弦外之音測驗臺灣版於思覺失調症患者之心理計量特性驗證

Validation of the Taiwanese version of the Strange Stories Test in patients with schizophrenia

10.6342/NTU201700306

鄭淇文

思覺失調症 ； 心智推理 ； 心理計量特性 ； schizophrenia ； theory of mind ； psychometric properties

臺灣大學職能治療研究所學位論文

2017年

碩士

薛漪平

繁體中文

研究背景：心智推理 (theory of mind) 是個體推論自己或他人心智狀態的能力。研究顯示，心智推理障礙為思覺失調症患者的特徵之一，影響患者的社會功能與社區生活的獨立甚劇。因此，有效評估患者心智推理能力對治療計畫擬定十分重要。Strange Stories Test是國外研究者常用來評估思覺失調症患者進階心智推理能力的評估工具，目前臺灣已發展中文版又名弦外之音測驗，其簡易、施測快速、適用臺灣文化，且在正常人上具良好再測信度等優點，使其相較其他評估工具更具研究、臨床上的使用潛力。然而，目前臺灣版的弦外之音測驗於思覺失調症患者的心理計量特性尚未被驗證。 研究目的：本研究欲驗證弦外之音測驗於思覺失調症患者的信度與效度，以瞭解此測驗用於思覺失調症患者心智推理評估的適用性。 研究方法：本研究募集共34位台大醫院日間病房的慢性思覺失調症患者參與研究，受試者共接受研究者2次施測，2次時間間隔為3周。每次的施測項目包括弦外之音測驗與社會認知篩檢問卷 (SCSQ)。此外於前測時，也會以蒙特利爾認知測驗 (MoCA) 評估受試者的認知功能，且由醫師以CGI-S評估其症狀嚴重度。受試者於第一次弦外之音測驗的回答在經其同意後，由研究者錄音以供施測者間信度的驗證。再測前，受試者先經CGI-S評分確認其症狀穩定無變化才進行再測。研究者於收案期間由病歷蒐集受試者的人口學資料，並向日間病房精神科醫師收集受試者最近一次評估的個人與社會功能量表 (PSP) 與活性與負症狀量表 (PANSS) 分數。本研究以弦外之音測驗的前後測結果進行資料分析，分析指標包括再測信度、隨機評估誤差、最小可偵測變化值、練習效應、內部一致性、施測者間信度、天花板與地板效應；再分別以PSP、SCSQ作外在效標，驗證弦外之音測驗之生態效度與收斂效度。本研究另比較患者與過去研究中正常人族群的弦外之音測驗分數差異，以檢驗測驗的區辨效度。 研究結果：結果顯示測驗具有可接受的施測者間信度、內部一致性、收斂效度。另外，測驗的再測一致性及生態效度不佳、隨機評估誤差與最小可偵測變化值較大，且具低至中度練習效應及明顯的天花板效應；區辨效度的結果顯示測驗對患者與正常人的區辨效度不好。 研究結論：弦外之音測驗的驗證結果顯示此測驗使用在慢性思覺失調症患者上的心理計量特性不佳，使得測驗的實用價值受限。未來，可能須改良此測驗或發展更具信效度之心智推理測驗以適用於思覺失調症患者。

