题名

無形投資與創新績效之研究–臺灣製造業之驗證

并列篇名

A Study of Intangible Investment and Innovation Performance - Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in Taiwan

DOI

10.6342/NTU201904160

作者

華德翰

关键词

無形投資 ; 創新 ; 品牌 ; 二元選擇模型 ; 追蹤資料模型 ; intangible investment ; innovation ; brand ; panel data ; binary choice model

期刊名称

國立臺灣大學經濟學系學位論文

卷期/出版年月

2019年

学位类别

碩士

导师

林惠玲

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究主旨在探討臺灣製造業無形投資對創新績效及品牌經營之影響,首先利用行政院主計總處2006年、2011年及2016年「工業及服務業普查報告」資料,討論與比較臺灣製造業十年間無形資產投資規模成長的概況。 接著本文利用二元選擇模型 (Binary Choice Model) 與追蹤資料模型(Panel Data),分兩部份進行實證研究。第一部份探討四位數字細類行業無形投資對「有無推出新開發或功能顯著改良之產品」、「有無導入全新或技術顯著改良之製程或產品運送儲放方式」、「有無導入全新或顯著改良之行銷、組織策略或管理方式」三種創新績效之影響效果。第二部份則先探討四位數字細類行業無形投資對「有無自有品牌經營」之影響因素,接著進一步分析製造業四位數字細類行業無形投資對製造業「自有品牌產品銷售收入比率」、「產品創新收入比率」之影響。 實證結果主要發現:1.製造業及電子業對內部研發及外部技術購買的投入越高,越有利於進行三種創新。2.員工訓練的投入對製造業、電子業之創新活動存在負向或不顯著的關係。3.市場行銷的投入對「自有品牌建立」、製造業「自有品牌產品銷售收入比率」的影響效果最大。4.研究發展投入對製造業「產品創新收入比率」的貢獻最為顯著。5.產業內大規模的企業,越可能有創新成果。6.越競爭的產業,越可能有創新活動。 本研究發現,我國企業已進行許多創新活動,且無形投入支出費用也與日俱增。然各產業間的屬性相異,無形投入的資源配置,亦會產生不同的創新成果,本文的研究發現,希望能提供予國內企業經營與政策之參考,提升臺灣產業及廠商的競爭力,以面對日趨嚴峻的國際競爭及創新革命。

英文摘要

The purpose of this paper is to analyze firms’ innovation activity in Taiwan and discuss the growth of intangible assets investment in Taiwanese manufacturing industry in ten years. This study is based on the 2006, 2011 and 2016 Industry, Commerce and Service Census. The analysis applies two models for the empirical research, including binary choice model and panel data model. The first model is to discuss the relationship between intangible investment and firm’s innovative activity ; the further model is to find out the determinants of setting up firm’s own brand and innovation performance. Our results indicate that:(1) R&D and technology purchase both promote innovation in manufacturing industry and electronics industry. (2) On-the-job training has negative or nonsignificant impacts on innovation in manufacturing industry and electronics industry. (3) Marketing has significantly positive impacts on brand building in manufacturing industry. (4) R&D promotes income from innovation in manufacturing industry. (5) Enterprise scale is an important determinant of innovative activity. (6) The more competitive the industry, the more likely there are innovative activities. According to the paper, accumulating industrial strength is the solution for keeping the competitiveness of Taiwan’s enterprises.

