從復仇式色情到數位性暴力：語彙、概念與認知框架的形成與轉變

From Revenge Porn to Digital Sexual Violence: Formation and Changes of Vocabulary, Concept, and Cognitive Frame

10.6195/TJOC.202312_44.0001

余貞誼(Chen-Yi Yu)

未經同意散布性私密影像 ； 性暴力連續體 ； 框架 ； 復仇式色情 ； 數位性暴力 ； nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images ； continuum of sexual violence ； frame ； revenge porn ； digital sexual violence

臺灣傳播學刊

44期（2023 / 12 / 01）

1 - 41

繁體中文;英文

擅自散布他人性私密影像的行動，在臺灣社會初始多以「復仇式色情」名之，後轉向「未經同意散布性私密影像」，接著則為「數位性暴力」。當現象的命名轉變，意味著其所指涉的槪念與文化基模的連結也會隨之轉變。本文同時收集新聞文本與Dcard的大眾輿論，來檢視媒介敍述在使用上述三種框架時，如何透過其所選擇與強調的面向帶出不同調性，並導引出不一的輿論氛圍。此分析將可協助我們看見命名政治如何導引甚或宰制我們對現象的理解。

The act of maliciously spreading other people's intimate images was initially known as "revenge porn" in the Taiwanese society; it was later referred to as "nonconsensual dissemination of intimate images," followed by "digital sexual violence." Such changes in the naming of the phenomenon signify the changes in the connection between the concept involved and the cultural schema. This study analyzed news texts and public opinions from Dcard to examine how media narratives bring out different tones through the aspects they choose and emphasize to shape public opinions using the three mentioned frames. The results are expected to clarify how the politics of naming guide or dominate people's understanding of a phenomenon.