Background The term theory of mind (ToM) refers to the ability to infer one’s own and other people’s mental states. A great deal of evidence shows that impaired ToM is a trait of schizophrenia which attributes to poor social function of patients. To address this problem, it is important for clinicians and researchers to use a good ToM test for schizophrenia patients to assess their abilities in ToM. Among several ToM tests, the Taiwanese version of the Strange Stories Test is one with many advantages because it is brief, easy to administer, and reliable in a normal group. However, the psychometric properties of this test in schizophrenia patients remain unknown. Objective The purpose of this study is to validate the reliability and validity of the Taiwanese version of the Strange Stories Test in patients with schizophrenia. Methods Two measures including the Taiwanese version of the Strange Stories Test and the Social Cognition Screening Questionnaire (SCSQ) were tested twice on 34 schizophrenia patients from National Taiwan University Hospital by the researcher, with a 3-week interval between assessments. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was also administered on the participants in the initial evaluation to assess the cognitive function of the participants. After giving their consent, the participants’ verbal responses of the Strange Stories Test in the initial evaluation were recorded to examine inter-rater reliability. The researcher used scores of the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) to confirm that the clinical states of the participants remained stable before retest. In addition, participants’ scores of Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were collected from two psychiatrists, and the demographic information of participants was collected from medical charts. The test-retest reliability, random measurement error, minimal detectable change (MDC), practice effect, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and ceiling and floor effect were examined by analyzing the test and retest scores of the Strange Stories Test. The ecological and convergent validity were examined by analyzing the correlation between the scores of the Strange Stories Test and PSP and the scores of the Strange Stories Test and SCSQ respectively. The discriminative validity was analyzed by comparing the difference between the scores of the patients and the scores of the normal group in a previous study. Results This measure had generally acceptable inter-rater agreement, internal consistency and convergent validity. The test-retest agreement was poor with non- negligible random measurement error and the MDC% of this measure exceeded the acceptable standard. This measure also showed a notable ceiling effect and small to moderate practice effects. Finally, the ecological validity and the discriminative validity were unsatisfactory. Conclusions Our results revealed that the Taiwanese version of the Strange Stories Test had insufficient reliability and validity. Therefore, we might consider a further revision of this test. It is also a useful way to develop a new ToM measure with both clinical usefulness and scientific soundness.