主题分类 社會科學院 > 經濟學系
社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 楊志海、陳忠榮(2002),研究發展、專利與生產力-臺灣製造業的實證研究,《經濟論文叢刊》,30(1),27-48。
    連結:
  2. 楊志海、陳忠榮(2002),研究發展、技術引進與專利-一般動差法於可數追蹤資料的應用,《經濟論文叢刊》,29(1),69-87。
    連結:
  3. 主計處(2009),工商及服務業普查報告(95年工商普查報告),中華民國。
  4. 主計處(2013),工商及服務業普查報告(100年工商普查報告),中華民國。
  5. 主計處(2019),工商及服務業普查報告(105年工商普查報告),中華民國。
  6. 林惠玲、楊志海(2014),無形投資、創新與成長,行政院主計總處委託研究。
  7. 陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發(2016),產業經濟學。
  8. 翁珮瑜(2016),廠商創新活動及其績效—臺灣製造業與服務業的比較。國立臺灣大學經濟學系碩士論文。
  9. 陳麗旭(2016),生產力與技術效率之研究—臺灣資訊服務業與農業之驗證。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所博士論文。
  10. Barnes, P. and A. McClure (2009), “Investments in intangible assets and Australia’s productivity growth.” Productivity Commission.
  11. Bagwell, K. (2007), “The economic analysis of advertising.” Handbook of industrial organization, 3, 1701-1844.
  12. González, X., D. Miles-Touya and C. Pazó (2016), “R&D, worker training and innovation: Firm-level evidence.” Industry and Innovation,23(8), 694-712.
  13. Baumann, J. and A. S. Kritikos (2016), “The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different?” Research Policy,45(6), 1263-1274.
  14. Buil, I., L. De Chernatony and E. Martínez (2013), “Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation.” Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 115-122.
  15. Carrado, C., C. Hulten and D. Sichel (2005), “Measuring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Framework, in Carrado, C., J. Haltiwanger and D. Sichel(eds).” Measuring Capital in the New Economy, NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  16. Corrado, C., J. Haskel, C. Jona-Lasinio and M. Iommi (2016), “Intangible investment in the EU and US before and since the Great Recession and its contribution to productivity growth (No. 2016/08).” EIB Working Papers.
  17. Chen, J. R. and C. H. Yang (2006), “The effects of knowledge capital on enhancing firms' productivity in Taiwan:Does R&D or technology import matter?” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 137-153.
  18. Delbecque, V. and L. Nayman(2010), “Measuring intangible capital investment : an application to the ‘French data. ’” CEPII, Working Paper No. 2010-19.
  19. Delbecque, V. and A. Bounfour (2011), “Intangible Investment: Contribution to Growth and Innovation Policy Issues. A Franco-German Comparison.” Working Paper No. 2011-1A, European Chair on Intellectual Capital Management.
  20. Dostie, B.(2018), “The impact of training on innovation.” Ilr Review, 71(1), 64-87.
  21. Fukao, K., T. Miyagawa, K. Mukai, Y. Shinoda and K. Tonogi (2009), “Intangible Investment in Japan: Measurement and Contribution to Economic Growth.” Review of Income and Wealth 55(3),717-736.
  22. Giorgio Marrano, M., J. Haskel, and G. Wallis(2009), “What happened to the knowledge economy? ICT, intangible investment, and Britain’s productivity record revisited.” Review of Income and Wealth, 55(3): 686-716.
  23. Hulten, C.R. and X. Hao(2008), “What is a company really worth? Intangible capital and the market to book value’ puzzle.” NBER Working Paper No. 14548.
  24. Hunter, L., E. Webster, and A. Wyatt(2012), “Accounting for expenditure on intangibles.” Abacus 48(1): 104-145.
  25. Kafouros, M. and M. Aliyev (2016) , “Institutions and foreign subsidiary growth in transition economies: The role of intangible assets and capabilities.” Journal of Management Studies , 53(4), 580-607.
  26. Lo, M. L., C.L. Lin and H. L. Lin (2019) , “The Portfolio of Intangible Investments and Production & Innovation Performance: Evidence from Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms” (manuscript).
  27. Mayneris, F., S. Poncet and T. Zhang (2014) , “The cleansing effect of minimum wage Minimum wage rules, firm dynamics and aggregate productivity in China.” Revised Version of IRES DP, 15.
  28. Miyagawa, T.(2011), “Economic Slowdown in Japan and the Role of Intangible Assets on The Revitalization of The Japan Economy.” Global COE Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series 162.
  29. Moore, A.M. (2004), “Darwin and the Demon:Innovation within Established Enterprises.” Harvard Business Review , 82 (7/8) , 86-92.
  30. Nakamura, L.(2001), “What is the US gross investment in intangibles? (At least) one trillion dollars a year!” Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper No. 01-15.
  31. Rao, V. R., M. K. Agarwal and D. Dahlhoff (2004) , “ How Is Manifest Branding Strategy Related to the Intangible Value of a Corporation? ” Journal of Marketing, 68, 126–141.
  32. Roth, F., and A. E. Thum (2013) , “Intangible Capital and Labor Productivity Growth: Panel Evidence for the EU from 1998–2005.” Review of Income and Wealth, 59(3), 486-508.
  33. Schivinski, B. and D. Dabrowski (2016) , “The effect of social media communication on consumer perceptions of brands.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(2), 189-214.
  34. Sung, S. Y. and J. N. Choi(2014), “Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations.” Journal of organizational behavior, 35(3), 393-412.
  35. Teece, D. J. (2010), “Business models, business strategy and innovation.” Long range planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
  36. Tsai, K. H., M. H. Hsieh and E. J. Hultink (2011), “External technology acquisition and product innovativeness: The moderating roles of R&D investment and configurational context.” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(3), 184-200.
  37. Yang, C.H. and M.W. Tsou(2014), “Own-Brand and Profitability in Taiwan’s Manufacturing Firms: The Role of Firm Size.” Mimeo.
  38. Yuhn, K. H. and S. R. Park (2010), “Information technology, organizational transformation and productivity growth: an examination of the Brynjolfsson–Hitt proposition.” Asian Economic Journal, 24(1), 87-108.
  39. Zahra, S. A., H. J. Sapienza and P. Davidsson (2006), “Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda.” Journal of Management studies, 43(4), 917-955.