题名

從組織管理角度探討公務人員調職制度-以交通部航港局為例

并列篇名

Job Transfers in Public Service from the Perspective of Organization Management– a Case Study of Personnel in Maritime and Port Bureau, Ministry of Transportation and Communications

DOI

10.6342/NTU201704284

作者

徐筱琪

关键词

調職 ; 公務人員 ; 組織管理 ; 公共人力資源管理 ; Job Transfers ; Public Service ; Organization Management ; Public Human Resources Management

期刊名称

國立臺灣大學政治學系學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2017年

学位类别

碩士

导师

洪美仁

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究以交通部航港局為例,進行調職之原因、程序、效益及影響之研究,並從研究成果探討調職做為組織管理方式的成效,總共訪談9位受訪者,其中包含7位主管及2位人事人員。   研究結果發現,調職原因如為自願性調職大多為家庭因素及考量升遷機會與未來發展;而非自願性調職原因則多為主管就員工之業務專長與組織整體業務運作考量所進行的職務輪調。另就調職正面功能方面,本研究發現調職對組織最具有提升組織內部流動性、培養通才及人才培育之功能,調職能增加組織人員調度的彈性。過往文獻所提出之負面影響,例如由於知識技能與經驗集中於專精範圍與專業工作,某些專業員工及幕僚專家不宜實施調職,因此調職之實施僅限於工作內容較不具專業性之人員;在實施調職之初,員工容易因不熟悉業務而產生短期工作效率與生產力下降情形,因此增加組織的訓練成本,此為主要之負面影響。   此外,本研究發現,當面對調職經驗較多之人員,主管通常會考量該頻繁調動之人員是否因為工作表現不佳、無心於工作,因此給人工作漫不經心的印象。本研究亦發現主管會考量調職是否會影響內部升遷狀況而打擊員工士氣,對於單位內原本的升遷佈局及工作士氣是否會帶來衝擊,此為過去文獻中未提及的研究發現。   本研究發現輪調在私部門受到重視並成為重要的組織管理與激勵方式之原因,實乃因公私部門本質之差異。公務體系具有良好之保障,無較明顯之淘汰措施;而私部門則將調職視為對員工能力考驗以及員工激勵方式,員工如能在輪調過程中有較好的表現,則能為員工帶來實質性報償,因此較能產生正面激勵效果,因此調職較能發揮正面功能。

英文摘要

This thesis explores the reasons, procedures, effectiveness, and impacts of job transfers in public service. From the perspective of organization management, this thesis focuses on personnel in Maritime and Port Bureau, Ministry of Transportation and Communications. To achieve the goal, this study interviews 9 respondents, including 7 supervisors of different divisions and 2 employees in the Personnel Office. This study acquires the following results: The reasons why job transfers occur come from two parts, voluntary and involuntary job transfers. Factors of voluntary job transfer include family care, promotion opportunities, and future development. However, factors of involuntary job transfer are derived from organization management, supervisors considering staff's expertises and the organizational operation so they promote job transfer. In terms of effectiveness of job transfer, this study finds out that job transfer could enhance the internal mobility of the organization, cultivate generalists and personnel training function, and adjust the staff to increase the flexibility of personnel utilization. The negative impacts of job transfer in the past literature include that some professional staff members should not be transferred, so the implementation of job transfer is limited to the less professional staff. The main negative impact is that at the beginning of the job transfer, employees are prone to short-term low productivity due to unfamiliarity, thus increasing the training costs of the organization. In addition, the study finds out several results that have never been discussed before. In the case of more experienced job transfer staff, the supervisors will consider whether the frequent mobilization of staff comes from their poor performance, inadvertently work, which gives supervisors the impression of recklessness. The study also finds out that the supervisors would consider whether the job transfer will affect the internal promotion situation and destroy employee morale. In the end, this study finds that the reason why job transfer been regarded as an important organization management way and incentives to motivate employees in private sector is due to the differences in the nature of public and private sectors. In public sector, there is no mechanism of selection through competition. However, in private sector, job transfer has been considered to be a test of employee competency and incentives to motivate employees. If the employees could have better performances in the job rotation process, they can have material remunerations which is a salary prompting scheme. Consequently, it produces positive incentive effects, so that job transfer can play a positive function.