1. Ahmed, F. S., & Miller, L. S. (2013). Relationship between theory of mind and functional independence is mediated by executive function. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 293-303. doi:10.1037/a0031365
   連結：
2. Ahmed, F. S., & Stephen Miller, L. (2011). Executive function mechanisms of theory of mind. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(5), 667-678. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1087-7
   連結：
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   連結：
4. Arnall, F. A., Koumantakis, G. A., Oldham, J. A., & Cooper, R. G. (2002). Between-days reliability of electromyographic measures of paraspinal muscle fatigue at 40, 50 and 60% levels of maximal voluntary contractile force. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16(7), 761-771.
   連結：
5. Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 26(4), 217-238.
   連結：
6. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241-251.
   連結：
7. Bartels, C., Wegrzyn, M., Wiedl, A., Ackermann, V., & Ehrenreich, H. (2010). Practice effects in healthy adults: a longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing. BMC Neuroscience, 11, 118. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-118
   連結：
8. Billeke, P., & Aboitiz, F. (2013). Social Cognition in Schizophrenia: From Social Stimuli Processing to Social Engagement. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00004
   連結：
9. Bird, C. M., Castelli, F., Malik, O., Frith, U., & Husain, M. (2004). The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on 'Theory of Mind' and cognition. Brain, 127(Pt 4), 914-928. doi:10.1093/brain/awh108
   連結：
10. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307-310.
    連結：
11. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(2), 135-160.
    連結：
12. Bora, E., Gokcen, S., Kayahan, B., & Veznedaroglu, B. (2008). Deficits of social-cognitive and social-perceptual aspects of theory of mind in remitted patients with schizophrenia: effect of residual symptoms. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(2), 95-99. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e318162a9e1
    連結：
13. Bora, E., Yucel, M., & Pantelis, C. (2009). Theory of mind impairment in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 109(1-3), 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2008.12.020
    連結：
14. Bosc, M. (2000). Assessment of social functioning in depression. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 41(1), 63-69.
    連結：
15. Brüne, M. (2003). Social Cognition and Behaviour in Schizophrenia The Social Brain (pp. 277-313): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    連結：
16. Brüne, M. (2005). Emotion recognition, ‘theory of mind,’ and social behavior in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 133(2–3), 135-147.
    連結：
17. Brüne, M., & Brüne-Cohrs, U. (2006). Theory of mind—evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(4), 437-455.
    連結：
18. Brüne, M., Schaub, D., Juckel, G., & Langdon, R. (2011). Social skills and behavioral problems in schizophrenia: The role of mental state attribution, neurocognition and clinical symptomatology. Psychiatry Research, 190(1), 9-17.
    連結：
19. Brent, E., Rios, P., Happe, F., & Charman, T. (2004). Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced theory of mind tasks. Autism, 8(3), 283-299. doi:10.1177/1362361304045217
    連結：
20. Brune, M. (2005). "Theory of mind" in schizophrenia: a review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(1), 21-42. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi002
    連結：
21. Brune, M., Abdel-Hamid, M., Lehmkamper, C., & Sonntag, C. (2007). Mental state attribution, neurocognitive functioning, and psychopathology: what predicts poor social competence in schizophrenia best? Schizophrenia Research, 92(1-3), 151-159. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2007.01.006
    連結：
22. Bruton, A., Conway, J. H., & Holgate, S. T. (2000). Reliability: What is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy, 86(2), 94-99.
    連結：
23. Buchanan, J. (1995). Social support and schizophrenia: A review of the literature. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 9(2), 68-76.
    連結：
24. Busner, J., & Targum, S. D. (2007). The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont), 4(7), 28-37.
    連結：
25. Castelli, I., Pini, A., Alberoni, M., Liverta-Sempio, O., Baglio, F., Massaro, D., . . . Nemni, R. (2011). Mapping levels of theory of mind in Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary study. Aging & Mental Health, 15(2), 157-168. doi:10.1080/13607863.2010.513038
    連結：
26. Champagne-Lavau, M., & Charest, A. (2015). Theory of Mind and Context Processing in Schizophrenia: The Role of Social Knowledge. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 98. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00098
    連結：
27. Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13(4), 181-197.
    連結：
28. Chiu, E. C., Koh, C. L., Tsai, C. Y., Lu, W. S., Sheu, C. F., Hsueh, I. P., & Hsieh, C. L. (2014). Practice effects and test-re-test reliability of the Five Digit Test in patients with stroke over four serial assessments. Brain Injury, 28(13-14), 1726-1733. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.947618
    連結：
29. Chung, Y. S., Barch, D., & Strube, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of mentalizing impairments in adults with schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(3), 602-616. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbt048
    連結：
30. Chung, Y. S., Kang, D. H., Shin, N. Y., Yoo, S. Y., & Kwon, J. S. (2008). Deficit of theory of mind in individuals at ultra-high-risk for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 99(1-3), 111-118. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2007.11.012
