危機傳播策略-比較政府處理2009年及2012年美國牛肉事件的危機傳播策略

Crisis Communication: The Ma Government's Crisis Communication of US Beef's Case Study in 2009 and 2012

10.6342/NTU.2013.01992

謝於純

美國牛肉 ； 危機 ； 危機傳播 ； 危機溝通 ； 傳播 ； US beef ； Crisis Management ； Crisis Communication ； Political Public Relation ； Political Communication

國立臺灣大學政治學系學位論文

2013年

碩士

蕭全政

繁體中文

自2003年美國爆發第一起狂牛症以來，政府曾對美國牛肉兩次禁止，又兩次解禁，再加上瘦肉精的因素，台灣對於美國牛肉的開放幅度，在錯綜複雜的國際政經情勢與國內政治情勢的交錯下，如何處理「美牛」問題，已成為政府執政的重要課題。 為進一步了解馬政府在2009年及2012年處理美國牛事件時的處理過程與對外溝通方式，本文以兩次開放美國牛肉進口的「危機傳播」做為研究主題，透過個案研究方式，進一步馬政府在2009年及2012處理美國牛肉進口爭議的危機處理過程為何；其對外傳播策略為何？若就媒體觀點來看，不同的危機傳播策略的媒體效能為何；比較馬政府在處理兩次擴大開放美國牛肉進口事件的媒體傳播策略的不同，並試圖從中提出政府未來面對重大事件或議題進行危機傳播的建議。

Since 2003, the imports of US beef have been abandoned twice because first the mad cow disease was found and then the ractopamine was detected. However, the complex political and economic relations between US and Taiwan, even within Taiwan, have led the issues more controversial and hard to make a consensus. Taiwan government, led by President Ma Ying-Jeou, has suffered the tension and conflicts from external and internal pressure. The US forced Taiwan to accept the import of US beef, and many people in Taiwan asked Ma government to resist the pressure. How should Ma government respond to the crisis caused by contentious struggles? This paper aims to reflect Ma government’s twice communication crisis of US beef imports and tries to find some useful lessons. In fact, there is something similar and something different in the two times which Ma government dealt with the open of imports of US beef in 2009 and 2012.In difference, in year 2009, the contention lay in the worry of mad cow disease which happened in 2003 in the US. In year 2012, the controversial issue changed to the problem of containing the ractopamine.In the same element, both times have led civil groups, opposite party and even the ruling party members to resist controversially. Su Chi, the Secretary of National Security Council, was regarded as President Ma’s close colleague by the media, but resigned because the crisis of US beefs. In year 2012, the opposite party, Democratic Progress Party has asked its Legislators to stand by in the Legislative Yuan for 120 hours, which is the longest ever, in order to boycott the bill of US beef and did not allow the chairman of the Legislator Yuan to anchor the meeting. Moreover, different media comments all indicated that Ma government has made several mistakes to communicate with people and lack of communicative ability in the importing issue. The imports of US beef might be regarded as the most serious of crisis communication of Ma government since 2008 coming to power. In order to understand the dealing process and ways of communication in which Ma government faced the twice importing issues of US beef, this paper analyzes the twice open events by the perspective of “crisis communication”. I hope to compare these two cases of Ma government and try to offer some reflective comments.