主题分类 社會科學院 > 政治學系
社會科學 > 政治學
参考文献
  1. Ranjit Kumar著,潘中道、胡龍騰、蘇文賢譯,2014,《研究方法:步驟化學習指南(二版更新版)》,臺北:學富文化。
    連結:
  2. 徐淑琳,2002,〈我國大學圖書館館員工作輪調之研究〉,國立政治大學圖書資訊研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  3. 郭敏雄,2011,《公務人員工作輪調、工作滿足與離職傾向關係之研究—以臺南市各區公所為例》,長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    連結:
  4. 張琇雯,2010,《臺北市國民小學公務人員工作滿意度及調職傾向之研究》,國立臺北教育大學教育經營與管理學系碩士論文。
    連結:
  5. 詹雅雯,2006,〈探討工作輪調對於組織人力運用效益之影響-以E銀行為例》,中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    連結:
  6. 趙達瑜,2005,〈從保訓會受理之保障事件研析我國公務員降調制度〉,《公共行政學報》,第 17 期,頁37-82。
    連結:
  7. 劉淑範,2013,〈論公務員職務調動之概念及法律性質:揮別我國特別權力關係思維之遺緒〉,《國立臺灣大學法學論叢》,42(1):頁1-48。
    連結:
  8. 蔡承佑,2006,《大學職員工作輪調制度認知、組織公平與輪調意願之相關性研究-以北部地區大學為例》,淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    連結:
  9. Armstrong, Michael. 1995. A Handbook of Personnel Management Practice(5th ed.). London: Kogan Page Limited.
    連結:
  10. Beardwell, Ian and Holden Len. 1994. Human Resource Management: A Contemporary Perspective.(3rd ed.). London: Pitman Publishing.
    連結:
  11. Bennett, B. 2003. Job Rotation: Its Role in Promoting Learning in Organizations. Development and Learning in Organizations.Bradford, Vol.17, No.4, Pages 7.
    連結:
  12. Brett, J. M. 1984. Job Transitions and Personal and Role Development. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 2: Pages 155-185.
    連結:
  13. Byars, Lloyd L. and Rue, Leslie W. 1991. Human Resource Management, Boston: Richard D. Irwin, INC.
    連結:
  14. Byars, Lloyd L., and Rue, Leslie W. 1994. Human Resource Management. 4th ed. Burr Ridge: Irwin.
    連結:
  15. Cluskey Jr. and Vaux. 1997. “Is Seasonal Stress a Career Choice of Professional Accountants?” Journal of Employment Counseling, Vol.34, No. 1 Pages 7-19.
    連結:
  16. Dessler, Gray.1994. Human Resource Management. London: Prentice Hall, Inc.
    連結:
  17. Hackman, J.R., and Oldham, G. R, 1976. “Motuvation Through the Design of Work: Test of A Theory”. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 16., Pages 250-279.
    連結:
  18. Kuijer, P.P., Visser, B. and Kemper, H.C., 1999. “Job Rotation as a Factor in Reducing Physical Workload at a Refuse Collecting Department.” Ergonomics, 42, Pages 1167-1178.
    連結:
  19. Molander, Christopher and Winterton, Jonathan. 1994. Managing Human Resources, London: Routledge Publishers.
    連結:
  20. Research.” Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 10, Pages 345-394.
    連結:
  21. Taylor, F. W., 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Row.
    連結:
  22. Taylor, S. J. and Bogdan R. 1984. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. 2nd ed. London: Wiley.
    連結:
  23. Tompkins, Jonathan. 1995. Human Resource Management in Government: Hitting the Ground Running. New York: Harper Collines College Publishers.
    連結:
  24. Viteles, M. S., 1950. “Man and Machine Relationship, the Problem of Boredom, In R. B. Ross (Ed.).” Proceedings of the Annual Fall Conference of the Society for Advancement of Management. New York, Pages 129-138.
    連結:
  25. 壹、中文部分
  26. 中央通訊社,2015,〈彈性用人 考委建議修公務員調任規定〉, http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/201509030336-1.aspx。(擷取日期2016年3月13日)
  27. 自由時報,2017,〈經部整頓肥貓 旗下法人行政主管3年輪調〉,http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1091224。(擷取日期2017年5月29日)
  28. 李枝花,2001,《行政機關不屬向上政治行為對升遷、調任之影響-以高雄縣政府為例》,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