    連結：
31. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
    連結：
32. Combs, D. R., Adams, S. D., Penn, D. L., Roberts, D., Tiegreen, J., & Stem, P. (2007). Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT) for inpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: preliminary findings. Schizophrenia Research, 91(1-3), 112-116. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.12.010
    連結：
33. Cook, D. A., & Beckman, T. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166.e167-166.e116.
    連結：
34. Corcoran, R., Mercer, G., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: investigating "theory of mind" in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 17(1), 5-13.
    連結：
35. Couture, S. M., Penn, D. L., & Roberts, D. L. (2006). The functional significance of social cognition in schizophrenia: a review. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(suppl 1), S44-S63.
    連結：
36. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. doi:10.1007/BF02310555
    連結：
37. Cunningham Amundson, S. J., & Crowe, T. K. (1993). Clinical applications of the standard error of measurement for occupational and physical therapists. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 12(4), 57-71. doi:10.1080/J006v12n04_05
    連結：
38. DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., . . . Kostas-Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155-164. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
    連結：
39. Fett, A. K., Viechtbauer, W., Dominguez, M. D., Penn, D. L., van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2011). The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 573-588. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.001
    連結：
40. Flansbjer, U. B., Holmback, A. M., Downham, D., Patten, C., & Lexell, J. (2005). Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(2), 75-82. doi:10.1080/16501970410017215
    連結：
41. Frith, C. D., & Corcoran, R. (1996). Exploring 'theory of mind' in people with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 26(3), 521-530.
    連結：
42. Gorecki, C., Brown, J. M., Cano, S., Lamping, D. L., Briggs, M., Coleman, S., . . . Nixon, J. (2013). Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 95. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-11-95
    連結：
43. Green, M. F., & Harvey, P. D. (2014). Cognition in schizophrenia: Past, present, and future. Schizophrenia Research: Cognition, 1(1), e1-e9. doi:10.1016/j.scog.2014.02.001
    連結：
44. Green, M. F., & Horan, W. P. (2010). Social Cognition in Schizophrenia. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(4), 243-248.
    連結：
45. Green, M. F., Horan, W. P., & Lee, J. (2015). Social cognition in schizophrenia. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 16(10), 620-631. doi:10.1038/nrn4005
    連結：
46. Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Braff, D. L., & Mintz, J. (2000). Neurocognitive deficits and functional outcome in schizophrenia: are we measuring the "right stuff"? Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(1), 119-136.
    連結：
47. Green, M. F., Olivier, B., Crawley, J. N., Penn, D. L., & Silverstein, S. (2005). Social cognition in schizophrenia: recommendations from the measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia new approaches conference. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(4), 882-887. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi049
    連結：
48. Greig, T. C., Bryson, G. J., & Bell, M. D. (2004). Theory of mind performance in schizophrenia: diagnostic, symptom, and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 192(1), 12-18. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000105995.67947.fc
    連結：
49. Happe, F. G. E. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129-154.
    連結：
50. Harris, K., & Lim, C. R. (2015). The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3788-0
    連結：
51. Harvill, L. M. (1991). An NCME instructional module on standard error of measurement. Educational Measurement : Issues and Practice, 10, 181-189.
    連結：
52. Herold, R., Tenyi, T., Lenard, K., & Trixler, M. (2002). Theory of mind deficit in people with schizophrenia during remission. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 1125-1129.
    連結：
53. Hobart, J. C., Lamping, D. L., & Thompson, A. J. (1996). Evaluating neurological outcome measures: the bare essentials. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 60(2), 127-130.
    連結：
54. Hoe, M., Nakagami, E., Green, M. F., & Brekke, J. S. (2012). The causal relationships between neurocognition, social cognition and functional outcome over time in schizophrenia: a latent difference score approach. Psychological Medicine, 42(11), 2287-2299. doi:10.1017/s0033291712000578
    連結：
55. Irani, F., Platek, S. M., Panyavin, I. S., Calkins, M. E., Kohler, C., Siegel, S. J., . . . Gur, R. C. (2006). Self-face recognition and theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and first-degree relatives. Schizophrenia Research, 88(1-3), 151-160. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2006.07.016
    連結：
56. Janssen, I., Krabbendam, L., Jolles, J., & van Os, J. (2003). Alterations in theory of mind in patients with schizophrenia and non-psychotic relatives. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108(2), 110-117.
    連結：
57. Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The Strange Stories Test: a replication with high-functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 395-406.
    連結：
58. Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987). The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13(2), 261-276.
    連結：
59. Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & Lindenmayer, J. P. (1988). Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics. Psychiatry Research, 23(1), 99-110.