1. 于鳳娟譯，2001，《危機管理》，台北：五南。譯自The Crisis Manager: Facing Risk and Responsibility, Otto Lerbinger.
   連結：
2. 巴長泓，2007，《我國危機管理機制之研究 以1996年台海危機及2003年SARS危機為例》，國立中興大學國際政治研究所碩士論文。
   連結：
3. 李佳珊，2007，《危機處理成「危機」：對四個失敗公關案例的專業診斷》，國立臺灣大學社會科學院新聞研究所碩士論文。
   連結：
4. 林榮毅，2011，《美牛事件對消費者購買行為的影響》，成功大學高階管理碩士專班碩士論文。
   連結：
5. 姚惠忠、汪睿祥，2008，<選舉危機情境分類之探討>，《選舉研究》，第十五卷第二期，頁67-90。
   連結：
6. 黃之棟、黃瑞祺，2012，<光說不安全是不夠的：美牛風險、管制理論與政策選擇>，《國家與社會》，第九期，頁151-188。
   連結：
7. 黃富源、侯友宜，20025，《談判與危機處理》，台北：元照。
   連結：
8. 溫偉群、游梓翔，2010，<八八水災救災過程中馬團隊對外傳播的檢討與啟示>，《選舉評論》，第八期，頁1-18。
   連結：
9. 雷立芬，2009，<拒買比修法、公投更有意義，因應放寬美國牛肉進口標準>，《海峽評論》，第228期，頁58-59。
   連結：
10. 樊娟娟，2011，《美國牛肉進口之議題週期與管理》，淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士論文。
    連結：
11. 顧珮仙，2011，《從國際法之觀點論美國牛肉進口進件》，中興大學科技法律研究所碩士論文。
    連結：
12. Benoit, W. L. 1997. “Image repair discourse and crisis communication.” Public Relations Review, 23, 177-186.
    連結：
13. Benoit, W. L. 1996a. “Dow Corning’s Image Repair Strategies in the Brest Implant Crisis.” Communication Quarterly, 44, 29-41.
    連結：
14. Benoit, W.L. 1996b. Apologies, Excuse, and accounts: A Theory of Image Restoration Discourse. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    連結：
15. Benoit, W. L. 1995a. Accounts, Excuses, and apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies, Albany: State University of New York Press.
    連結：
16. Benoit, W. L. 1995b. “Sears’ repair of its Auto repair image: Image restoration discourse in the corporate sector.” Communication Studies, 46, 89-109.
    連結：
17. Benoit, W. L. 1982. Richard M. “Nixon’s rhetorical strategies in his public statement on Watergate.” Southern Speech Communication Journal, 47, 191-211.
    連結：
18. Benoit, W. L. & Brinson, S. L. 1999. “Queen Elizabeth’s image repair discourse: Insensitive royal or compassionate Queen?” Public Relations Review, 25(2), 1458-156.
    連結：
19. Benoit, W.L. & Brinson, S. L. 1994. “AT&T: Apologies are not enough.” Communication Quarterly, 42(1), 75-88.
    連結：
20. Benoit, W.L., Gullifor, P., & Panici, D. A. 1991. “President Reagan’s Defensive Discourse on the Iran-contra affair.” Communication Studies, 42, 272-294.
    連結：
21. Boin, A., & Lagadec, P. 2000. “Preparing for the future: Critical challenges in crisis management.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 8(4), 185-191.
    連結：
22. Fearn-Banks, K. 1996. Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach. NY: Lawrane Erlbaum Associate.
    連結：
23. Hwang, P. & Lichtenthal, D. 2000. “Anatomy of organizational crises.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 8(3), 129-140
    連結：
24. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth 1977. Turbulances in the climate of opinion: Methodological applications of the spiral of silence theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41 (2), pp.143-158.
    連結：
25. Ray, S. J. 1999. Strategic Communication in Crisis Management: Lessons from the Airline Industry. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
    連結：
26. Sturges, D. L. 1994. Communicating through crisis: A strategy for organizational survival. Management Communication Quarterly, 7(3), 297-316.
    連結：
27. Tyler, L. 1997. “Liability means never being able to say your’re sorry: Corporate guilt, legal constraints, and defensiveness in corporate communication.” Management Communication Quarterly, 11(1), 51-73.
    連結：
28. 壹、中文部份
29. 卜正(王民)，2003，《公共關係-政府公共議題決策管理》，台北：揚智文化。
30. 王芳，2010，《危机传播经典案例透析》，北京：中国社会科学出版社。
31. 王浦劬譯，1992，《政治生活的系統分析》，台北：桂冠。譯自A systems analysis of political life ,David Easton
