题名

建築照明節能參數比較

并列篇名

Energy-saving factor comparison of building lighting

作者

林師培;劉敏生;廖建順;韋宗楒

关键词

建築照明 ; 照明功率密度(LPDc值) ; 台灣綠建築(EEWH) ; Building Lighting ; Lighting Power Densities (LPD) ; Taiwan EEWH

期刊名称

冷凍空調&能源科技

卷期/出版年月

107期(2018 / 01 / 10)

页次

56 - 60

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

參考內政部建築研究所的台灣綠建築(EEWH)日常節能指標,及ASHRAE 90.1-2013規範,以台灣主要作業空間照明功率密度基準LPDc值,及ASHRAE 90.1 LPD(Lighting Power Densities)為探討指標,兩者有相同的單位(W/m^2),該值愈低,照明耗能就愈低,表示照明的節能愈好。文中表列出ASHRAE 90.1於2004年至2013年間,LPD值的變化,並針對宿舍、博物館(展覽廳)、辦公室等3種不同的場所,作2010年至2015年間LPDc值與2004年至2013年間,LPD值的比較。從降低LPD值,可獲得較佳的節能效益。

英文摘要

Reference Architecture and Building Research Institute of Taiwan Green Building (EEWH) daily energy-saving targets, and ASHRAE 90.1-2013 standard, LPD (Lighting Power Densities) is an important factor to measure building lighting consumption. The lower the LPD factor value, the lower the amount of lighting consumption. It means the building lighting has better energy-saving. The paper listed the change of ASHRAE 90.1-2013 LPD value from 2004 to 2013,and also make LPD value comparison between Taiwan and ASHRAE 90.1 at dormitory、museum and office three different arear. lower the LPD value could improve better energy efficiency.

主题分类 工程學 > 電機工程
参考文献
  1. (2010).ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings.
  2. (2013).2013 年版之綠建築評估手冊,評估手冊-基本型(EEWH-BC).
  3. (2010).2010 年版之綠建築評估手冊,評估手冊-基本型(EEWH-BC).
  4. (2015).2015 年版之綠建築評估手冊,評估手冊-基本型(EEWH-BC).
  5. (2007).ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings.
  6. (2013).ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings.
  7. (2004).90.1 User’s ManualANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004.