小型新興經濟體企業品牌國際化策略─以台灣製鞋產為例

International Branding Strategy of Small Emerging Economies` Firm─Evidences of Shoe Industry in Taiwan

10.6342/NTU.2011.03179

王濬康

資源依賴理論 ； 資源基礎理論 ； 制度理論 ； 品牌價值 ； resource dependence theory ； resource base theory ； institutional theory ； brand value

國立臺灣大學國際企業學系學位論文

2011年

碩士

陳厚銘

繁體中文

在金融危機後，世界經濟重心正逐漸由以美國、歐洲、日本為主的已開發國家，轉移至以中國、巴西、印度、南韓等國為主的新興經濟體。若以人口數量或內需市場為區隔，則新興經濟體將可分為人口資源豐富的大型新興經濟體與創意、技術取勝的小型新興經濟體。對於小型新興經濟體企業發展品牌，在本國勢必會受到內需市場小的影響，因而邁向國際化。但在國內學術研究上卻鮮少針對該型經濟體進行探討與分析。 因此，本研究以資源依賴理論分析小型新興經濟體企業發展品牌的必要性；以資源基礎理論與制度理論比較小型新興經濟體企業品牌國際化市場的選擇，分別針對大型新興經濟體與已開發國家進行比較；最後則探討小型新興經濟體企業本土品牌與國際品牌之價值。分別以寶成、達芙妮、將門、阿瘦之企業發展個案為例，將個案內容與文獻相互印證，推導出七個命題，並歸納結論如下： 1.小型新興經濟體企業多以為國際品牌代工製造為主，透過提升本身核心競爭力，加強與品牌客戶間相互依賴關係，將不必朝向自有品牌發展。 2.大型新興經濟體政府多以實質優惠鼓勵至當地投資，加上該經濟體內消費者對於新品牌接受程度較高。小型新興經濟體企業資源薄弱，品牌產品差異性低，可選擇大型新興經濟體，擴充市場，增強核心能力，提升品牌價值。 3.已開發國家法規發展完善亦較嚴格；消費者雖對於新產品、技術接受程度高，但有品牌來源國疑慮。因此，小型新興經濟體企業應以利基產品，進入已開發國家，藉由利基市場獲取所需資源以進行品牌價值提升。 4.小型新興經濟體企業熟悉並深耕本國市場，亦能透過本國市場行銷品牌，創造品牌價值，與進入國內之國際品牌相互抗衡。

After the financial crisis, the focus of world economic gradually shifted from developed countries like United States, Europe, Japan, to emerging countries such as China, Brazil, India and South Korea etc. In terms of population or domestic demand, emerging economies can be segmented into two categories: a large emerging economy with abundant labor force and a small one with creativity and technology. The latter must be confined to the limited domestic demand while branding, leading to its internationalization. However, this issue is relatively unexplored in Taiwan and this research focuses on international branding strategy of small emerging economies` firms. This research includes three subjects. First, the necessity that firms in small emerging economy develop brands is analyzed based on resource dependence theory. Then, the selection of international markets by these firms is discussed with resource base theory and institutional theory. Last, we compare the value difference of small emerging economies` local brand and international brand. The study utilizes the enterprise development cases of Pou Chen, Daphne, Jump, and A.S.O. as an example. Citing the content of the cases confirm the literature. Seven propositions are derived and summarized as follow: 1.Most businesses in emerging economies are mainly OEM for international brands. They Strengthen the interdependent relationship with brand customer through enhance their core competitiveness. As a result, they don`t need to develop their own brand. 2.Most large emerging economies` governments use real premium to encourage foreign companies` local investment and the customers in large emerging economies have higher new brand acceptance. Small emerging economies enterprises who having poor resources, lower brand product differentiation, can enter large emerging economies to expand market share, strengthen core competencies, enhance brand value. 3.Developed countries have well-developed, strict laws and regulations. Local consumers have higher new product and technology acceptance, but they still have doubts about COO effects. As a result, small emerging economies` enterprises can enter developed countries accompanying with niche product and obtain the necessary resources to enhance brand value through the niche market. 4.Small emerging economies` businesses are familiar with and root in their local markets. They can compete with international brands through brand marking and brand value creation in local markets.