32. 吳宜蓁，1998，《議題管理-企業公關的新興課題》，台北：正中。
33. 吳宜蓁，2002，《危機傳播-公共關係與語藝觀點的理論與實證》，台北：五南。
34. 吳錫河，2003，《政治人物的危機傳播研究：以高雄市長謝長廷為例》，世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
35. 杜秋菁，2006，《企業危機事件與媒體報導之相關性研究》，國立中山大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
36. 林文益、鄭安鳳譯，2003，《危機傳播與溝通：計畫、管理與回應》，台北：風雲論壇。譯自Ongoing Crisis Communication-planning, management, and responding, W. Timothy Coombs.
37. 邱強口述，張慧英採訪撰述，2001，《危機處理聖經》，台北：天下遠見。
38. 邱毅，1999，《危機管理》，台北：揚智。
39. 洪秀菊，1999，《危機決策、處理、談判：美伊人質危機個案》，台北：商鼎。
40. 洪珮菁，2003，《政府災變公共關係管理之研究—以台北市政府因應納莉風災為例》，國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文。
41. 胡百精，2009，《危机传播管理-流派、范式与路径》，北京：中国人民大学出版社。
42. 倪炎元，2009，《公關政治學：當代媒體與政治操作的理論、實踐與批判》，台北：商周。
43. 孫秀蕙，1997，《公共關係-理論、策略與研究實例》，台北：正中。
44. 張明敏譯，2003，《美國總統的七門課》，台北：時報文化。譯自Eyewitness to Power :The Essence of Leadership, Nixon to Clinton. Simon& Schuster, Inc.
45. 陸炳文，1992，《公關與危機處理》，台北：南海圖書文具。
46. 彭滂沱，2007，<打造美國總統—從羅斯福到柯林頓的決策領導>，台北：時報。
47. 彭懷恩，2006，《別怕媒體-經營媒體關係》，台北：米羅文化。
48. 彭懷恩，2011，《媒體關係技巧》，台北：風雲論壇。
49. 葉乃嘉，2006，《研究方法的第一本書》，台北：五南。
50. 歐振文，2003，《形象修護策略與危機情境-國軍危機傳播個案》，世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
51. 蕭全政，1987，〈國家機關在政治過程中的地位〉，《社會科學論叢》，35期，頁133-151。
52. 蕭全政，1997，〈組織與制度的政治經濟分析〉，《暨大學報》，1(1)：1-16。
53. 蕭全政，2006，《政治與經濟的整合》，台北：桂冠圖書公司。
54. 蘇蘅主編，2009，《新聞、公關與危機處理-傳播個案分析》，高雄：高雄復文。
55. 貳、外文部份
56. Barton, L. 2001. Crisis in Organizations. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
57. Barton, L. 1993. Crisis in Organizations. Cincinnati: South Western.
58. Blair, T. 2007. “Our Nation’s Future - Public Life”. Speech of Prime Minister, June 12, 2007. Available at:< http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20060213205517/number10.gov.uk/page11923> [Accessed December 31, 2012].
59. Coombs, W. T. 1999. “Crisis management: Advantages of a relational perspective” In J. A. Ledingham & S.D. Bruning(Eds.), Relationship Management: A Relational Approach to the Study and Practice of Public Relations(P.75-93. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
60. Gonzales-Herrero, A., & Pratt, C. B. 1995. “How to manage a crisis before- or whatever-it hits.” Public Relations Quarterly, 40(1), 25-29
61. Heath, R. L. 1997. Strategic Issues Management—Organizations and Public Policy Challenges. CA:Sage.
62. Humphrys, J. 2004. Lost for words: The mangling and manipulating of the English language. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
63. Kasunic, D. K. 1989. Issues management versus crisis management: A comparative study of their effectiveness. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
64. Mansfield, Harvey C. 2001. A Student’s Guide to Political Philosophy. Wilmington, Del.: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.
65. Mitroff, I. I. Pearson, C. & Pauchang, T. C. 1992. “Crisis management and strategic management: Similarities, difference and challenges.” P. In Shrivastava, Ed., Advances in Strategic Management, JAI Press, 8, 235-260.
66. Mitroff, I. I. & Pauchant, T. 1990. We’re so Big and Powerful Nothing Bad can Happen to Us. New York, NY: Harper Business.
67. Mitroff, I. I. & Pauchant, T.1988. “The structure of man-made organizational crisis: Conceptual and empirical issues in the development of a general theory of crisis management.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 33(1), 83-107.
68. Ogrizak, M., &Guillery, J. 1999. Communicating in Crisis. Translated by H. Kimball-Broke & R. Z. Brooke. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.