1. 王維菁（2018）。〈勞動薪資議題之媒體再現與定錨影響初探：以人力銀行青年起薪調查新聞為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，33：219-256。
   連結：
2. 陳靜茹、蔡美瑛（2009）。〈全球暖化與京都議定書議題框架之研究——以2001-2007年紐約時報新聞為例〉，《新聞學研究》，100：253-295。
   連結：
3. 黃惠萍（2003）。〈媒介框架之預設判準效應與閱聽人的政策評估—以核四案為例〉，《新聞學研究》，77：67-105。
   連結：
4. 楊意菁（2017）。〈風險溝通、媒體關注與框架分析：以新聞再現企業環境相關議題為例〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，7(1)：71-106。
   連結：
5. 謝君蔚、徐美苓（2011）。〈媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變：以基因改造食品新聞為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，20：143-179。
   連結：
6. 魏然、李若筠（2021）。〈為人為己：新聞關注和文化取向如何影響美國民眾對新冠病毒的認知與防疫行為〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，58：203-253。
   連結：
7. Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Yang, Y. (2018). The strength of peripheral networks: Negotiating attention and meaning in complex ecologies. Journal of Communication, 68, 659-684.
   連結：
8. Boyle, K. (2019a). What’s in a name? Theorising the inter-relationships of gender and violence. Feminist Theory, 20(1), 19-36.
   連結：
9. Boyle, K. (2019b). # MeToo, weinstein and feminism. Cham, CH: Springer International Publishing.
   連結：
10. Bright, J. (2018). Explaining the emergence of political fragmentation on social media: The role of ideology and extremism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(1), 17-33.
    連結：
11. Brown, P. (1995). Naming and eraming: The social construction of diagnosis and illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Extra Issue: Forty Years of Medical Sociology: The State of the Art and Directions for the Future, 36(5), 34-52.
    連結：
12. Edelman, M. (1993). Contestable categories and public opinion. Political Communication, 10(3), 231-242.
    連結：
13. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
    連結：
14. Georgakopoulou, A. (2017). ‘Whose context collapse?’: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2-3), 169-189.
    連結：
15. Giaxoglou, K. (2017). Reflections on internet research ethics from language-focused research on web-based mourning: Revisiting the private/public distinction as a language ideology of differentiation. Applied Linguistics, 8(2-3), 229-250.
    連結：
16. Karlsen, A. S., & Scott, K. D. (2019). Making sense of Starbucks’ anti-bias training and the arrests of two African American men: A thematic analysis of Whites’ facebook and twitter comments. Discourse, Context & Media, 32, 100332.
    連結：
17. Langlois, G., & Slane, A. (2017). Economies of reputation: The case of revenge porn. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(2), 120-138. doi:10.1080/14791420.2016.1273534
    連結：
18. Maddocks, S. (2018). From non-consensual pornography to image-based sexual abuse: Charting the course of a problem with many names. Australian Feminist Studies, 33(97), 345-361. doi: 10.1080/08164649. 2018.1542592
    連結：
19. Maddocks, S. (2021). Feminism, activism and non-consensual pornography: Analyzing efforts to end “revenge porn” in the United States. Feminist Media Studies, 22(7), 1641-1656. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2021.1913434
    連結：
20. Mantziari, D. (2018). Sadistic scopophilia in contemporary rape culture: I spit on your grave (2010) and the practice of ‘media rape’. Feminist Media Studies, 18(3), 397-410. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1367700
    連結：
21. McGlynn, C., Rackley E., & Houghton, R. (2017). Beyond ‘revenge porn’: The continuum of image-based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies, 25(1), 25-46.
    連結：
22. McKenzie-Mohr, S., & Lafrance, M. N. (2011). Telling stories without the words: ‘Tightrope talk’ in women's accounts of coming to live well after rape or depression. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 49-73.
    連結：
23. Ogbodo, J. N., Onwe, E. C., Chukwu, J., Nwasum, C. J., Nwakpu, E. S., Nwankwo, S. U.,… Ogbaeja, N. I. (2020). Communicating health crisis: A content analysis of global media framing of COVID-19. Health Promot Perspect, 10(3), 257-269.
    連結：
24. Patella-Rey, P. (2018). Beyond privacy: Bodily integrity as an alternative framework for understanding non-consensual pornography. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 786-791.
    連結：
25. Ren, W. (2018). Mitigation in Chinese online consumer reviews. Discourse, Context & Media, 26, 5-12.
    連結：
26. Rüdiger, S., & Dayter, D. (2017). The ethics of researching unlikeable subjects: Language in an online community. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2-3), 251-269.
    連結：
27. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
    連結：
28. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.
    連結：
29. Simon, A., & Xenos, M. (2000). Media framing and effective public deliberation. Political Communication, 17(4), 363-376.
    連結：
30. Spilioti, T., & Tagg, C. (2017) The ethics of online research methods in applied linguistics: Challenges, opportunities, and directions in ethical decision-making. Applied Linguistics, 8(2-3), 163-167.
    連結：
31. Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 17(3), 275-297.
    連結：
32. Vera-Gray, F. (2016). Men's stranger intrusions: Rethinking street harassment. Women's Studies International Forum, 58, 9-17.
    連結：
33. Vera-Gray, F. (2017). ‘Talk about a cunt with too much idle time’: Trolling feminist research. Feminist Review, 115, 61-78.
    連結：
34. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2020). An emotional turn in journalism studies? Digital Journalism, 8(2), 175-194.
    連結：
35. 杜瑛秋、鄭筱舢、許皓程（2022）。〈新興虛擬數位性別暴力議題誰可接招？數位性暴力之社工服務〉，《社區發展季刊》，178：328-342。
36. 謝宜婷（2021年8月）。〈全臺最大年輕人社群平台Dcard 讓每個人都有機會找到共鳴〉，《臺灣光華雜誌》。取自https://www.taiwan-panorama.com/Articles/Details?Guid=1426d0fb-1879-4fa2-98c7-56 fe220b6a98&CatId=9&postname=%E5%85%A8%E5%8F%B0%E6% 9C%80%E5%A4%A7%E5%B9%B4%E8%BC%95%E4%BA%BA%E7 %A4%BE%E7%BE%A4%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0Dcard%20-%E8 %AE%93%E6%AF%8F%E5%80%8B%E4%BA%BA%E9%83%BD% E6%9C%89%E6%A9%9F%E6%9C%83%E6%89%BE%E5%88%B0 %E5%85%B1%E9%B3%B4
37. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychology, evolution and epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
38. British Psychological Society (2021). Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research. doi:https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsrep.2021.rep155
39. Citron, D. K., & Franks, M. A. (2014). Criminalizing Revenge Porn. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 345+.
40. Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1982). Frames of meaning: The social construction of extraordinary science. London, UK: Routledge.
41. Franks, M. A. (2017a). ‘Revenge porn’ reform: A view from the front lines. Florida Law Review, 69(5), 1251-1337. Retrieved from http://www. floridalawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/3-Franks.pdf
42. Franks, M. A. (2017, March 31). The conversation we need to have about ‘revenge porn’. Refinery 29. Retrieved from https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2017/03/147465/revenge-porn-legality-controversy
43. franzke, a. s., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C., & the Association of Internet Researchers (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. Retrieved from https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
44. franzke, a. s. (2020). Feminist research ethics, IRE 3.0 companion 6.3. Retrieved from Association of Internet Researchers Web site https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
45. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Hall, M., Hearn, J., & Lewis, L. (2022). Digital gender-sexual violations: Violence, technologies, motivations. London, UK: Routledge.
49. Haslanger, S. (2012). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50. Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2015). Embodied harms: Gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. Violence Against Women, 21(6), 758-779.
51. Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
52. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
53. NESH (The [Norwegian] National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences and the Humanities). (2019). A guide to internet research ethics. Oslo, NO: NESH.
54. Price, V., Tesksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1995). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Mid- west Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
55. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
56. Spender, D. (1985). Man made language (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
57. Tuerkheimer, D. (1997). Street harassment as sexual subordination: The phenomenology of gender-specific harm. Wisconsin Women's Law Journal, 12, 167-206.
58. Tyler, M. (2016, February 24). All porn is revenge porn. Feminist Curren. Retrieved from http://www.feministcurrent.com/2016/02/24/all-porn-is-revenge-porn/
59. Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of communication, 57(1), 60-78.
60. West, R. (2000). The difference in women’s hedonic lives: A phenomenological critique of feminist legal theory. Wisconsin Women's Law Journal, 15, 149-215.
61. Yar, M., & Drew, J. (2019). Image-based abuse, non-consensual pornography, revenge porn: A study of criminalization and crime prevention in Australia and England & Wales. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(2), 578-594.