品牌個性偏好與消費者涉入程度、生活型態之關係研究── 以香水產品為例

The Relationship Among Brand Personality Preference, Consumer Involvement and Lifestyle - The Case of Fragrance Product

10.6342/NTU201601287

葉彥妮

品牌個性偏好 ； 涉入程度 ； 生活型態 ； 因素分析 ； 二元迴歸 ； 香水 ； Brand Personality ； Consumer Involvement ； Lifestyle ； Factor Analysis ； Binary Logistic Regression ； Fragrance

國立臺灣大學國際企業學系學位論文

2016年

碩士

任立中

繁體中文

品牌個性(Brand Personality)是以人格特質理論為基礎的一組評估品牌個性的架構(Aaker, 1997; Geuens, Weijters, & De Wulf, 2009)。將消費者所知覺的品牌個性分為五種構面:真誠 (Sincerity)、興奮(Excitement)、有能力的(Competence)、教養(Sophistication)、強壯(Ruggedness)。 本研究以五個香水品牌Dior、Bvlgari、Jo Malone、Chanel、Victoria’s Secret作為研究對象, 以此探討消費者對品牌個性(真誠、興奮、能力、教養、粗獷堅實)的偏好與涉入程度(包 括產品涉入、品牌涉入)、生活型態(獨立自主傾向、休閒態度傾向)之間的關係。 通過設計問卷了解受測者對品牌的個性認知、對品牌的偏好以及其個人特質。問卷發放 時間為2016年3月29日至5月20日,以網路問卷作為主要形式。參與問卷填答的受測者總共有 216名,最終回收218份問卷。最後有效問卷為202份,有效回收率為91.74%。 問卷回收後,通過因素分析、對應分析對Dior、Bvlgari、Jo Malone、Chanel、Victoria’s Secret 等五個香水品牌個性製作出品牌個性知覺圖,得出五個不同品牌之個性。通過二元迴歸分析, 得出偏好不同品牌個性的受測者具有哪些類型的人格特質。綜合兩個部分的數據得出人格特 質與品牌個性偏好之關係,總結為以下實證結果: 1. 「興奮」、「教養」的品牌個性偏好與「獨立自主」的人格特質呈正相關; 2. 「能力」的品牌個性偏好與「獨立自主」的人格特質呈負相關; 3. 「能力」的品牌個性偏好與「品牌涉入」、追求「休閒態度」的態度呈正相關; 4. 「粗獷堅實」的品牌個性偏好與「產品涉入」程度呈負相關。

Brand personality is set of description to evaluate the personality of brands based on the theory of personality trait(Aaker, 1997; Geuens, Weijters, & De Wulf, 2009), Which consists of sinceriy, excitement, competence, sophistication, ruggedness. This thesis uses five fragrance brands include Dior, Bvlgari, Jo Malone, Chanel and Victoria’s Secret as the research objects, to find out the relationship among brand personality, Consumer Involvement and Lifestyle. Using questionnaire to know about consumers’ attitudes toward brand personality, preference toward different brands and their characteristics. From March 29th to May 20th of 2016, 218 questionnaires have been done and 202 of them are effective. Effective rate is 91.74%. To find out the brand personality of five brands, I use factor analysis and correspondence analysis to draw the perceptual map of brand personality and get the characteristics of consumers via binary logistic regression. Following are the results of this thesis: 1. Sincerity and sophistication of brand personality have positive correlation with independence of consumers’ characteristics. 2. Competence of brand personality has negative correlation with independence of consumers’ characteristics. 3. Competence of brand personality has positive correlation with brand involvement and recreational attitude of consumers’ characteristics. 4. Ruggedness of brand personality has negative correlation with product involvement of consumers’ characteristics.