    連結：
60. Keefe, R. S., & Harvey, P. D. (2012). Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology(213), 11-37. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25758-2_2
    連結：
61. Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89(1), 25-41.
    連結：
62. Kosmidis, M. H., Giannakou, M., Garyfallos, G., Kiosseoglou, G., & Bozikas, V. P. (2011). The impact of impaired "Theory of Mind" on social interactions in schizophrenia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(3), 511-521. doi:10.1017/s1355617711000300
    連結：
63. Lee, P., Liu, C. H., Fan, C. W., Lu, C. P., Lu, W. S., & Hsieh, C. L. (2013). The test-retest reliability and the minimal detectable change of the Purdue pegboard test in schizophrenia. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 112(6), 332-337. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2012.02.023
    連結：
64. Leemrijse, C., Meijer, O. G., Vermeer, A., Lambregts, B., & Ader, H. J. (1999). Detecting individual change in children with mild to moderate motor impairment: the standard error of measurement of the Movement ABC. Clinical Rehabilitation, 13(5), 420-429.
    連結：
65. Leucht, S., & Engel, R. R. (2006). The relative sensitivity of the Clinical Global Impressions Scale and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in antipsychotic drug trials. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31(2), 406-412. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300873
    連結：
66. Leucht, S., Kane, J. M., Etschel, E., Kissling, W., Hamann, J., & Engel, R. R. (2006). Linking the PANSS, BPRS, and CGI: Clinical implications. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31(10), 2318-2325.
    連結：
67. Leucht, S., Kane, J. M., Kissling, W., Hamann, J., Etschel, E., & Engel, R. R. (2005). What does the PANSS mean? Schizophrenia Research, 79(2-3), 231-238. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2005.04.008
    連結：
68. Lexell, J. E., & Downham, D. Y. (2005). How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(9), 719-723.
    連結：
69. McGrath, J. J. (2006). Variations in the Incidence of Schizophrenia: Data Versus Dogma. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(1), 195-197. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi052
    連結：
70. McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293-307.
    連結：
71. Mehta, U. M., Thirthalli, J., Naveen Kumar, C., Mahadevaiah, M., Rao, K., Subbakrishna, D. K., . . . Keshavan, M. S. (2011). Validation of Social Cognition Rating Tools in Indian Setting (SOCRATIS): A new test-battery to assess social cognition. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 4(3), 203-209.
    連結：
72. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., . . . de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737-745.
    連結：
73. Morosini, P. L., Magliano, L., Brambilla, L., Ugolini, S., & Pioli, R. (2000). Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 101(4), 323-329.
    連結：
74. Musso, M. W., Cohen, A. S., Auster, T. L., & McGovern, J. E. (2014). Investigation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a cognitive screener in severe mental illness. Psychiatry Research, 220(1–2), 664-668.
    連結：
75. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., . . . Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
    連結：
76. Osterlind, S. J. (1998). Judging the Quality of Test Items: Item Analysis Constructing Test Items: Multiple-Choice, Constructed-Response, Performance, and Other Formats (pp. 253-299). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
    連結：
77. Perez-Zapata, D., Slaughter, V., & Henry, J. D. (2016). Cultural effects on mindreading. Cognition, 146, 410-414. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.018
    連結：
78. Peterson, E., & Miller, S. F. (2012). The Eyes Test as a Measure of Individual Differences: How much of the Variance Reflects Verbal IQ? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 220. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00220
    連結：
79. Pickup, G. J. (2008). Relationship between Theory of Mind and executive function in schizophrenia: a systematic review. Psychopathology, 41(4), 206-213. doi:10.1159/000125554
    連結：
80. Pietrzak, R. H., Snyder, P. J., Jackson, C. E., Olver, J., Norman, T., Piskulic, D., & Maruff, P. (2009). Stability of cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia over brief and intermediate re-test intervals. Human psychopharmacology, 24(2), 113-121. doi:10.1002/hup.998
    連結：
81. Pinkham, A. E., Penn, D. L., Green, M. F., Buck, B., Healey, K., & Harvey, P. D. (2014). The social cognition psychometric evaluation study: results of the expert survey and RAND panel. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 40(4), 813-823. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbt081
    連結：
82. Pinkham, A. E., Penn, D. L., Green, M. F., & Harvey, P. D. (2015). Social cognition psychometric evaluation: Results of the initial psychometric study. Schizophrenia Bulletin. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv056
    連結：
83. Rankin, G., & Stokes, M. (1998). Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12(3), 187-199.
    連結：
84. Rash, J. K. (1953). Refining the health education test. Journal of School Health, 23(2), 39-43. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1953.tb06768.x
    連結：
85. Roncone, R., Mazza, M., Frangou, I., De Risio, A., Ussorio, D., Tozzini, C., & Casacchia, M. (2004). Rehabilitation of theory of mind deficit in schizophrenia: a pilot study of metacognitive strategies in group treatment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14(4), 421-435. doi:10.1080/09602010343000291
    連結：
