题名

兒少時期歷經父母離異單親家庭子女之復原力展現探討

并列篇名

The Process of Resilience Among People Experienced Parents's Divorce in Childhood

DOI

10.6342/NTU201803259

作者

蘇連雅

关键词

復原力 ； 兒少時期 ； 父母離異 ； 單親家庭 ； 困境 ； resilience ； adolescence ； divorce ； single parent family ； adversity

期刊名称

國立臺灣大學社會工作學系學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2018年

学位类别

碩士
导师

陳毓文
内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

為數不少的研究或是我國的社會價值觀常將單親家庭子女視為「不良的」，無論是在課業、行為舉止亦或是人際交友上皆存在著如此的刻板印象。陳若喬、鄭麗珍（2003）曾以「破繭而出—青少年時期經歷父母離異之大學生生活歷程的優勢經驗」一研究，打破社會上對於單親家庭子女課業表現不佳的既定印象，而本研究則是期望透過更多不同的面向探究父母離異的單親家庭子女展現復原力的方式與意義，不僅限於輝煌的學業成就。 本研究目的如下： 一、探討兒少時期曾經歷父母離異且自認目前適應狀況良好者的成長經驗，以及在成長過程中面臨了哪些困境？ 二、瞭解這些在兒少時期歷經父母離異的人，在其成長過程中用以因應困境的復原力展現歷程。 三、探討經歷父母離異衝擊後，復原力展現經驗對其目前生活狀況的意義。 根據研究目的，研究參與者回溯其在單親家庭的成長歷程以及遭遇的困境，研究者再經由所蒐集到的資料進行分析與歸納，藉以呈現參與者的生命歷程，以及他們是何以度過曾經艱辛且困難的兒少成長時期。 本研究採質性研究的深度訪談法，經由網路募得三位研究參與者以及透過友人介紹募得一位參與者，共計四位參與者參與本研究。研究參與者皆於兒少時期歷經父母離異，其中僅有一位參與者對父母離異有印象，其餘三位雖對父母離異沒有記憶，但對生活於單親家庭是有感知的，而四位參與者也都認同復原力展現之於他們現今的生活是有意義的。 研究發現，參與者在兒少時期可能經歷了父母再婚、家庭暴力、被迫屢次搬遷、無法向同儕或身邊的人言說家庭帶來的煩惱、無法與他人建立穩定的人際關係與親密關係，以及對自身家庭背景感到失落等問題。然而研究卻也發現，參與者在經歷與調適的過程中，個人特質與能力是協助他們的一大重要資源，即便對於家庭的失落仍在，但成年後多以不同的角度看待父母離異；親子關係的緊密程度也與他們適應單親家庭生活息息相關，而父母離異也是他們重新學習人際關係與親密關係的契機；家庭外方面的資源：如學校教師及同儕、朋友也協助了參與者渡過父母離異帶來的不適應。研究參與者雖於兒少時期歷經了種種困境，但藉由個人、家庭及家庭外三大資源協助，展現了他們自覺適應的良好結果，復原或許一條沒有盡頭的路，但他們仍堅毅地走在這條路上。 最後，本研究以父母的角度、子女的角度、教師及專業人員以及社會的角度提出「離婚單親家庭及其子女」所需的服務提出建議。
英文摘要