1. 7. 鄭時宜,黃慶源,蔡秀芳,李宗侯,2003,南台灣博物館參觀觀衆生活型態
   連結：
2. 8. 韓國華,2004,品牌個性,品牌形象,品牌聲譽與涉入對品牌權益影響之研
   連結：
3. 2. Aaker, J. L. 1995. Brand personality: conceptualization, measurement and
   連結：
4. 3. Aaker, J. L. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research,
   連結：
5. carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality
   連結：
6. constucts. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(3): 492.
   連結：
7. 5. Barber, M. B., & Venkatraman, M. 1986. THE DETERMINANTS OF
   連結：
8. 6. Belk, R. W., Sherry Jr, J. F., & Wallendorf, M. 1988. A naturalistic inquiry into buyer and seller behavior at a swap meet. Journal of Consumer Research, 449-470.
   連結：
9. 7. Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. 1988. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of consumer research, 210-224.
   連結：
10. 9. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. 2005. Self-construal, reference groups, and brand
    連結：
11. 10. Fournier, S. 1998. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in
    連結：
12. 11. Gardner, B. B., & Levy, S. J. 1955. The product and the brand.
    連結：
13. 12. Geuens, M., Weijters, B., & De Wulf, K. 2009. A new measure of brand
    連結：
14. personality. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(2): 97-107.
    連結：
15. 13. Goldsmith, R. E., & Emmert, J. 1991. Measuring product category involvement: a
    連結：
16. 14. Govers, P. C., & Schoormans, J. P. 2005. Product personality and its influence on
    連結：
17. 15. Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. 1969. The theory of buyer behavior (Vol. 14). New
    連結：
18. 16. Johar, G. V., Sengupta, J., & Aaker, J. L. 2005. Two roads to updating brand personality impressions: Trait versus evaluative inferencing. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4): 458-469.
    連結：
19. 18. Knox, S., & Walker, D. 2003. Empirical developments in the measurement of involvement, brand loyalty and their relationship in grocery markets.Journal of Strategic marketing, 11(4): 271-286.
    連結：
20. 19. Ma, Z., Wu, Q., Lee, D. Y., Tracy, M., & Lukas, S. E. 2005. Determination of puerarin in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography.Journal of Chromatography B, 823(2): 108-114.
    連結：
21. 20. Mittal, B., & Lee, M. S. 1989. A causal model of consumer involvement.Journal of economic psychology, 10(3): 363-389.
    連結：
22. 21. Phau, I., & Lau, K. C. 2000. Conceptualising brand personality: A review and research propositions. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 9(1): 52-69.
    連結：
23. 22. Plummer, J. T. 1974. The concept and application of life style segmentation.the Journal of Marketing, 33-37.
    連結：
24. 23. Plummer, J. T. 2000. How personality makes a difference. Journal of advertising research, 40(6): 79-83.
    連結：
25. 24. Quester, P., & Lin Lim, A. 2003. Product involvement/brand loyalty: is there a link?. Journal of product & brand management, 12(1): 22-38.
    連結：
26. 25. Reynolds, F. D. 1974. An analysis of catalog buying behavior. The Journal of Marketing, 47-51.
    連結：
27. 26. Sirgy, M. J. 1982. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review.Journal of consumer research, 287-300.
    連結：
28. 28. Swinyard, W. R. 1993. The effects of mood, involvement, and quality of store experience on shopping intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, 271-280.
    連結：
29. 30. Zaichkowsky, J. L. 1985. Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of consumer research, 341-352.
    連結：
30. 中文文獻
31. 1. 王靖瑜 ,2014,生活型態、社會比較與認知年齡對服裝穿著興趣之影響-以 熟年世代的女性為例。
32. 2. 吳昭賢,2007,自我一致性, 品牌態度與品牌忠誠度關係之研究。
33. 3. 黃志文,羅吉榜,周希烱,行動電話消費者生活型態之研究。
34. 4. 黃俊英,賴文彬,1990,涉入的理論發展與實務應用。
35. 5. 莊正汶,2013,品牌形象、品牌態度、品牌個性與自我概念一致性、從眾行
36. 為與購買意願之關係-以Apple品牌平板電腦為例。
37. 6. 張裕淵,2000,以生活型態觀點探討台灣地區銀行網路金融服務市場區隔之
38. 研究。
39. 初探,科技博物,7(1): 60-75。
40. 究-以手錶為例,銘傳大學 管理科學研究所碩士在職專班,未出版,台北市。
41. 9. 沈哲偉,2011,探討品牌個性對不同自我調節類型消費者的品牌依附影響。
42. 英文文獻
43. 1. Aaker, D. 1991. Brand equity. La gestione del valore della marca.
44. underlying psychological mechanisms. UMI Dissertation Services.
45. 347-356.
46. 4. Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V., & Garolera, J. 2001. Consumption symbols as
47. SATISFACTION FOR A HIGH INVOLVEMENT PRODUCT: THREE RIVAL HYPOTHESES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS IN THE HEALTH CARE CONTEXT. Advances in consumer research, 13(1).
48. 8. Ernst & Young Global Limited, 2013, Women The Next Emerging Market
49. meaning. Journal of consumer research, 32(3): 378-389.
50. consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4): 343-353.
51. multitrait-multimethod study. Journal of Business Research,23(4): 363-371.
52. consumer preference. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 22(4): 189-197.
53. York: Wiley.
54. 17. Kapferer, J. N., & Laurent, G. 1985. Consumer involvement profiles: a new and practical approach to consumer involvement. HAL.
55. 27. Struse, R. W. 1977. Lifestyle research inappropriate for some categories of product. Marketing New, 10(17): 1977.
56. 29. Wind, Y. J., & Green, P. E. 1974. Some conceptual, measurement, and analytical problems in life style research. Marketing Classics Press.