英文摘要
|
Motor insurance receives the highest proportion of income from written premiums for
domestic property insurance. In addition to this, almost thirty percent of motor
insurance premiums are from third party liability insurance. However, its loss ratio
has remained consistently high.
Through research into records for third party liability insurance, this study undertakes
the empirical research and analysis of related data and past experiences in order to
discover the related factors to third party liability accidents and protective measures.
These will then be used as a reference for motor insurance management in the
consideration of insurance regulations and business policies.
This study took samples from third party motor liability insured (natural person) of a
domestic insurance company during the period of January 2015 to December 2015. In total there were 13,842 samples, among them the effective piece is 8,173, and the
following seven factors were taken into account: (1) claim amount, (2) gender, (3)
area of residence, (4) car brand, (5) vehicle age, (6) area accident occurred in, (7)
insurance category. Car exhaust levels were not taken into account.
Through this study’s methods and empirical research, it is confirmed that in the
Taiwanese motor insurance market, information asymmetry exists in third party
liability motor insurance.
|
参考文献
|
-
1. Koenker, R. and G.Bassett (1978), “Regression Quantiles”, Econometrica, Vol.46,
連結:
-
2. Brissman, M. D.,(1980), “The Effect of a Suburban Driving Population on Urban
連結:
-
4. Begg, D.J., J.D. Langley, and S.M. Williams ,(1999), “A Longitudinal Study of
連結:
-
Lifestyle Factors as Predictors of Injuries and Crashes Among Young
連結:
-
Young Drivers’ Lifestyle on Their Road Traffic Accident Risk in Greater Athens
連結:
-
Highway Traffic Accidents:A Case Control Study,” Accident Analysis and
連結:
-
Affecting the Severity of Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes Involving Elderly
連結:
-
8. Hallock, K., & Koenker, R. (2001), “Quantile Regression,” Journal of Economic
連結:
-
Perspectives, Vol.15, No.4, pp.143-156.
連結:
-
Techniques for Stratified Contingency Tables,” Accident Analysis and
連結:
-
Incidence and Severity between some French Counties,” Accident Analysis &
連結:
-
參考文獻
-
一、中文文獻
-
1. 李仁傑 (1996) 意外保險入門-理論與實務,台北市三民書局,頁16。
-
2. 蔡育倫(1999)任意汽車責任保險認知涉入與購買行為之關係,逢甲大學保
-
險學系碩士論文。
-
3. 李國忠 (2003) 汽車保險損失率因素之研究--以台南、高雄地區為例,國立高
-
雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險所碩士論文。
-
4. 賴政治(2002)汽車第三人責任保險理賠與逆選擇之研究-主成份因素分析與
-
迴歸分析之應用,國立高雄第一科技大學風險管理與保險所碩士論文。
-
5. 陳彩稚(2003),我國過失侵權行為與責任保險人身傷害賠償之分析保險專
-
刊,第19卷第1期,頁41-74。
-
6. 蔡玉娟 (2006) 台灣汽車責任保險之損失率與消費者特性之相關性研究,國
-
立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
-
二、英文文獻
-
pp.33-50.
-
Auto Insurance Premiums,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol.47, No.4,
-
pp.636-659.
-
3. Cane, P.(1996), Tort Law and Economic interests, 2nd . Oxford University Press.
-
58
-
Adults,”Accident Analysis and Prevention ,Vol.31, pp.1-11.
-
5. Chliaoutakis, J.E , C. Darviri, and P.T. Demakakos , (1999), “The Impact of
-
Area,” Accident Analysis and Prevention ,Vol.31, pp.771-780.
-
6. HıZjar, M, C., M. Flores, R. Anaya, and V. Lopez (2000), “Risk Factor in
-
Prevention , Vol.32, pp.703-709.
-
7. Zhang, J., J. Lindsayb, K. Clarkea, G. Robbinsc and Y. Maoa ,(2000), “Factors
-
Drivers in Ontario,” Accident Analysis and Prevention ,Vol.32,pp.117-125.
-
9. Al-Ghamdi, Ali S , (2002), “Pedestrian–Vehicle Crashes and Analytical
-
Prevention , Vol.34,pp.205-214
-
10. Amoros, E., Martin, J. L., & Laumon, B. (2003) , “Comparison of road Crashes
-
Prevention,Vol. 35, No.4, pp.537-547.
-
11. Fleiter, J., Watson, A., Watson, B., and V. Siskind (2015), “Criminal Histories of
-
Crash and Non-crash Involved Queensland Speeding Offenders: Evidence
-
Supporting the Idea that We Drive as We Live.,” In Australasian Road Safety
-
Conference, 1st, 2015, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
|