1. 2.台灣區製鞋同業公會，統計資料，民98年。
   連結：
2. 15.陳怡杏，企業價值評估與經營策略之研究─以寶成、豐泰為例，國立政治大學管理碩士學程未公開論文，民95年。
   連結：
3. 16.陳相菱，台商對中國大陸投資驅動力─以資源基礎觀點與市場基礎觀點分析，國立暨南國際大學國際企業學系研究所碩士論文，民98年。
   連結：
4. 17.曾漢壽，讓台灣品牌站上國際舞台，台北：經濟部國際貿易局，民國97年。
   連結：
5. 1.Barney (1986), J. B., “Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy, “ Management Science, Vol. 42, p.1231-1241.
   連結：
6. 2.Barney (1991), “Firm Resources and sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management Science, Vol. 17. p.99-120.
   連結：
7. 3.Bourantas, D.(1989), “Avoiding Dependence on Suppliers and Distributors,” Long Range Planning, p.140-149.
   連結：
8. 4.Chan, M. C., and Makino, S.(2007), “Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: Implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure.” Journal of International Business Studies, 38, p.621-638.
   連結：
9. 5.Chatterjee & Wernerfeld (1991), “Types of Synergy and economic value: The Impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firm”, Strategic Management Journal，7(2), p.119-139.
   連結：
10. 6.Collis & Montgomery (1995), ”Competing on Resource: Strategy in The 1990s”, Harvard Business Review, 73(4), p.118-128.
    連結：
11. 7.Collis & Montgomery (1997), the authors of Corporate Strategy, Resources and the Scope of the Firm, Chicago: Irwin.
    連結：
12. 8.Collis, D.J. (1991), “A Resource-based Analysis of Global Competition: The case of the bearing industrial”, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1), p.49-68.
    連結：
13. 9.David A. Aaker, (1989), “Management Assets and Skill: The key To a Sustainable Competitive Advantage”, California Management Review, 31(2), p.91-106.
    連結：
14. 12.DiMaggio , P. J., and Powell , W. W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review , 48, p.147-160.
    連結：
15. 13.Douglass C. North (1990), “Institutions, Institutional Change & Economic Performance”, New York: Cambridge University Press, p.1-20.
    連結：
16. 15.Gomes, L. and K. Ramaswamy (1999), “An Empirical Examination of the Form of the Relationship Between Multinationality and Performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), p.173-188.
    連結：
17. 17.Hamel & Prahalad(1990), “Inter organizational Governance in Marketing Channels” ,Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, p.71-85.
    連結：
18. 18.Henisz,W.J., and Delios, A.(2001), “Uncertaintly, imitation, and plant location : Japanese multinational corporations,1990-1996”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, p.443-475.
    連結：
19. 19.Hofer, Charles W. & Dan E. Schendel(1979), “Strategy Management: A New ofBusiness Policy and Planning”, New York : Little Brown and Co. Itami, H. and T. Roehl (1987), “Mobilizing Invisible Assets”, Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
    連結：
20. 20.Hoskisson, R.E. Eden L. Lau CM and Wright M.(2000), “Strategy in emerging economies”, Academy of Management Journal 43.3, p.249-267.
    連結：
21. 21.Kostova, T., and Zaheer, S. (1999), “Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of multinational enterprise”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1), p.64−81.
    連結：
22. 22.Leonard-Barton (1992), “Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development”, Strategic Management Journal, 13, p.111-125.
    連結：
23. 23.Mahen Tampoe (1994), “Exploiting The Core Competence Of Your Organization”, Long Rang Planning, 27, 4, p.66-77.
    連結：
24. 24.Mark C. Suchman(1995), “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches”, Academy of management review, 20, p.571-610.
