. A,Varis, O.(2016).The water-energy-food nexus and the transboundary context: insights from large Asian rivers.Water,8(5),193-217.
27. Krugman, P.(1991).Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.The Journal of Political Economy,99,483-499.
28. Le Blanc, D.(2015).Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets.Sustainable Development,23(3),176-187.
29. Leck, H.,Conway, D.,Bradshaw, M.,Rees, J.(2015).Tracing the water-energy-food nexus: Description, theory and practice.Geography Compass,9(8),445-460.
30. Marshall, C.,Rossman, G. B.(2014).Designing qualitative research.Sage publications.
31. Meadows, D.,Randers, J.(2012).The limits to growth: the 30-year update.Routledge.
32. Meuleman, L.(2018).Metagovernance for sustainability: A framework for implementing the sustainable development goals.Routledge.
33. Nagle, G.,Cooke, B.(2017).Oxford IB Diploma Programme: Geography Course Companion.UK:Oxford University Press.
34. Ralon, P.,Taylor, M.,Ilas, A.,Diaz-Bone, H.,Kairies, K.(2017).Electricity storage and renewables: Costs and markets to 2030.Abu Dhabi, UAE.:International Renewable Energy Agency.
35. Redaelli, E.(2016).Creative placemaking and the NEA: unpacking amulti-level governance.Policy Studies,37(4),387-402.
36. UNGA(2015).UNGA. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). New York: United Nations General Assesmbly..
37. Varis, O.,Keskinen, M.(2018).Discussion of "Challenges in operationalizing the water-energy-food nexus".Hydrological Sciences Journal,63(12),1863-1865.
38. Weitz, N.,Strambo, C.,Kemp-Benedict, E.,Nilsson, M.(2017).Closing the governance gaps in the waterenergy-food nexus: Insights from integrative governance.Global Environmental Change,45,165-173.
39. 山下祐介(2012)。限界集落の真実。東京:中公新書出版。
40. 內政部 (2020)，《人口統計資料》，2021年11月4日，取自：https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
41. 余騰耀(2016).糧食、能源、水資源鏈結（FEW Nexus）發展趨勢與應用潛力.台北:財團法人中技社.
42. 李桂君,李玉龍,賈曉菁,杜磊,黃道涵(2016)。北京市水─能源─糧食可持續發展系統動力學模型構建與模擬。管理評論，28(10)，11-26。
43. 林志慧,劉憲鋒,陳瑛,傅伯傑(2021)。水─糧食─能源 Nexus 關係研究進展與展望。地理學報，76(7)，1591-1604。
44. 林俊秀(2019)。政府部門以科技力導入推動地方創生的具體做法。台灣經濟論衡，16(4)，28-40。
45. 國家發展委員會(2014).中華民國人口推計（103 至 150 年）.行政院國家發展委員會.
46. 張宗勇,劉俊國,王凱,田展,趙丹丹(2020)。水─糧食─能源關聯系統述評：文獻計量及解析。科學通報，65(16)，1569-1580。
47. 張斐章,范致豪,胡明哲,盧虎生,黃泰霖(2019)。都市化水─糧食─能源鏈結之研究。自然科學簡訊，31(2)，78-85。
48. 曾旭正(2019)。<地方創生是更大尺度的社區營造需要更深廣的社會動員>。 2021年 11 月 4 日，取自：https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/117418/
49. 劉佩真(2020)。從各面向觀測半導體景氣與發展情勢。今日合庫，46(4)，38-66。
50. 増田寛也(2014).地方消滅.東京都:中公新書出版.

1. (2024)。論社會文化參與：以地方創生為導向。中國地方自治，77(7)，61-88。