86. Schaafsma, S. M., Pfaff, D. W., Spunt, R. P., & Adolphs, R. (2015). Deconstructing and reconstructing theory of mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 65-72. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.007
    連結：
87. Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9-34. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009
    連結：
88. Sergi, M. J., Rassovsky, Y., Widmark, C., Reist, C., Erhart, S., Braff, D. L., . . . Green, M. F. (2007). Social cognition in schizophrenia: Relationships with neurocognition and negative symptoms. Schizophrenia Research, 90(1–3), 316-324.
    連結：
89. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428.
    連結：
90. Spek, A. A., Scholte, E. M., & Van Berckelaer-Onnes, I. A. (2010). Theory of mind in adults with HFA and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(3), 280-289. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0860-y
    連結：
91. Sprong, M., Schothorst, P., Vos, E., Hox, J., & van Engeland, H. (2007). Theory of mind in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 5-13. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.035899
    連結：
92. Stiller, J., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks, 29(1), 93-104.
    連結：
93. Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal Lobe Contributions to Theory of Mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 640-656. doi:10.1162/089892998562942
    連結：
94. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., . . . de Vet, H. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34-42.
    連結：
95. Terwee, C. B., Roorda, L. D., Knol, D. L., De Boer, M. R., & De Vet, H. C. W. (2009). Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1062-1067.
    連結：
96. Tsai, C. F., Lee, W. J., Wang, S. J., Shia, B. C., Nasreddine, Z., & Fuh, J. L. (2012). Psychometrics of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and its subscales: validation of the Taiwanese version of the MoCA and an item response theory analysis. International Psychogeriatrics, 24(4), 651-658. doi:10.1017/s1041610211002298
    連結：
97. Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Melis, M., Marrone, M., Petretto, D. R., Masala, C., & Preti, A. (2013). The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test: systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 18(4), 326-354. doi:10.1080/13546805.2012.721728
    連結：
98. Weinberger, D. R., & Harrison, P. (2011). Schizophrenia: Wiley.
    連結：
99. Westby, C., & Robinson, L. (2014). A Developmental Perspective for Promoting Theory of Mind. Topics in Language Disorders, 34(4), 362-382.
    連結：
100. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103-128.
     連結：
101. Wu, B. J., Lin, C. H., Tseng, H. F., Liu, W. M., Chen, W. C., Huang, L. S., . . . Lee, S. M. (2013). Validation of the Taiwanese Mandarin version of the Personal and Social Performance scale in a sample of 655 stable schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Research, 146(1-3), 34-39. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.036
     連結：
102. Wu, C., Dagg, P., & Molgat, C. (2014). A pilot study to measure cognitive impairment in patients with severe schizophrenia with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Schizophrenia Research, 158(1–3), 151-155.
     連結：
103. Zhu, C. Y., Lee, T. M., Li, X. S., Jing, S. C., Wang, Y. G., & Wang, K. (2007). Impairments of social cues recognition and social functioning in Chinese people with schizophrenia. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 61(2), 149-158. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01630.x
     連結：
104. 葉在庭、花茂棽、劉珣瑛 (2009)。猜猜我在想什麼？－中文版心智推理作業的信效度研究及其在老年人的表現初探。中華心理學刊，51(3)，375-395。
     連結：
105. Aaronson, N., Alonso, J., Burnam, A., Lohr, K. N., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E., & Stein, R. E. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193-205.
106. Baron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 407-418.
107. Fawcett, A. L. (2013). Principles of Assessment and Outcome Measurement for Occupational Therapists and Physiotherapists: Theory, Skills and Application: Wiley.
108. Happe, F. G. E. (1991). Theory of mind and communication in autism. University of London.
109. Kolt, G. S., & Snyder-Mackler, L. (2007). Physical Therapies in Sport and Exercise: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier.
110. Lohr, K. N. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11(3), 193.
111. Lord, F. M. (1952). A Theory of Test Scores: Psychometric Society.
112. MacDonald-Wilson, K. L., Nemec, P. B., Anthony, W. A., & Cohen, M. R. (2002). Assessment in psychiatric rehabilitation. Handbook of Measurement and Evaluation in Rehabilitation, Paul Brookes, Baltimore.
113. Mazza, M., Pollice, R., Pacitti, F., Pino, M. C., Mariano, M., Tripaldi, S., . . . Roncone, R. (2012). New evidence in theory of mind deficits in subjects with chronic schizophrenia and first episode: correlation with symptoms, neurocognition and social function. Rivista di Psichiatria, 47(4), 327-336. doi:10.1708/1139.12561
114. McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(3), 219-238.
115. Robert, D. L., Fiszdon, J., & Tek, C. (2011). Ecological validity of the social cognition screening questionaire (SCSQ). Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(Suppl.1), 280.
116. Uttl, B. (2005). Measurement of individual differences: lessons from memory assessment in research and clinical practice. Psychological Science, 16(6), 460-467. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01557.x
117. YM, B. (2008). Interrater Realibility of Personal and Social Performance Scale [Chinese version]. Oral presentation at Annual meeting of the Society of Taiwan Psychiatry, Taichung, Taiwan.
118. 謝清麟、陳官琳 (2011)。第七章：評估之基本概念。載於薛漪平 (主編)，生理疾病職能治療學：評估理論與技巧。台灣：禾楓書局。