    連結：
25. 25.Meyer, J., and Rowan , B.(1977), “Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, 83, p.340-363.
    連結：
26. 27.Oliver, C.(1991), “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes”, Academy of Management Review, 16(1), p.145-179.
    連結：
27. 28.Peng, M.W.(2003), “Institutional Transitions and strategic choies”, Academy of Management Review 28, 2, p.275-296.
    連結：
28. 29.Penrose (1959), “The theory of the growth of the firm, in Foss, N.J.(Eds.)”, Resources Firms and Strategic.
    連結：
29. 30.Peteraf (1993), “The Cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14(No. 3), p.179-191.
    連結：
30. 31.Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R.(1978), “The External Control of Organization: a Resource Dependence Perspective”, Haper and Row, N.Y. Wernerfelt, B.(1984), “A Resource-based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, P.171-180.
    連結：
31. 32.Porter, Michael E. (1980), “Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors”, New York: The Free Press.
    連結：
32. 33.Prahalad & Hamel (1994), “Strategy as Field of Study: Why Search for a New Paradigm?”, Strategic Management Journal, p.15.
    連結：
33. 36.Wernerfelt B.(1984), “A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, p. 171-180.
    連結：
34. 37.Wright. M. Filatocher. I. Hoskisson. R.E. & Peng M.W.(2005), “Strategy research in Emerging economies. Challenge the conventional wisdom”, Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), p.1-33.
    連結：
35. 38.Yiu, D. and S. Makino (2002). “The Choice between Joint Venture and Wholly Owned Subsidiary: An Institutional Perspective”, Organization Science, 13, p.667-683.
    連結：
36. 中文部分
37. 1.于卓民，國際行銷學，台北：智勝文化，民98年。
38. 3.吳思華，策略九說：策略思考的本質，台北：麥田，民國85年。
39. 4.吳清松，國際企業管理：理論與實務，台北：智勝文化，民國95年。
40. 5.李秋慧，台灣廠商國際化下之品牌策略─產業條件與自創品牌之個案分析，國立台灣商學研究所碩士論文，民國75年。
41. 6.卓越雜誌，阿瘦皮鞋羅榮岳，養將相攻頂101，第280期。
42. 7.林隆儀，國際行銷管理，台北：雙葉書廊，民99年。
43. 8.邱新球，企業相依性、影響策略、衝突與績效關係之研究，銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文，民89年。
44. 9.施振榮，全球品牌大戰略，台北：天下文化，民國94年。
45. 10.洪順慶，台灣品牌競爭力：台灣企業從代工走向自創品牌的策略，台北：天下雜誌，民95年。
46. 11.烏偉凱，以制度與交易成本觀點探討轉型經濟體地區差異性影響進入模式之研究-以台灣製造業投資中國大陸為例，國立東華大學國際企業研究所碩士論文，民99年。
47. 12.財訊，陳瑞文以『MIT』牌打敗中國本土貨，第201102特刊期。
48. 13.張和喜，展望2002年製鞋業'的永續經營方針，鞋技，120卷，頁21-24，民91年
49. 14.莊永順，企業國際化策略之研究─以台灣工業電腦產業為例，國立台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文，民91年。
50. 18.楊濱燦，品牌經營管理，台北：國立空中大學，民99年。
51. 19.葉健任，製鞋業界轉型經營邁向新契機，鞋技，110卷，頁50-51，民90年
52. 20.遠見雜誌，快速與時尚 吸引中國3億名女性入店，第292期。
53. 21.鞋技通訊編輯室，台灣鞋業廠商如何迎向全球化競爭，鞋技，135卷，頁41-43，民93年。
54. 22.羅勗銘，創始國際企業成長策略之個案研究，國立台灣大學國際企業研究所碩士論文，民90年。
55. 英文部分
56. 10.Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B., and Francis, J. D. (2000), “Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies, 31 (2), p.239-258.
57. 11.De Leo(1994), “Understanding the Roots of Your Competitive Advantage from Product/market Competition to Competition as a Multiple-Layer Game,” In G. Hamil and A. Heene(eds) Competence-Based Competition, Ch.2, p.35-55
58. 14.French, R. P. and Rave n, B.(1959), “The Bases of Social Power”, University of Michigan Press.
59. 16.Grant, M. Robert(1991), “Contemporary Strategy Analysis”, p.98.
60. 26.Nee, V. (1998), “Norms and networks in economic and organizational performance”, American Economic Review, 88(2), p.85−89.
61. 34.Scott, W. R.(1995), “Institutions and organizations”, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62. 35.Scott, W. R.(2001), “Institutions and organizations”, 2nd edn, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.