  29. 李建良,2002,〈公務人員保障法復審及申訴標的之探討〉,《月旦法學雜誌》,第90期:頁112-140。
  30. 林育安,2010,《政府主計人員角色衝突對調職傾向之影響:工作相關壓力與資訊不對稱之影響效果》,國立彰化師範大學會計學系碩士論文。
  31. 林明鏘,2000,《公務員法研究(一)》,臺北:學林出版社。
  32. 胡幼慧,2008,《質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,臺北:巨流圖書公司。
  33. 施能傑,2009,〈公務人力年齡結構分析及對人力資源管理的意涵〉,《文官制度季刊》,第1卷第3期:頁1-24。
  34. 陳金貴,1998,〈建立公務人員職務輪調制度研究〉,考試院考銓研究報告。
  35. 陳金貴,2003,〈公務人員升遷制度之研究〉,行政院人事行政局委託研究報告。
  36. 陳英惠,2005,《國立大學職員職務輪調意向之研究》,玄奘大學公共事務管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
  37. 陳淑貞,2010,《工作輪調對工作滿足及組織承諾相關性之探討-以玄奘大學為例》,玄奘大學公共事務管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
  38. 馬瑞雲,2008,《公務人員職務輪調制度之研究》,國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。
  39. 翁祺宜,2011,《新北市政府衛生局及所屬衛生所人員遷調與離職原因之研究》,銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
  40. 許南雄,2006,《人事行政學(增訂五版)》,臺北:商鼎文化出版社。
  41. 黃英忠,2003,《人力資源管理(二版)》,臺北:三民書局。
  42. 黃朝盟,1999,《公務人員職務輪調制度之影響評估〉,《行政暨政策學報》,第一期,頁185-218。
  43. 趙其文,2001,《人事行政學—兼論現行考銓制度(二版)》,臺北:華泰書局。
  44. 趙其文,2002,《人力資源管理─理論、策略、方法、例證》,臺北:華泰書局。
  45. 趙達瑜,2004,〈我國公務員調職案件之研析〉,行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫。
  46. 銓敘部,現職公務人員調任辦法。
  47. 銓敘部,2015,人事法規宣導座談會會議手冊,銓敘部網站。
  48. 銓敘部,職組暨職系名稱一覽表,銓敘部網站。
  49. 蔡良文,2003,《人事行政學 論現行考銓制度(二版)》,臺北:五南出版社。
  50. 蔡秀涓,2003,〈世代因素對公務人員工作價值觀影響之實證分析:以考試院暨所屬機關為例〉,《東吳政治學報》,第18期:頁41-67。
  51. 蔡祈賢,2008,《公務人力資源管理》,臺北:商鼎文化出版社。
  52. 貳、西文部分
  53. Beer, Michael and Bert Spector, eds. 1985. Readings in Human Resource Management. New York: Free Press.
  54. Campion, M. A., Cheraskin, L., and Stevens, M. J. 1994. “Career-related Antecedents
  55. and Outcomes of Job Rotation.”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol.37, No.6, Pages 1518-1542.
  56. De Cenzo, David A. and Robbins, Stephen P.1996. Human Resource Management(5th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  57. Fisher, Cynthis D., Schoenfeldt, Lyle F. and Shaw, James B. 1993. Human Resource Management(2nd ed.). London: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  58. Gomez—Mejia, Luis R., Balkin, David B. and Cardy, Robert. 1995. Managing Human Resources. (6th ed.). London: prentice Hall, Inc.
  59. Griffin, R. W. 1982. Task Design: An Integrative Approach. Glenview. Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
  60. Hackman, J.R and Oldham, G.R, 1980. Work Redesign. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
  61. Herzberg, F. 1987. “One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees.” Harvard Business Review, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Publishing.
  62. Lincoln, J.R. and Kalleberg, A. L, 1990. Culture, Cntrol, and Commitment. New York:
  63. Cambridge University Press.
  64. Noe, R. A., and Ford, J. I., 1992. “Emerging Issues and New Directions for Training
  65. Olsen, Herfuf V, 1953. “Teaching the Total Management Function Through Job Rotation and the Other Ways”, Advanced Management, Vol.18, No.1, Pages 19.
  66. Robbins, S. P. 2001. Organizational Behavior. 9th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  67. Triggs, D. D., and King, P. M., 2000. “Job Rotation.” Professional Safety, Vol. 45, No.2, Pages 32-34.
  68. Yorder, D., 1958. Handbook of Persnnel Management and Labor Relations. New York: MvGraw-Hill.
  69. Walker, C. R., and Guest, R. H. 1952. The Man on the Assembly Line. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.