Too often children raised by single parent are labeled as “damaged goods”; this stereotype extends to every aspect of their lives, including school performances, behaviors, and their relationships. In the paper titled “Experiencing Parental Divorce during Adolescence Period-From a Strength Perspective,” the authors made great efforts squashing that stereotype, as they found children growing up in single-parent families did not perform poorly academically. This study also wants to examine the experiences of children growing up in single-parent families, and had an emphasis on their resilience, not only from the aspect of academic performance, but in all other aspects of their lives. The aim of this study included: 1. To investigate the live experience of children who have undergone parental divorce during adolescence, and regarded themselves as adapting well now. 2. To examine how the people demonstrated resilience as they grew up in single-parent families. 3. To explore the role of resilience played in their lives. Methodologically, this study approached potential participants through the help of Internet and friends. A total of 5 participants were interviewed, but only information of 4 was analyzed, because one though that parental divorce was not a risk to her, so there was no need to talk about resilience. Each one of them has gone through parents’ divorce, with only one of them remembering what happened during their divorce. However, all agreed that parent divorce had an impact on their lives, and thought that resilience played an indispensable role in their lives. Data were recorded with the agreement from the participants, and they were analyzed using logical inductions to demonstrate life experiences of four participants and how resilience played a role to help them overcame the hardships. It is found that participants did have experienced in re-marriage of their parents, domestic violence, countless relocation, having hard times sharing their problems or connecting with people or feeling self-conscious about their own family backgrounds. However, those hardships did not beat them up; instead, it made them be stronger and tougher. Even though they were once disappointed with their family experiences, they decided to look at parental divorce from a different perspective. They were not only able to build up a better relationship with their families, they were also more devoted to maintaining other personal relationships. Outside their families, they also received a great deal of support from others, including other family members, school teachers, classmates, and friends. Despite all the impediments, they all tried to live their best lives with the assistance from others. Lastly, this study concluded with suggestions to children experienced parental divorce, it is hoped that family members and related professionals can provide support to these people, so that the adversity of parental divorce won’t have great impact on these children, and they can grow up resiliently.
主题分类 社會科學院 > 社會工作學系
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 彭淑華（2006）。臺灣女性單親家庭生活處境之研究。東吳社會工作學報，14，25-62。
    連結：
  2. 王雲東（2007）。社會研究方法。新北市：揚智文化。
  3. 王齡竟（2006）。家庭衝突及社會支持對青少年憂鬱情緒及偏差行為之影響：補償抑或緩衝作用。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
  4. 江素芬（2004）。單親媽媽與她的孩子之間–失去臂膀之後的日子與教養想法。 新竹師院學報，19，113-136。
  5. 江淑琳（2002）。後離婚的家庭。台北市：韋伯文化
  6. 朱柔若（譯）（2000）。社會研究方法—質化與量化取向（原作者：Neuman, L. W.）台北：揚智。（原著作出版年：1991）
  7. 李育忠（2000）。影響青少年兩性關係發展之家庭因素探討—單雙親家庭之比較。訓育研究，39，63-73。
  8. 宋麗玉、常欣怡（2007）。青少年復原力概念與相關研究之探究。東吳社會工作學報，17，171-192。
  9. 吳月霞（2007）。離異單親母親之母職經驗敘說研究。國立暨南大學輔導與諮商研究所學位論文。
  10. 吳永裕（1996）。單親兒童之親子關係、行為困擾與學習適應研究所。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
  11. 林亮岑（2001）。國中生危險與保護因子及復原力之相關研究。國立彰化師範大 學教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。
  12. 胡善喻（2014）。單親家長社會支持、親職效能與親職壓力關係之研究。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
  13. 郭珮婷（2005）。復原力理論的介紹與應用。輔導與諮商，231，45-50。
  14. 郭瑞芬（2006）。都會區弱勢學生之學習處境。現代教育論壇，15，465-484。
  15. 陳向名（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南出版社。
  16. 陳若喬、鄭麗珍（2003）。破繭而出–青少年時期歷經父母離異之大學生生活歷程的優勢經驗。社會政策與社會工作學刊，7(1)，35-97。
  17. 陳婉琪（2014）。都是為了孩子？父母離婚敷面影響之重新評估。臺灣社會期刊，54，31-73。
  18. 陳毓文（2004）。少年憂鬱情緒的危險因子與保護因子之相關性研究。中華心理衛生學刊，4(17)，67-95。
  19. 許智傑（2008）。復原力在貧窮大學生生活經驗中之歷程探究。國立暨南國際大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。
  20. 許珮婕（2007）。未成年子女經歷父母離婚告知經驗。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
  21. 張清富（1995）。單親家庭現況及其因應對策之探討。行政院研究發展考核委員會委託報告。
  22. 張英陣、彭淑華（1996）。從優勢觀點論單親家庭。東吳社會工作學報。2，227-271。
  23. 張高賓（2002）。單親兒童的失落與其輔導策略。輔導季刊，38(2)，44-52。
  24. 張華甄（2012）。淺談父母離異對其子女的影響。家庭教育雙月刊，35，29-35。
  25. 黃玟萃（2004）。突破逆境–單親家庭子女的危機與轉機。南華大學教育社會研究所碩士論文。
  26. 黃淑賢（2003）。聽覺障礙者家長超越逆境知優勢類型探討。東吳社會工作學報，15，113-154。
  27. 曾華源、郭靜晃（1998）。少年福利。台北：亞太圖書。
  28. 曾文志（2005）。復原力的構念與研究之分析。臺中護專學報，4，36-56。
  29. 曾文志（2006）。復原力保護因子效果概化之統合分析。諮商與輔導學報–高師輔導所刊，14，1-35。
  30. 碓井真史（2017）。誰都可以，就是想殺人。台北：時報。
  31. 鄭麗珍（1999）。女性單親家庭的資產累積與世代傳遞過程。台大社會工作學刊。1，111-147。
  32. 鄭麗珍（2001）。貧窮女性化與社會救助政策。社會教育年刊，49，13-18。
  33. 潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究理論與應用。台北：心理。
  34. 蔡群瑞、蕭文（2004）復原力對離婚後個人適應之影響研究。諮商與輔導學報–高師輔導所刊，11，59-80。
  35. 蔡麗鴻（2009）。父母離婚兒童生活適應之行動研究。靜宜大學青少年兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
  36. 賴歆怡（2010）。國小離婚單親兒童之多元輔導輔導運作模式。家庭教育雙月刊，37，54-65。
  37. 蕭文（2001）。復原力概念及在輔導上的應用。華人知能輔導研討會論文集，34-40。
  38. 蕭世慧（2005）。單親家庭問題之探究。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。
  39. 簡春安、鄒平儀（2004）。社會工作研究方法。台北：巨流
  40. 顏寧（譯）（2011）。質性研究：設計與施作指南（原作者：Merriam, B. S.）台北：五南。（原著作出版年：2009）
  41. 羅文苑（2004）。一位綜合高中學生反被為勝的求學歷程之研究—探討期間的復原力。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文。
  42. Amato, P. R. (1993). Children’s adjustment to divorce: Theories, Hypotheses, and Empirical Support. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55(1), 23-38
  43. Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for Adults and Children. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62, 1269-1287.
  44. Amato, P. R. (2005). The impact of family formation change on cognitive, social, and emotional Well-Being of next Generation. The Future of Children, 15(2), 75-96.
  45. America Academy of Pediatrics (2017). What Your Child is Experiencing When You Remarry. Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health.
  46. Armstrong, I. M., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S. & B. & Ungar, T. M. (2005). Pathways between Social support, Family Well-Being quality of parenting, and child resilience: What we know. Journal of Child and Family, 14(2), 269-281.
  47. Booth, A., & Brinkerhoff, B. D., & White, L. K. (1984). The impact of parental divorce on courtship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46(1), 85-94.
  48. Carlson, J. M. & Corcoran, E. M. (2004). Family structure and children’s behavioral and cognitive outcomes. Journal of marriage and Family, 63(3), 779-792.
  49. Criss, M. M., Pettit, S. G., Bates, E. J., Dodge, A. K. & Lapp, L. A. (2002). Family adversity, positive peer relationships, and children’s externalizing behaviors: A Longitudinal Perspective on Risk and Resilience. Child Development, 73(4), 1220-1237.
  50. Dekovic, M. (1999). Risk and Protective factors in development of problem behavior during Adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28(6), 667-680.
  51. Fergusson, M. D., & Lynskey, T. M., (1996). Adolescent resiliency to family adversity. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(3), 281-292
  52. Fraser, W. M. & Galinsky, J. M., & Richman, M. J. (1999). Risk, Protection, and Resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. National Association of Social Workers, 23(3), 131-143.
  53. Frisby, N. B. (2012). Face and resilience in divorce: The impact on emotions, stress and post-divorce relationships. Journal of social and Personal Relationships, 29(6), 715-735.
  54. Fergusson, M. D. & Horwood, J. L. (2003). Resilience to childhood adversity: Results of a 21-year-study. Resilience and vulnerability, 130-155.
  55. Furstenberg, F. F. & Kiernan, E. K. (2001). Delayed Parental Divorce: How Much Do Children Benefit? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 446-457.
  56. Ganong, L., Coleman, M., & Marilyn, C. & Chapman, A. (2017). Stepchildren claiming stepparents. Journal of Family Issues, 36(6), 1712-1736.
  57. Gilligan, R. (2000). Adversity, Resilience and Young People: the protective Value of Positive School and Spare Time Experiences. Children & Society, 14(1), 37-47.
  58. Gruber, J. (2004). Is making Divorce Easier Bad for Children? The Long-Run Implications of Unilateral Divorce. Journal of Labor economics, 22(4), 799-833.
  59. Hammen, C. (2003). Risk and Protective Factors for Children of Depressed Parents. Resilience and vulnerability, 50-70.
  60. Hetherington, E. M. & Elmore, A. M. (2003). Risk and Resilience in Children Coping with Their Parents/ Divorce and Remarriage. Resilience and vulnerability, 182-206.
  61. Johnson, L. J. & Wiechelt, A. S. (2004). Introduction of the Special Issue on Resilience: Substance use & Misuse, 39(5), 657-670.
  62. Kelly, B. J. & Emery, E. R. (2003). Children’s Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspective. Family Relations, 52(4), 352-362.
  63. Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
  64. Masten, A. S. (1994). Resilience and development: Successful adaption despite risk and adversity. In Wang, M. C., & Gordon, E. W. (Eds), Educational Resilience in Inner-city America: Challenges and Prospects (pp.3-25). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assocites.
  65. Masten, A. S. & Coatswoth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments. America Psychologist, 52(2), 205-220.
  66. Masten, A. S. & Powell, J. L, (2003). A Resilience Framework for Research , Policy, and Practice. Resilience and vulnerability, 1-25.
  67. Riggio, H. R. (2004). Parental marital conflict and divorce and, parent-child relationships, social support, and relationship anxiety in young adulthood. Personal Relationships. Children & Society, 11(1), 99-114.
  68. Rodgers, B. K. & Rose A. H. (2002). Risk and Resiliency Factors among Adolescents Who Experience Marital Transitions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4),1024-1037.
  69. Warshak, A. R. & Santrock, W. J. (1983). The Impact of Divorce in Father-Custody and Mother-Custody Homes: The Child’s Perspective. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1983(19), 29-46.
  70. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1998). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: Adams, Bannister, Cox.
  71. Yates, T., Egeland, B. & Sroufe, L. A. (2003). Rethinking Resilience: A Developmental Process Perspective. Resilience and vulnerability, 243-266.
print cancel